Ellison has raised money for Trump. Trump has called Ellison a "tremendous guy."
Read the whole story
Read the whole story
Well on the bright side if you don't like TikTok, Oracle will probably change the usage and licensing terms for it next year and make it prohibitively expensive and confusing.
Well on the bright side if you don't like TikTok, Oracle will probably change the usage and licensing terms for it next year and make it prohibitively expensive and confusing.
Of course they won't! They'll keep the main product free. It'll just advertise a free closed-source addon with a separate EULA that indicates any for-profit use requires a paid license and then start suing creators that monetize.
Microsoft didn't need to be a part of this shit show. It's perfectly 2020 that this lands in Larry's lap.
I'm rooting for China to just shut it down rather than permit the sale. Just bring on the f'ing stupid, we apparently got plenty to spare.
Henceforth, at no point can Republicans claim they are against picking winners and losers in the market without subsequently having longer noses.
Henceforth, at no point can Republicans claim they are against picking winners and losers in the market without subsequently having longer noses.
I foresee an absolute dumpster fire in the future of this deal and I also foresee no losers in that regard.
Both are just....
If Larry Ellison and the head of TikTok were on fire and I only had enough piss to put one of them out, I'd find a toilet and get a burrito.
Sold to Oracle? Well, this is one way to make a product slowly wither away.
This won't happen. China won't let it. And there's plenty of world market outside the US to provide useless services to for TikTok. Plenty of room for profit...it will just be less profit, that's all.
I’m surprised the WTO hasn’t (yet?) been involved with all this sovereign interference in commerce, AFAIK. Certainly seems like it’s relevant to their jurisdiction.
I’m surprised the WTO hasn’t (yet?) been involved with all this sovereign interference in commerce, AFAIK. Certainly seems like it’s relevant to their jurisdiction.
There is a national security and defense exception clause. Anything goes if you claim that there is potential for espionage. In fairness, China uses the same exception to ban Facebook and Google from operating domestically.
WTO regulations about digital goods and online services are a mess, but that's a separate discussion.
I’m surprised the WTO hasn’t (yet?) been involved with all this sovereign interference in commerce, AFAIK. Certainly seems like it’s relevant to their jurisdiction.
There is a national security and defense exception clause. Anything goes if you claim that there is potential for espionage. In fairness, China uses the same exception to ban Facebook and Google from operating domestically.
WTO regulations about digital goods and online services are a mess, but that's a separate discussion.
Could China still bring a complaint by alleging that the national security claim is in bad faith and without valid basis, and therefore WTO still could make a ruling? Or does the US claiming national security automatically mean that WTO can’t or won’t even hear arguments?
Well on the bright side if you don't like TikTok, Oracle will probably change the usage and licensing terms for it next year and make it prohibitively expensive and confusing.