Samsung may be bracing for first-ever annual loss in smartphone business

I'm increasingly considering the second-hand market for the time when my current phone dies.

The hardware has been good enough for a while now. I have not had to worry about battery, storage or RAM on my cheap 3-year-old phone.

OS updates are a lot better than they have been: a 2023 Pixel 8 which came out with Android 14 can be updated to Android 16 and should get updates up to Android 21.

I'll let the people who like shiny new things buy new.
 
Upvote
46 (46 / 0)
What's absurd is that Samsung makes memory, and they chose to prioritize the AI grift instead of their own internal customers for chips, and they're just now realizing that doing that was robbing peter to pay paul?
Exactly. As far as I'm aware, Samsung is the only company in the world that manufactures an SoC, DRAM, NAND, AMOLED screens, CMOS sensors, and batteries.
 
Upvote
70 (70 / 0)

evan_s

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,402
Subscriptor
What's absurd is that Samsung makes memory, and they chose to prioritize the AI grift instead of their own internal customers for chips, and they're just now realizing that doing that was robbing peter to pay paul?

I think part of it is that Samsung isn't as much of a single company as most Americans assume it is. The fab division is really more like a loosely related company for the mobile division than it is another division of the same company. The overall Samsung conglomerate is probably also making more money milking the AI crazy at the fabs and loosing money on the mobile division than propping up their mobile division by prioritizing supply or providing favorable pricing from the fabs.
 
Upvote
100 (101 / -1)
They’re selling the A17 5G at $200. I’m prepared to believe there would be little margin for such device even without the AI bullshit.

If anyone needs to get their folks out of the iPhone ecosystem and they don’t have any phone requirements uncharacteristic of their age group, A17 is an easy recommendation.
 
Upvote
-16 (11 / -27)

quamquam quid loquor

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,880
Subscriptor++
I think part of it is that Samsung isn't as much of a single company as most Americans assume it is. The fab division is really more like a loosely related company for the mobile division than it is another division of the same company. The overall Samsung conglomerate is probably also making more money milking the AI crazy at the fabs and loosing money on the mobile division than propping up their mobile division by prioritizing supply or providing favorable pricing from the fabs.
Samsung's revenue is 20% of Korea's GDP. Think about that for a minute. Walmart revenue is 2% of US GDP.

In Korea, Samsung is your landlord, your utilities, your bank, your grocery store, your food, your insurance, your transportation, your entertainment - your entire life.
 
Upvote
94 (94 / 0)
I'm increasingly considering the second-hand market for the time when my current phone dies.

The hardware has been good enough for a while now. I have not had to worry about battery, storage or RAM on my cheap 3-year-old phone.

OS updates are a lot better than they have been: a 2023 Pixel 8 which came out with Android 14 can be updated to Android 16 and should get updates up to Android 21.

I'll let the people who like shiny new things buy new.
I’ve been eyeing a Pixel 8(a?) for GrapheneOS.

Learning some problematic things about GrapheneOS that have delayed that decision.
 
Upvote
-1 (3 / -4)

fenris_uy

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,135
What's absurd is that Samsung makes memory, and they chose to prioritize the AI grift instead of their own internal customers for chips, and they're just now realizing that doing that was robbing peter to pay paul?
Samsung "divisions" treat each other as strangers, they don't have the close interactions that you would expect from a similar company in the US or Europe.
 
Upvote
37 (38 / -1)

evan_s

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,402
Subscriptor
When are phone manufacturers going to bring back the microSD/TransFlash card slot?

That probably takes a generation or two before they could make that pivot due to flash pricing. Design and manufacturing lead times are pretty long so maybe their 2027 lineup could change but could easily be their 2028 line up before it happens. Would depend on their exact lead times and when they made the decision. If they started working on it as soon as Dram and Flash prices started spiking 2027 is more likely but if they took more of wait and see, "it can't get that bad right?" approach it could easily be 2028. Then they have to decide if they think by 2028 it will still be the issue it is today or would they be investing in a feature people won't actually want/need as much by the time it gets out to them.
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)

hrpanjwani

Ars Scholae Palatinae
738
Subscriptor
I'm increasingly considering the second-hand market for the time when my current phone dies.

The hardware has been good enough for a while now. I have not had to worry about battery, storage or RAM on my cheap 3-year-old phone.

OS updates are a lot better than they have been: a 2023 Pixel 8 which came out with Android 14 can be updated to Android 16 and should get updates up to Android 21.

I'll let the people who like shiny new things buy new.

I would heartily recommend this strategy. My last two phones have been refurbished ones.

No problems with either one, saved me money and besides some AI bullshit features that I wasn’t interested in anyways, they have been full featured in every way that matters.
 
Upvote
15 (16 / -1)
Samsung's revenue is 20% of Korea's GDP. Think about that for a minute. Walmart revenue is 2% of US GDP.

In Korea, Samsung is your landlord, your utilities, your bank, your grocery store, your food, your insurance, your transportation, your entertainment - your entire life.
Yeah and entire country that is a company town. No wonder the birthrate is a catastrophic 0.7.
 
Upvote
-9 (8 / -17)

Velvet G

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,135
They haven't given me a single reason to move from my S23 Ultra anyway, especially since they crippled the S Pen. New does not equal better. There is nothing I throw at my phone that doesn't run fast. They walled LOG behind software to force upgrades. A paid app does the same thing so I'll keep my paid off phone instead, thank you.
 
Upvote
8 (9 / -1)
If anyone needs to get their folks out of the iPhone ecosystem and they don’t have any phone requirements uncharacteristic of their age group, A17 is an easy recommendation.
There's no "need" to get elderly people "out of the iPhone ecosystem", there's only punishing them for past wrongdoings by subjecting them to Android. And I suppose if you're trying to do that, a $200 Samsung is "an easy recommendation".

Meanwhile, if you love your "folks", buy them iPhones. I can understand the arguments for younger, more tech-savvy users who might have a personal preference for Android, but it's not something that the majority of older people should have to deal with.

Seriously, access to FaceTime by itself is enough of a reason to give them an iPhone. You might hate everything Apple stands for while turning a blind eye to Google's many and storied sins, but that's not a reason to screw your Nana out of the ability to chat face-to-face with her friends whose children and grandchildren actually love them.
 
Upvote
13 (52 / -39)

sword_9mm

Ars Legatus Legionis
25,911
Subscriptor
Samsung "divisions" treat each other as strangers, they don't have the close interactions that you would expect from a similar company in the US or Europe.

Like Microsoft where no department ever talks to another. If they did their products would be about 1000x better. :)

I'm increasingly considering the second-hand market for the time when my current phone dies.

The hardware has been good enough for a while now. I have not had to worry about battery, storage or RAM on my cheap 3-year-old phone.

OS updates are a lot better than they have been: a 2023 Pixel 8 which came out with Android 14 can be updated to Android 16 and should get updates up to Android 21.

I'll let the people who like shiny new things buy new.

I just updated my old SE2 to a refurb 16e. 400$ was my max for a phone.
 
Upvote
7 (8 / -1)

Drum

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,081
Subscriptor
Samsung Semiconductor has smashed records in the first quarter of 2026, earning an estimated $38 billion (KRW 57.2 trillion) in profit. That’s more than seven times its net from Q1 2025.
This can’t possibly be right, can it? Samsung semiconductor is making more in profit than Nvidia made in revenue (albeit nvidia in q4 25 since they haven’t had earnings yet).

I went to google this, and apparently it’s right. Holy crap that’s a lot of money. How is Samsung semiconductor making more profit than nvidia or tsmc make in revenue? Purely off of memory alone? The mind boggles.
 
Upvote
23 (23 / 0)

markg729

Seniorius Lurkius
48
Subscriptor
I'm never sure what people mean by statements like this:
DRAM production in 2027 could fall 40 percent short of expected demand.
Supply and demand curves intersect at a single point, the quantity produced/delivered at a certain price. Does it mean that prices are just higher than what people want them to be?
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

Jeff S

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,056
Subscriptor++
Samsung "divisions" treat each other as strangers, they don't have the close interactions that you would expect from a similar company in the US or Europe.
By "losing" money, I can't help but think here what Samsung really means is "making less profit", not actually losing money.

Because if Samsung mobile phones division is paying Samsung memory division more money for the memory in their phones, it's one hand paying the other.

Although Samsung phones face the very real prospect of market share decline/fewer units sold, if their phones are too expensive, and people cut back buying new phones and tablets, and keep using devices a year or two longer.

But the Samsung Board of Directors might decide that they make more money selling memory to AI companies than they lose on mobile phones. Especially if they lay off a bunch of workers in the mobile phone division so they don't have to keep paying them while mobile phone sales are down.

In general, companies/investors want to allocate their money and other resources where it's most profitable, even if that means axing other products or services that are profitable but less profitable.

However this can also long term hurt the bottom line, because, for example, if you largely abandon the mobile phone market for a couple years, by the time you come back, you might find that other competitors have stepped in and long-term taken that market away from you and it's hard to get back.

Sometimes, though, as markets mature and commodify, companies decide to just permanently leave them. Take for example IBM selling their desktop/laptop PC division to Lenovo.

PCs had become quite commodified with lots of cheap competition. IBM decided they had other more profitable lines of business and it was just time to leave the PC market. Plus by selling to Lenovo, they got a one-time final cash infusion from the PC line of business, which they could invest in their other products and services.
 
Upvote
1 (5 / -4)

Jeff S

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,056
Subscriptor++
I'm never sure what people mean by statements like this:

Supply and demand curves intersect at a single point, the quantity produced/delivered at a certain price. Does it mean that prices are just higher than what people want them to be?
It means that they think that if there were more production, they could sell 40% more. But because production capacity is finite, they aren't selling as many units of the product as "The Market" wants to buy at that time.

They could try to expand their production capacity, but that usually takes lots of money and several years of time, and if the increase in demand is a temporary blip, that wouldn't pay off, as the increased demand might be gone by the time you increase production. So now you are selling the same or reduced units after spending a bunch of money to be able to manufacturer more units that you can't sell.
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)

Purpleivan

Ars Praetorian
435
Subscriptor++
I'm increasingly considering the second-hand market for the time when my current phone dies.

The hardware has been good enough for a while now. I have not had to worry about battery, storage or RAM on my cheap 3-year-old phone.

OS updates are a lot better than they have been: a 2023 Pixel 8 which came out with Android 14 can be updated to Android 16 and should get updates up to Android 21.

I'll let the people who like shiny new things buy new.
I literally did this today. My new Pixel 8, which is as capable a phone as I'n likely to want, arrived from the reseller this morning. A 1 year warranty and software updates for the next 4 years, for a fraction of the price of the latest model.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)
When are phone manufacturers going to bring back the microSD/TransFlash card slot?
About the same time $5,000 new convertables hit the streets and Singer sells more sewing machines than Apple sells iPhones. I am as big a proponent of removable storage as anyone, but it is long past time to face reality. SD card slots are simply NEVER coming back. It has been 6 years since Samsung had a major phone with one and over a decade at this point for some other brands.

It is just way past the point of accepting it.
 
Upvote
19 (23 / -4)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

emag

Ars Praefectus
3,626
Subscriptor
They’re selling the A17 5G at $200. I’m prepared to believe there would be little margin for such device even without the AI bullshit.

If anyone needs to get their folks out of the iPhone ecosystem and they don’t have any phone requirements uncharacteristic of their age group, A17 is an easy recommendation.

I recently set up a Galaxy A16 (which has the same chip set/SoC/RAM as the A17) as a backup/emergency device for my mom. It's noticably slower, both in benchmarks and actual usage, than my FIL's iPhone 8 from 2017.

do they do not understand, if you cannot access AI (due to a lack of RAM), you cannot use it?
Access to cloud service AIs (the potential money maker) is not dependent on the amount of RAM in the client device.
 
Upvote
5 (6 / -1)

jhesse

Ars Scholae Palatinae
747
Subscriptor
But the Samsung Board of Directors
Samsung Group is a chaebol, not a company.
That's 63 individual sub-companies, each with their own board of directors. There may be a lot of directors serving on more than one board, and some pressure to keep projects within the group, but one has little incentive to give another preferential pricing.
 
Upvote
27 (27 / 0)
The CPUs in a single server will consume enough RAM for 4,600 Galaxy S26 Ultra devices (12GB each).
Are the same RAM chips made for phones are also used in servers? I find that hard to believe. Not only would I expect them to have different architectures but also be made on completely different fabs.
 
Upvote
-4 (0 / -4)

Jeff S

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,056
Subscriptor++
Samsung Group is a chaebol, not a company.
That's 63 individual sub-companies, each with their own board of directors. There may be a lot of directors serving on more than one board, and some pressure to keep projects within the group, but one has little incentive to give another preferential pricing.
Oh, interesting. Thanks.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)
Are the same RAM chips made for phones are also used in servers? I find that hard to believe. Not only would I expect them to have different architectures but also be made on completely different fabs.
Might be a slightly different packaging spec, but yes, it is the same fundamental memory technology and fab wafers split between mobile, high end servers, and mid-high end desktop. It's LPDDR5X in one way or another throughout. We'll probably see Apple and Nvidia trying to shift to LPDDR6 relatively shortly with the standard released last year and the form factors for CAMM2 launching recently. Other phone SOCs and processor SOCs are probably in development for 6 as well. Good luck with the memory fab transition, though!
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)

Mrbonk

Ars Scholae Palatinae
937
Subscriptor
I'm increasingly considering the second-hand market for the time when my current phone dies.

The hardware has been good enough for a while now. I have not had to worry about battery, storage or RAM on my cheap 3-year-old phone.

OS updates are a lot better than they have been: a 2023 Pixel 8 which came out with Android 14 can be updated to Android 16 and should get updates up to Android 21.

I'll let the people who like shiny new things buy new.
OS updates aside from the battery nuking haven't hampered my 6A experience. On 16 now. So I second this.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
By curiosity, I was looking at the S26 and S Pen reviews. Due to the minor changes of making the phones slim, the S Pen's are quite brittle and break easily after suffering a minor drop. That extra $60ish after taxes isn't appealing since the change. when the Ultra phone base is nearly $1.3K US.
Limited discounts too.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)
Samsung's revenue is 20% of Korea's GDP. Think about that for a minute. Walmart revenue is 2% of US GDP.

In Korea, Samsung is your landlord, your utilities, your bank, your grocery store, your food, your insurance, your transportation, your entertainment - your entire life.
There are Samsung apartment blocks
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)
About the same time $5,000 new convertables hit the streets and Singer sells more sewing machines than Apple sells iPhones. I am as big a proponent of removable storage as anyone, but it is long past time to face reality. SD card slots are simply NEVER coming back. It has been 6 years since Samsung had a major phone with one and over a decade at this point for some other brands.

It is just way past the point of accepting it.
What? My S25 from less than two years ago has one. Admittedly, it is shared with the SIM 2 slot (one tray for SIM 1 and SIM 2 / SD card), but it is present and currently in use. Where did you get the 6‑year number from?

Edit: Maybe I'm confused. I'll check it later.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
-1 (3 / -4)
What? My S25 from less than two years ago has one. Admittedly, it is shared with the SIM 2 slot (one tray for SIM 1 and SIM 2 / SD card), but it is present and currently in use. Where did you get the 6‑year number from?

Edit: Maybe I'm confused. I'll check it later.
S10 series was the last microSD-supporting flagship. Maybe some versions of later Galaxy S series flagship phones support dual SIM trays, but I'm pretty sure there hasn't been a microSD option since. Yes, I paid them more to upgrade because I couldn't keep my portable, local media collection on the same card.
 
Upvote
1 (4 / -3)

PhaseShifter

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,034
Subscriptor++
S10 series was the last microSD-supporting flagship. Maybe some versions of later Galaxy S series flagship phones support dual SIM trays, but I'm pretty sure there hasn't been a microSD option since. Yes, I paid them more to upgrade because I couldn't keep my portable, local media collection on the same card.
When I bought my S25 ultra last fall, SD cards weren't supported, so I paid extra for the 1TB model.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)