The proposed bill would ban trading, mining, and even holding cryptocurrencies.
Read the whole story
Read the whole story
Okay, I'll bite. Describe for me a specific example of a case where "decentralized finance" would make life concretely better than it is now in some significant way.
Apparently you can't be bothered to actually spend 30 seconds to google this but I'll go ahead and give you some of my time and write you this response. Not sure why, to be honest, because you seem closed-minded about the subject already, but here goes.
DeFi concretely makes life better for some people in small but meaningful ways:
•1 DeFi does not require an intermediary, which mitigates several issues and inefficiencies.
•2 DeFi markets and credit facilities are open 24/7/365; no need to wait for the bank to open.
•3 DeFi is open to anyone, even if they have bad credit. No closed doors because someone stole your identity and ruined your credit, for example. Many more reasons why this is good. Some reasons why this could be bad.
1. Is not the transaction cost an "intermediary" in a structural sense? This bullet point is vague to the point of uselessness; I genuinely don't know what you mean or even what could be meant.
2. Doesn't venmo/cashapp/paypal cover this use case? I used venmo this morning to pay for breakfast. Instantly.
3. I'm having trouble, conceptually, with the idea of giving people loans without doing due diligence -- "can the person I'm loaning money to pay me back" seems like the key factor in deciding whether or not to loan them the money. I mean, overextended credit was the problem in the subprime mortgage crisis, so how is "DeFi" not an over-leveraged unsecured debt market? Is it just because the insecurity is spread across the entire system?
None of this addresses the real problem with cryptocurrency, the baked-in deflationary nature. Deflation discourages economic activity -- strongly -- and is rightly feared by economists.
ETH has been considering proof-of-stake since 2016 and will NEVER switch. Proof-of-stake brings its own set of problems and any attempt to switch will end up as a valueless fork. I'd love to be proved wrong, but all those crypto-enthusiasts bringing up proof-of-stake can't point to a successful coin with it. And by successful, I mean a coin that consistently outranks BTC or ETH in usage growth.
I'm all for it. It's high time for this energy-sucking scam to be legislated away. It has 0 benefit for humanity.
I don't know you but I created an account just to let you know that odds are good that you yourself are an energy-sucking [] that has done nothing to benefit humanity. So who are you to talk about what is or isn't beneficial? When you're gone from this world no-one will have noticed or cared but Bitcoin will still have value.
I never understand why people would make such strong statements. Progress is slow, and things always take longer than we think, be it making a rocket, fundamental research, making a video game, or moving to proof of stake. From what I could tell though, there is already PoS running on Ethereum testnet and it seems that the general consensus is that it would be moved to the new system soon. Just because it's delayed doesn't mean they will never do it. Is there a reason why you think they will never switch? There are obviously all sorts of new problems associated with it and it's more untested, but from what I understand people have been spending a lot of effort on making this work.I'm all for it. It's high time for this energy-sucking scam to be legislated away. It has 0 benefit for humanity.
Not all cryptocurrencies are the same. XRP and XLM combined use as much energy as a small apartment block rather than a small country. Ethereum is looking to move to proof of stake which will massively reduce the energy consumption currently used in mining ETH. And if Bitcoin ever get their lightning network functioning it may go from the energy consumption of Argentina to the Vatican.
ETH has been considering proof-of-stake since 2016 and will NEVER switch. Proof-of-stake brings its own set of problems and any attempt to switch will end up as a valueless fork. I'd love to be proved wrong, but all those crypto-enthusiasts bringing up proof-of-stake can't point to a successful coin with it. And by successful, I mean a coin that consistently outranks BTC or ETH in usage growth. Cryptoworld is plagued by pump and dump schemes so it is really hard to measure adoption. On a gold rush, be the one selling pick-axes. Crypto-exchanges are the smart ones, they make money no matter what speculators do.
I'm all for it. It's high time for this energy-sucking scam to be legislated away. It has 0 benefit for humanity.
This guy is going to be so disappointed when he finds out his wheat, oil, and gold are going to have to cross international borders to be delivered. Also, that real life is not like Settlers of Catan.[...]I can buy 50 tonnes of wheat from Kazakhstan, 1 million barrels of oil from Iran, and 2000 kg of gold from China all on a Sunday afternoon, without needing to involve any banking system, or trying to process any currency conversions, or waiting days for a wire transfer to clear, or wondering if the transaction was received by the counterparty, or any of the other inconveniences sometimes encountered while transferring large sums of money across the globe. [...]
alright here's whats what
1-crypto rewards efficiency, it is run mainly on renewables, it drives renewables development, traditional fiat doesnt care
...
...
meanwhile, when someone tries to block "the internet porn" or whatever everyone rages because it is practically impossible (and stupid), when someone tries to ban bitcoin "they are doing this for mankind".
It is the same kind of impossible thinking. How are they going to "ban bitcoin" in practice?
And this site (and comments most of all) is a little biased against crypto. Not many technical arguments on this forum are dismissed as easily as bitcoin and crypto as a whole, which is odd for Ars. Not denying the power issue, and not advocating for bitcoin replacing fiat, but still...
I never understand why people would make such strong statements. Progress is slow, and things always take longer than we think, be it making a rocket, fundamental research, making a video game, or moving to proof of stake. From what I could tell though, there is already PoS running on Ethereum testnet and it seems that the general consensus is that it would be moved to the new system soon. Just because it's delayed doesn't mean they will never do it. Is there a reason why you think they will never switch? There are obviously all sorts of new problems associated with it and it's more untested, but from what I understand people have been spending a lot of effort on making this work.I'm all for it. It's high time for this energy-sucking scam to be legislated away. It has 0 benefit for humanity.
Not all cryptocurrencies are the same. XRP and XLM combined use as much energy as a small apartment block rather than a small country. Ethereum is looking to move to proof of stake which will massively reduce the energy consumption currently used in mining ETH. And if Bitcoin ever get their lightning network functioning it may go from the energy consumption of Argentina to the Vatican.
ETH has been considering proof-of-stake since 2016 and will NEVER switch. Proof-of-stake brings its own set of problems and any attempt to switch will end up as a valueless fork. I'd love to be proved wrong, but all those crypto-enthusiasts bringing up proof-of-stake can't point to a successful coin with it. And by successful, I mean a coin that consistently outranks BTC or ETH in usage growth. Cryptoworld is plagued by pump and dump schemes so it is really hard to measure adoption. On a gold rush, be the one selling pick-axes. Crypto-exchanges are the smart ones, they make money no matter what speculators do.
For a successful example, the only one I know that's somewhat big is Cardano, which has been rising in value rapidly (but then you could argue it's pump and dump if you want) and is running on a type of PoS system.
I think the big question is after more popular crypto like Ethereum moves to PoS, what Bitcoin will do. It literally invented (well, popularized) Proof-of-Work, and the concept of it is quite baked into the philosophy itself (down to the whitepaper), so I think it could be tricky to switch. Not to mention a lot more money is at stake with Bitcoin since it occupies more than half of the total market cap so people could be skittish.
See also India demonitizing their large denomination banknotes in 2016 -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Indi ... netisation
Europe did the same thing with their largest Euro banknote (far better executed, though).
This is the true action. Literally they are useless other than criminal payment.
Everyone is buying to make Profit and how can that be possible?
Someone has to lose money so that you can profit in this system
I hope every country ban crypto markets payments with their banks
... if I want to see if someone has any interesting opinions or articles on some tech‐related topics, but then I see that they have a wallet address on their page for donations, or have any posts talking up or recommending cryptocurrencies, or work on any cryptocurrency‐related projects, I can easily and immediately discredit all of their opinions and move on. Saves me a lot of time.
A large proportion of non salaried professionals in India already don’t pay the full taxes that would be normally due. I am assuming that this ban I s to plug any additional venues for revenue leakage. Saving citizens from self inflicted damage may be the advertised benefit but not the primary motivation.
Yup. This says 3.8% of Indians paid taxes. That's insane.
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/we ... s?from=mdr
Imagine what they could do with more of their 1.3 billion population paying taxes. Makes a kind of sense as plugging an avoidance loophole.
I'm all for it. It's high time for this energy-sucking scam to be legislated away. It has 0 benefit for humanity.
Hey now, how else am I supposed to pay for small arms? Or my 10 metric ton heroin shipment? Or get paid in my latest black mail scheme?
Perhaps refer to the cocaine-laced fiat in your back pocket?
meanwhile, when someone tries to block "the internet porn" or whatever everyone rages because it is practically impossible (and stupid), when someone tries to ban bitcoin "they are doing this for mankind".
It is the same kind of impossible thinking. How are they going to "ban bitcoin" in practice?
And this site (and comments most of all) is a little biased against crypto. Not many technical arguments on this forum are dismissed as easily as bitcoin and crypto as a whole, which is odd for Ars. Not denying the power issue, and not advocating for bitcoin replacing fiat, but still...
alright here's whats what
1-crypto rewards efficiency, it is run mainly on renewables, it drives renewables development, traditional fiat doesnt care
...
...
No, proof-of-work (which Bitcoin uses) doesn't reward efficiency. The entire premise of it is that you have to waste energy / computation to prove that you have done work. So it's baked into the design to be inefficient. When people come up with new chips that can hash faster, the difficulty adjustment algorithm is going to make sure you end up having to calculate more hashes but keep the mining rate at 10 minutes / block.
The amount of energy cost associated with mining Bitcoin is directly associated with how much profit miners can make, which is related to the market cap. The larger the market cap, the more energy will end up being used, regardless of how efficient chips are. It's just an endless arms race, by design.
If we make energy cheaper/greener? Not going to help. If you make energy 1/10th the price, miners are just going to end up using 10x the power because now they can afford to use up more energy to mine. Due to the competitive market of mining, making things more efficient is actually bad, because it makes you can now waste more calculations (hence energy).
This is the true action. Literally they are useless other than criminal payment.
Everyone is buying to make Profit and how can that be possible?
Someone has to lose money so that you can profit in this system
I hope every country ban crypto markets payments with their banks
You do realize you just described the stock market.
I never understand why people would make such strong statements. Progress is slow, and things always take longer than we think, be it making a rocket, fundamental research, making a video game, or moving to proof of stake. From what I could tell though, there is already PoS running on Ethereum testnet and it seems that the general consensus is that it would be moved to the new system soon. Just because it's delayed doesn't mean they will never do it. Is there a reason why you think they will never switch? There are obviously all sorts of new problems associated with it and it's more untested, but from what I understand people have been spending a lot of effort on making this work.I'm all for it. It's high time for this energy-sucking scam to be legislated away. It has 0 benefit for humanity.
Not all cryptocurrencies are the same. XRP and XLM combined use as much energy as a small apartment block rather than a small country. Ethereum is looking to move to proof of stake which will massively reduce the energy consumption currently used in mining ETH. And if Bitcoin ever get their lightning network functioning it may go from the energy consumption of Argentina to the Vatican.
ETH has been considering proof-of-stake since 2016 and will NEVER switch. Proof-of-stake brings its own set of problems and any attempt to switch will end up as a valueless fork. I'd love to be proved wrong, but all those crypto-enthusiasts bringing up proof-of-stake can't point to a successful coin with it. And by successful, I mean a coin that consistently outranks BTC or ETH in usage growth. Cryptoworld is plagued by pump and dump schemes so it is really hard to measure adoption. On a gold rush, be the one selling pick-axes. Crypto-exchanges are the smart ones, they make money no matter what speculators do.
For a successful example, the only one I know that's somewhat big is Cardano, which has been rising in value rapidly (but then you could argue it's pump and dump if you want) and is running on a type of PoS system.
I think the big question is after more popular crypto like Ethereum moves to PoS, what Bitcoin will do. It literally invented (well, popularized) Proof-of-Work, and the concept of it is quite baked into the philosophy itself (down to the whitepaper), so I think it could be tricky to switch. Not to mention a lot more money is at stake with Bitcoin since it occupies more than half of the total market cap so people could be skittish.
I'm willing to wait. It's just been very long... if it happens, I'd love to see it gain traction. My bet remains that it will result in a fork and PoS will lose in the adoption fight and both will remain available but classic ETH will remain a stronger value proposition. People follow the money, so we will see where the sell-off happens and which one pulls ahead. Unfortunately, even if PoS based ETH wins out, it still needs to slay the bitcoin monster, so quite a few ifs need to chain up for my confidence in crypto to be restored.
I'm all for it. It's high time for this energy-sucking scam to be legislated away. It has 0 benefit for humanity.
Hey now, how else am I supposed to pay for small arms? Or my 10 metric ton heroin shipment? Or get paid in my latest black mail scheme?
Perhaps refer to the cocaine-laced fiat in your back pocket?
I can take this ebil fiat to the store and buy milk and eggs or a tv or a PS5 or any manner of legal things. Bitcoin on the other hand outside of some nominal proof of concept is used for nothing but illegal activities. Its speculative value is derived from its ability to be used for illegal activities. Take away the criminality from bitcoin and it collapses.
People still seem to be confused about the dynamics of Fuck you™ money. Allow me to demonstrate what Bitcoin is all about. I will be quoting snippets of comments from this very thread as examples:
"Report: Indian government is planning outright ban on cryptocurrency"
BTC holder: Fuck you.
Fuck you.
Are we clear now? Or do I need to cite more examples?
People still seem to be confused about the dynamics of Fuck you™ money. Allow me to demonstrate what Bitcoin is all about. I will be quoting snippets of comments from this very thread as examples:
"Report: Indian government is planning outright ban on cryptocurrency"
BTC holder: Fuck you.
Fuck you.
Are we clear now? Or do I need to cite more examples?
You do know that's not at all what "fuck you money" means, right? It doesn't mean you're an abusive asshole, it means you can maintain your current lifestyle forever without needing a job.
Depending on your lifestyle, "fuck you money" starts at ~10 million bucks, because you can live off the interest without ever having to go into your nest egg.
The point I'm making is that supply of energy is not infinite. A hydro plant has fixed power output and preferably we want to spend them on actual beneficial use, be it running a laundry machine or keeping the lights on.alright here's whats what
1-crypto rewards efficiency, it is run mainly on renewables, it drives renewables development, traditional fiat doesnt care
...
...
No, proof-of-work (which Bitcoin uses) doesn't reward efficiency. The entire premise of it is that you have to waste energy / computation to prove that you have done work. So it's baked into the design to be inefficient. When people come up with new chips that can hash faster, the difficulty adjustment algorithm is going to make sure you end up having to calculate more hashes but keep the mining rate at 10 minutes / block.
The amount of energy cost associated with mining Bitcoin is directly associated with how much profit miners can make, which is related to the market cap. The larger the market cap, the more energy will end up being used, regardless of how efficient chips are. It's just an endless arms race, by design.
If we make energy cheaper/greener? Not going to help. If you make energy 1/10th the price, miners are just going to end up using 10x the power because now they can afford to use up more energy to mine. Due to the competitive market of mining, making things more efficient is actually bad, because it makes you can now waste more calculations (hence energy).
My point is, someone mining in Vancouver will out compete someone mining from india because of energy costs, Vancouver is mostly hydro, thats why, miners go to where energy is cheap, renewables are cheaper, mining energy usage will only keep growing, but it will do so demanding cheaper sources, which happens to be a good thing since polluting sources will only get costlier, killing any incentive to mine with it
Miners in china from what ive seen get their farms located as close to the hydro plants as possible, that way they get the cheaper rates and the plant doesn't have to worry about excess production, it would actually be a total waste if they had no miners using up the overflow at this point
Mining through its "waste" of energy will ultimately end up pushing silicon and energy production efficiency, as you said, it is an arms race, pointless as it might seem
BTW, hiding transactions from the government is not a valid answer. This is not a good thing!
BTW, hiding transactions from the government is not a valid answer. This is not a good thing!
See my previous post. The answer to that, is also "Fuck you" I could explain in more detail, but that's the final answer anyway.
I could talk about sovereignty, how it's uncensorable, non fungible, limited supply, etc, etc. But in the end, the answer will always be, because it's "fuck you" money. And we don't need to justify it to anyone.
5 Pages. Plenty of sane, reasonable questions by a few people to the bitcoin holders.
Yet, I don't see a single reply that makes sense, answer the question or dose not resort to immature swearing or the old "you don't know what you are talking about"...
I have tried to talk to so many bitcoin holders (bitcoin talk was like asking a question about Biden on Parler), I have tried to use it (it was litecoin but same thing), I have tried to read about it. I am still, after more years then I care to remember, waiting for the answer to one simple question.
---What does this bring that existing systems don't already do.---
BTW, hiding transactions from the government is not a valid answer. This is not a good thing!
True, but that's not why Modi would do it. He would ban cryptocurrencies because he's not getting his cut.I'm all for it. It's high time for this energy-sucking scam to be legislated away. It has 0 benefit for humanity.
People still seem to be confused about the dynamics of Fuck you™ money. Allow me to demonstrate what Bitcoin is all about. I will be quoting snippets of comments from this very thread as examples:
"Report: Indian government is planning outright ban on cryptocurrency"
BTC holder: Fuck you.
Fuck you.
Are we clear now? Or do I need to cite more examples?
You do know that's not at all what "fuck you money" means, right? It doesn't mean you're an abusive asshole, it means you can maintain your current lifestyle forever without needing a job.
Depending on your lifestyle, "fuck you money" starts at ~10 million bucks, because you can live off the interest without ever having to go into your nest egg.
I'm sorry, how am I an abusive asshole by holding Bitcoin, and telling everyone to fuck off when they say they want to ban it, censor it, regulate it, kill it, etc?
It's fuck you money because you can't do any of these things, no matter how hard you try.
Do you own property? The government can take it from you, or they can tax you to death for owning it.
Do you have bank accounts? The government can freeze your money first, ask questions later.
Do you own socks? Same shit.
I'm pretty sure Bitcoin is the ultimate form of fuck you money.
5 Pages. Plenty of sane, reasonable questions by a few people to the bitcoin holders.
Yet, I don't see a single reply that makes sense, answer the question or dose not resort to immature swearing or the old "you don't know what you are talking about"...
I have tried to talk to so many bitcoin holders (bitcoin talk was like asking a question about Biden on Parler), I have tried to use it (it was litecoin but same thing), I have tried to read about it. I am still, after more years then I care to remember, waiting for the answer to one simple question.
---What does this bring that existing systems don't already do.---
BTW, hiding transactions from the government is not a valid answer. This is not a good thing!
Dr. have you heard of Google?
Your years long wait for answers is over!
This is the true action. Literally they are useless other than criminal payment.
Everyone is buying to make Profit and how can that be possible?
Someone has to lose money so that you can profit in this system
I hope every country ban crypto markets payments with their banks
You do realize you just described the stock market.
That's not true of stocks since one of the primary motivators for a LOT of investors is based on paying healthy dividends, not on stock prices only going up. I have a couple of dividend-producing stocks which have behaved themselves value-wise -- the per share price has been fairly stable, and I reinvest all the dividends.
Crypto works more along the lines of the kind of stock trading that day-traders do; when it's a bull market they'll be OK, but in a market decline, they're gonna get screwed. So too with the small-time crypto "investors."
I think that something which hasn't been discussed is portfolio rebalancing, less an issue for Tesla, more an issue for the Big Money Investment Firms that have stated guidance they must follow. When BTC's value increases past a certain point, some of them will be forced to sell.
Since it's impossible to know anyone's price targets, or to determine what's a "realistic" target to begin with, I'd be worried about a flash-crash style event when one of the Big Guys decides to sell a large chunk of coins.
Like I said - " I have tried to read about it."
This is a forum, and is used to have a conversation. Telling me about google is pointless.
5 Pages. Plenty of sane, reasonable questions by a few people to the bitcoin holders.
Yet, I don't see a single reply that makes sense, answer the question or dose not resort to immature swearing or the old "you don't know what you are talking about"...
I have tried to talk to so many bitcoin holders (bitcoin talk was like asking a question about Biden on Parler), I have tried to use it (it was litecoin but same thing), I have tried to read about it. I am still, after more years then I care to remember, waiting for the answer to one simple question.
---What does this bring that existing systems don't already do.---
5 Pages. Plenty of sane, reasonable questions by a few people to the bitcoin holders.
Yet, I don't see a single reply that makes sense, answer the question or dose not resort to immature swearing or the old "you don't know what you are talking about"...
I have tried to talk to so many bitcoin holders (bitcoin talk was like asking a question about Biden on Parler), I have tried to use it (it was litecoin but same thing), I have tried to read about it. I am still, after more years then I care to remember, waiting for the answer to one simple question.
---What does this bring that existing systems don't already do.---
BTW, hiding transactions from the government is not a valid answer. This is not a good thing!
Dr. have you heard of Google?
Your years long wait for answers is over!
Yeah... you know where it points me when i search? At crypto news sites hosted and funded by exchanges. There's no honest news broker. Everyone is interested in making things look GREAT for the newcomers. Gotta get that fresh blood.
Engagement in a discussion is kind of the point of forums, btw. Not "Google it." Everyone already knows to do that.
People still seem to be confused about the dynamics of Fuck you™ money. Allow me to demonstrate what Bitcoin is all about. I will be quoting snippets of comments from this very thread as examples:
"Report: Indian government is planning outright ban on cryptocurrency"
BTC holder: Fuck you.
Fuck you.
Are we clear now? Or do I need to cite more examples?
You do know that's not at all what "fuck you money" means, right? It doesn't mean you're an abusive asshole, it means you can maintain your current lifestyle forever without needing a job.
Depending on your lifestyle, "fuck you money" starts at ~10 million bucks, because you can live off the interest without ever having to go into your nest egg.
I'm sorry, how am I an abusive asshole by holding Bitcoin, and telling everyone to fuck off when they say they want to ban it, censor it, regulate it, kill it, etc?
It's fuck you money because you can't do any of these things, no matter how hard you try.
Do you own property? The government can take it from you, or they can tax you to death for owning it.
Do you have bank accounts? The government can freeze your money first, ask questions later.
Do you own socks? Same shit.
I'm pretty sure Bitcoin is the ultimate form of fuck you money.
Hey, if you want to be an abusive asshole, feel free. You certainly haven't added one goddamn actual positive or reasoning, just blathering on about it.
Well, fuck you, too, dude. You're a blithering idiot if you think that you can escape governmental oversight, or that tax avoidance is some noble thing you're doing. If that's what you're doing -- tax avoidance -- you deserve a special kind of hell for being a freeloader.
So many people have asked so many times what BTC does that Paypal doesn't; none of them have provided an answer besides your "fuck you," which is both abrasive and inaccurate.
You're also a fool if you think bitcoin can't be regulated into obscurity, should that be a choice we make. Just ban exchanges. Send it all to Mt. Gox.
You are the reason cryptocurrency gets a shitty rep.
BTW, hiding transactions from the government is not a valid answer. This is not a good thing!
See my previous post. The answer to that, is also "Fuck you" I could explain in more detail, but that's the final answer anyway.
I could talk about sovereignty, how it's uncensorable, non fungible, limited supply, etc, etc. But in the end, the answer will always be, because it's "fuck you" money. And we don't need to justify it to anyone.