"Our hands are poised on the levers of power but yet our grasp on it is still fragile."
See full article...
See full article...
From what I understand, the source material doesn't even adhere to the source material, so seems like it's all pretty much fair game at this point.it's unclear how closely the series will adhere to the source material
Typically depending on how you view power and decency Atredies were the be Machiavellian fear how much they love us, whilst Harkonnen were the love how much they fear us. Atredies weren't being benevolent because it was right they were benevolent because it was useful and possibly more powerful.I look forward to this one.
I will be a little sad if it is the typical Harkonnen bad, Atreides good. There were bits in the books that referenced the past that seemed to indicate that, depending on your point of view, the roles were reversed as far as who played bad guy and relatively good guy. I think that would be fun.
I do hope it isn't just house rivalry. There's a lot at that timeline that would be interesting that has no relation to the later films.
Ditto, though it looks good aesthetically at least... couldn't be worse than LoTR RoP!I'm afraid they lost me at "by Brian Hebert"
The next Dune game's creators will eventually spin off their own IP. The new IP will help to popularize an obscure game genre and carry serious motifs about the environmental and sociopolitical consequences of technological change. The new IP will itself have a more light hearted spinoff. Eventually both franchises will be purchased by a megacorp, get driven into the ground by creative bankruptcy, and die with a whimper.I wonder what's the next Dune game going to be like.
You realize this is the elevator pitch for the game ‘Prequel’. Who’s your VC?The next Dune game's creators will eventually spin off their own IP. The new IP will help to popularize an obscure game genre and carry serious motifs about the environmental and sociopolitical consequences of technological change. It will itself have a more light hearted spinoff. Eventually both franchises will be purchased by a megacorp, get driven into the ground by lack of creative vision, and die with a whimper.
is enough to convince me that I don't want to watch this.by Brian Herbert and Kevin J. Anderson
Yeah; in Frank's universe, I always figured that the Harkonnen / Atredies dynamic was just a snapshot in time, with each house grasping what would give them an advantage, and the Bene Gesserit acting as a modifying influence to stop either house from getting out of hand. In the original Dune, Atredies was currently well-heeled and Harkonnen was just reaching peak evil. And the activity on Arrakis was throwing that complex political web out of balance.Typically depending on how you view power and decency Atredies were the be Machiavellian fear how much they love us, whilst Harkonnen were the love how much they fear us. Atredies weren't being benevolent because it was right they were benevolent because it was useful and possibly more powerful.
At least as I remember it. I haven't read them in ~20 years so I might be misremembering their takes on power but that was my take away.
So you get into the whole is a good thing done for a bad reason, or at least a morally neutral reason still a good thing? I personally know which house I'd rather live under, but we should be clear it wasn't ever intended as a black and white morality story. The movies just don't have the time to devote to the nuances. We didn't have enough time with Leto and Paul to dig into that so we get a more simple good vs bad and a seemingly good man forced to do bad things for a less bad outcome?
I remember being excited when the first one came out. I was (am) a huge Dune fan and have read all six of Frank's books multiple times. I ordered the first prequel from the Science Fiction Book Club and couldn't wait for it to arrive. I think I read two chapters before tossing it in the trash.Yeah, better hope they have good script writers - the Brian/Kevin prequels were rough (I guess they could have improved - I dropped them fairly quickly).
Someone's watching the RNC then, I suspect.I enjoy watching the high drama of religious zealots battling over the arcane and intricate machinations of their ideologies.
The events of the series will consist of long, intensely whispered scenes of dense political intrigue, interspersed with choreographed battle scenes, despite which, nothing matters and these events will set up a ten thousand year period during which the Corrinos rule, the Harkonnens and Atreides snipe at each other behind the scenes, and the Bene Gesserit playing conniving horsebreeders.After my experience with their novels, seeing is enough to convince me that I don't want to watch this.
And if it turns out to be good, oh well, it can join the thousands of hours of other good media that I will never have time to look at <shrug>
I remember being excited when the first one came out. I was (am) a huge Dune fan and have read all six of Frank's books multiple times. I ordered the first prequel from the Science Fiction Book Club and couldn't wait for it to arrive. I think I read two chapters before tossing it in the trash.
You should read the Brian Hebert / Kevin Anderson books that have come out, a LOT of "referenced only" things were fully revealed. In fact the whole reason Harkonnens were considered bad, and Atreides good...I will be a little sad if it is the typical Harkonnen bad, Atreides good.
I do hope it isn't just house rivalry. There's a lot at that timeline that would be interesting that has no relation to the later films.
IIRC, In the Butlerian Jihad novel(s) that everyone likes to hate on, the Harkonnens were generally the good guys and the event that destroyed their reputation was the main H character refusing to nuke a bunch of human hostages that the machines basically bolted onto their ships for just that purpose.Typically depending on how you view power and decency Atredies were the be Machiavellian fear how much they love us, whilst Harkonnen were the love how much they fear us. Atredies weren't being benevolent because it was right they were benevolent because it was useful and possibly more powerful.
At least as I remember it. I haven't read them in ~20 years so I might be misremembering their takes on power but that was my take away.
So you get into the whole is a good thing done for a bad reason, or at least a morally neutral reason still a good thing? I personally know which house I'd rather live under, but we should be clear it wasn't ever intended as a black and white morality story. The movies just don't have the time to devote to the nuances. We didn't have enough time with Leto and Paul to dig into that so we get a more simple good vs bad and a seemingly good man forced to do bad things for a less bad outcome?
Same. The wrap-up season was disappointing, but not enough to sour the series. Great stuff.Fringe! One of my favorite TV series of all time, and sorely underappreciated.
Ugh. I can't stand anymore ''Dune''.
Villeneuve already thrashed his opportunity (imagine making 2 movies about a 180 page book, STILL missing about 40 % of the content, AND snorting so much coke that your second movie has characters flying and full of facial tattoos - while the first movie was a bland & uninspired affair, the second one spat so much in the face of the books, I couldn't watch more than 5 minutes).
LotR's Rings of Power was bad, I can't even imagine how shit this will be.
I still have it, but I've been considering dropping it for a while. That's not a damning statement; I have a very limited "television" habit, and mostly retain my services due to sheer inertia. I do feel like we're reaching Peak Streaming, and hopefully consolidation will set in soon. I'm looking forward to video becoming a bit more like music, where virtually every service offers you all the same content, but that would require the platforms to divest of their in-house studios…Only a related question, but does anyone even haveHBOHBO MaxMaxHBO Max anymore? Among the gazillion other streaming options, this is the one I hear mentioned least.
A link is not enough, it needs to be seen here:
HBO still has some level of prestige to the name, and House of the Dragon seems popular and well reviewed.Only a related question, but does anyone even haveHBOHBO MaxMaxHBO Max anymore? Among the gazillion other streaming options, this is the one I hear mentioned least. Like, not at all after GoT shit the bed.
Well, there is a Brian Herbert book about the Butlarian Jihad that tackles this apparentlyI find the premise unrealistic. In a future where there is interstellar space travel, it would be more interesting to me to see what gave rise to the rejection of non-human computers while seeing Homo Sapiens being channeled selectively bred into sub-species. Gordon Dickson tackles that issue in his Dorsai series, a future where the only intelligent life is homo sapiens.
Frank's adheres to Franks.From what I understand, the source material doesn't even adhere to the source material, so seems like it's all pretty much fair game at this point.
Not sure what Apple and Foundation have to do with this upcoming HBO series except that they are both sci-fi, but whatever. I'm enjoying the Foundation series much, much more than I ever enjoyed the books and I'm hopeful for this series as well. Like Foundation, I think it will only benefit if it takes an "inspired by" approach to the source material and concentrates on just making a compelling show. Time will tell. Eventually I'll resub to HBO long enough to catch up on HotD s2, TLoU s2, Penguin and probably this show as well.After Apple butchered Foundation I am going to pass, hard, on this.