Multispectral imaging, proteomics, historical texts yield new insights into 16th-century medical manuals.
See full article...
See full article...
This was exactly my thought while reading the article. "I wonder how well, if at all, any of these remedies worked?" I assume not at all, or any positive benefit was the result of a placebo effect. I would still be curious to hear if there was any truth, even a grain, that they were on the right track. Or, at least, the remedies had a basis in logic if not effectiveness.It would be interesting to know how many of these home remedies actually achieved anything. I suspect it’s not very high percentage. Because they were just anecdotes. But maybe?
It's surprising that researchers can unmask pseudonymous users with such accuracy.Stefan Hanss said:They were in use for more than a hundred years and we know the [users’] names.
There has always been a large "Action Bias" in home remedies, and medicine in general... If you do something or not, most things will get better. Imagine a complaint, a rash or earache you are uncomfortable so you do something, you make a potion of dandelion root and borage flowers, and it resolved just a few days later...This was exactly my thought while reading the article. "I wonder how well, if at all, any of these remedies worked?" I assume not at all, or any positive benefit was the result of a placebo effect. I would still be curious to hear if there was any truth, even a grain, that they were on the right track. Or, at least, the remedies had a basis in logic if not effectiveness.
RFK has entered the chat.I suspect the efficacy of the vast majority of the formulas was much lower than we would accept as a standard of care now.
i hath conducted mine own researthIt would be interesting to know how many of these home remedies actually achieved anything. I suspect it’s not very high percentage. Because they were just anecdotes. But maybe?
Let's put this in context: literacy rates at that time in Germany were maybe 15%, so the target demographic here wasn't exactly your average hausfrau.Hanss et al. focused on two 1531 German medical manuals ... written in the vernacular and targeted at the common populace.
Have you tried Smeckler's Powder?Ooh, put some Lister's Carbolic Unguent on a wad of cotton. Put the cotton in her ear. That'll stop them shakes.
Works great for all sorts of diseases, like dropsy, the grippe, scrofula, the vapors, jungle rot, dengue fever, poor man's gout, housemaid's knee, the staggers, dum-dum fever...Have you tried Smeckler's Powder?
That's because we have AI now!It's surprising that researchers can unmask pseudonymous users with such accuracy.
The vapors? Did the underwear experiment prove out its efficacy there? Now I'm relieved.Works great for all sorts of diseases, like dropsy, the grippe, scrofula, the vapors, jungle rot, dengue fever, poor man's gout, housemaid's knee, the staggers, dum-dum fever...
Which seems typical of modern homeopathy too.The manuscripts also include recipes for blonde hair dyes. The analysis revealed traces of plants with particularly striking yellow flowers on those pages. “That is a common theme in cosmetic and medical discourse at the time,” said Hanss. “The idea was to look for resemblances between the remedies and what you wish to achieve in terms of the treatment.”
Most of them were likely effective - at least for the day to day things.This was exactly my thought while reading the article. "I wonder how well, if at all, any of these remedies worked?" I assume not at all, or any positive benefit was the result of a placebo effect. I would still be curious to hear if there was any truth, even a grain, that they were on the right track. Or, at least, the remedies had a basis in logic if not effectiveness.
Thats nice and all but I heard you say something about a magic pebble that gives you healthy teeth? Does it cure existing toothaches, or is it strictly preventative? Do you think if you wore it in a pouch hanging from a chain around your neck, it would work better, because it's closer to your teeth? I bet it would...I'll tell you what, if you let me just check the pebble out for like a fortnight, I'll make sure you get the pick of the goats from the first three litters, just to say thanks. If the pebble does work, well I don't have to tell you, but that's worth a bit more than some goats and cows! Haven't you heard about the guy who invented the rock that keeps tigers from attacking you? He made billions of dollars, billions with a B! He didn't get to enjoy any of it, because he was mauled by a mountain lion; but thank God he had his rock! If it had been a tiger that had attacked him, he would surely be dead right now.Most of them were likely effective - at least for the day to day things.
Willow bark tea for headaches, and other kinds of pain. Foxglove for heart ailments. Certain mixtures that created what we call a "healthy biome" for digestive ailments.
And when it comes to "effective", that is a sliding scale for the day and age. If someone believed strongly enough that carrying a pebble in their pockets would help alleviate a toothache, then it probably did to some extent simply from the placebo effect.
The key difference is that back then, what worked, "worked". It didn't have to have a CLINICALLY effective effect. Just a perceptually effective effect.
That's where a lot of assumptions about medical interventions in the past fall apart. Some things that have no modern measurable clinical effect were "effective" to the individual back then.
So it really depends on what your definition of "effective" is. It's typically highly subjective, which accounts for the huge variety of different "cures" for the same general ailment.
13th century Lapidary of king Alfonso X provides good example. The book about magical properties of stones directly influences medieval alchemy as a kind of precursor to modern chemistry. As they had no deep understanding about underlying chemistry, they attributed the power of stones to stars, therefore medieval chemistry and pharmacology is related to astrology. Many of the recipes were discovered by experimenting and prolonged use, then written as verified.It would be interesting to know how many of these home remedies actually achieved anything. I suspect it’s not very high percentage. Because they were just anecdotes. But maybe?
Thats no way to describe the PresidentWeird dupe. Not sure what happened.
All-One! All-One! Dilute! Dilute! OK!Works great for all sorts of diseases, like dropsy, the grippe, scrofula, the vapors, jungle rot, dengue fever, poor man's gout, housemaid's knee, the staggers, dum-dum fever...
That sentence could really use some cleanup and editing, as it's quite confusing and doesn't make any sense.Mass spectrometry-based proteomics is a relative newcomer to the field and is capable of providing a thorough and very detailed characterization of any protein residues present in a given sample, as well as any accumulated damage. The technique is so sensitive that less sample material is needed compared to other methods. And unlike, say, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry,
In the US, perhaps, but there are numerous medical schools in Europe going back to the Middle Ages, if not earlier. (Bologna, Padua, St Barts London, Montpelier, Heidelberg, Coimbra, etc.) They at least claimed to be rooted in what passed for rational thought at that time, even if they were fixated on the infallibility of Galen and Aristotle.The first medical schools didn't appear until the late 1700's
Another thing to add to this is that while people traveled a bit during the Middle Ages and Renaissance, for the most part you were likely to stay pretty close to where you were born. So query how much the local diet (and/or gut biomes) would have influenced things leading to situations where a minor dietary deficiency could be corrected by a local remedy that was seemingly useless in other areas due to a more balanced diet.Most of them were likely effective - at least for the day to day things.
To be fair, being told to drink nothing but hot tea to help with a case of the runs effectively was guidance to boil all your water before drinking it, which probably would help.Most of them were likely effective - at least for the day to day things.
Willow bark tea for headaches, and other kinds of pain. Foxglove for heart ailments. Certain mixtures that created what we call a "healthy biome" for digestive ailments.
And when it comes to "effective", that is a sliding scale for the day and age. If someone believed strongly enough that carrying a pebble in their pockets would help alleviate a toothache, then it probably did to some extent simply from the placebo effect.
The key difference is that back then, what worked, "worked". It didn't have to have a CLINICALLY effective effect. Just a perceptually effective effect.
That's where a lot of assumptions about medical interventions in the past fall apart. Some things that have no modern measurable clinical effect were "effective" to the individual back then.
So it really depends on what your definition of "effective" is. It's typically highly subjective, which accounts for the huge variety of different "cures" for the same general ailment.
Maybe. Though I am not sure I would say "ANY".This was exactly my thought while reading the article. "I wonder how well, if at all, any of these remedies worked?" I assume not at all, or any positive benefit was the result of a placebo effect. I would still be curious to hear if there was any truth, even a grain, that they were on the right track. Or, at least, the remedies had a basis in logic if not effectiveness.
When I had my wisdom teeth removed (I had 6) about a week later, I had the cavities from my lower 4 packed with gauze soaked in cloves to help reduce an infection I was just starting to get. It worked fantastic.13th century Lapidary of king Alfonso X provides good example. The book about magical properties of stones directly influences medieval alchemy as a kind of precursor to modern chemistry. As they had no deep understanding about underlying chemistry, they attributed the power of stones to stars, therefore medieval chemistry and pharmacology is related to astrology. Many of the recipes were discovered by experimenting and prolonged use, then written as verified.
- For example washing hair in mercury bath to kill hair lice. It works by clogging breathing tracheas while not too toxic for people (breathing vapors is different story).
- Another example is usage of vinegar and wine as basis for mouth waters to prevent bad odors and usage of pine/juniper resin to seal liquid transportation vessels (all 4 have strong antibacterial properties). Those resins were traditionally used to prepare plasters for treating open injuries probably since neanderthal times and such plasters can still be bought in Sweden, for example.
- Mouth waters were scented with pepper, mint, cinnamon, cloves. Cloves and mint have strong antibacterial properties too, in addition to pleasant smell.
Similarly medieval cookbooks (Andalusian, Syrian) speak about poisonous chemical interactions of copper dishes with acid meals and recipes for creating perfumes and scented mouth waters. According to Syrian cookbook, 13th century antiperspirants were crafted on basis of alum and Zinc oxides, this continues to present day.
Pharmacists were frequently consulting herbary books and they still remain treasure trove for finding new medicines, as noted above.
Medieval people were aware of the toxicity of some products and pharmacists were responsible for safe dosing during the preparation. They were preparing rat poisons as well as medicines, according to Siete partidas law code of Alfonso X (1265).
So there was lot of trial and error, writing down more useful recipes. Sometimes holding as trade secret, sometimes sharing with broader community.
Wintergreen/teaberry has a chemical precursor of the same chemical, and was also used to treat aches and pains by Native Americans and later European settlers.Willow bark is used to treat pain, fever, muscle aches, and headaches. It is the base, salicin, where we later developed salicylic acid. It has also been used for millenia.
Clove oil... Is it safe?When I had my wisdom teeth removed (I had 6) about a week later, I had the cavities from my lower 4 packed with gauze soaked in cloves to help reduce an infection I was just starting to get. It worked fantastic.
Other than the fact that anytime a little drop of the essence of cloves leaked out into my mouth it made me gag from how strong it was.
PS It was the orthodontic surgeon who did the packing, not some home remedy thing.
Its wasn't until the parallel development of epidemiology and the theroy of infectious diseases in the 19th century did medicine really advance. Even Paracelsus, who publicly burnt books by Galen, was stuck full of nonsense about astrology, demonology and divination. Paracelsus was taught up to the beginning of the 19th century. Medicine remained very much a pseudo science for far to longIn the US, perhaps, but there are numerous medical schools in Europe going back to the Middle Ages, if not earlier. (Bologna, Padua, St Barts London, Montpelier, Heidelberg, Coimbra, etc.) They at least claimed to be rooted in what passed for rational thought at that time, even if they were fixated on the infallibility of Galen and Aristotle.
Edinburgh, founded in 1726, is one of the first in the Enlightenment, when observation and critical thinking were to the fore.
To add to others, Symphytum officinale. Especially extract processed to gel works pretty nicely. Longest used combination is with Camphor. Good for light to medium muscle and joint aches. Good for high volume treatment after exercise and training. For Manga/Light novel readers, this combination was used in Spice and Wolf to treat Holo's back and Kraft's face injury.It would be interesting to know how many of these home remedies actually achieved anything. I suspect it’s not very high percentage. Because they were just anecdotes. But maybe?
It's also a CYP3A4 inducer, with potentially strong drug interactions. Which is always the danger with herbal medicines, plenty of them might have serious interactions with normal medicines.(…)
St John's Wart has a few, very small studies and that is it, and they are mixed.