also Biden wasted like 2 years before putting a quorum on the FCC even though Pai was one of the most insufferable people of the last trump admin.Under Lina Khan the FCC was actually starting to do some real regulation, of course that got shut down as soon as Trump came into office
I really and honestly struggle with my feelings about this stuff.
I believe in paying and supporting content creators. I'm really grateful for all the subscribers we have, you make a difference in our existence. We are not Too Big Too Fail, that's for sure.
What we do depends on the support of our readers. It doesn't exist otherwise.
And yet when I see people postingetc I not only get where they're coming from, but I also wonder at what point is it almost an ethical response?
3 companies owning every major piece of media is bad. Encouraging the failure of that model almost feels like it might be the best course at this point, since it's clear nobody with any power is going to be on our side.
When they cancel Jimmy Kimmel for speaking some really basic truth to power and the only response available is "cancel Disney+" that's incredibly unhealthy, we shouldn't even be in that position in the first place.
Alternatively Netflix could return HBO as an exclusively prestige brand. No body currently associates Netflix with quality, I don’t see how they benefit from having 2 schlock brands when they’re acquiring a brand that defined prestige TV.Yep. If this goes through – and who are we kidding, what "if"? – then HBO as a premium brand is finished. It was already out the door, anyway, but with Netflix at the helm, it'll just be quantity over quality schlock all the way down.
I'm not sure what sort of contract GRR has in place for GoT and spin offs, but the days of 'HBO will treat it right and give it the premium treatment it deserves/needs'... yeah, buh-bye.
You waited until now?!Time to dust off the ol' Jolley Roger.
Before today’s announcement, industry folks were concerned about Netflix potentially owning that much content while dominating streaming. However, Netflix said today that buying WB would enable it to “significantly expand US production capacity and continue to grow investment in original content over the long term, which will create jobs and strengthen the entertainment industry.”
I guess at that point I don't see why you would ever pay for any media. If your goal is to boycott something because of foul play, IMO you shouldn't experience the media. If your goal is to just get the media you want, then I don't see why you'd bother to pay for any of it. I'm not falling on the sword for billion dollar media conglomerates, but like i had mentioned, they might be pushing the boundaries of what's considered legal, but at the end of the day there's basically no chance the cops are going to kick down your door for burning your Blu Rays you bought to your own hard drive. Stuff like that gets hard when Netflix doesn't want to release physical media for their shows and they're trapped in an endless subscription service, so that begs the question of what your goal is.Which is why this isn't about boycotting big media, it's about fair play. If media companies are going to consistently manipulate the law in their favor, through ever longer copyright terms, ever more draconian restrictions on fair use, and increasingly few rights for customers actually paying for their media, what right do they really have to expect people who want to access what they're selling to pay?
Big business in the US, for the most part, has no principles other than to extract the maximum profit while externalizing as many costs as possible. There's no reason regular folks should be hamstrung by any idealized principles when responding to these practices, especially when the only real harm a business is facing is lost revenue.
A visit to the White House bearing cheap gold-plated tchotchkes is all the work approval needs nowadays.There is almost a 0% chance this gets approved.
It's possible... like it's possible that you can walk through solid wall - quantum physics allows it, but the probability is so low...Alternatively Netflix could return HBO as an exclusively prestige brand. No body currently associates Netflix with quality, I don’t see how they benefit from having 2 schlock brands when they’re acquiring a brand that defined prestige TV.
That sounds good in theory, but somehow it's inevitably going to raise costs. I can see it raising costs whether they offer current Netflix standalone as an option or not.Uniting Netflix and HBO Max’s libraries could make it easier for streaming subscribers to find content with fewer apps and fewer subscriptions.
NetFlix could simply promise Trump to make a really nice documentary movie, with a couple of leading stars in it, extolling the bigly bestest president of all times. The deal would sail through the regulatory exam without effort.A visit to the White House bearing cheap gold-plated tchotchkes is all the work approval needs nowadays.
Because monopoly has a specific definition, and it isn’t “BIG AND BAD!!!”Big IT monopoly? How would then NOT fit with that list of companies
the worst part is that HBO actually made great shows and usually followed with the story while netflix is just about viewership and cancellations are ripe left and right...Remember years ago when the guy running HBO said their goal was to become Netflix faster than Netflix became HBO? Well now they literally are Netflix.
The costs were going to go up regardless as they do for everything.That sounds good in theory, but somehow it's inevitably going to raise costs. I can see it raising costs whether they offer current Netflix standalone as an option or not.
On the following, I only mention this as a second option to the current billing model. Since I don't enjoy canceling services round-robin, and I'm not a very heavy user of streaming, I wish some company would use their influence to establish the Apple iTunes type model for rentals. Again, as an option - not trying to affect everyone else. Charging by the hour watched, per month, for example. I feel like I've been subsidizing the heavy streamers for years and I wouldn't mind this option. I can't sustain the steaming price increases forever and eventually I'll probably just drop the service entirely. Main reason is I'm between jobs (I'm an old dude, and this year hasn't been kind to me) and having to start making tough decisions. You'd think they'd be happier with 'some' income, since I don't utilize it much, than none at all.
psst don't go look at how many HBO shows were cancelled after just one season lol.the worst part is that HBO actually made great shows and usually followed with the story while netflix is just about viewership and cancellations are ripe left and right...
Theatrical has seen attendance decline for 30 years by this point it's not going to suddenly grow and come back.
Theatrical 'profits' are not why it continues to exist it's a halo product like a concept car or limited edition hyper cars. The legacy media companies made massive profits thanks to the cable TV bundle but that doesn't get column inches box office number ones and awards shows do. It's just about executive egos.
Netflix getting hold of not just a huge library of films and shows but experienced production studios for both means they have even less reason to deal with other legacy media companies who do overcharge with licencing fees to support their own streaming services.
Physical media is even worse it's basically dead at this point. Collectors still exist as does Magnetar ($3000 blu-ray player anyone?) but all the main consumer electronics companies have long abandoned physical media players.
I'm pretty sure it's implicit that the people asking for that also want it to be $10/month with no ads like it used to be. Though, I'd probably be willing to pay $30 if it actually had everything. That's what I was paying for just Netflix and Disney before I cancelled them.I hope everyone that complained about "too many streaming services" or yearned for the "good old days of having everything on Netflix" enjoys paying $30+ a month for their subscription. This one's for you, kid.
DVD hasn't been a relevant movie format for almost 20 years. Physical media is, if not dead, on life support. I love 4K Blu-rays, and have a 100+ collection of Blu-rays, but that's not common and I have no intention of building a large 4K collection. Even if I wanted to, lots of stuff isn't available physically or only comes out way after it's available digitally."Physical media is basically dead." No it isn't. You can buy a cheap, good (or: good enough) CD+DVD R/W which plugs into your computer by USB for like, 30 bucks. I like owning my media and I loathe streaming, so I still buy CDs and DVDs.
Great. Now our streaming service fees will rise to the absurd level of theatre pricing.
Those days never went away for most series. They are available on iTunes and Amazon Prime at least, and often on DVD still.I miss the days when TV series could be purchased/rented from multiple platforms for a few bucks per episode.
You're not "buying" on iTunes or Prime or any other digital platform. You're paying for a licence to view - and that licence can be (and has been) ripped away with no notice.Those days never went away for most series. They are available on iTunes and Amazon Prime at least, and often on DVD still.
That's been true for every digital store front for video since day one.You're not "buying" on iTunes or Prime or any other digital platform. You're paying for a licence to view - and that licence can be (and has been) ripped away with no notice.
https://law.vanderbilt.edu/gone-but-not-forgotten/
Right, so to equate "buying" via a digital storefront to owning a physical copy is flawed.That's been true for every digital store front for video since day one.
Right, so to equate "buying" via a digital storefront to owning a physical copy is flawed.
Of course, even physical copies aren't forever. Players break down and, whilst they are still making players - how long until that goes by the wayside?
yeah, no it's absolutely not. It wouldn't make any sense whatsoever for this to have any regulatory scrutiny given how much Disney and Amazon have already been able to acquire. To argue Netlfix cannot make the acquisition is nonsenseNetflix’s proposed entertainment juggernaut set to face regulatory scrutiny.
Why? Disney and even Amazon have been given a pass to acquire several times over. Saying Netflix can't do this acquisition is silly given those factsThis needs to be blocked 8 ways to Sunday. Anti competitive in basically every way
Closer to home, Sony buying Crunchyroll and then installing Funimation's leadership is why subtitle quality has been going down the toilet in recent months, as they've scrapped CR's more-capable in-house tooling.I do hope at least Netflix doesn't take on WB's leadership a la Boeing.
Worst of all worlds, that.
Looking at it from the narrow viewpoint of Last Week Tonight fans (of which I am one), Netflix purchasing WB/HBO Max seems much more preferable than having the other likely buyer, Paramount/Skydance, getting HBO.Looks like it’s John Oliver’s turn to be fired for reasons “completely unrelated to this article”.
Sorry that's your experience, but it's definitely not mine. I can't remember ever hearing screaming kids and I go to the movies at least a few times a month. Even people on their phones or talking is pretty rare. Maybe because I usually see them on the premium format screens.I HATE going to the movies. In practically every theater there's screaming or crying kids and parents who won't control them, People with their cell phones lighting up the room, people who would rather talk than watch the movie, and other annoyances. Its just not worth paying a premium for that.