If it's anything like previous BMW platform introductions, additional trims come the following year. So 2028 model year.Any word on if or when a version comparable to an X3 i30 will arrive? I could see replacing my 2017 X3 with one, and its i28 powertrain is fine for me.
I find my HUD useful but I had to minimize how much info it throws up, I found myself looking at it too much otherwise. It’s nice, but given the option I’d be just as happy without it. But if you want x you must get y these days.I’d go for the optional HUD too. Well, unless it’s bundled into some high dollar package with a bunch of stuff I don’t want — never underestimate a car manufacturer’s ability to do that.
True aficionados know the best way to roll coal is to use literal coalIs there going to be a version for the USA market with a big door in the front so people can just shovel in charcoal and wood?
Wild that you thought this was a contribution to the conversation. If you hate the topic, find a topic you can contribute to without being an asshole.Crossover what? What does it cross over?
It's another GD Fn SUV. All we see nowadays (except for the new Honda Prelude) is SUVs. The entire US roadscape is filled with SUVs.
Crossover? Like it's "sporty"? No, it's not. Like an XUV means something? No, it doesn't. These are soccer-mom behemoths who now have ONE MOM and ONE KID going to a field. So for 11 of them there are 11 SUVs/XUVs/Crossovers with two people apiece.
Disgusting. Not newsworthy. But hey, here's a headline for you:
"Car manufacturer produces yet another SUV butt this one is a crossover and it has a sporty look, like a 60 year old in a sports top."
Nothing stops you from driving it in Germany or West Virginia ...True aficionados know the best way to roll coal is to use literal coal
I don’t know what I’m doing ‘wrong’ but I’m getting 14.4kWh/100km out of my IONIQ5. Figures quoted everywhere for all kinds of EVs show in the range of 20kWh/100km as the norm and anywhere around 15 as great.
Fair enough. I will say, having sat in a number of BEVs, that BMW interiors are still nicer. $30K nicer? Meh.I didn't judge anyone for their purchasing preferences in my comment. As people above confirmed with a scientific argument, cars are indeed getting more similar for a good reason. My point is simply that one pays for a badge MORE now than before. BMW from 2010 with their famous 3.0 diesel engine coupled with their transmission was simply miles ahead of what Kia was offering. For BEVs it's not the case anymore. And it is good. If you want you can buy an expensive car for status and pleasure, no judgement, good for you, but it is nice that performance and features akin to ones found in more premium brands are now becoming available for wider audiences.
Thank you!I can't see anything but a pair of buck teeth on the front of that car.
So if I'm distractedly looking to the left and the car veers onto the left shoulder (or into the opposing traffic lane) then the car won't try to correct? No thanks.if you intentionally cross the median or a lane marker and are looking where you're going, the eye-tracking driver monitoring system sees you and won't try to correct
Tell me you’ve never seen a 2002 or E21 3-series without telling me.Thank you!
It's wild that people are actually praising the design when they've finally gone full buck teeth.
Personally, I see this failing spectacularly.
BMW will claim "there's no appetite for EV-first vehicle platforms" when in reality people don't want to be seen driving around in Alvin
So weirdly consolidating the hardware allows you to run something more like micro services. With a distributed architecture you functions at those remote ECUs are fixed and very limited and might only provide basic status. When you consolidate you can create those same concepts as the ECUs but gain flexibility in how they are implemented and how they interact with other functions in the car all while not being restricted by very limited and ECU hardware and CAN bus."Instead of hundreds of discrete black boxes, each with a single electric control unit (ECU) performing a single job, the iX3 uses four high-performance computers, each in charge of a different domain."
I get the weight savings, but is this not going from micro services-like architecture to DC-based (somewhat monolithic one)? Are the tides turning?
It's absolutely hideous, IMO. Does not look better than the massive grillI can't see anything but a pair of buck teeth on the front of that car.
They do not look the same. The cut corners at the top of the buck teeth make it look significantly worse, IMOTell me you’ve never seen a 2002 or E21 3-series without telling me.
I get arround 14.3 myself averaged over the past 3 years in my Ioniq 5. It really depends on your mix of driving, your typical speeds, and how much you stomp it.I don’t know what I’m doing ‘wrong’ but I’m getting 14.4kWh/100km out of my IONIQ5. Figures quoted everywhere for all kinds of EVs show in the range of 20kWh/100km as the norm and anywhere around 15 as great.
They have gotten rid of the rotary dial and most physical buttons in the refreshed CX5. Which is actually a shame imo as I quite like the dial for everything other than text entry. Ideally you would have it and a touchscreen which really should add little cost. Not sure why Mazda mostly forced us to pick one or the either.I wonder what data Mazda has about its own rotary controller. It’s the main thing discouraging me from getting a Miata. The various safety features are quite good in the new ones and it’s gorgeous, but I keep hoping they’ll get rid of that thing.
Inofficial timelines (those are start of production dates, not model years or market introduction) for additional models:If it's anything like previous BMW platform introductions, additional trims come the following year. So 2028 model year.
I hope they move production to SC...
Getting anything fixed in a BMW is painfully expensive.I like it... looking at the panoramic though, and how it blends into the windshield... i wonder if windshield replacement costs will be normal or if its integrated in a way that they will be painfully expensive
Not at all. The old world had one physical computer for each function like cruise control or climate control or driver behavior monitoring. Each of them having a diferent kind of operating system and a different type of CPU."Instead of hundreds of discrete black boxes, each with a single electric control unit (ECU) performing a single job, the iX3 uses four high-performance computers, each in charge of a different domain."
I get the weight savings, but is this not going from micro services-like architecture to DC-based (somewhat monolithic one)? Are the tides turning?
The front does nothing for me.I actually quite like the look of it: at last we have moved on from “peak grille” and have gone back down the slope to something reminiscent of BMWs from more elegant years.
That strong regen is good and would probably make towing something much more efficient. To offer a better car cheaper is no mean feat these days. It just goes to show how much Tesla have lost their first-mover advantage...
I dunno, I think the new butterfly wings add a nature-oriented light touch.They do not look the same. The cut corners at the top of the buck teeth make it look significantly worse, IMO
It's not the only color option, there are regular black wheels as well.I have to believe that white steering wheel would get pretty grimy -- especially for the wife who keeps hand cream next to her in the car.
Overall I like the design and I’m glad to see them moving away from the direction they were taking with the X3 and the 5 series.Nice to see the classic small kidneys back!
Agreed! For all the tech, improvements, range, charging, styling... I expected much higher. This looks like a Tesla killer to me! Bring it on BMW!This is the first BMW in a long time to peak my interest. If "around $60,000" is true (or even "less than"), I might actually show up on the lot for a test drive.
I didn't think the goalpost was over there. Weird.They do not look the same. The cut corners at the top of the buck teeth make it look significantly worse, IMO
My Model S does something like this, and I hate it. When I touch the brakes or move the wheel it should kick out of cruise control entirely, not put the car into some kind of ambiguous state where CC is "on" but not doing anything, just waiting for a chance to unexpectedly retake control from me or nag/punish me for going too fast, etc.Unlike just about every car on the road currently, using the brake will not immediately kill the cruise control. . .
The (i3) sedan will follow a year later or soThat is a very pretty interior. Now if only they’d make a sedan
If that's where your mind goes, sure. I see rabbit/rodent teeth.I kinda thought it looked like camel-toe
I wonder whether there is any redundancy baked into such a system. If it's truly multifunctional computers, if one fails (as computers do from time to time, especially in a car environment) - can the remaining 3 just take over the tasks of the faulty one? That would be one major upside in that approach.Instead of hundreds of discrete black boxes, each with a single electric control unit (ECU) performing a single job, the iX3 uses four high-performance computers, each in charge of a different domain.