That seems contradictory- did you mean the lawsuit is unnecessary since the orders are ineffective?the fact that coal is dropping would seemingly support the view that the orders are unnecessary.
Getting off of fossil fuels cuts the power of so many bad actor states - Saudi, Russia, Texas, etc. it’s why the right is so desperate to cling to them.I would love to see the day when renewables become so cheap and efficient - and local energy storage scaled up massively and cheaply too - that we can get close to 'zero' carbon. And desalinating sea water becomes economical too. That will take away a lot of the economic friction vexxing humanity today.
No, the orders are made under the guise of an energy emergency - made under a law that allows these sort of directives if the grid is going to be short on power. But clearly it's not so short on power that the coal plants are necessary.That seems contradictory- did you mean the lawsuit is unnecessary since the orders are ineffective?
The order are emergency orders. If they aren't needed despite the supposed "emergency" because of renewables growth, the orders are unnecessary.That seems contradictory- did you mean the lawsuit is unnecessary since the orders are ineffective?
Aren't we already in the days of renewables being cheap and efficient? And grid storage projects are being heavily pushed across the country, with battery prices continuing to fall year over year.I would love to see the day when renewables become so cheap and efficient - and local energy storage scaled up massively and cheaply too - that we can get close to 'zero' carbon. And desalinating sea water becomes economical too. That will take away a lot of the economic friction vexxing humanity today.
Drought combined with the fact that basically all of America's hydro dams were thrown up within a 30 year time span...and all of them are reaching EOL, as structures, at the same time consequently--and there's no money to systemically rehabilitate or replace the thousand or so presently critical-rated structures now--never mind the thousands of others soon to be in the same status.This is a great example of the "invisible hand" at work. Since solar and wind are so much less expensive than natural gas or coal, renewable are slowly taking over from fossil fuels. The only thing slowing down the switch right now is the tendency of Trump and his cronies to put their collective thumb on the scales.
As for hydro, I expect that will start to reduce over the next few years as the effects of the current drought start to take hold.
I was casually pricing hardware for a grid-tie system at my new house that would average out to covering a year's worth of electricity and it was less than half the cost of the hardware we installed at my old house five years ago, not including the subsidies in place then. The end of the subsidies isn't going to matter much at all very soon.
Also states like Wyoming that relies for a good chunk of its annual budget from natural resource extraction excise taxes. Same for Alaska. Which is how those states don't have income tax.Getting off of fossil fuels cuts the power of so many bad actor states - Saudi, Russia, Texas, etc. it’s why the right is so desperate to cling to them.
Practical Engineering made a video about this - All Dams Are Temporary. One issue with dams is that they silt in over time and it isn’t feasible to remove all that silt. They’re also generally terrible for the environment. The sooner we can shift away from fossil fuels and dams, the better.Drought combined with the fact that basically all of America's hydro dams were thrown up within a 30 year time span...and all of them are reaching EOL, as structures, at the same time consequently--and there's no money to systemically rehabilitate or replace the thousand or so presently critical-rated structures now--never mind the thousands of others soon to be in the same status.
Nothing lasts forever, and dam failures will start to become more common, as a lot of those structures were privatized and handed off to groups that just defer maintenance to infinity. And even if they were kept up--man-made rock, AKA concrete, doesn't last forever. Even the genuine article doesn't.
Note that lack of income tax doesnt necessarily imply an extractive economy. Washington, New Hampshire, and Tennessee dont have income tax either and I wouldn't classify any of them as deriving a lot of income from natural resource extraction.Also states like Wyoming that relies for a good chunk of its annual budget from natural resource extraction excise taxes. Same for Alaska. Which is how those states don't have income tax.
I was on a bike tour years ago and a state official from Nebraska was asking some people how they could replicate Wyoming's lack of income tax--I told him he should just magic a crapload of coal into the ground. He had no idea about how Wyoming was basically like Russia/Venezuela except on coal.
I would agree, although the historic reason Washington doesn't have an income tax is because when they were drafting the state constitution they thought timber was an inexhaustible resource that would fund everything forever. Turns out that isn't true, but now we have an entrenched population of people who are incapable of doing the math to understand just how badly they are getting fucked by sales taxes instead of an income tax.Note that lack of income tax doesnt necessarily imply an extractive economy. Washington, New Hampshire, and Tennessee dont have income tax either and I wouldn't classify any of them as deriving a lot of income from natural resource extraction.
Sales tax are regressive and income tax can be set up as progressive. Oregon has no sales tax.I would agree, although the historic reason Washington doesn't have an income tax is because when they were drafting the state constitution they thought timber was an inexhaustible resource that would fund everything forever. Turns out that isn't true, but now we have an entrenched population of people who are incapable of doing the math to understand just how badly they are getting fucked by sales taxes instead of an income tax.
All of everything is temporary...except entropy. Entropy is forever.Practical Engineering made a video about this - All Dams Are Temporary. One issue with dams is that they silt in over time and it isn’t feasible to remove all that silt. They’re also generally terrible for the environment. The sooner we can shift away from fossil fuels and dams, the better.
It’s that quarterly target nonsense that keeps Nebraska down — if only it had invested in vast anoxic swamps 60 million years ago! But no, it went for the short-term win of shallow seas full of fish instead, and just got shale.Also states like Wyoming that relies for a good chunk of its annual budget from natural resource extraction excise taxes. Same for Alaska. Which is how those states don't have income tax.
I was on a bike tour years ago and a state official from Nebraska was asking some people how they could replicate Wyoming's lack of income tax--I told him he should just magic a crapload of coal into the ground. He had no idea about how Wyoming was basically like Russia/Venezuela except on coal.
The emergency is still bogus, the utilities and regulators already did the math and are closing coal plants that aren’t needed. That said, your counter argument just doesn’t work: if there really were an emergency of availability of power, a quarter with higher than usual stream flows wouldn’t contradict it.No, the orders are made under the guise of an energy emergency - made under a law that allows these sort of directives if the grid is going to be short on power. But clearly it's not so short on power that the coal plants are necessary.
I remember that vid! Dams get tricky because they exist for different reasons. Here in Nebraska we (used to?) have one of the strongest dams (in terms of the concrete) the Corps of Engineers measured. Which kind of needs to exist. Even though it too is a 50s era dam. And will also need replaced--and there's no capital to do it.Practical Engineering made a video about this - All Dams Are Temporary. One issue with dams is that they silt in over time and it isn’t feasible to remove all that silt. They’re also generally terrible for the environment. The sooner we can shift away from fossil fuels and dams, the better.
Which is the #1 reason Vancouver, WA exists. Meanwhile, now that I'm over by the Idaho border I'm getting to see how our sales tax money is being used to cover medical services for uninsured Idahoans as required by our state law. It'd be nice if their state took care of their own instead. But at least the Idahoans come over here and buy a lot of weed to take back to their theocracy, so that helps a bit.Oregon has no sales tax.
Sir, I see no invisible hand.This is a great example of the "invisible hand" at work. Since solar and wind are so much less expensive than natural gas or coal, renewable are slowly taking over from fossil fuels. The only thing slowing down the switch right now is the tendency of Trump and his cronies to put their collective thumb on the scales.
As for hydro, I expect that will start to reduce over the next few years as the effects of the current drought start to take hold.
Entropy.All of everything is temporary...except entropy. Entropy is forever.
Is that 1200 W total per residence? Or 1200 W per circuit (which is pretty close to the max sustained load [1440 W] for a 120V/15A breaker).Here in California, a Senate committee unanimously approved a bill authorizing balcony solar, so we might get it in the near future. The proposed max limit is 1200w. One 400w panel could generate 14% of a typical apartment's needs, so x3 would be 42%; increasing the limit to 1600w would push that over 50% but baby steps for now, I guess.
Edison keeps reminding me I use half again as much electricity as my neighbors so anything to cut my bill would be welcome.
Per dwelling.Is that 1200 W total per residence? Or 1200 W per circuit (which is pretty close to the max sustained load [1440 W] for a 120V/15A breaker).
(c) “Portable solar generation device” means a moveable photovoltaic energy generation device that meets all of the following conditions:
(1) Has a maximum aggregated AC output of 1,200 watts per dwelling.
(2) Is designed to be connected to a building’s electrical system through a single standard electrical outlet.
(3) Is intended to offset the customer’s onsite electricity consumption.
(4) Meets the standards of the most recent version of the National ElectricalCode.Code and the California Electrical Code (Part 3 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations).
(5) Is certified as a plug-in photovoltaic system by Underwriters Laboratories or an equivalent nationally recognized testing laboratory.
(6) Includes a feature, certified by Underwriters Laboratories or an equivalent nationally recognized testing laboratory, that isolates the portable solar generation device from the building’s electrical system to prevent the portable solar generation device from backfeeding electricity to the electrical grid during a power outage.
"the Persian Gulf conflict drives global natural gas prices higher"
Which unintuitively may lower US natural gas prices. A lot of natural gas is coproduced with oil and exporting oil isn't limited by capacity to load it in tankers. Natural gas exports have been limited by export facilities for years and can't increase any meaningful amount.
-edit Note the price in April was lower than any month in 2025
https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngwhhdm.htm