That is the step you should be taking now while you have a little time to make the transition. OS X or Linux would be better for you at this point.This is very bad. We have several critical systems that are NEVER allowed to connect to the Internet under any circumstances, and are often installed where there is no Internet connection to be had. Full stop. Remove these workaround - even as onerous as they've already become - and we simply won't be able to use Windows for these systems anymore.
I mean it when I say I only use windows for gaming. I've got a Mac for everything else. I'm not gonna dual boot my gaming box, so I'll leave it as-is until it's less useful than it would be on Linux and then it's change time.I feel you (I'm bloody pissed at MS also), but I think you don't need to go that far...
As far as I understand, the real issue with MS dropping support is that you won't get security updates anymore, and possibly that some future software will only be supported from win 11 onwards.
So, how about:
- Use linux for your everyday "medium/high risk" activities (browsing, home banking etc...)
- Play the games you can play on linux
- Keep a VM with Win 10 for when you need to perform those "low risk" operations that requires it (like gaming... or yarring
, if you do not want to risk logging into an account)
Unlikely as Apple has a strong interest in user privacy. They make plenty of money without this sort of forced account setup.For now. I think we all know that these sorts of things are going to come for the Mac as well. It is only a matter of time. The only reason why it hasn't is how focused they've been on their cash cow: the phone.
As I've mentioned before, it occasionally happens where upon reinstall, the machine comes up without either ethernet or wifi drivers. Then you get to the setup screen where it makes you pick a network connection, which is prior to the screen you've shared, and then you just get completely stuck as it won't find ethernet or wifi. In those instances, OOBE /BYPASSNRO has been the only outcome for us in our corporate setting.I've commented on this previously; there is still the option to "Join Domain Instead," which allows you to create a local admin account, complete OOBE, and not require an email.
I do this in my office when setting up new computers or PXE boot installs. View attachment 119832
View attachment 119833
View attachment 119838
At this point, wearing my corporate IT hat, let them go ahead with their seemingly inevitable quest to be a cloud service. Just offer client access license packages to anyone or any org that wants to connect to their cloud offerings, and keep printing money. Then just dump the corpse that is Windows into open source and let it get re-animated into something useful, but probably forked and balkanized, same as the vast array of Linux distros. Any Windows API-based client is the tool needed to connect to MS pay-to-play services, but MS won't have to spend a dime to support endpoint OSes. All of us who've had to support Windows for decades can just shrug and move on to supporting whatever distro makes sense and continue to deal with Microsoft licensing and services like always. All that really would change might be patching and upgrade cycles.Windows is devolving to the point of ALL the downsides of open hardware/software (complicated, unreliable, inscrutable, too many cooks in the kitchen, iffy support) with ALL the downsides of locked-down platforms (cloud sign-ons, security hassles, feature removals, no privacy, take it or leave it terms, secrecy). There are a few upsides they've kept, such as backwards compatibility, and alt app stores (Steam mostly) which are diminishing year on year.
I'm not sure where this ends up. They're driving away consumers, but corporate customers have no choice.
MS is coasting along with no real roadmap or competition, as the 'cloud migration' continues as a ploy to receive both cloud and 'terrestrial' income in perpetuity. This is Moses wandering for 40 years, barred from the Promised Land. If they commit fully to the cloud, their economy collapses. Like Germany with EVs.
When did Linux stop being an operating system?all operating systems (including Apple's and Google's)
In your long tirade of experienced woes with attempting to install Linux you neglected to describe how Windows has changed in the same period. Perhaps this is a case of "how to boil a frog".
Laptops specifically can have some extra quirks with NVIDIA, but I admit my information on that is probably somewhat outdated. I still think you'll have the best out-of-the-box experience with all-Intel or all-AMD laptops. It does look like NVIDIA is getting better and maybe more open (but really, just moving more into the firmware so there's less driver to open up).Why not just put Linux on an extra drive in your main ride and choose at bootup if you want to go Windows or Linux? That way you can really be impressed about how well the Linux drivers work for your main GPU.
By the way, the advice to "avoid Nvidia" I thought was true as well when I discussed switching with friends a few months ago.
However, it doesn't seem to be the case any longer. At least the Nvidia drivers work 100% perfectly out of the box for my RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in the sense that the performance I get in games is on par with what I get playing them under Windows.
I've been running Fedora for over 18 years, and I've been upgrading from one major release to the next without issue for probably 15 years at this point. I firmly believe Fedora gives the best experience for folks who want recent versions of software, and then Debian is the best choice for something with longer release cycles. I think Ubuntu has done more harm than good by being too different over the years, trying too many things that didn't stick while trying to be the distro for new users. Debian and Fedora are community projects that have stood the test of time.I'm as irritated as everyone else with Microsoft and Windows.
The common, glowing refrain seems to be: Linux, which I've starting thinking about again.
But has anyone else tried that MANY times and found it disappointing every time?
Granted I haven't done it recently, but I lost count of how many times I've heard "It's different now", in the 30+ years since I first brought home a stack of floppies from University, with Slackware on it.
In that time, I think I have had a Linux dual boot on my home computer about 10 different times, and it's been a disappointing experience every time. Nearly every time I do, this the distro ends up breaking on upgrades. How's that saying go: "Fool me once, shame on you, Fool me ten times...".
Every time, I've been extremely disappointed with with GUI, regardless of which DE I choose. It always feels like a random assemblage of parts that don't quite mesh.
Last time I tried was on my previous Windows 7 computer. I tried many distros (all had GPU issues), asked for advice, and was eventually told that my GPU was "too old", which I found hilarious because the message has always been, "when your computer is too old for Windows, install Linux". Many hours over a couple of weeks wasted on "It just works now" Linux.
There is never a definitive Linux, that you can just install an use/upgrades consistently safely for 10 years like you can with Windows. Unless you choose a major one, it might not even exist in 10 years. I've never had Windows fail and need reinstall. I installed Window XP once and used it past EOL, then Windows 7 once and used it past EOL, and Now Windows 10 which it seems I will use past EOL.
As much as everyone complains about Windows, IMO, it would be a dream if any Linux distro worked that well and could maintains stability over a 10 year lifetime of upgrades.
It never started ;-).When did Linux stop being an operating system?
This issue is one of several reasons I am moving away from Microsoft. I use it at work because I have to, but I no longer use it for my personal desktop or laptop.Personally all this does it push me closer to OSX. I already use both uses at work and Windows at home. Honestly, it's only PC games that keep me on Windows at this point.
What's absolutely hilarious is that just from the art styling of the desktop screenshot, I muttered, "This is Arch-based, isn't it?"
Idk, I seem to recall the CIA leaving a bunch of zero-day cyberweapons up online with the virtual doors thrown open...you know, the sort of things that make you WannaCry.This doesn't apply to LTSC, that's enterprise only and as long as the US gov is a client there will never be a requirement to hook enterprise up to the MS cloud. With the multiple breaches of govcloud there will continue to be machines that aren't going to be put online to protect the most important secrets.

Importantly too you can just login to just the services you want too. Throwaway app store account for free apps and logged into else works fine. Login just to iMessage or just to Facetime also works. Login to everything with a different account? why not.You can buy a MacBook, download all the software you want, and do Time Machine backups all without an AppleID. Maybe you can't download from the app store, but you can still install applications.
That's been obvious since Windows 10 came out in 2015, at least.I think the logical conclusion that MS is building towards is Windows 365 with a perpetual subscription.
That's been obvious since Windows 10 came out in 2015, at least.
Do you have a link to an article or website that details this registry trick of yours?None of my Win 10 home machines have been offered extended support. I did the registry trick on one machine to get the support to show. I need to do that on 2 more machines.
Or just a Pro/Enterprise version of Windows 11 which allow you to domain-join and escape this problem, and will continue to do so for at least the rest of Windows 11's life and probably part of Windows 12's life, at minimum. That's probably a way more viable solution for a business than "totally switch which OS you are using, along with all the software, too".That is the step you should be taking now while you have a little time to make the transition. OS X or Linux would be better for you at this point.
I'm as irritated as everyone else with Microsoft and Windows.
The common, glowing refrain seems to be: Linux, which I've starting thinking about again.
But has anyone else tried that MANY times and found it disappointing every time?
Granted I haven't done it recently, but I lost count of how many times I've heard "It's different now",
Last time I tried was on my previous Windows 7 computer. I tried many distros (all had GPU issues), asked for advice, and was eventually told that my GPU was "too old",
There is never a definitive Linux
As much as everyone complains about Windows, IMO, it would be a dream if any Linux distro worked that well and could maintains stability over a 10 year lifetime of upgrades.
https://www.askwoody.com/forums/topic/how_to_force_windows_10_esu/Do you have a link to an article or website that details this registry trick of yours?
TL;DRHow do I get Mastercam and Solidworks to run on Linux? They're my primary reasons for having a PC in the first place.
suggested OS X (which is supposed to be referred to as MacOS
I'd be curious to hear more about the issues you have with Linux on your Acer laptop?Linux is getting there, i prefer the Cinnamon desktop offered by Linux Mint, and i have few issues on the range of computers i have installed it on, although my laptop is wonky, but that might be an Acer problem no matter what distro i try.