The Galaxy Note II smartphone measures 3.17" x 0.37" x 59.5" and weighs 0.40 lb.
Misplaced decimal, perhaps?gr3yh47":211wgt6r said:The Galaxy Note II smartphone measures 3.17" x 0.37" x 59.5" and weighs 0.40 lb.
that's a really really really long phone
_____________________________________________
[_____________________________________________]
gr3yh47":2cgqs6uc said:The Galaxy Note II smartphone measures 3.17" x 0.37" x 59.5" and weighs 0.40 lb.
that's a really really really long phone
_____________________________________________
[_____________________________________________]
NulloModo":ge0wq4as said:Overall this is a 'meh' for a phone that I was previously really excited about.
On the minus side:
- still a lentil display
Akemi":33u5gqbw said:gr3yh47":33u5gqbw said:The Galaxy Note II smartphone measures 3.17" x 0.37" x 59.5" and weighs 0.40 lb.
that's a really really really long phone
_____________________________________________
[_____________________________________________]
LOL
That's a HDTV, not a phone.
gr3yh47":2wk6ji6v said:Akemi":2wk6ji6v said:gr3yh47":2wk6ji6v said:The Galaxy Note II smartphone measures 3.17" x 0.37" x 59.5" and weighs 0.40 lb.
that's a really really really long phone
_____________________________________________
[_____________________________________________]
LOL
That's a HDTV, not a phone.
epic 19:1 aspect ratio![]()
Brandon B":2tmky7tx said:Again Samsung going for lower spec displays? Again I don't get it, that area is totally one of their strong suits.
Maybe trying for extraordinary battery life?
tuxRoller":284jbets said:This kind of thing is the most damning evidence against Samsung aping apple.
Unfortunately unlike the sgs3 relative to its predecessor, and this is arguably a downgrade from the original note.
It really really didn't take long for Samsung's success to make them lazy, and that lack of a tendency to laziness is Apple's real strength.
BTW, I'm not an apple fan, but just a disappointed consumer.
'Evidence against aping' means that this is proof they didn't copy. I think you both agree on that.UltimateLemon":17qorcd8 said:How did you arrive at that conclusion? It has entirely different dimension and use case than iPhone.tuxRoller":17qorcd8 said:This kind of thing is the most damning evidence against Samsung aping apple.
oblib__":2tuhos6x said:'Evidence against aping' means that this is proof they didn't copy. I think you both agree on that.UltimateLemon":2tuhos6x said:How did you arrive at that conclusion? It has entirely different dimension and use case than iPhone.tuxRoller":2tuhos6x said:This kind of thing is the most damning evidence against Samsung aping apple.
iamaelephant":3kiq8sol said:According to Ars there are two countries in the world: US and International.
UltimateLemon":3putsxb3 said:tuxRoller":3putsxb3 said:This kind of thing is the most damning evidence against Samsung aping apple.
Unfortunately unlike the sgs3 relative to its predecessor, and this is arguably a downgrade from the original note.
It really really didn't take long for Samsung's success to make them lazy, and that lack of a tendency to laziness is Apple's real strength.
BTW, I'm not an apple fan, but just a disappointed consumer.
How did you arrive at that conclusion? It has entirely different dimension and use case than iPhone.
oblib__":2ka3re8e said:'Evidence against aping' means that this is proof they didn't copy. I think you both agree on that.UltimateLemon":2ka3re8e said:How did you arrive at that conclusion? It has entirely different dimension and use case than iPhone.tuxRoller":2ka3re8e said:This kind of thing is the most damning evidence against Samsung aping apple.
It's a pretty standard acronym in the phone world (about as common as CPU for processor). Next time it'll be faster to highlight SoC, do 'google search' on it, and the answer is in the third result: System on a Chip. Since the term is probably no more helpful than the acronym, you could then click on the wiki article and read all about it.Postulator":3vywp84l said:SoC? Please explain your acronyms, Ars - even regular readers don't know all of the ones you seem to toss out.
sn0v":zgj6qo6i said:Correct me if I'm wrong here, but most phones seem to be switching to a 16:9 aspect ratio. First the Note II, then the rumored display of the iPhone 5.
Any specific reason behind this sudden change?
oblib__":3cgsep6p said:It's a pretty standard acronym in the phone world (about as common as CPU for processor). Next time it'll be faster to highlight SoC, do 'google search' on it, and the answer is in the third result: System on a Chip. Since the term is probably no more helpful than the acronym, you could then click on the wiki article and read all about it.Postulator":3cgsep6p said:SoC? Please explain your acronyms, Ars - even regular readers don't know all of the ones you seem to toss out.