I’m not familiar with the app. Is it in support of hardware they sell, or does it have some other monetization aside from subscriptions? If not, the benefit to the company of doing this is to try to get the users who pay nothing to subscribe - though admittedly it seems a lot of money to gain that one feature. As far as “but those users were promoting your app for you” - if they were paying nothing, that sounds a bit like someone going to a vendor and saying “do this job for me for free - it’ll get you great exposure, so others will hire you [and maybe actually pay you]”.Enshittification at work. Great... But I would think this would lead more to a PR nightmare then to real benefits for Strava? Lots of people will be unhappy, instead of all those people sharing their yearly stats and promoting the app for you.
between this and one of their marketing leadership people getting arrested for being a shitass, they're not having a great week.
https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/strava-fires-woman-at-center-of-sf-viral-restaurant-video/
But it WAS free. Now its not. The only expectations were created by the company itself. "Was free, now you pay" is the quintessential enshittification move.From my point of view (a software developer and strava user) I'm optimistic that this is actually counter enshittification. People expecting all their software for free is, IMO, the biggest driver of enshittification.
If it is unviable to give non-paying users, why were they giving it to non-paying users before now? And how much are they earning by monetizing the data the “non-paying” users give them for nothing?From my point of view (a software developer and strava user) I'm optimistic that this is actually counter enshittification. People expecting all their software for free is, IMO, the biggest driver of enshittification.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that shitty behavior by an employee doesn't necessarily extend to shitty behavior by the employer. Especially as she is now an ex-employee.between this and one of their marketing leadership people getting arrested for being a shitass, they're not having a great week.
https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/strava-fires-woman-at-center-of-sf-viral-restaurant-video/
Isn’t weird how data provided by users to these services has no value whatsoever, but suddenly becomes valuable enough to support an entire information economy immediately after that?I’m not familiar with the app. Is it in support of hardware they sell, or does it have some other monetization aside from subscriptions? If not, the benefit to the company of doing this is to try to get the users who pay nothing to subscribe - though admittedly it seems a lot of money to gain that one feature. As far as “but those users were promoting your app for you” - if they were paying nothing, that sounds a bit like someone going to a vendor and saying “do this job for me for free - it’ll get you great exposure, so others will hire you [and maybe actually pay you]”.
That's easy.Strava spokesperson Chris Morris declined to answer Ars’ specific questions about why the decision to put Year in Sport behind a paywall was made now.
Oh oh oh! I know! I know!Cyrus Farivar said:Strava spokesperson Chris Morris declined to answer Ars’ specific questions about why the decision to put Year in Sport behind a paywall was made now.
Don't many athletes flex?Matt Cook said:It makes me not want to share [my Strava year-end results] because it feels like I’m flexing.
Wow, you really must skim Ars! Here is an Ars article from 2018 (that was one of several at the time)Never heard of Strava until that woman faceplanted on the sidewalk.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that shitty behavior by an employee doesn't necessarily extend to shitty behavior by the employer. Especially as she is now an ex-employee.
Garmin's paywall hasn't gone over very well. It offers very little for the typical user and Garmin users have had this interesting thesis (not borne out by anything the company has said) that said 'we buy your overly expensive hardware, you give us an app as part of the deal.' The paywall sort of tripped up that nice little fantasy.I just now noticed that Garmin has a "year in review" option as well that's hidden behind a paywall. I don't recall that they had that previously so at least it wasn't something I was expecting and then lost. They do have badges you can earn (steps/miles/activities/etc) and they recently included new badges that are behind a paywall but didn't move any of the previously "free" badges behind the paywall which would have irked me if they did.
Interesting that all of this unfriendliness has shown up since the idea of that Golden IPO was floated. Including the totally bizarre lawsuit against Garmin. Not going to go into that here but it really sounds like someone in the current US administration is moonlighting.What a load of whining. It's a good service at a fair price. Some of the features are only for subscribers. Seems reasonable.
I'm definitely not a power user, but I am certainly of the ilk, "If it's not logged on my Garmin, it didn't happen." I'm not exactly proud of that, but whatever it takes to get my old ass moving.Garmin's paywall hasn't gone over very well. It offers very little for the typical user and Garmin users have had this interesting thesis (not borne out by anything the company has said) that said 'we buy your overly expensive hardware, you give us an app as part of the deal.' The paywall sort of tripped up that nice little fantasy.
Of course, now we have the slippery slope of more and more features are behind the paywall. Creeping enshitification. Sigh, there is always Apple, I suppose (cuddles watch, hell I sleep with the thing).
Garmin hasn't moved any formerly free features behind Connect+. Your rant is ridiculous.paywall ... paywall ... paywall ... enshittification
Not yet. The concern is that it is a slippery slope. Garmin used not to have a paywall, period.Garmin hasn't moved any formerly free features behind Connect+. Your rant is ridiculous.
No, this is enshitification. Like, the main purpose for these “Year in Review” things is free marketing (and reminding people how much these companies are spying on you). This is something that I would expect them to give out for free.From my point of view (a software developer and strava user) I'm optimistic that this is actually counter enshittification. People expecting all their software for free is, IMO, the biggest driver of enshittification.
This feature literally is only for marketing. It stinks of idiotic, short sighted managementWhat a load of whining. It's a good service at a fair price. Some of the features are only for subscribers. Seems reasonable.
I'd normally agree with you, but per that KRON4 report, Shireen was a "Senior Manager, Growth Marketing" at Strava, and paywalling off formerly-free features of an app sounds like something that a "Growth" department would do.I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that shitty behavior by an employee doesn't necessarily extend to shitty behavior by the employer. Especially as she is now an ex-employee.
Wow. I'm not usually a fan of violence, but watching that woman get casually tripped after she throws a violent tantrum in a restaurant and pulls the hair of the bartender who escorted her outside is satisfying. Her boyfriend also appears to be an utter tool.between this and one of their marketing leadership people getting arrested for being a shitass, they're not having a great week.
https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/strava-fires-woman-at-center-of-sf-viral-restaurant-video/
But it's not free. They're literally using the data provided by the users to power their business. They are nothing without that data.From my point of view (a software developer and strava user) I'm optimistic that this is actually counter enshittification. People expecting all their software for free is, IMO, the biggest driver of enshittification.