SpaceX has started commissioning a second launch pad at the company's Starbase facility in Texas.
See full article...
See full article...
SpaceX said:Deployment of 29 @Starlink satellites confirmed
Tweet was written during the launch from California last night/this morning.Jonathan McDowell said:Falcon 9 now in parking orbit. There are now 10020 Starlinks in orbit (although 25 of them are still attached to the Falcon 9 for another 50 min or so, until the stage's circularization burn and satellite deployment).
Anatoly Zak said:Soyuz-5 rocket to fly its inaugural test mission on March 27, according to local authorities in the Yugra Region, warning population on fragments' impact; no confirmation from Roskosmos yet: https://www.russianspaceweb.com/2026.html#soyuz5
First indications of a solid date for the first Soyuz-5 flight:
Maybe Ars could do an article highlighting what distinguishes the various Russian launch vehicles from each other - or point readers to a source of such if someone's already done it?Hah. I thought they had given up on Soyuz-5. Those Russians do like the name Soyuz so maybe that kept it alive.
I still say Russia has too many launch vehicles. It would be like Italy fielding not one but six launch vehicles (Soyuz 2.1a, Soyuz 2.1b, Proton-M, Angara-1.2, Angara-A5, and Soyuz-5).
Proton is being phased out, so can be ignored for the future. It looks like all the variants they have span different capabilities. If we look at payload to LEO:Hah. I thought they had given up on Soyuz-5. Those Russians do like the name Soyuz so maybe that kept it alive.
I still say Russia has too many launch vehicles. It would be like Italy fielding not one but six launch vehicles (Soyuz 2.1a, Soyuz 2.1b, Proton-M, Angara-1.2, Angara-A5, and Soyuz-5).
https://satnews.com/2026/03/16/l3ha...-and-satellite-direct-to-device-connectivity/
L3Harris Unveils XL-300P: The First P25 Handheld with 5G and Satellite Direct-to-Device Connectivity
The new device is the industry’s first land mobile radio (LMR) to integrate a native 5G modem and 3GPP-standard Non-Terrestrial Network (NTN) capabilities, providing first responders with a triple-layered redundancy of P25, cellular broadband, and satellite connectivity in a single handheld form factor.
Just want to point out it's the first device of it's class with 5G and direct to cell, not the first with direct to cell.
And it's not new either. It's been available through channel partners.
I've also seen vehicle tracking applications. But only in NZ and USA.
Airtel Kenya and MTN Zambia are also about to release something similar to T-Mobile. They are done testing the Carrier app.
Soyuz-2 - the same good old ICBM that kicked off the space race in the 1950s, still going. Center kerolox sustainer and four strap-on kerolox LRBs with an upper stage. After the fall of the Soviet Union, Soyuz-FG got new engines with slightly improved chamber pressure and all domestic components. Soyuz-2.1a got upgraded structures and digital flight computers. Soyuz-2.1b replaced the second stage GG engine with a new ORSC engine (RD-0124).Maybe Ars could do an article highlighting what distinguishes the various Russian launch vehicles from each other - or point readers to a source of such if someone's already done it?
Rumor has it it's $7k don't know about other costs.Useful gear for first responders. However it is made by L3 which comes with a defacto "if you have to ask how much it costs you can't afford it" disclaimer.
Isar Aerospace said:Now targeting NET 23 March for launch of Mission ‘Onward and Upward’ due to unfavorable weather conditions in the launch area. Launch date remains subject to weather, safety and range infrastructure.
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-419255A1.pdfView attachment 130828
From the FCC.
Thank you! That is pretty much exactly what I was looking for. A very good, concise summary!Soyuz-2 - the same good old ICBM that kicked off the space race in the 1950s, still going. Center kerolox sustainer and four strap-on kerolox LRBs with an upper stage. After the fall of the Soviet Union, Soyuz-FG got new engines with slightly improved chamber pressure and all domestic components. Soyuz-2.1a got upgraded structures and digital flight computers. Soyuz-2.1b replaced the second stage GG engine with a new ORSC engine (RD-0124).
Soyuz-2.1v - Nothing to do with the above rocket. Single stick kerolox using the same surplus N-1 engines that doomed Antares 100. It has the same second stage engine (RD-0124) as Soyuz-2.1b, but the stage itself is different.
Proton - UR (Universal Rocket) 500, part of a planned "family" of various size rockets with no commonality. Build as an ICBM but was never actually an ICBM. Russia's Saturn-1. This appears to have a set of LRBs, but those "boosters" are six fuel (UDMH) tanks surrounding a common oxidizer (NTO) tank, and do not detach.
Angara - URM (Universal Rocket Module, no relation to Proton) is a common booster like Delta IV Heavy or Falcon Heavy, with 0, 2, 4, or 6 boosters attached. Boosters are kerolox using the same engine as Antares 200. Only 0 and 4 booster versions are likely to ever fly. Both versions use the same ORSC engine as Soyuz-2.1b (RD-0124), but with different upper stages. 4-booster version can optionally be operated without an upper stage.
Irtysh - a.k.a. Soyuz-5 (because all must be Soyuz) is the stretched, Russified Zenit. It's the four-chamber RD-170 from Energia/Zenit, redesigned to use all Russian parts, required after they bombed the previous manufacturing plant in Dnipro, Ukraine. Single-stick kerolox ORSC first stage, with yet another unique second stage based off the same Soyuz upper stage engine. This has been sitting on the pad since late last year.
Rokot - UR-100 (to Proton's 500). No commonality besides UDMH/NTO propellants. This one actually did serve as an ICBM. 1.5yrs overdue for return to flight.
Amur - a.k.a Soyuz-7 (why not...) reusable, methalox, vaporware
Rus-M - basically the Russian Atlas V, but with options for two or for common core boosters. It wasn't named Soyuz, so it had to be canceled.
Yenisei - RD-180 sustainer and six RD-170 boosters, staged four, then two, then center. Hydrolox upper. This will take the new spacecraft and the new lunar lander to the new lunar base. Except it won't, because it's not Soyuz.
SpaceX said:Initial Super Heavy V3 and Starbase Pad 2 activation campaign complete, wrapping up several days of testing that loaded cryogenic fuel and oxidizer on a V3 vehicle for the first time. While the 10-engine static fire ended early due to a ground-side issue, we saw successful startup on all installed Raptor 3 engines. Next up: preparing the booster for a 33-engine static fire
The booster being flown is B1077 which last flew on February 20th.SpaceX’s Falcon 9 is targeting the launch of 29 Starlink satellites to low-Earth orbit from Space Launch Complex 40 (SLC-40) at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida.
A live webcast of this mission will begin about five minutes prior to liftoff, which you can watch here and on X @SpaceX. You can also watch the webcast on the X TV app.
This will be the 27th flight for the first stage booster supporting this mission, which previously launched Crew-5, GPS III Space Vehicle 06, Inmarsat I6-F2, CRS-28, Intelsat G-37, NG-20, TD7, and 19 Starlink missions. Following stage separation, the first stage will land on the Just Read the Instructions droneship, which will be stationed in the Atlantic Ocean.
SLS NASA is now targeting Thur Mar 19 for the rollout of its SLS rocket from the Vehicle Assembly Building to the pad at LC 39B. First motion is scheduled for 8 pm. Let's try this again.
I expect it will take them a week to install the 23 other engines. I don’t know how we can wait so long! /sSpaceX update on recent Boca Chica testing.
During V1/V2 they could install all engines practically overnight, definitely within 24 hours.I expect it will take them a week to install the 23 other engines. I don’t know how we can wait so long! /s
During V1/V2, they could install engines in a couple hours. They had a flat pad and would just drive under the rocket with lifts. The new pad does not support such operations. I thought they had installed rails for a removable work platform, but it turns out that's just for the test stands. There's no reason the work itself would need to be slower, but they at least need to lift it off the pad.During V1/V2 they could install all engines practically overnight, definitely within 24 hours.
Let's see how quickly they can fit V3 once they get 2-3 launches done.![]()
SpaceX have published https://www.spacex.com/launches/sl-10-33 with details of a Starlink launch from Florida, currently scheduled for about 6:30am local time on the 19th.
The booster being flown is B1077 which last flew on February 20th.
Livestreams:
Spaceflight Now:
NASA Spaceflight:
Space Affairs:
Jeff Foust said:ESA Director General Josef Aschbacher says at a press briefing that controllers have just managed to restore contact with the Proba-3 coronagraph spacecraft, which had been out of contact since last month. Recovery efforts underway.