Reddit faces new reality after cashing in on its IPO

NameRedacted

Ars Scholae Palatinae
845
Subscriptor
Not a single mention in the article about how Reddit earned its valuation on the back of content creation by the community (including being open source at one point!) only to rug-pull and then act like we should feel special that they “invited” to buy a share of our content back from them.

Fuck that. And fuck /u/spez.
 
Upvote
181 (187 / -6)
The close of the piece:

"Reddit, more so than many social media platforms, has been a very community-based, non-commercial space and people know and love it for [this],” said Samuel Woolley, a propaganda expert and assistant professor at the University of Texas at Austin.

“I think the big question that should be on everyone’s mind for Reddit is to what extent the IPO will change the very nature and fabric of the platform.”

=====

Money changes everything... everything it touches.
Money already started changing the place, long before the IPO was issued. The APIcalypse last year was proof enough of that.
 
Upvote
95 (95 / 0)

steakman1971

Smack-Fu Master, in training
28
When the third party app drama started, I canceled my account on Reddit and stopped using it. Not that anyone at Reddit cared, but I let them know why their policies and actions led me to cancel my account. I most likely wasted my time sharing the reasons why. Spez does not care.
Since then, I occasionally find something of interest in a web search and will consume what I was looking for. I'm waiting for Reddit to require an account to read all of the post in the future.
I also have found that I have more time. I likely spent a good 60 minutes of day on Reddit going down "rabbit holes". I also actively posted in the tech communities I subscribed to - by no means was I an expert, but I did share information I learned from other people or figured out myself.
As others have stated, I miss usenet of the past.
 
Upvote
61 (62 / -1)

papito10

Ars Scholae Palatinae
837
Things were sort of OK when the Sacred Shareholder interests were dead last - after customers and employees.

And since we are in late-stage capitalism, the incentives are ass-backwards. No one wants to build a company over 10 years - you need to think of how to do 3x next quarter so the Sacred Shareholder is delighted at getting so much money for doing nothing.

Which is to say - let the Enshitification BEGIN!
 
Upvote
92 (100 / -8)

KDogg

Ars Praefectus
4,888
Subscriptor
There always seems to be this fundamental shift in the life of any social media platform. Once they get to a certain size or become publicly traded, the vampires take over and all effort goes into sucking money out of it. Slowly there's more and more ads. Slowly the algorithm favors clickbait. Etc. etc. It doesn't necessarily happen overnight, but it is inevitable. The enshittification will commence. Or rather, will continue. The shareholders must be served above all others. It's a stupid system and I wish we would make a better one.
 
Upvote
79 (80 / -1)
You're indulging in a persecution fantasy. This is the single most protected group on Reddit, as well as the internet at large. Reddit has purged hundreds of subreddits for being radical feminist, gender-critical, or simply not toeing the dominant ideology on transgender issues. They then try to dress this up as justice by calling such non-conformist thought "hate speech".

This had a massive knock-on chilling effect, where many subs outright banned any and all discussion of anything transgenderism-related, out of fear of being purged from the site.
Found the alt-right/Nazi engaging in classic right-wing projection lol
 
Upvote
77 (115 / -38)

Mechjaz

Ars Praefectus
3,263
Subscriptor++
This article has all the toned-down flavor of Conde Nast, and little of the flavor of Ars Technica. It's easy to see if you go through the history of Ars articles.

Considering how CN made out in all of this, I can't say I'm surprised.
The banal
Nevertheless, the approach has left Huffman and the company at odds with some Reddit communities, who have been resistant to any changes to the platform
line spectacularly undersells the depth and strength of the bad faith efforts Reddit has undertaken in spiting its user base in pursuit of dressing up its shambolic business model in a cheap suit in time for an IPO and the personal enrichment of a few. Businesses can make money, and in fact a healthy Reddit is a valuable thing. But what it is, and what Reddit leadership has done, has made it less valuable than before they squeezed it.

I only ever use it for whatever turns up in a web search, and even I'm angry at their malicious API pricing scheme, effectively disabling community solutions to first party failures. And then spez said "hold my beer" to grab a shovel to dig an even deeper hole, being an absolutely condescending fuck to everyone except dumb investors. Smart investors should realize that the burning the goodwill of a community on a community driven site is not a recipe for success. Dumb investors are only happy that line goes up, which of course it will always and must always do.
 
Upvote
70 (72 / -2)

cgo_12345

Ars Scholae Palatinae
903
You're indulging in a persecution fantasy. This is the single most protected group on Reddit, as well as the internet at large. Reddit has purged hundreds of subreddits for being radical feminist, gender-critical, or simply not toeing the dominant ideology on transgender issues. They then try to dress this up as justice by calling such non-conformist thought "hate speech".

This had a massive knock-on chilling effect, where many subs outright banned any and all discussion of anything transgenderism-related, out of fear of being purged from the site.
You don't have to lie like this, bigot. You're not good at it.
 
Upvote
53 (87 / -34)
Nah? The end commenter isn't obligated to deliver value to the website if they don't want to.

They didn't say they were obligated to do anything, just that it was a disservice which I very much agree with. People can do what they want, and in the end it's on Reddit and not the user deleting the stuff, but it sucks for sure. And the decades worth of general knowledge isn't going to pop up anywhere else. Maybe Discord, but that isn't indexable and I've been burnt before*.

*Asking in the modding channel "Is it possible to do X with modding?" and the only replies I would get were basically multiple steps of "Download the source code, learn C# and find out".
 
Upvote
7 (18 / -11)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
The close of the piece:

"Reddit, more so than many social media platforms, has been a very community-based, non-commercial space and people know and love it for [this],” said Samuel Woolley, a propaganda expert and assistant professor at the University of Texas at Austin.

“I think the big question that should be on everyone’s mind for Reddit is to what extent the IPO will change the very nature and fabric of the platform.”

=====

Money changes everything... everything it touches.
I love Reddit and have since almost its inception. If they kept all the great things about it great, then it could keep going and return a moderate profit to them year after year after year for a long, long time.

More likely they will make changes that make it more lucrative while gradually eroding what’s special about it, get 5-6 highly profitable years from it, then hit the inflection point on the J-curve of users leaving and throw their hands in the air and wonder what happened to the platform they invested in
 
Upvote
9 (15 / -6)

needSomeCoffee

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
138
Been enjoying a daily visit to r/dataisbeautiful for a long time. Often something is worth clicking into. Previously after clicking into a topic and then clicking on the image (if there is one), the image would open in a new tab, higher-rez, with a zoom function. Very necessary as a lot of presentations are dense and one cannot read the text. A little while ago I think Reddit changed this and when one clicks on the image it simply goes full screen without any rez increase, and no zoom function. Can't believe they made this change as it hampers usability a lot. Might be missing something (Mac, Brave). If so please advise. If not, then Corey D. can carve another notch in his E-belt.
 
Upvote
18 (22 / -4)
…even a company that is unprofitable, such as Reddit

But it’s “worth” $10B.

The irony of Sam Altman owning $600m in stock and the rest of the shareholders trying to leverage reddit users free content for licensed LLM would be an amusing future id like to see.

What else is possibly worth $10B?
 
Upvote
36 (36 / 0)

BrangdonJ

Ars Praefectus
4,612
Subscriptor
There always seems to be this fundamental shift in the life of any social media platform. Once they get to a certain size or become publicly traded, the vampires take over and all effort goes into sucking money out of it. Slowly there's more and more ads. Slowly the algorithm favors clickbait. Etc. etc. It doesn't necessarily happen overnight, but it is inevitable. The enshittification will commence. Or rather, will continue. The shareholders must be served above all others. It's a stupid system and I wish we would make a better one.
This is sometimes called enshitification. It doesn't just apply to social media sites. The examples on that link include Amazon, Google search, and Uber.

(Edit: hadn't noticed that you used that word. Left the post anyway for the link.)
 
Upvote
18 (32 / -14)
Gross! But not surprising, sadly.
I wish that the minority communities I was part of would move away from reddit, but I can't force them. Quitting Reddit entirely is what I'd like to do, but I'd be cutting my self off from important resources if I'm being honest.
All I can realistically do for now is periodically delete my old posts and opt out of everything I possibly can, not go there for non vital stuff or things that are available elsewhere, and keep encouraging people to move.
What’s an alternative though? Discord isn’t it. Reddit is one of the last community led open forums out there as far as I’m aware. I’m not a fan of the trend moving the internet to private discord servers.

Thats probably why Reddit thinks it can get away with a lot of the changes they’ve made. There aren’t any real alternatives (as far as I’m aware) at the scale they operate at. I can google a topic and usually the top hits are Reddit posts. It used to be open forums but now it’s all pretty much Reddit.
 
Upvote
44 (45 / -1)

akial

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
100
It sucks, but the alternatives didn't work out. Some of the reddit communities I joined tried to start up companion boards that could be accessed via like Lemmy but users didn't migrate in enough numbers for those boards to keep momentum. This is despite users voting overwhelmingly in favor of temporarily closing the boards during the API change protests!

I'm not sure if the issue was the boards not advertising the alternatives enough or what. Maybe people are really creatures of habit...
 
Upvote
23 (23 / 0)

Lexus Lunar Lorry

Ars Scholae Palatinae
848
Subscriptor++
This article has all the toned-down flavor of Conde Nast, and little of the flavor of Ars Technica. It's easy to see if you go through the history of Ars articles.

Considering how CN made out in all of this, I can't say I'm surprised.
Given the fact that Ars didn't have its own article about Reddit and instead reposted a writeup from the Financial Times two days after the IPO, I'm guessing that there was probably some nontrivial editorial pressure from Conde Nast.
 
Upvote
86 (90 / -4)

Kjella

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,080
I only ever use it for whatever turns up in a web search, and even I'm angry at their malicious API pricing scheme, effectively disabling community solutions to first party failures. And then spez said "hold my beer" to grab a shovel to dig an even deeper hole, being an absolutely condescending fuck to everyone except dumb investors. Smart investors should realize that the burning the goodwill of a community on a community driven site is not a recipe for success. Dumb investors are only happy that line goes up, which of course it will always and must always do.
"Smart investors" are also telling you that Zuckerberg is an idiot and that Facebook will collapse any day now even though they're at an all time high of >$500/share, most often it's vitriol from end users who feel they've been wronged or deprived but actually aren't as essential to the business as they believe. Particularly there's a very vocal segment coming out saying "I quit social media" even though there's zero indications that any sizable fraction does that, some platforms fall in and out of favor but the total market is rock solid.

Spez knows that there's a ton of momentum in social media, killing off third party APIs is first and foremost a problem for moderators and power users. The casual users will install the first party app to keep up with the subreddits they already know giving him a lot of extra eyeballs to sell at IPO, while any migration away is a very slow bleed-out that would take many years if it even happens at all. Even Elon's having trouble chasing his users away with 77% still there after he took over, and he's going at it much, much harder than spez did...
 
Upvote
-14 (22 / -36)

Readercathead

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,712
Subscriptor
If you just can’t get enough of The Financial Times’ completely clueless money-grubbing content there is now a bot who will make up answers from the FT’s trove of made-up stories!


https://www.theverge.com/2024/3/23/24106296/ask-ft-generative-ai-chatbot-answers-tool
PS This particular article is even more tone-deaf and ignorant than the usual FT article. It was former Reddit ceo Ellen Pao who was fired for trying to get rid of the hate-crimes on Reddit, and the current CEO who fired moderators! Who decided to publish this Wall Street Journal-style garbage on Ars Technica?
 
Upvote
45 (54 / -9)

Aurich

Director of Many Things
40,906
Ars Staff
This article has all the toned-down flavor of Conde Nast, and little of the flavor of Ars Technica. It's easy to see if you go through the history of Ars articles.

Considering how CN made out in all of this, I can't say I'm surprised.
Did you ... look at the author of the article?
 
Upvote
47 (50 / -3)

Readercathead

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,712
Subscriptor
Given the fact that Ars didn't have its own article about Reddit and instead reposted a writeup from the Financial Times two days after the IPO, I'm guessing that there was probably some nontrivial editorial pressure from Conde Nast.

Some reader push-back is required. Perhaps the editors can show these comments to the absentee management. Anna Wintour has no idea how to cultivate an audience who wants more than fashion spreads and celebrities — Ars may be the next victim. Conglomerates being allowed to buy up dozens of media properties and drive them into the ground is evidence of an extremely weak government happy to exist only for billionaires.
 
Upvote
12 (20 / -8)

Paranoid Android

Ars Scholae Palatinae
895
Subscriptor
I long for the days when forums powered by vBulletin, Xenforo, phpBB, et al. ruled the roost of online communities.

It's not simple nostalgia speaking to say that the culture and communities of the pre-social media internet were better. They really were. Consolidating online life into a shrinking handful of walled-off silos run by mega corporations has made the internet feel more empty, lifeless, and isolating, in spite of the massive growth in the raw numbers of people using it.

We had it right in the mid to late 2000s: Smaller, slower paced, and more personal communities developed around a large number of decentralized websites, forums, blogs. Plus a couple of basic "social" platforms like early Facebook or Myspace that let you keep up with what your real life friends and family were doing, without algorithms dangling rage-bait and "influencers" (gag) in your face.

There seems to be a growing sense of discontent with the current state of online life that's been developing over the past couple of years. I don't know how widespread that sentiment is outside of certain demographics of extremely online tech nerds, but surely we're overdue for a cultural shift from the existing social media landscape, right?
 
Upvote
77 (78 / -1)