Research roundup: 6 cool science stories we almost missed

w8bencert

Smack-Fu Master, in training
89
Subscriptor
So the fastest were 1588 mph and the slowest we’re 5.5 mph. That is a pretty incredible range…
To quote the paper:

"The peak velocity of many viperid species was higher than those observed in the elapid and colubrid species included in this study (Fig. 7A). Bothrops asper reached the highest peak velocity in viperids (3.53±0.98 m s−1) and Acanthophis rugosus in elapids (2.21±0.21 m s−1), while the slowest members of each family were Echis ocellatus and Aspidelaps lubricus (0.93±0.20 m s−1 and 0.32±0.05 m s−1, respectively)."

So, 3.52 + 0.98 m/s = 4.5 m/s as the high value. This is 16 km/h which is about 10 miles per hour. The article really has the units messed up. The paper is really clear about what is what.

There is a table in the paper showing time to peak velocity which is between 20 to 200ms depending on species:

"In most Viperidae, the prey was reached within the first 100 ms, with a maximum of 208.3±80.1 ms (mean±s.e.m.; Crotalus scutulatus) and a minimum of 21.7±2.9 ms (Macrovipera lebetina) (Table 1)."

Not sure if I mix up species but this would mean to accelerate to 100 km/h (60 mp/h) would take less than a quarter of a second for the Macrovipera lebetina (6 * 20 = 120). Beating all cars on the list of fastest accelerating cars on wikipedia by a comfortable margin :).
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)

Thinker_in_TX

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
495
Subscriptor
Weirdly, I didn't know this was difficult that. I pull them from the package, hold them with my palms up, pinkies together touching, give them a bit of a twist (not a lot), then bend quickly and sharply to bring my thumbs together. I also can do it the other way, with thumbs touching, palms down and breaking downward in the middle so my knuckles touch. The idea is to get the breaking force focused on one small area.

I get clean breaks almost every time.

Yes, this was a refined technique, but I learned it very early in life - my teens, IIRC. I'd have thought someone would have mentioned how to do that generally. If you do it slow, you get shards. If you hold them at the ends, you get shards. If you don't twist a bit to lock them together or compress them more, you can get shards, too.

The twisting compresses them against their neighbors a bit, keeping them from moving on their own, and giving them less chance to shatter. Keeping your hands as near to each other as you can limits the location where it can bend. It puts the bending force all on one small area. And the quick sharp bend puts creates a fast breaking force for all of them through that small area, enough to break them all at once, preventing the weaker ones from shattering first. It's like it sends that snap propagating through the neighbors along one "fault line". You might get a few bits, but mostly you get full halves.

Upward or downward for the palms, as long as the break is downward toward the water it's all good. The other direction upward in the middle can make the bits occasionally be a little like shrapnel, while they go into the water downward.

And all that's probably a little TMI, but it works.
Nice to know now. But I suspect Italian grandmas have known this for years. (I'm not Italian)
 
Upvote
-2 (0 / -2)

Thinker_in_TX

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
495
Subscriptor
For me, it's because I want to be able to get them in my mouth. I never mastered the "wind it around a fork" technique, so having shorter strands makes it a lot easier to deal with on the plate.
I'm with you. I must be a Barbarian as I chop up the cooked spaghetti into 1-1/2 lengths on my plate.
 
Upvote
1 (3 / -2)

jvanaken

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
160
Subscriptor
Another semi related question. Why does Cincinnati chili use spaghetti broken into pieces that are so short they can only be scooped up by a fork? The official reason I have seen is the customers preferred it that way. Which leads to the question why is it that so many people in Cincinnati have problems with spooling spaghetti on a fork? One time I had a spaghetti dinner with some Vietnamese immigrants who were not comfortable with using forks, but had no problems with spooling the spaghetti on their chopsticks. Yet, a sufficiently large portion of the Cincinnati population had issues with this, so that now all Cincinnati style chili is served on a bed of broken up spaghetti.
No idea if this is the actual reason, but my bet is that "most people" probably want both the pasta and chili together in one bite. Combine that with the fact that chili is much easier to eat with a spoon, and you get small spaghetti pieces...
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)

MaxArt

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,181
With the rise in the number of people with a gluten intolerance
Is that right, or is it rather the rise in the number of people knowing they have gluten intolerance?

Because now we have the Charlatan who doesn't know the difference and goes about saying that there's an "epidemic of autism".
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)

ZenBeam

Ars Praefectus
3,292
Subscriptor
Is that right, or is it rather the rise in the number of people knowing they have gluten intolerance?

Because now we have the Charlatan who doesn't know the difference and goes about saying that there's an "epidemic of autism".
...or thinking they do.
My wife has a theory that most of them who don't have Coeliac disease aren't intolerant of gluten, but of the other chemicals that are in commercial bread products now.
 
Upvote
12 (12 / 0)

graylshaped

Ars Legatus Legionis
67,689
Subscriptor++
No idea if this is the actual reason, but my bet is that "most people" probably want both the pasta and chili together in one bite. Combine that with the fact that chili is much easier to eat with a spoon, and you get small spaghetti pieces...
Start with Cincinnati is a melting pot of a city, and this dish came about at a time when its immigrant residents were acclimating to being "Americans."Chili" is essentially a stew; Cincinnati chili is, at its core, a greek-influenced bolognese, spaghetti is the pasta of choice because it was the most readily available (aka only local option) when this dish was popularized, and it is cut for the same reason Chicagoans don't put catsup on hot dogs: that's not how the custom arose locally. It's only called "chili" because at the time, they wanted something that sounded more American than the Macedonian inspiration.

For that matter, spaghetti is considered a dubious choice for bolognese by Italians, too, because that shape doesn't hold the meaty sauce well; nor would Italians simply pour a sauce on top of a pile of noodles.

Sources: Family in Cincinnati, and a more journalistic take.
 
Upvote
10 (11 / -1)

yzars

Seniorius Lurkius
3
Subscriptor
So all the vipers landed bites within 0.1 frame of the high-speed camera film (1000 fps, or 1 ms between start of each frame)?

Sounds unreasonable to me, I guess there is a mixup of milliseconds and microseconds...
The article currently (Sunday morning) has a mix of units:

with the blunt-nosed viper accelerating up to 710 m/s2, landing a bite within 22 microseconds. All the vipers landed bites within 100 milliseconds of striking.

The math for a 710m/s^2 acceleration from 0 for a distance of about 10cm produces milliseconds.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

Fred Duck

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,166
I was holding off on commenting but Mr. Guy's comment prompted me.

The official reason I have seen is the customers preferred it that way.
I am suspicious of this answer. I have far-too-often seen shredded lettuce on hamburgers.* When asked, I'm always told "the customers preferred it that way." Leaf lettuce is far better because it doesn't immediately all drop onto the plate. So take that not as an "official answer" but with a grain of salt.**

Anyway, spaghetti is not very exciting. Everyone should eat bucatini. However, please do not overcook it as the last two restaurants I visited did...it should NOT FEEL LIKE SPAGHETTI.

*Sometimes under. WHY would someone put "toppings" beneath the patty?
** Or 7g/L
 
Upvote
-1 (2 / -3)

Stuart Frasier

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,472
Subscriptor
If you get a chance to see Karnak, do your best to allow (i)at least(/i) 2 full days to explore. The site is HUGE. I was there in late Sept -early Oct 2001, and despite an understandable dearth of crowds, the 4 hour tour scheduled by my vacation company was not nearly enough time to do more than dash through and quickly see the most important highlights.
The whole area around Luxor is full of amazing sites. My favorite was the Temple of Hatshepsut, which is in extraordinary condition. We spent three days in Luxor and there was plenty more to see. My friends and I are planning to go to Luxor for the 2027 eclipse. It will be brutally hot in August, but a once-in-a-lifetime event.
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)

SixDegrees

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,302
Subscriptor
The whole area around Luxor is full of amazing sites. My favorite was the Temple of Hatshepsut, which is in extraordinary condition. We spent three days in Luxor and there was plenty more to see. My friends and I are planning to go to Luxor for the 2027 eclipse. It will be brutally hot in August, but a once-in-a-lifetime event.
It's an excellent, long eclipse, over six minutes of totality near Luxor, with pretty much a 100% chance of clear skies. Unfortunately right around noon local time, so extremely hot. Pick out some nearby shade, save your stamina for totality itself - when you'll be under a VERY large shadow.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)
Leaf lettuce is far better because it doesn't immediately all drop onto the plate. So take that not as an "official answer" but with a grain of salt.**
shredded lettuce provides a much more texturally consistent bite though. It's much nicer. Also idk I haven't found dropping all over the plate to be that much of a problem.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

Chuckstar

Ars Legatus Legionis
37,249
Subscriptor
My wife has a theory that most of them who don't have Coeliac disease aren't intolerant of gluten, but of the other chemicals that are in commercial bread products now.
My nephew had stomach trouble with bread and my sister thought he might be celiac. Then the pediatrician said to try fresh bakery bread with no additives. Nephew was fine with the fresh bread.

I’m fond of pointing out that soy lecithin and guargum are not traditional bread ingredients.

I also wonder if some people on low gluten diets might feel better just because it tends to overlap heavily with a low proportion of highly processed carbs. Simple carbs such as sugars and starches tend to cause high blood sugar fluctuations (both spikes and dives) as well as heartburn and other types of GI irritation.
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)
An old software project, REVERSE BOGGLE ENCODER, is still available for free (with source code if you want) at professorguy.com/software. You can try to stuff a list of words into a gird of letters. It uses a simple genetic algorithm (almost ridiculously so) and lots and lots of iterations to try to come up with a solution from a set of random grids. Once you read the description of how it works, the fact that it does work is, to me, mind-blowing.



Also, in the final sentence of the snake story, you meant 'ensuring' not 'ensuing.'
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)
My wife has a theory that most of them who don't have Coeliac disease aren't intolerant of gluten, but of the other chemicals that are in commercial bread products now.
See FODMAP. I know of someone with IBS that ended up being able to eat sourdough bread, where they were previously 'gluten free'. The slow fermentation removes the problematic sugars.
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)

Doink

Smack-Fu Master, in training
87
Weirdly, I didn't know this was difficult that. I pull them from the package, hold them with my palms up, pinkies together touching, give them a bit of a twist (not a lot), then bend quickly and sharply to bring my thumbs together. I also can do it the other way, with thumbs touching, palms down and breaking downward in the middle so my knuckles touch. The idea is to get the breaking force focused on one small area.

I get clean breaks almost every time.

Yes, this was a refined technique, but I learned it very early in life - my teens, IIRC. I'd have thought someone would have mentioned how to do that generally. If you do it slow, you get shards. If you hold them at the ends, you get shards. If you don't twist a bit to lock them together or compress them more, you can get shards, too.

The twisting compresses them against their neighbors a bit, keeping them from moving on their own, and giving them less chance to shatter. Keeping your hands as near to each other as you can limits the location where it can bend. It puts the bending force all on one small area. And the quick sharp bend puts creates a fast breaking force for all of them through that small area, enough to break them all at once, preventing the weaker ones from shattering first. It's like it sends that snap propagating through the neighbors along one "fault line". You might get a few bits, but mostly you get full halves.

Upward or downward for the palms, as long as the break is downward toward the water it's all good. The other direction upward in the middle can make the bits occasionally be a little like shrapnel, while they go into the water downward.

And all that's probably a little TMI, but it works.
Actually, if I remember correctly, torsion while bending was the recommendation from that research, but I don't remember if that analysis was for a whole bundle or just one strand. Seems like you've experimentally worked out a bunch of other variables in the bundle branch of that research field!
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

Doink

Smack-Fu Master, in training
87
7 g/L of salt seems too little for pasta. That's like 0,7% concentration, less than a standard saline solution. The recommendation I follow is to make it taste it like seawater, which Google says is around 3,5% concentration.
As Samin Nosrat footstomped in her book, don't make it ACTUALLY as salty as the ocean, it's supposed to taste as salty as your MEMORY of the ocean, which is closer to around 1%.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

Errum

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,140
Subscriptor++
I was holding off on commenting but Mr. Guy's comment prompted me.


I am suspicious of this answer. I have far-too-often seen shredded lettuce on hamburgers.* When asked, I'm always told "the customers preferred it that way." Leaf lettuce is far better because it doesn't immediately all drop onto the plate. So take that not as an "official answer" but with a grain of salt.**

Anyway, spaghetti is not very exciting. Everyone should eat bucatini. However, please do not overcook it as the last two restaurants I visited did...it should NOT FEEL LIKE SPAGHETTI.

*Sometimes under. WHY would someone put "toppings" beneath the patty?
** Or 7g/L
Because putting the toppings under the patty provides a barrier that helps to prevent the bottom bun from getting soggy and disintegrating.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)