NO.Can we pander to MAHA, re-litigate COVID, and improve science at the same time?
Can we pander to MAHA, re-litigate COVID, and improve science at the same time?
We don't negotiate with terrorists.Can we pander to MAHA, re-litigate COVID, and improve science at the same time?
My god, the mindset that is required to produce words like this....Why this grandiose vision? The first scientific revolution you have… very broadly speaking, you had high ecclesiastical authority deciding what was true or false on physical, scientific reality. And the first scientific revolution basically took… the truth-making power out of the hands of high ecclesiastical authority for deciding physical truth. We can leave aside spiritual—that is a different thing—physical truth and put it in the hands of people with telescopes. It democratized science fundamentally, it took the hands of power to decide what’s true out of the hands of authority and put it in the hands of ridiculous geniuses and regular people.
The second scientific revolution, then, is very similar. The COVID crisis, if it was anything, was the crisis of high scientific authority geting to decide not just a scientific truth like “plexiglass is going to protect us from COVID” or something, but also essentially spiritual truth. How should we treat our neighbor? Well, we treat our neighbor as a mere biohazzard
Read: truth is basically whatever the dumbest person in the room says it is.The COVID crisis, if it was anything, was the crisis of high scientific authority geting to decide not just a scientific truth... but also essentially spiritual truth. How should we treat our neighbor?
not just in scienceBunch of braindead morons...
The USA is walking itself back a few hundred years in science it seems.
This is a classic “pick any two” situation.Can we pander to MAHA, re-litigate COVID, and improve science at the same time?
Oh BULLSHIT a lot of people let themselves get tricked into thinking that "sleight of hand was happening" because they are fools who like to be lied to.Covid did a number on scientific credibility, not because the science was bad but because a lot of ethical / political decisions were being made and being called scientific decisions, so a lot of people felt a slight of hand was happening were they were being told to sit down and shut up because they weren't scientist (which is valid in a scientific discussion), but then the scientist proceeded to do political or ethical work which is a domain that the populace should be allowed to work in within a democracy.
The current admin is of course entirely incapable of dealing with that issue and instead will just further muddy the waters.
These people are still literally complaining that they were asked to put on a mask and maybe stay away from people they don't need to be around while we figured out a novel worldwide pandemic. They put everyone in danger because they couldn't stand the idea of someone who wasn't part of their tribe telling them what to do. It's that simple. And we're supposed to feel sorry for them.Covid did a number on scientific credibility, not because the science was bad but because a lot of ethical / political decisions were being made and being called scientific decisions, so a lot of people felt a slight of hand was happening were they were being told to sit down and shut up because they weren't scientist (which is valid in a scientific discussion), but then the scientist proceeded to do political or ethical work which is a domain that the populace should be allowed to work in within a democracy.
So, speaking truth-to-power is a good thing in your mind instead of blindly listening to a leader that you don't respect? Going against the grain should be celebrated?“I recognized it as an act of courage because you weren’t allowed to contradict the leader for fear that you were going to get suppressed.”
... of a concerted effort from conservatives and anti-vaxxers to discredit and disparage science and scientists.Covid did a number on scientific credibility, not because the science was bad but because
"I have a foreboding of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time-when the United States is a service and information economy; when nearly all the key manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries; when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues; when the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority; when, clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content in the enormously influential media, the 30-second sound bites (now down to 10 seconds or less), lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudo-science and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance." - Carl Sagan, A Demon-Haunted World, 1995.
"celebration of ignorance"...priceless and prescient.
I think the inmates in an asylum would do a far better job than this lot though.I'm afraid the inmates have taken over the asylum at the NIH. They may still occasionally do something that isn't the worst possible thing in the same way that a stopped clock is correct twice a day, but America's strength in biomedical research is history.
What's a name for circus that is stupid and dangerous? I hate denigrating clowns compared to these monsters
Are the RedWell, I suppose the Cultural Revolution was technically a revolution, so at least they have historical precedent...