Oracle shares slide on $15B increase in data center spending

pond-iridium.2q

Ars Centurion
264
Subscriptor
I imagine all those folks who signed onto Cerner* (recently acquired by Oracle) are also nervously scanning the headlines. Either the thing implodes and Cerner gets spun off again or AI infiltrates the product - which, while not being a great product, isn't an awful one. What fun.

* Number 2 Electronic Health Record behind EPIC in the US.
Way way way behind Epic.
 
Upvote
15 (15 / 0)

TylerH

Ars Praefectus
5,031
Subscriptor
99.9 BILLION in long-term debt. To my non-expert ears this sounds like... a lot?
When that bubble pops, it might even sound completely unsustainable and business-ending to me...
It is a lot, one of the highest from a tech company. It is #70 currently in terms of total debt holdings. You can view sites like https://companiesmarketcap.com/companies-with-the-highest-debt/ to see how much debt major corporations hold. The top 100 are overwhelmingly banks or asset holding companies, with car companies and telecoms mixed in here and there (top 20 for example are all banks, except Toyota at #20).
 
Upvote
23 (23 / 0)

TylerH

Ars Praefectus
5,031
Subscriptor
I imagine all those folks who signed onto Cerner* (recently acquired by Oracle) are also nervously scanning the headlines. Either the thing implodes and Cerner gets spun off again or AI infiltrates the product - which, while not being a great product, isn't an awful one. What fun.

* Number 2 Electronic Health Record behind EPIC in the US.
AI is already infiltrating all the other healthcare products hospital systems use; that well is being poisoned from the outside. I see new AI slop companies being pushed every week in the healthcare world.
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)

DCStone

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,819
What does that mean?
Rather than borrowing a huge amount of money to build all the data centres they need themselves, Oracle are signing contracts with third-parties who will assume the risks, costs, and debt to build said data centres, with an agreement that Oracle will immediately lease them once they are ready.

Presumably, if the AI bubble bursts before the data centres are ready and Oracle balks at the lease agreement, there will be plenty of law suits to go around.

Edit: I wonder how many of those 3rd-party data centres are being funded in part through State and municipal grants, loans, and tax incentives?
 
Upvote
25 (25 / 0)

TylerH

Ars Praefectus
5,031
Subscriptor
What does that mean?
It means they're renting space in data centers rather than building their own. Renting is a cash expenditure, whereas building/owning is a capital expenditure. Capital projects tend to require a lot of financing, and in Oracle's case especially that means lots of debt financing.
 
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

jimmy.j.r

Ars Centurion
205
Subscriptor
Can't wait for the inevitable "too big to fail" cries and sobs from the poor top hats and also the inevitable tax-payer bail outs (i.e. socialized costs).

The bubble will pop - but it will be us lowly peasants holding the bag, not the ones that caused it or profited the most from it.
for something like Oracle I really doubt that'll be the case. "too big to fail" for the huge US automakers and banks during the 2008 existential crisis was a real risk. If they did fall over then by all counts we would STILL be in a nasty recession not unlike what happened to Japan in the 90s. Which they still haven't recovered from. It would have been MILLIONS of people out of work for a VERY long time, and stuff like banks are crucial infrastructure for countries.

MS and Amazon are diversified enough where AI stuff not panning out won't really hit em too hard. might be a kick in the shin, not ripping its heart out. Oracle going whole hog on this AI garbage is a little too centralized of a business, but if they fall over then it won't really be that nasty.
 
Upvote
3 (4 / -1)

jimmy.j.r

Ars Centurion
205
Subscriptor
The fact that most people on here think there will be an AI bubble burst tells me the exact opposite will happen. Ars's comment section is terrible at calling market conditions (think Tesla for example).
Think of it as the reverse - if everyone in here really did have the ability to predict things like that then they'd be making a LOT more money than they do now. And they wouldn't be wasting time on internet commenting.
 
Upvote
-1 (5 / -6)

themooserooster

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
120
Subscriptor
Oracle is definitely the most overleveraged large player in this business. Even with the SPVs being set up it's going to be ugly when things go south, but they might have as long as 2-3 years before that happens.
Certainly Larry and David Ellison trying to hoover up as much of the remaining major news media as they can, including both CBS News and CNN certainly won't be part of any push in the press to bail Oracle out as Too Big To Fail when the bubble pops. Perish the thought...
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)
The fact that most people on here think there will be an AI bubble burst tells me the exact opposite will happen. Ars's comment section is terrible at calling market conditions (think Tesla for example).
You're in the Ars comment section calling market conditions. Ergo, you're terrible at calling market conditions, too.
 
Upvote
38 (38 / 0)

bjn

Ars Praefectus
5,202
Subscriptor++
I see where you come from, however, being an actual Oracle customer using their database stuff, I'm actually pretty concerned about their level of spending on AI (especially those fast aging data centers), so that the AI bubble bursting presents a real chance to take them down, also making Oracle DB an unsustainable business ...
Given that they actually make money on that part of the business, it would likely be sold off as a going concern to pay off some debt.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

shawnce

Ars Praefectus
3,991
Subscriptor++
The fact that most people on here think there will be an AI bubble burst tells me the exact opposite will happen. Ars's comment section is terrible at calling market conditions (think Tesla for example).
The “market” can and these days often is well detached from reality for individual stocks (and sadly for broader sectors of it).

A number of folks here are often looking at things much closer to the reality of the businesses involved. Yes the market can remain irrational but it doesn’t make folks wrong about the fundamentals. If you are left not holding an empty bag be happy but just know that someone else (many others) likely have the empty bag.

Tesla for example is highly detached from the companies fundamentals and wound around future handwaving and Musk’s cult of personality (among other manipulations)… despite many examples of missed (and repeatedly missed) product promises over a decade now in some cases. It will fall down at some point unless a lot of things finally become realized… the odds are not in its favor given competition, commoditization of some of the industries it is trying to play in, and being so dependent on Musk’s cult (he will “end” in some way at some point).
 
Upvote
21 (21 / 0)

graylshaped

Ars Legatus Legionis
68,215
Subscriptor++
Given that they actually make money on that part of the business, it would likely be sold off as a going concern to pay off some debt.
Pay off the debt? It would be more likely the profitable pieces will be sold and the liabilities stuck in a shell they slide into bankruptcy. In the casino business, that's called "playing the Trump card."
 
Upvote
16 (16 / 0)

Heavens

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
154
Subscriptor
for something like Oracle I really doubt that'll be the case. "too big to fail" for the huge US automakers and banks during the 2008 existential crisis was a real risk. If they did fall over then by all counts we would STILL be in a nasty recession not unlike what happened to Japan in the 90s. Which they still haven't recovered from. It would have been MILLIONS of people out of work for a VERY long time, and stuff like banks are crucial infrastructure for countries.

MS and Amazon are diversified enough where AI stuff not panning out won't really hit em too hard. might be a kick in the shin, not ripping its heart out. Oracle going whole hog on this AI garbage is a little too centralized of a business, but if they fall over then it won't really be that nasty.
If Oracle falls over all of their cloud ERP customers are going to be knee-deep in trouble.

Even though I really dislike Oracle I'm glad were still on-prem with our ERP, even though IT seems to toy with the idea of moving it to the cloud.

In general I just wish this bubble pops soon so we can get over this absolute madness.
 
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)

Navalia Vigilate

Ars Praefectus
3,143
Subscriptor++
When the bubble does pop, I hope Ars covers the billionaire to rags story of Larry Ellison.

(crosses fingers and looks above in prayer)
He took his money and is pulling the cream off the top still. He may get the boot but he'll be sitting on billions.
 
Upvote
7 (7 / 0)

DNSGeek

Ars Centurion
217
Subscriptor
OCI is the absolute worst of the hyperscalers, by a wide margin. Everything is difficult with them and we constantly detect issues long before they do or even admit to them. I’m not certain anyone at OCI understands how computers work. Its like the offshored employees running the place are working off docs given to the last batch of offshored hands who were given documentation by employees laid off 20 years ago.
I see you must work at TikTok also.
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Does anyone do a national fund?

The UK government pension system since day 1 has been a ponzi scheme those working today pay for those who retired yesterday the problem is we and many other countries are getting to the point where the retirees match then outnumber the workers.

That's why financialization has increased to make up for the deficit in national schemes.
What does that last sentence even mean? But you are totally right. The scheme was not ringfenced. But then again you had to be at least 70 to claim it and if I am not mistaken (with my track record I probably am!). it was set at 5 bob a week (about 26 quid, not much but stuff cost a hell of a lot less then)
 
Upvote
1 (3 / -2)
Can't wait for the inevitable "too big to fail" cries and sobs from the poor top hats and also the inevitable tax-payer bail outs (i.e. socialized costs).

The bubble will pop - but it will be us lowly peasants holding the bag, not the ones that caused it or profited the most from it.
Precisely. A lot of the internet travels through Amazon, Microsoft, and Goggle.

That's a nice internet you have there....would be a shame if something were to happen to it.
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)

Eldorito

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,980
It is a lot, one of the highest from a tech company. It is #70 currently in terms of total debt holdings. You can view sites like https://companiesmarketcap.com/companies-with-the-highest-debt/ to see how much debt major corporations hold. The top 100 are overwhelmingly banks or asset holding companies, with car companies and telecoms mixed in here and there (top 20 for example are all banks, except Toyota at #20).

Worth noting that hasn't been updated for the latest quarter for Oracle yet - they're at $115b in debt (because that chart includes lease debt as well).

Just to add to this, the car companies are on there because of their financial services. They're acting as financial institutions, they borrow money from banks and lend it to customers to buy cars. So at least it's tied up in an asset with a repayment system.

Phone companies take on debt to fund their massive networks. Despite that they get tonnes of government dollars and do a shit job overall, they do invest quite a lot in their networks to keep them running. Debt is pretty much a requirement here. Networks aren't a bubble, unless we decide to turn off the internet.

Amazon's debt is growing because of their accelerated investments, but there's piles of existing lease debt relating to their warehouse space. They have tens of billions tied up in leasing those properties and, again, Amazon's delivery setup isn't a bubble (as far as I know). AWS debt is becoming a larger and larger portion (not disclosed in the quarterly statements, but in their last annual statements that's where the debt is growing the fastest). They could knock off their non-lease debt with a few quarters profits.

Oracle, on the other hand, needs 5 years of profits just to knock off their debt. That's insane. Their balance sheet looks awful, the $60b of goodwill (i.e. "we overpaid for our acquisitions and this will eventually be written down") is the only thing making it look marginally ok, but there's no offsetting receivable for this debt. It needs to be turned into more and more profit somehow. Even if Oracle's AI play somehow out great, there's not really any way for shareholders to get their money back out of the company while they pay down all this existing and planned debt.
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)
I imagine all those folks who signed onto Cerner* (recently acquired by Oracle) are also nervously scanning the headlines. Either the thing implodes and Cerner gets spun off again or AI infiltrates the product - which, while not being a great product, isn't an awful one. What fun.

* Number 2 Electronic Health Record behind EPIC in the US.
They already are trying to do this and are calling it an "AI first" EHR. They already fired everyone in Kansas City that knows how EMRs work so I suppose this is their way of catching up a decade of mismanagement.

I still have old coworkers that are affiliated with Cerner and they've all told me that Oracle has basically given up getting any other client save for VA, DoD, and NIH. This, of course perfectly aligns with Larry's version of libertarianism.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

LordEOD

Ars Scholae Palatinae
778
for something like Oracle I really doubt that'll be the case. "too big to fail" for the huge US automakers and banks during the 2008 existential crisis was a real risk. If they did fall over then by all counts we would STILL be in a nasty recession not unlike what happened to Japan in the 90s. Which they still haven't recovered from. It would have been MILLIONS of people out of work for a VERY long time, and stuff like banks are crucial infrastructure for countries.

MS and Amazon are diversified enough where AI stuff not panning out won't really hit em too hard. might be a kick in the shin, not ripping its heart out. Oracle going whole hog on this AI garbage is a little too centralized of a business, but if they fall over then it won't really be that nasty.
While I grant your points make logical sense, I may take this moment to remind you of exactly what type of foreign, corrupt entity calling itself the current administration is.

They'll be too big to fail and receive all the tax-payer bail out they need simply because Trump met with someone the day before. (Probably also involving some under the table kickback deal or crypto scheme)
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)
OCI is the absolute worst of the hyperscalers, by a wide margin. Everything is difficult with them and we constantly detect issues long before they do or even admit to them. I’m not certain anyone at OCI understands how computers work. Its like the offshored employees running the place are working off docs given to the last batch of offshored hands who were given documentation by employees laid off 20 years ago.

Not to worry, their new OpenAI project is starting from scratch and being run entirely in-house rather than relying on contractors...


... yeah.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)
The biggest spenders Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft etc can afford it and are spending what they can afford.

Not many companies are trying to keep up with the Joneses like Oracle is.
Won't matter to what really matters which is the employees. Like sure none of them will go out of business, but they will slash a ton of jobs.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)