Swimming with spacemen: training for spacewalks at NASA's giant pool

Status
Not open for further replies.
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

mperrin

Ars Praetorian
541
Subscriptor++
The NBL training is indeed pretty awesome, but it's only one part of what astronauts work through to be ready on orbit. As Lee noted here, the physics of a pressurized suit in water are pretty different from a pressurized suit in vacuum. So, how can an astronaut train for what a real space suit feels like?

In a giant vacuum chamber of course, with an honest to god airlock door in the side you can walk through. "Chamber B" at JSC is a room-sized vacuum tank that astronauts practice in to get the feel of working with hand tools against 4.3 psi in vacuum. See http://www.nasa.gov/centers/johnson/eng ... index.html

It doesn't get as much press coverage since it's not nearly as photogenic, but from a technical perspective it's every bit as impressive. Takes more than your average lab vacuum pump to remove all the air in a chamber that big - and they can re pressurize in 30 seconds in an emergency. Never had to be used for real but it's tested once a year and by all accounts is absurdly loud. :)
 
Upvote
30 (30 / 0)
the human mind isn't used to accounting for an object's weight and mass as separate properties (p. 1)

I understand the difference between mass and weight, but I don't understand why they must be treated as separate properties in space. Could somebody explain it for me?

"For example, . . . when they first get into the pool they may grab a handrail and try to pitch their body like this . . . . Very little moment arm there. So they sort of learn skills where they go like this . . . And now you have a much bigger moment arm and you get that reaction." (p. 3)

What is moment arm? (Or is it a dictation error and it should be momentum?)
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)
zpletan":2h48oztd said:
I understand the difference between mass and weight, but I don't understand why they must be treated as separate properties in space. Could somebody explain it for me?

An object in zero-g has no weight (it floats), but its mass is important because of inertia. High-mass objects will still be hard to move, and slamming them together can damage them (or you), or whatever.
 
Upvote
15 (15 / 0)
K1LLTACULAR":21loer6o said:
As a freediver all I could think reading this was "I must find a way to dive there."
As a swimmer, I was thinking exactly the same thing. Swimming over a mockup of the ISS would be insane (I like how the divers specifically mentioned this with their training). I wonder if the public ever can get in…
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)
I've visited the NBL twice in the last two years. It is quite an impressive site to look at, much less get the chance to work in. Eventually I might get the opportunity to get to Kennedy and watch an actual launch, but for now I get the opportunity to work with people here in Houston who are working hard in keeping Space Exploration in the forefront of people's minds. (Yes, we're glad to see SpaceX get their Dragon docked, even if they're a competitor to us in some respects.)
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)

Aurich

Director of Many Things
41,437
Ars Staff
To everyone who loved the layout: thanks, we had a good time with it. When Lee came back from his first trip and started sharing the early photos I knew we had to go all out on it, was just too much of an opportunity to pass up for something fun. Please share it with your friends, it was a ton of work! ;)

If it wasn't your cup of tea: well, don't worry overmuch. We'd like to keep doing fun features like this, but they're not going to become the new normal for our stories or anything. When the right kind of special story comes along we'll run with it, but as always with Ars the content drives everything.
 
Upvote
48 (48 / 0)

Aurich

Director of Many Things
41,437
Ars Staff
RockDaMan":1wj6bjs0 said:
Aurich, is the background image (http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/t ... -image.jpg ) something you created, or that you sourced from someplace else?
It's a photo illustration. So it's an original image, you won't find it anywhere else, but the source photographs of the water etc that form the basis of it are (legally licensed) stock photographs.
 
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)

pokrface

Senior Technology Editor
21,557
Ars Staff
My pics were shot on a T3i (600D) with a Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS USM lens and a Speedlite 270 EX II flash. Steve, my photographer, shot with a T2i (550D) and used several lenses and flashes, but the majority of his pics were taken with a Tamron AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di-II and a Speedlite 430 EX II (with a sto-fen diffuser).
 
Upvote
14 (14 / 0)

tripledes

Seniorius Lurkius
14
Awesome article! Read from start to finish, which took awhile, but so worth it! Thanks for this!

Many incredible things that came out of this and I agree the BRT is the coolest tool of them all!

6 million gallons of water and they can turn it over in less than a day! Anyone who owns a pool will appreciate the gravity of this (pun intended).
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)

daemonios

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,695
Fascinating read! Big thumbs up on the content and photos.

That said, I have to agree with some of the comments regarding format: while it's refreshing, it also looks very out of touch with the Ars layout. After a while, the wavy water paragraph breaks are distracting, as are some of the animations. The photos taking up the whole width of the content column look kind of strange (no border to separate them from the background). I don't hate it, but I don't love it either.
 
Upvote
-5 (1 / -6)
Status
Not open for further replies.