I don't quite understand why this is important for flight decision making. As diagnostic data for confirming why a ship was lost, sure, yes, that's still quite useful. But if the Ship is going to be lost, it's not like there's some rescue plan that will save it for less than the cost of just manufacturing a new one, and the way that landings work, they aren't targeting the launch site until they've confirmed engine relight, so if it fails it will crash into the ... oh, hmm, I see. It's only the booster that reenters from the oceanic direction. The ship arrives at Boca Chica from the East, meaning that it fundamentally has to pass over a lot of populated land (even if it dodges major population centers).
So I guess if the inspection shows that Starship is missing enough heat tiles to have significant risk of failure during reentry, they are going to target open ocean to reduce the risk of it failing over land? It's not about reducing the risk of losing a Starship. It's about reducing the risk of a Starship failure scattering debris over land. I wonder what the decision threshold will be. Is a 1% chance of failure over land enough to dump a 99% survivable Starship in the ocean?