The $100M+ cost should be reason enough for congressmen on both sides to block the move. I don't understand why anyone would seriously consider this. What has happened to government?
Based on this, NASA should ignore the directive. What would the consequences be?Under the terms of the act, NASA has until January 4, 2027 (18 months after the bill's enactment) to transfer Discovery to Space Center Houston. For its part, the Smithsonian says that it owns the title to Discovery and, as the institution is not part of the federal government, the orbiter is no longer the government's to move.
I can imagine the only solution being hacking it apart and shipping it piecemeal, effectively ruining it. All to appease the egos of petty senators.Then there are the logistical challenges with relocating Discovery, which could result in damaging it, "permanently diminishing its historical and cultural value for future generations."
What has happened to government?
You've been here long enough to know how this would end. What do you think a "competence test" would look like under the current political regime?I'm at the point where I think people should have to take a competence test to vote. If they can't cogently answer a few neutral questions about the issues/candidates they're voting for or against, then they shouldn't be allowed to vote - ever again.
Yes, my reaction to visiting was that the Space Shuttle is larger than you think and the Concorde is smaller.I mean, I remember paying $15 to park at Udvar Hazy, but admission was free and seeing the shuttle was the coolest thing. It’s huge!
Tests to vote are a bad idea. I get where you're coming from, but they are incredibly abusable. Look up literacy tests sometime.The morons have taken over, proving the adage that if you consider how stupid the average person is, you have to realize that half of the rest of humanity is DUMBER.
I'm at the point where I think people should have to take a competence test to vote. If they can't cogently answer a few neutral questions about the issues/candidates they're voting for or against, then they shouldn't be allowed to vote - ever again.
People started looking at voting as a chore, rather than the privilege it typically is, since the majority of the world has no ACTUAL say in who gets elected or what legislation gets passed. And that's why we have the fuckers in office we have today, systematically destroying our country on the behalf of the wealthy.
And IMHO, anyone who voted for Trump should lose their right to vote, because they've demonstrated not only appalling ignorance, but malicious intent toward the rest of humanity. And we don't need those kinds of people impacting the decisions of the future ever again.
I'll also add that it's nice to see at least a few of the Dem's get off their asses and DO something active to oppose this administration instead of sitting with their fucking thumbs up their asses dithering about it.
Even if it's something as relatively minor as keeping the fucking space shuttle where it is instead of, you know, impeaching Trump for multiple abuses of power.
All of this has been tried, and was in turn corrupted. Or maybe it was corrupt in the first place.The morons have taken over, proving the adage that if you consider how stupid the average person is, you have to realize that half of the rest of humanity is DUMBER.
I'm at the point where I think people should have to take a competence test to vote. If they can't cogently answer a few neutral questions about the issues/candidates they're voting for or against, then they shouldn't be allowed to vote - ever again.
People started looking at voting as a chore, rather than the privilege it typically is, since the majority of the world has no ACTUAL say in who gets elected or what legislation gets passed. And that's why we have the fuckers in office we have today, systematically destroying our country on the behalf of the wealthy.
And IMHO, anyone who voted for Trump should lose their right to vote, because they've demonstrated not only appalling ignorance, but malicious intent toward the rest of humanity. And we don't need those kinds of people impacting the decisions of the future ever again.
I'll also add that it's nice to see at least a few of the Dem's get off their asses and DO something active to oppose this administration instead of sitting with their fucking thumbs up their asses dithering about it.
Even if it's something as relatively minor as keeping the fucking space shuttle where it is instead of, you know, impeaching Trump for multiple abuses of power.
You do have to pay to park there. However, though NOT easy to reach, you can walk in without parking and you can take public transportation there.I mean, I remember paying $15 to park at Udvar Hazy, but admission was free and seeing the shuttle was the coolest thing. It’s huge!
The language in the law mentions that it has to be one that has been to space and carried astronauts or something to that affect.Don't they have a Lego model or something they could send instead?
The $100M+ cost should be reason enough for congressmen on both sides to block the move. I don't understand why anyone would seriously consider this. What has happened to government?
Civl forfeiture/Asset forfeiture?The shuttle is also fully owned by the Smithsonian, there is no legal precedent to steal property via law. So the shit state of Texas could per letter of law really only get the one in Florida.
The shuttle wasn't involved in a crime and the Federal Government has executive priv and is immune to 'those' types of crimes. That was the only use case I could come up with as well and dismissed it.Civl forfeiture/Asset forfeiture?
I am not sure why Houston could commission a mock-up for that amount of money. If I remember correctly at Air&Space you can walk to within a meter of the shuttle. Some styrofoam bricks over scaffolding with some spare tires should do the trick. It should be less expensive to maintain. Republican Senators are used to smoke and mirror budget deals so it is not like a stage prop is something new to Senator Cruz.
Just in case anyone missed it, Lee posted a comment on the last article about moving Discovery that further emphasizes how petty this is. He says Houston already has a full scale, high-fidelity mock-up of the shuttle Independence, which people can walk around in. And they have a bunch of other real vehicles too.
https://meincmagazine.com/space/2025/...-wont-say-which-one/?comments=1&post=43889391
Houston has a (high fidelity) mockup - the one that had been on display at Kennedy Space Center from 1993 to 2011. It was moved to Houston then because Atlantis had been awarded to KSC to display. Houston’s application to get one of the retiring shuttles was rated far lower than those of the sites that did get shuttles.I am not sure why Houston could commission a mock-up for that amount of money. If I remember correctly at Air&Space you can walk to within a meter of the shuttle. Some styrofoam bricks over scaffolding with some spare tires should do the trick. It should be less expensive to maintain. Republican Senators are used to smoke and mirror budget deals so it is not like a stage prop is something new to Senator Cruz.