Tesla has literally lost lawsuits for having a racist hostile work environment with black workers being demeaned and abused by management. The fish rots from the headYou - and no one else - can just define any of these people as racists. That’s my choice - and I don’t think they’re racists.
But beyond that, I don’t discard people and put them in irredeemable categories just because I disagree with them or things they may say. Both Trump and Musk have said things I disagree with before, but that doesn’t mean that should he discarded as a result of that.
I don’t wish ill upon any of you.
"Progressist"? Is your belief that satellite internet is some sort of non- or anti-progress — a movement toward homo sapiens' preindustrial, "natural" state?Go Elon Go! The tears of progressists are like honey to me.
You mean he's price gouged the US military to aid Ukraine and enrich his pocket, but has actively worked to stop payments of Medicaid coverage for life saving drugs and treatment, stopped the flow of aid abruptly to the world, and is advocating driving up prices to push more people into destitution. Fuck MuskNah, citation needed. He has, however, demonstrably saved lives in wartime and emergency situations with SpaceX. Sounds like you are very clearly advocating for removal of communications to people in those situations, based on your spin.
I'm sorry, what????Ironically, that is pretty much exactly what Trump and Musk are doing. But you all are too blind and too biased to see it.
According to Trump himself, nothing short of total capitulation of Canadian national sovereignty; Trump wants his own Vichy France, a slave state to use for free labor and pillaging of natural resources and industrial material to prop up a failing economy as long as possible.
You - and no one else - can just define any of these people as racists. That’s my choice - and I don’t think they’re racists.
But beyond that, I don’t discard people and put them in irredeemable categories just because I disagree with them or things they may say. Both Trump and Musk have said things I disagree with before, but that doesn’t mean that should he discarded as a result of that.
I don’t wish ill upon any of you.
You - and no one else - can just define any of these people as racists. That’s my choice - and I don’t think they’re racists.
But beyond that, I don’t discard people and put them in irredeemable categories just because I disagree with them or things they may say. Both Trump and Musk have said things I disagree with before, but that doesn’t mean that should he discarded as a result of that.
I don’t wish ill upon any of you.
Trump has fallen victim to one of the classic blunders:Yeah, but you REALLY don't want to try and conquer a country filled with people who have hockey sticks and know how to use them.
But we can't. Musk has tied himself closely to his businesses and has proven over and over again he is quite happy to weaponize them to suit his whims and to further his aims. Which are harmful to pretty much everyone who earns under 100M a year.Ignoring the person/owner, it is a brilliant business (Starlink). Many customers have no choice to get this service from others. Large moat to entry. I would also suggest this is one of most valuable uses of space that does not require government funding. If space is to become real business driven, we need to find more ways to make money up there,
I confess as much every Mass during the Penitential RiteAs long as you recognize that you’re as much a sinner as I am and no greater in the eyes of God than anyone else.
Like most here -- I assume -- I have multiple monthly subscriptions. Of these, ONE [1] company sends me an email alerting me to my upcoming charge: Starlink. Not sure what that means... maybe they think their service is so valuable they have no fear of me cancelling. If so, then they would be correct.
Ignoring the person/owner, it is a brilliant business (Starlink). Many customers have no choice to get this service from others. Large moat to entry. I would also suggest this is one of most valuable uses of space that does not require government funding. If space is to become real business driven, we need to find more ways to make money up there,
You just need a little push in the form of a special severance procedure to have your perception of the owner and business surgically split. Poof, done - permanent and perfect cognitive dissonance.But we can't. Musk has tied himself closely to his businesses and has proven over and over again he is quite happy to weaponize them to suit his whims and to further his aims. Which are harmful to pretty much everyone who earns under 100M a year.
So, no, I can't ignore the person / owner and love the business. Because they are one and the same.
Every time somebody in one of these threads goes off about how they don't think musk is even a bigot, and we all need to be more respectful and not call him mean things despite his own words and actions, "why can't we just talk about rockets", and blah blah blah, I think of On Smarm, because they always play the same hitsMusk is on the record as a supporter of the Great Replacement theory.
Trump has routinely discriminated against Black people in his businesses.
Please tell me how that isn't racist and how you aren't lying your ass off when you say you don't wish ill on any of us. You're actively supporting people who want to divide this country so they can profit. That's wishing ill in anybody's book. Including the one that's nominally about Jesus Christ.
Smarm should be understood as a type of bullshit, then—it expresses one agenda, while actually pursuing a different one. It is a kind of moral and ethical misdirection.
The evasion of disputes is a defining tactic of smarm. Smarm, whether political or literary, insists that the audience accept the priors it has been given. Debate begins where the important parts of the debate have ended.
To actually say a plain and direct word like "corrupt" is more outlandish, in smarm's outlook, than even swearing. A disagreeable attitude is one thing, but a disagreeable fact is much worse.
Talk about something else, smarm says. Talk about anything else.
Could you please provide the video that is taken from? Then we can compare it against the Nazi salute that Musk gave.Guess this guy is a Nazi too eh? <heavy sigh>
Since you appear to be very familiar with it, could you please upload a video of yourself showing us what it looks like?Because it clearly wasn't a Nazi salute. Just watch the frigging video yourself.
Your first paragraph does absolutely nothing to answer my question and instead dances around rephrasing it in some wild attempt at claiming we (Canada) will reduce our prices instead of simply finding new trading partners or holding fast on prices since so much of what we export to you guys is so necessary for your economy and society to function. Right, got it.Actually, it’s taxation on imports - that may or may not actually raise prices domestically. It depends on what the foreign producer does - if anything - to maintain their sales.
The tariffs aren’t being done to actually raise much in the way of cash. They’re being used as bargaining tools to get those other countries (except China) to capitulate on issues of national interest. For China their purpose is probably more aimed at recovery of our own domestic manufacturing ability or to refocus our reliance to more friendly countries.
Problem is that's mostly not true.Just cover it up with a bumper sticker.
View attachment 101771
Problem is that's mostly not true.
We knew he was crazy at least as far back as the Thai cave rescue incident (2018). Nobody owning a Model 3 or Y goes back that far...
Oh so now it's "virtue signalling" to want to not be ruled by an unelected billionaire oligarch who is actively and admittedly causing "pain" to ordinary people to prove his fake point about "government waste" and boost his geo and personal political powerMine is up the end of March, I'm considering terminating also. Agree with your sentiments.
Canadians buy over 40% of all the American booze that gets exported worldwide.Without looking at the contract, it's hard to say if it's strictly legal but I'll bet it'll get through any review. This is more that just "not liking politics", the US has declared economic war on Canada and Musk is basically part of the government. Note that you won't be able to buy US beer, liquor or wine in Ontario next week either. There's a billion dollars (Canadian) of sales that just disappeared.
Mr. Ford is a greedy, greasy, slimy scumbag who has longstanding ties to organized crime and who has spent his entire term in power looking for ways to funnel public assets into the hands of the people who put him in charge of his party. He keeps failing to balance the budget of a province that already has the world's largest sub-sovereign debt. He's the single biggest reason why Canadians are losing faith in our health-care system and our infrastructure projects.Welcome to a trade war. It's politically inadvisable for the Canadian government to do business with US corporations right now, especially those who are tied to Musk. Since Ford is a politician, he's doing the right thing in the eyes of his constituents.
Who actually writes the check for the tariffs? Is it, or is it not, the importer?Actually, it’s taxation on imports - that may or may not actually raise prices domestically. It depends on what the foreign producer does - if anything - to maintain their sales.
Sci-fi readers might recognize Canada in:Yeah, but you REALLY don't want to try and conquer a country filled with people who have hockey sticks and know how to use them.
It is the importer, who can either absorb the costs or pass them onto the the customer to recoup what they paid.Who actually writes the check for the tariffs? Is it, or is it not, the importer?
Our elections are incredibly secure and there is a secret ballot. This is literally impossible. This is why they can't throw out votes even when they later charge and convict someone with voting fraudulently.Real, serious question:
What else has to be compromised by Musk and his ilk to have full access to see who voted against Trump?
Actions speak louder than words. Cancel your subscription now if you find Ars so distasteful. Hell, why don't you leave Ars completely since it doesn't line up with your politics apparently?Mine is up the end of March, I'm considering terminating also. Agree with your sentiments.
Real, serious question:
What else has to be compromised by Musk and his ilk to have full access to see who voted against Trump?
That's just good customer communication. We have Starlink as a backup ISP at our work (the main one is a fixed microwave link that gets wobbly in the winter) and those emails are much appreciated. But they're also just like the ones I get from most of my other vendors that offer business subscription services, like various SaaS offerings. So maybe you're seeing business level communication instead of consumer level. Since all of those charges need to be accounted for, you're unlikely to forget about one.Like most here -- I assume -- I have multiple monthly subscriptions. Of these, ONE [1] company sends me an email alerting me to my upcoming charge: Starlink. Not sure what that means... maybe they think their service is so valuable they have no fear of me cancelling. If so, then they would be correct.
You know something has gone deeply evil too if people are replacing it with service from Verizon like some others have said on this thread tooI was considering Starlink as a backup for internet. That and you can pause internet easily enough. But prior to January 20 I wasn't thrilled with the Muskrat. Now? I'd sooner go without internet than support that asshat.
I hate Doug Ford and Ford Nation with a seething fury, but I can agree with him giving a big middle finger to Musk.Before people praise Doug Ford too much, the guy is a politician first and foremost and has been doing some pretty shady things.
First one that comes to mind involves land development. Land in southern Ontario is pretty expensive, partly because of land outside the cities are part of the Green Belt. The Green Belt, as far as I understand it, largely protects agricultural land from urban development so farming can continue. Ford controversially released some land from the Green Belt to build more housing. Turns out there were some developers close to him (close enough to attend a wedding party for one of Ford's kids) that had purchased the land before it was released from the Green Belt and had known before hand what Ford was going to do. Basically the developers got expensive land for cheap using back channels. Once the whole thing blew up, Ford was forced to reverse his decision.
Then there's this science center in Ottawa. It was getting old and in need of repairs. Instead of commissioning the repairs, Ford wanted it demolished and relocated to make way for a development project. This one is controversial because the science center was shut down without much notice and I think the relocation would've been more expensive than the repairs. There was some shady developer business going on though.
I'm sure there's more dirt to be found. Those were the just a couple that hit the national headlines. Ford is making a big show of this whole trade war to secure votes. He conveniently called for a provincial election shortly after the whole tariff thing came up. So while Ford has done something to show he isn't putting up with US trade antics, I still wouldn't put too much trust in him.