Recent job listings on the Ars job board
- Thread starter JournalBot
- Start date
Why does Michigan suck so bad! The only two MI jobs are 2 hours away from me :-/
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
Countdown to wankers pissing about advertising on the front page...<BR><BR>...<BR>..<BR>.
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
hey, this doesn't have anything to do with the rumored Wired/CondeNast and Ars merger does it?
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by hanser:<BR>Countdown to wankers pissing about advertising on the front page...<BR><BR>...<BR>..<BR>. </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>Countdown to wankers pissing about wankers pissing about advertising on the front page...<BR><BR>But seriously, I'm a paying subscriber and I have been for a while now...there should be an opt-out for this.
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
<blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by mykie:<br>hey, this doesn't have anything to do with the rumored Wired/CondeNast and Ars merger does it? </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>It's not rumor, it's fact.<br><br>Wired owns Ars, and soon we'll see many arsvertisements. -- View image here: http://episteme.meincmagazine.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif --
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by mykie:<br>hey, this doesn't have anything to do with the rumored Wired/CondeNast and Ars merger does it? </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>It's not rumor, it's fact.<br><br>Wired owns Ars, and soon we'll see many arsvertisements. -- View image here: http://episteme.meincmagazine.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif --
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by pope master:<BR><BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by hanser:<BR>Countdown to wankers pissing about advertising on the front page...<BR><BR>...<BR>..<BR>. </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>Countdown to wankers pissing about wankers pissing about advertising on the front page...<BR><BR>But seriously, I'm a paying subscriber and I have been for a while now...there should be an opt-out for this. </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>There is. It is called not clicking the link. It's kinda like not visiting the *chan boards unless you have something there you want to see. Barging in and complaining about them when you can just ignore them is quite simply a waste of your energy.<BR><BR>This post is brought to you by dial soap.
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
<blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Commander Thanatos:<br><blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by pope master:<br><blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by hanser:<br>Countdown to wankers pissing about advertising on the front page...<br><br>...<br>..<br>. </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>Countdown to wankers pissing about wankers pissing about advertising on the front page...<br><br>But seriously, I'm a paying subscriber and I have been for a while now...there should be an opt-out for this. </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>There is. It is called not clicking the link. It's kinda like not visiting the *chan boards unless you have something there you want to see. Barging in and complaining about them when you can just ignore them is quite simply a waste of your energy.<br><br>This post is brought to you by dial soap. </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>Oh come the fuck on. "Its just like ignoring the TV when it displays ads!" -- View image here: http://episteme.meincmagazine.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif --<br><br>Arstechnica isn't promoting this ad* because it wants people who aren't interested to ignore it. No, its trying to get a stumbling job search service off the ground and in the process raise more funds for itself. Which is perfectly fine, but let me (a paying subscriber) ignore it. Or raise the subscriber rate to something acceptable so that I can pay to ignore these ads.<br><br>*And it is an ad.
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Commander Thanatos:<br><blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by pope master:<br><blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by hanser:<br>Countdown to wankers pissing about advertising on the front page...<br><br>...<br>..<br>. </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>Countdown to wankers pissing about wankers pissing about advertising on the front page...<br><br>But seriously, I'm a paying subscriber and I have been for a while now...there should be an opt-out for this. </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>There is. It is called not clicking the link. It's kinda like not visiting the *chan boards unless you have something there you want to see. Barging in and complaining about them when you can just ignore them is quite simply a waste of your energy.<br><br>This post is brought to you by dial soap. </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>Oh come the fuck on. "Its just like ignoring the TV when it displays ads!" -- View image here: http://episteme.meincmagazine.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif --<br><br>Arstechnica isn't promoting this ad* because it wants people who aren't interested to ignore it. No, its trying to get a stumbling job search service off the ground and in the process raise more funds for itself. Which is perfectly fine, but let me (a paying subscriber) ignore it. Or raise the subscriber rate to something acceptable so that I can pay to ignore these ads.<br><br>*And it is an ad.
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
=^( I'm sad Ars got bought. But then if I busted my ass for 10 years making a great tech website, I'd sell out for $25M too.
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
<blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by bombcar:<br><blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by mykie:<br>hey, this doesn't have anything to do with the rumored Wired/CondeNast and Ars merger does it? </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>It's not rumor, it's fact.<br><br>Wired owns Ars, and soon we'll see many arsvertisements. -- View image here: http://episteme.meincmagazine.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif -- </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>Sigh. -- View image here: http://episteme.meincmagazine.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif -- <br><br>I was about to pay up for a subscription.<br><br>Now that's on hold. -- View image here: http://episteme.meincmagazine.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gif --
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by bombcar:<br><blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by mykie:<br>hey, this doesn't have anything to do with the rumored Wired/CondeNast and Ars merger does it? </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>It's not rumor, it's fact.<br><br>Wired owns Ars, and soon we'll see many arsvertisements. -- View image here: http://episteme.meincmagazine.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif -- </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>Sigh. -- View image here: http://episteme.meincmagazine.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif -- <br><br>I was about to pay up for a subscription.<br><br>Now that's on hold. -- View image here: http://episteme.meincmagazine.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gif --
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
<blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by pope master:<br><blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Commander Thanatos:<br><blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by pope master:<br><blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by hanser:<br>Countdown to wankers pissing about advertising on the front page...<br><br>...<br>..<br>. </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>Countdown to wankers pissing about wankers pissing about advertising on the front page...<br><br>But seriously, I'm a paying subscriber and I have been for a while now...there should be an opt-out for this. </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>There is. It is called not clicking the link. It's kinda like not visiting the *chan boards unless you have something there you want to see. Barging in and complaining about them when you can just ignore them is quite simply a waste of your energy.<br><br>This post is brought to you by dial soap. </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>Oh come the fuck on. "Its just like ignoring the TV when it displays ads!" -- View image here: http://episteme.meincmagazine.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif --<br><br>Arstechnica isn't promoting this ad* because it wants people who aren't interested to ignore it. No, its trying to get a stumbling job search service off the ground and in the process raise more funds for itself. Which is perfectly fine, but let me (a paying subscriber) ignore it. Or raise the subscriber rate to something acceptable so that I can pay to ignore these ads.<br><br>*And it is an ad. </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>You can't ignore tv commercials [exception, tivo], but you can move your mouse the half inch to go to the next article in question, thus bypassing this article. Your analogy fails.
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by pope master:<br><blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Commander Thanatos:<br><blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by pope master:<br><blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by hanser:<br>Countdown to wankers pissing about advertising on the front page...<br><br>...<br>..<br>. </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>Countdown to wankers pissing about wankers pissing about advertising on the front page...<br><br>But seriously, I'm a paying subscriber and I have been for a while now...there should be an opt-out for this. </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>There is. It is called not clicking the link. It's kinda like not visiting the *chan boards unless you have something there you want to see. Barging in and complaining about them when you can just ignore them is quite simply a waste of your energy.<br><br>This post is brought to you by dial soap. </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>Oh come the fuck on. "Its just like ignoring the TV when it displays ads!" -- View image here: http://episteme.meincmagazine.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif --<br><br>Arstechnica isn't promoting this ad* because it wants people who aren't interested to ignore it. No, its trying to get a stumbling job search service off the ground and in the process raise more funds for itself. Which is perfectly fine, but let me (a paying subscriber) ignore it. Or raise the subscriber rate to something acceptable so that I can pay to ignore these ads.<br><br>*And it is an ad. </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br>You can't ignore tv commercials [exception, tivo], but you can move your mouse the half inch to go to the next article in question, thus bypassing this article. Your analogy fails.
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by mAx 5teeL:<BR>are you guys just joking or did Ars really get bought out? </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR> Conde Nast buys Ars Technica
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
<blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by ssiu:<br><blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by mAx 5teeL:<br>are you guys just joking or did Ars really get bought out? </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br> Conde Nast buys Ars Technica </div>
</blockquote>ars should have reported on this. -- View image here: http://episteme.meincmagazine.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif --
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by ssiu:<br><blockquote class="ip-ubbcode-quote">
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div>
<div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by mAx 5teeL:<br>are you guys just joking or did Ars really get bought out? </div>
</blockquote>
<br><br> Conde Nast buys Ars Technica </div>
</blockquote>ars should have reported on this. -- View image here: http://episteme.meincmagazine.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif --
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by ssiu:<BR><BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by mAx 5teeL:<BR>are you guys just joking or did Ars really get bought out? </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR> Conde Nast buys Ars Technica </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>...<BR><BR>I want the old 2001ish Ars back. I'm visiting less and less now. If things degrade even more that'll seal the deal.
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SSNSeawolf:<BR><BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by ssiu:<BR><BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by mAx 5teeL:<BR>are you guys just joking or did Ars really get bought out? </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR> Conde Nast buys Ars Technica </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>...<BR><BR>I want the old 2001ish Ars back. I'm visiting less and less now. If things degrade even more that'll seal the deal. </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>It's the law of the Internet. Any site that starts out great and focus will expand, become more profit oriented, and become watered down shit. Ars used to be a great place to read detailed and intelligent tech articles. Now it's just another so-so place to read about everything.<BR><BR>We should just be grateful it was a slow decline. These days, sites are exploding and going from 'the shit' to just 'shit' in months rather than years.
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by pope master:<BR>But seriously, I'm a paying subscriber and I have been for a while now...there should be an opt-out for this. </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>... Am I missing something? Paying subscriber? What are we paying for now?
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Knives:<BR><BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by pope master:<BR>But seriously, I'm a paying subscriber and I have been for a while now...there should be an opt-out for this. </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>... Am I missing something? Paying subscriber? What are we paying for now? </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Good question. Maybe the boards will be independent, maybe the forums will so free, maybe you will pay Conde Nast's salaries, maybe the boards will just cease to exist.<BR><BR>It's anyone's guess.
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
Well ARS I've considered to be one of the few *REAL* journalism sites on the web. Rarely do you see anything on tech news sites that give you an NPR-esk breakdown of nearly all sides of an issue and what particular news really means in a larger sense and cuts through the BS. 85% of sites are regurgitated news with occasional reviews. That be said I have noticed a decline in quality mostly I think due to expanding what they cover on. If they stuck to Technology/Science with a sub category in Technology that would be Gaming/Benchmarks then you'd have the 2 strengths of Ars Technica without all the bullshit like Microsoft and apple news, and whatever else they have journals on now.<BR><BR>I was truly considering a subscription as I've been visiting this site for the last 3-4 years more and more regularly and just recently (last year) have been participating in the forums/community. I'll have to wait and see now. I'm surprised they gave up on the subscription model. The quality of this site could've supported it.
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
I have been a long time reader of Ars, and more recently, an occasional contributer to the forums. To find out about this buyout via the discussion thread on an advertisement for the arguably pointless Job.Ars is disheartening. I hope there will be an official editorial acknowledgment within the next few days.
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by ssiu:<BR><BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by mAx 5teeL:<BR>are you guys just joking or did Ars really get bought out? </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR> Conde Nast buys Ars Technica </div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>Holy crap!
Upvote
0
(0
/
0)
- Status