I can give a shout out to the aqara doorbell, I have it running battery powered, it’s isolated network-wise and can only communicate with my appletvs (home hubs) to use through homekitI've replaced some of my Ring cameras with Unifi, but the lack of battery powered options is limiting. I live in a condo and can't make any holes through the exterior walls for cabling. So for now, I still have some ring battery powered cameras and a doorbell.
Seconded. I've been running Unifi cameras for about a year and they've been great. It was a PITA to run the cable for them, but totally worth it.I like my Unifi stuff, FWIW. Supposedly now that you can use ONVIF cameras there are maybe better options for PQ for the price while still having the convenience of Unifi integration once set up.
sure would be nice to hit them right in the customers wallet...would be nice to see a bunch of Ring doorbells getting sledgehammered and the videos posted to social...![]()
Reminder that not everything you read some random person on the internet saying is actually fact, and you should check with verifiable sources, no matter how many people are upvoting.Reminder that Ring was primarily created by Amazon to indemnify themselves against so-called "porch-pirates"/package thieves. Instead of a failed delivery in which they would have liability, they conned end users into paying money so Amazon can then show evidence, "no, see we delivered it, it's not our fault, it's the user/police's fault".
The company was founded in autumn 2013 by Jamie Siminoff as the crowdfunded startup Doorbot; it was renamed Ring in autumn 2014, after which it began to receive equity investments. It was acquired by Amazon in 2018 for approximately $1 billion.
In October 2017, Amazon.com added an option for Prime members to get in-home deliveries by its Amazon Flex contractors, who gain entry using a one-time code.[95] The service, Amazon Key, became available for customers residing in 37 United States metro areas in April 2018.[96][97] As of 2018, the service required a Kwikset or Yale smart lock and a special version of Amazon's Cloud Cam security camera.[98]
Customers are given a time window of four hours for the package to be delivered. Once the courier opens the door, the Cloud Cam records a clip until the door is locked, which is sent to the customer's smartphone.[99] Participants in the service can also use the Amazon Key companion app for iOS and Android to lock and unlock the door, monitor the camera, and issue virtual keys.[100]
Person I know is on the board for her community HOA and thought about getting Flock cameras until they had a lawyer look at the T&Cs. Lawyer, apparently, advised them to run screaming.
Decently powerful UV laser pointed at the sensor is easier and leaves no image of you on the camera.would be nice to see a bunch of Ring doorbells getting sledgehammered and the videos posted to social...![]()
I've been pretty happy with reolink cameras/video doorbell. If you like they can be set up without internet, and run locally with their app, or via the camera's web server - I use it with a home assistant integration which is supported fully by reolink, and is all local, and I don't use the reolink app. I might eventually do an frigate based NVR someday when I trim my project list down a bit.Well… there goes my Ring setup. Time to look at CCTV solutions that are local.
The current system actually prevents police access. The only thing they can do is "blanket request" an area and it shows up in a notification in your ring community dashboard. The system doesn't iterate the cameras or addresses - just a geofenced block of an area.Can Ring users encrypt their video like Google nest users? My understanding is that encrypting the Nest video will prevent police access...
Nope. I'm the same and I live in one of those cities the right like to claim has super-dangerous no-go zones (London, original flavour not Canadian).I haven't any surveillance and answer the door in person.
...Am I doing this wrong?
Have you considered that maybe some people have different conditions and experiences than you, and that maybe your point of view isn’t comprehensive on the matter? For example, how many abusive exes have made you worried about your safety? What if your community is more distributed than the condo door six feet away? And for some people the cameras are to monitor the police, not enable themNope. I'm the same and I live in one of those cities the right like to claim has super-dangerous no-go zones (London, original flavour not Canadian).
Everybody living in their fortified castles and video surveiling each other 24/7 sounds like a nightmare. You gain more safety by talking to your neighbours and at least attempting to be part of a community than with any number of CCTV cameras.
No amount magic doorbells is actually going to make the cops actually do anything about burglary.
Here in Europe, our society isn't based on fear and hate of the other and violence. Very few people own gun to "defend their homes" and while not everything is a rosy paradise, a strong social contract and police-based protection is always better than gated communities and houses with cameras and electric fences.Have you considered that maybe some people have different conditions and experiences than you, and that maybe your point of view isn’t comprehensive on the matter? For example, how many abusive exes have made you worried about your safety? What if your community is more distributed than the condo door six feet away? And for some people the cameras are to monitor the police, not enable them
True. Cops won't do anything with your video if you can't tell them who's in it and where they live. But you'll need that footage if you want homeowners insurance to pay out.No amount magic doorbells is actually going to make the cops actually do anything about burglary.
Ring initiated conversations about a deal with Flock
Amazon will allow approximately 5,000 local law enforcement agencies to request access to Ring camera footage via surveillance platforms from Flock Safety
[A] analyst for the ACLU Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, wrote that “Flock is building a dangerous, nationwide mass-surveillance infrastructure.” [and] pointed to - ICE using Flock’s network of cameras, - Flock’s efforts to build a people lookup tool with data brokers.
Here in Europe, our society isn't based on fear and hate of the other and violence. Very few people own gun to "defend their homes" and while not everything is a rosy paradise, a strong social contract and police-based protection is always better than gated communities and houses with cameras and electric fences.
Assuming...If you have Ring cameras, you can gain more control over your video footage by enabling end-to-end encryption which, in theory, should prevent Ring from being able to see any of your video or sharing it with a third party. Assuming that Ring is telling the truth about the encryption, and since enabling e2e disables pretty much all of their server-side processing, it seems that they really can't see your encrypted video.
https://ring.com/support/articles/7e3lk/using-video-end-to-end-encryption-e2ee?redirect=true
They are also associated with Amazon. Wouldn't put it too far that something similar is going on there too.I've never heard about any of this shit from Blink.
I’m in the “warrant or GTFO” camp.The current system actually prevents police access. The only thing they can do is "blanket request" an area and it shows up in a notification in your ring community dashboard. The system doesn't iterate the cameras or addresses - just a geofenced block of an area.
They are simply building out Nazi infrastructure. All the wire cage camps they are building out in the desert for migrants will soon have permanent resident dissidents.TL;DR quotes: this is terrifying.
Amazon once again shows it really doesn’t care about customers but will partner with those that suck up to the A-holes at ICE.
I fully expect ICE to dive into this whole hog as they try to find anyone Trump disapproves of.
You think it's hypocritical for Democrats to exhale carbon dioxide, but thanks for sharing.Seems hypocritical to me that Democratic lawmakers are rallying against this while allowing Flock to install license plate cameras in their towns.
The problem used to be enshittification. Now it is nazification.They are simply building out Nazi infrastructure. All the wire cage camps they are building out in the desert for migrants will soon have permanent resident dissidents.
The problem doesn't lie in those instances when the camera can help justice, but rather when it exacerbates injustice.If my Ring camera can help identify a criminal or person responsible for an accident in front of my home then I invite them to use my footage.
I'm surprised Flock even asked. Their usual MO is to just put their cameras wherever they want (you've almost surely seen them - they're everywhere -beside roads and just assumed they were something official/supposed to be there), wait until there are complaints and then act shocked and hurt that someone would accuse them of such a thing.
Do you have any links to some expert discussion of the flock stuff? the way they present it in this article seems pretty reasonable, but the fine print matters.Person I know is on the board for her community HOA and thought about getting Flock cameras until they had a lawyer look at the T&Cs. Lawyer, apparently, advised them to run screaming.