A voice of sanity, thank you![…] against unarmed civilians in the ocean to guide in heavily armed warships, I guess that works.
And that explains the fucked-up dystopian apocalyptic sound track. It got the psychopaths in charge of the country murdering unarmed civilians all jazzed up, I'm sure.
This is a really specific rant about music on a video that has less than 1000 views with a byline that makes no sense.That video looks and sounds like it was put together by a tweaking 18 year old Tiktoker shooting for a cyberpunk cool factor.
It's an unarmed, electric ultralight. Why does the fuck sound track have a dystopian apocalyptic vibe to it?
As for its military viability, it has none if you're going to be facing even a modest military threat. But against unarmed civilians in the ocean to guide in heavily armed warships, I guess that works.
And that explains the fucked-up dystopian apocalyptic sound track. It got the psychopaths in charge of the country murdering unarmed civilians all jazzed up, I'm sure.
There is no mention of clouds.So... A solar powered plane was able to fly for over a week until the weather became too cloudy and it ran out of power?
That doesn't sound like a ringing endorsement for "perpetual flight" to me.
Yeah, but the video (and especially audio) is really obnoxious and cut like a 16 year old was trying to make a solar airplane look cool for other 16 year olds.This is a really specific rant about music on a video that has less than 1000 views with a byline that makes no sense.
Long range high endurance cheap surveillance assets are 100% relevant militarily.
Just turn off the sound. 99% of promo videos have unpleasant noise posing as “music” or “value added info@..That video looks and sounds like it was put together by a tweaking 18 year old Tiktoker shooting for a cyberpunk cool factor.
It's an unarmed, electric ultralight. Why does the fuck sound track have a dystopian apocalyptic vibe to it?
As for its military viability, it has none if you're going to be facing even a modest military threat. But against unarmed civilians in the ocean to guide in heavily armed warships, I guess that works.
And that explains the fucked-up dystopian apocalyptic sound track. It got the psychopaths in charge of the country murdering unarmed civilians all jazzed up, I'm sure.
Seems strange that they would maintain airborne operations of a prototype in unstable weather conditions instead of finding somewhere to land. Surely they must have been aware of the limited capacity of the built in batteries, and the kind of flying conditions the aircraft was built to endure.There is no mention of clouds.
“extreme vertical air mass variability exceeding 10 times typical climb and descent rates,”
Now they know to watch for and avoid that kind of extreme condition.
Seems strange that they would maintain airborne operations of a prototype in unstable weather conditions instead of finding somewhere to land. Surely they must have been aware of the limited capacity of the built in batteries, and the kind of flying conditions the aircraft was built to endure.
The drone eventually positioned itself south of Cuba and north of the Cayman Islands while waiting out a period of bad weather.
MANILA, May 13 - Philippine Senator Ronald dela Rosa called on the public to step in to prevent law enforcement agents from handing him over to the International Criminal Court as the sound of gunfire rattled through the Senate building on Wednesday evening.
Dela Rosa stands accused by the ICC of crimes against humanity related to the war on drugs he oversaw while serving as police chief under then President Rodrigo Duterte. Dela Rosa, 64, has denied involvement in illegal killings.
The Philippine government has officially acknowledged 6,248 deaths due to the anti-drug campaign.
But activists say the real toll of the crackdown was far greater, with thousands of urban and poor drug users, many placed on official "watch lists", killed in mysterious circumstances.
Both Duterte and dela Rosa were unapologetic in their defence of the brutal campaign, insisting police were only told to kill in self-defence.
“extreme vertical air mass variability exceeding 10 times typical climb and descent rates”
As for the weather conditions that killed the aircraft, climb rates for large jet airliners are 1,000 to 3,000 feet per minute, and for large drones perhaps a maximum of 2,000 feet per minute. Severe turbulence can produce vertical air movements of 1,500 to 3,000 feet per minute.
interpreted literally, that implies vertical velocity of 10,000 to 20,000 feet per minute. This is beyond ordinary “severe turbulence.” It's extreme convective storm cores; microbursts or downbursts; tornadoes or equivalent. Extreme thunderstorm updrafts in supercells can exceed 10,000 feet per minute internally.
Long range, yes. High endurance, questionable. Cheap, not.This is a really specific rant about music on a video that has less than 1000 views with a byline that makes no sense.
Long range high endurance cheap surveillance assets are 100% relevant militarily.
The total cost to develop and operate the Solar Impulse 2 project, from 2003 through its round-the-world flight in 2016, was approximately CHF 170 million (roughly US$170–$200 million). It was financed by private corporate partners and individuals, rather than being sold as a commercial product
For what it's worth, I'm pretty confident they mean 10x the design loads on this specific aircraft, not generically.In other news, Reuters report:
*****
As for the weather conditions that killed the aircraft, climb rates for large jet airliners are 1,000 to 3,000 feet per minute, and for large drones perhaps a maximum of 2,000 feet per minute. Severe turbulence can produce vertical air movements of 1,500 to 3,000 feet per minute.
interpreted literally, that implies vertical velocity of 10,000 to 20,000 feet per minute. This is beyond ordinary “severe turbulence.” It's extreme convective storm cores; microbursts or downbursts; tornadoes or equivalent. Extreme thunderstorm updrafts in supercells can exceed 10,000 feet per minute internally.
Perhaps check the hurricane trackers near Cancun that day.
I think the intention was that it was 10 times the ascent rate for this specific aircraft, which was much less powerful and capable than other drones or commercial airliners.In other news, Reuters report:
*****
As for the weather conditions that killed the aircraft, climb rates for large jet airliners are 1,000 to 3,000 feet per minute, and for large drones perhaps a maximum of 2,000 feet per minute. Severe turbulence can produce vertical air movements of 1,500 to 3,000 feet per minute.
interpreted literally, that implies vertical velocity of 10,000 to 20,000 feet per minute. This is beyond ordinary “severe turbulence.” It's extreme convective storm cores; microbursts or downbursts; tornadoes or equivalent. Extreme thunderstorm updrafts in supercells can exceed 10,000 feet per minute internally.
Perhaps check the hurricane trackers near Cancun that day.
I am rather puzzled how it wasn’t obvious in the first place.There is no mention of clouds.
“extreme vertical air mass variability exceeding 10 times typical climb and descent rates,”
Now they know to watch for and avoid that kind of extreme condition.
There is no mention of clouds.
“extreme vertical air mass variability exceeding 10 times typical climb and descent rates,”
Now they know to watch for and avoid that kind of extreme condition.
In other words, business as usual for the Unprincipled Syndicate of Assholes.the strikes violate both domestic and international law
Sure, it's research after all. The development cost of a (single) prototype is always going to be extremely high, and not as capable as future generations could become. But you have to start somewhere. "Standing on the shoulders of giants" works even if it means you have to stand on your own past's shouldersLong range, yes. High endurance, questionable. Cheap, not.
This thing has an enormous radar signature. Hell, it's so big, it could be visually sighted in many conditons. It's a wonderful weapon for surveillance against enemies with no air assets or even decent SAMs. It's useless against anything else.
As far as cheap, according to Wikipedia:
They wouldn't be the first. Consider AeroVironment.As another commenter pointed out, I was completely blindsided by this aircraft's repurposing from a renewable technology demonstrator to a kill-chain component.
Quite a change of careers...
Paul Beattie MacCready Jr. (September 25, 1925 – August 28, 2007) was an American aeronautical engineer. He was the founder of AeroVironment and the designer of the human-powered aircraft that won the first Kremer prize. He devoted his life to developing more efficient transportation vehicles that could "do more with less".[1]
MacCready was also a passionate environmentalist who was concerned about humanity's role in the depletion of natural resources. "Environmentally conscious, technologically clever, and culturally grand, Paul wanted to change the world through reason, intelligence, and creativity", Shermer wrote of him in an obituary.[68]
The U.S. Army has awarded a massive contract valued at close to $1 billion to AeroVironment for the delivery of Switchblade-series loitering munitions, also known as kamikaze drones, over the next five years. This is part of a larger effort that the service has said is intended to help make its infantry units just as lethal as formations with tanks and other heavy armored vehicles amid a pivot to preparing for potential high-end fights, especially one against China in the Pacific.
As already noted, the Army and others within the U.S. military have already been buying Switchblades. For the Army, specifically, its huge new order for these kamikaze drones reflects a major push to field them in far greater numbers, especially within infantry units. Loitering munitions offer dismounted infantry formations, even at the lowest levels, valuable new ways to engage various kinds of targets well beyond the reach of traditional man-portable missiles, rockets, and similar weapons, and from the safety of cover.
Only if it's cheap though, which this most certainly isn't. Anything this large, this slow and this delicate will get immediately swatted out of the sky by an interceptor drone, or a conventional SAM if it's too high for a drone. The only way this makes sense is if you can deploy thousands of them, and don't care if 90% are attritted. Or if the people you are monitoring are completely defenceless, in which case it's not really a military operation any more.Long range high endurance cheap surveillance assets are 100% relevant militarily.