I am curious why some states have excess capacity. Upstate NY and Vermont have many remote areas. They seem to be states which should have reduced capacity.
I think it's mainly a marketing issue?
I mean Connecticut isn't really a low-density state, and yet it's on that list of states elligible for the discount. I think those are just states where Starlink has failed to convince many people to subscribe.
It could be that in states like Connecticut, their cable, fiber, and 5G options are so good that there's little reason to get Starlink? In some of the very rural states, maybe folks just don't care that much about Internet? Or maybe they have good municipal ISP?
It's a great question, "why", but I suspect the answer has little to do with population density.
Also, specifically regarding NY state - I suspect the answer why they aren't on the list is that, since this is being done state by state, that while a few small parts of NY state might have reduced usage, overall the state probably has lots of Starlink subscribers.
Not so much in NYC or the dense suburbs near it - Starink doesn't work well in the dense areas. But I suspect in much of the state with a lower density, places like the outskirts of Buffalo, Rochester, Ithaca, Binghamton, Albany, Syracuse - they probably have lots of subscribers.