Of course it's coming back, they'll just try and find some excuse to justify bringing it back on, even if a really flimsy one.Meta won’t say why or whether it’s coming back.
To cash in like Palantir, Clearview and other shady facial recognition/tracking endeavors. What else could it be?What's the use case for this? You don't need these glasses to recognize people you already know.
One memo reportedly described releasing it during a “dynamic political environment,” when privacy and civil liberties advocates would be distracted.
I do not accept Meta's terms of service, and hereby exercise my right to opt out of all collection, storage, and processing of my biometric data by their devices and systems.WIRED also found that faces the system failed to recognize were cropped, indexed, and stored locally for future processing.
You can curse here, it's ok. See, look:Fu##in' with your cash is the only thing you kids seem to understand. - Larry
When Satan makes an offer, one should give the offer serious consideration— even if you’re not entirely sure why the offer is being made.What's the use case for this? You don't need these glasses to recognize people you already know.
Don't worry. Congress will simply pass legislation making it illegal to store politicians or their friends/family/hookers in facial recognition databases.I'd say to members of Congress "Aren't you already annoyed when people recognize you in public and you want to give away the anonymity of the common man?" but they'd say something about MS13 or Border Security like that wallpapers over the issue.
It is explicitly intended to let the creepy guy at the other end of the bar use Meta services to root out personal details about you up to and including a home address and phone number.What's the use case for this? You don't need these glasses to recognize people you already know.
So users of Meta smart glasses can seamlesly view the deepfake pron they've created for people they know, while talking to them.What's the use case for this? You don't need these glasses to recognize people you already know.
The fact that these people KNOW that they will be pissing people off, but push anyways, is just...so, so very revealing.We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns.
People with prosopagnosia?What's the use case for this? You don't need these glasses to recognize people you already know.
Fixed that for you.Repeat after me:These social mediacompanies CANNOT be trusted.
In China, there are smart glasses vendors in academia--so students can use AI enabled smart glasses to cheat on exams. Stalkers of course would have a field day with this too.What's the use case for this? You don't need these glasses to recognize people you already know.
Even if Meta insists your device stores all the data, governments of the world are going to SALIVATE over this data and likely propose secret or public laws granting themselves access. Why install surveillance cameras on every street corner when you've got millions of these things all over the world walking around in real time scanning people's identities. I would submit that this even goes beyond 1984's dystopian worldview.To cash in like Palantir, Clearview and other shady facial recognition/tracking endeavors. What else could it be?
To cash in like Palantir, Clearview and other shady facial recognition/tracking endeavors. What else could it be?
I fully recognize the nefarious use cases for this, but some people (including myself) have some level of face blindness and find it hard to recognize people we know, especially if seen out of context or in different clothing or hair styles. However, it's definitely not something every user needs.What's the use case for this? You don't need these glasses to recognize people you already know.
Edit: I mean the use case from the customer perspective.
Well Facebook Marketplace got me to re-install the app. This made me uninstall it again. Mark really can't help himself.