Humans will manipulate anything for profit.i'm pretty ok with prediction markets in principle, but this is starting to move my needle away. i guess i was naive to assume that people wouldn't try to bet (and essentially leak) national security information for profit.
100%Look, look everyone! See, we are strong tough boi on crime ! Look over there! I'm not doing the same, or worse or picking your pocket while I distract you. No no no ,not at all.
And the idiots will lap it up.
Sure doesn't make you wonder if this guy is just a scapegoat for someone higher up in the admin.
any details on how they found him?
my understanding is that access to Poly is very restricted inside the US (without a VPN?) and transactions are typically linked to crypto accounts?
I know such things are not 100% private, but he probably jumped through a few hoops to hide his identity
they'll take it very seriously - by launching the new $TRUMPMarket prediction market…He used classified information to do this. Problem is that he's very likely not alone.
I wonder how serious this administration is going to take this potential risk to national security
Thanks for the reminder; that quote sounded to me like Trump saying he didn't see anything wrong with what the Soldier did because he didn't bet against the USA succeeding and the context makes that impression stronger.Like Pete Rose? You mean the guy you convinced MLB to make hall of fame eligible again? That guy? The pedophile? That guy? You love him!
That dumb fuck and his cronies/assistants are all making these bets. Why else would the White House tell them not to use prediction markets? The hypocrisy and attempts at gaslighting are infuriating
Very seriously - all bets from the White House will be routed through the Atlantic!He used classified information to do this. Problem is that he's very likely not alone.
I wonder how serious this administration is going to take this potential risk to national security
No- these markets rely on insider trading - if there are no insiders the bets aren’t accurate. This a feature not a bug.Genuinely curious - can this even qualify as insider trading?
The guy used information about an upcoming military action, but no result of that action was guaranteed.
i'm pretty ok with prediction markets in principle, but this is starting to move my needle away. i guess i was naive to assume that people wouldn't try to bet (and essentially leak) national security information for profit.
There is no practical utility. Polymarket says Switzerland will lose Eurovision with their current band but there is no practical mechanism to change the band. This soldier clearly gave Venezuala a heads up the raid was coming and Maduro did nothing. The Mets are clearly on a losing streak in spite of tons of Polymarket “information” about their lineup.Now personally I don't see any real world utility in prediction markets but any utility they could possibly have requires "insider trading".
Everyone I know in the military/DoD and adjacent industries immediately knew it was an insider, someone with clearance and eyes on shit they should not be talking about, making those bets. It's not at all surprising.i'm pretty ok with prediction markets in principle, but this is starting to move my needle away. i guess i was naive to assume that people wouldn't try to bet (and essentially leak) national security information for profit.
Exactly this. It’s crazy that it’s OK for politicians to use inside information to trade on, but no one else can.Van Dyke‘s biggest mistake was not being a member of Congress (or an administration official) when placing the bets.
I don't think that is true. Your premise relies on the idea that forecasting can't be done well/usefully, can't be better in one person versus another, and that ultimately an aggregation of forecasts can't provide any useful utility that exceeds the individual forecast. I don't have a proof handy but it seems totally nuts to draw those conclusions in the age of ML, let alone being so bearish on the powers of us limited human beings.If people with information didn't bet to move the odds they wouldn't be a prediction market anymore than a magic eight ball is.
Even if you agree with the premise of prediction markets the entire concept is based around the idea if the question is "will X happen" that people who know about X will make wagers and that will bias the odds towards the the likely outcome.
Now personally I don't see any real world utility in prediction markets but any utility they could possibly have requires "insider trading".
To be clear though despite the article headlines this soldier was not charged with insider trading in the traditional sense but rather misusing classified information. Arguably "markets" involving classified materials should be inherently illegal. The only way they could work is if people do unlawfully use classified material.
A prediction market on when with New Glenn return to flight also has to involve insider information to be anything but a random guess but that information isn't classified.
This is something that a good portion of the Trump administration is doing, but of course only the little people are held accountable for it.
Yeah, he'll look into it, so that he makes sure he gets the name on the pardon papers correct.President Trump was asked about Van Dyke at the White House on Thursday, and responded by comparing the wagers to “Pete Rose betting on his own team,” according to CNBC. “Pete Rose, they kept him out of the Hall of Fame because he bet on his own team,” Trump was quoted as saying. “Now, if he bet against his team, that would be no good, but he bet on his own team. I’ll look into it.”
You’re okay with unregulated legalized gambling in which corruption and insider trading goes unchecked?i'm pretty ok with prediction markets in principle, but this is starting to move my needle away. i guess i was naive to assume that people wouldn't try to bet (and essentially leak) national security information for profit.
How much of that $410k will he have to use toSeeing as he'll get a pardon my only hope is his lawyer fees bankrupt him.