i always wonder what the endgame for people like this is.
like a) if you're promising an earth shattering, commercializable breakthrough, it will be scrutinized. do you honestly think that your forged data will withstand scrutiny and recreation attempts? if you don't think your forgery will stay up, what on earth is your exit strategy? and b) lordy the grad student co-authors of your paper know that you bought the material, and they know what the data actually is. what on earth did you think was going to happen when you lie so blatantly??
I was at APS when he did his talk. 10,000 condensed-matter physicists, many of whom have
decades of experience in synthesis and superconductivity. Within
days, groups all over the world had done DFT computation on the stuff (said "there might actually be something going on"), synthesized it, tested it, and posted to arXiv.
But when you think about it, LuH wasn't commercializable. It was at 1 GPa (10,000 atm) that he claimed it would superconduct near 300K. Nobel Prize worthy, yes, but not really deployable. It would have been enough to snag some good VC to develop further, which then would have probably gone nowhere.
LK-99 would have been a commercial, and that looked like a Pons-and-Fleischmann sort of thing - two groups scared of getting scooped by the other, so they rushed to publish.