It feels like sooner or later there’s going to be a major shift in the market. Microsoft does not seem to prioritize Windows the way it used to, and while I get it, it is eventually going to bite them.
I saw this as a fairly satisfied Windows user - I use 11, and honestly don’t get what most people complain about. I do have my own frustrations though. And while it’s a mature platform and I don’t want to see major changes… I also don’t feel like it’s improving or even keeping up.
Basic stuff people have been complaining about for years just never seems to get fixed. You need to stay on top of the basic stuff if you want users to trust you.
This thing with side mounting the taskbar is a perfect example. I don’t do that. I don’t want to. I don’t get why anyone else does - though I accept that other people have their own workflows where it makes sense. But come on Microsoft, I want that fixed so that I can stop hearing people complain about it! The fact that it took this long makes me think that I’m SOL if Microsoft ever breaks something that is important to me.
Your precise, cutting commentary is to be commended, sir!Unnecessary Copilot entry points = all of them.
To be fair, we've been on the "...sure, Microsoft's latest system / cloud / whatever upgrade is a buggy, vulnerable, cluttered mess with useful settings and options buried in places nobody should have to look, but we have to use it because... everyone uses it..." train, arguably since the days of Windows 3.1. The level of Windows-related adoption over the years, no matter how bad or frustrating it got at times, is as much a study in "stupid things humans do even though they know they're stupid" as it is a study in technology advacement (or not).Would that be the same commitment to quality that led the FedRAMP team to describe Azure (and I quote) "a pile of shit"?
The fact that said pile of shit was approved for US Government use is just more evidence that we live in the worst possible timeline.
Microsoft has been 'committed to quality' since Windows Vista.
Your precise, cutting commentary is to be commended, sir!
To be fair, we've been on the "...sure, Microsoft's latest system / cloud / whatever upgrade is a buggy, vulnerable, cluttered mess with useful settings and options buried in places nobody should have to look, but we have to use it because... everyone uses it..." train, arguably since the days of Windows 3.1. The level of Windows-related adoption over the years, no matter how bad or frustrating it got at times, is as much a study in "stupid things humans do even though they know they're stupid" as it is a study in technology advacement (or not).
Obviously, Windows 10 especially and early days of Windows 11 (once everyone figured out how to shut off all the Cortana crap that no one asked for), are MUCH better experiences than 95, 98, 2000, et al... but in terms of Microsoft gonna Microsoft and people just going along with it... we've been here for a long time. It was just a less painful version of the commute than earlier versions...
...or in summary, "what that guy ↓↓↓ said..."
Ability to run updates without a restart and without killing my power save features to run an update when I really need the computer to stay charged (travelling etc)
Not to get too Battlefronty but 100% agreed on the bolded part. What frustrates the hell out of me is Microsoft's inability to simplify the amount and kind of settings (and the amount they get buried for no apparent UI design reason).... along with the constant churn of security vulernabilities and updates. It's what prevented me from becoming a two OS guy when Windows 10 had matured and stabilized. Even the best of what MS could muster, was still just arbitrarily complicated in places. It is amazing to me that a company with such deep pockets and basically unlimited human resources, has not figured out — after all this time — how to design a simple, accessible UI that mostly persists from generation to generation.I've been primarily a Windows Admin for 20+ years. Cut my teeth on NT 4.0 back in the day. That's 30 years of Windows for those keeping track. [snip]
My biggest complaint is how every part of the OS has become more and more incoherent for professionals trying to use or support it. Remember back where there was a big push to move from Control Panel to Settings? How are we coming on that? Oh right, it's 2026 and configuration options are still spread out over hell's half acre. Want to create a shortcut? Get ready to click half a dozen times instead of twice. Meanwhile I can hand a mac to someone who hasn't touched an apple product in 20 years and for the most part they'll recognize the OS. .... [snip]
One of the most humorous settings in Windows to me is Natural Scrolling. They did not even natively support that feature until a year or two ago and they do not call it something logical like “Inverted” or “Natural” scrolling. Instead it reads “Down motion scrolls down” and “Down motion scrolls up” which may make sense to people who have never used Natural Scrolling but makes no sense if you prefer Natural Scrolling. Their wording describes the action of the scroll bar and not of the content.Not to get too Battlefronty but 100% agreed on the bolded part. What frustrates the hell out of me is Microsoft's inability to simplify the amount and kind of settings (and the amount they get buried for no apparent UI design reason).... along with the constant churn of security vulernabilities and updates. It's what prevented me from becoming a two OS guy when Windows 10 had matured and stabilized. Even the best of what MS could muster, was still just arbitrarily complicated in places. It is amazing to me that a company with such deep pockets and basically unlimited human resources, has not figured out — after all this time — how to design a simple, accessible UI that mostly persists from generation to generation.
Obviously some things will change and move no matter what platform you use, but damn if MS doesn't take the frustration cake. (In fairness, Apple has occasionally been guilty as well, albeit to a much less painful degree, which is why the bolded still rings true. They're more prone to periodic, stupid Marketing-driven (that's probably redundant), aesthetic shit like Liquid Glass most recently or skumorphics (sp) back in the day, than they are to burying multiple important settings 3 layers deep in dialog boxen.)
I’m sorry but your examples are all backwards. If Microsoft was prioritizing Windows, they would not do any of those things. Back when they did prioritize windows the goal was always windows first, and many other Microsoft ambitions died so that windows could take top priority.Gonna quibble a little bit.....
The problem isn't that Microsoft isn't prioritizing Windows, it's that it is prioritizing it too much. They keep doing stupid shit to try and get Windows to generate more revenue for Microsoft when the vast majority of people just want an operating system that does nothing but operating system things.
Nobody needs Copilot in their OS. Nobody needs advertising in their OS. Nobody needs their OS to take pictures of every little thing they do. And nobody needs their OS phoning home with who knows what it's picked up.
Yet somehow Microsoft has never really understood any of this.
TBH 'natural' is only natural if you are already conditioned to that way of thinking, and so 'inverted' is the opposite of your conditioning. I honestly don't know which way is which (are Macs typically the opposite? I have no idea), but after a few minutes with a machine I manage to adjust to whichever way it wants to scroll. 'Down scrolls down' seems a much better way to describe it than deciding one way is 'natural'.One of the most humorous settings in Windows to me is Natural Scrolling. They did not even natively support that feature until a year or two ago and they do not call it something logical like “Inverted” or “Natural” scrolling. Instead it reads “Down motion scrolls down” and “Down motion scrolls up” which may make sense to people who have never used Natural Scrolling but makes no sense if you prefer Natural Scrolling. Their wording describes the action of the scroll bar and not of the content.
ReactOS gets almost no attention or mention in these threads.
I haven't checked on them in a while, but am wondering if anyone has tried using it as a desktop replacement, and how far you can go with it.
I’m sorry but your examples are all backwards. If Microsoft was prioritizing Windows, they would not do any of those things. Back when they did prioritize windows the goal was always windows first, and many other Microsoft ambitions died so that windows could take top priority.
If the best interest of windows are being sacrificed for copilot, and they are, it’s a different problem.
Our bosses (including those in the govt who are REALLY our bosses, however we voted) are locked solidly into the Microsoft system. Regardless of glitches and hitches and inability to demonstrate adequate security (see recent/ongoing issues with M365 and Azure). So losing a few gamers to Linux or even Mac won't be noticed by anybody at MS. Ditto families and other home users. I'm a Linux and Windows user, and it's convenient (and possible) to do that as long as I don't need to use one of those Windows-only specialized apps (I have a couple - don't need them often, but when I do there's no reasonable alternative).100%. The problem for Microsoft is that the world's changed. Gabe Newell slipped them one hell of a sucker punch with SteamOS which also led to Proton. All of a sudden, the gamer crowd that supported the Windows consumer market is showing serious stress fractures. And if the gamers that make up family tech support go to Linux, their families aren't too far behind.
Which just leaves us with our bosses shoving Windows down our throats.
I run Open Shell for my (Win 7 like) Start Menu and ExplorerPatcher for a Windows 10 taskbar. Both have worked well for me.Great. Maybe Ramen's Taskbar Tweaker will work in Win11 after this change. Now we just need to get the Win10 start menu back. I absolutely hate having the app list invade the pinned items after the current update.
“And over the past several months, the team and I have spent a great deal of time analyzing your feedback.
Retired now but did computer support for decades starting in the late ‘90s. For much of that time I was very open about it. “They pay me to fix Microsoft shit. I use the money to buy Macs because I don’t want to spend all my free time fixing Microsoft shit.”…
I only recently returned to workstation work after years of being mostly server side. It takes hours to get 11 prepped and ready for users. And don't even get me started on the "Classic" vs "New" Outlook situation. I got fed up early with 11 and purged all the Windows laptops and desktops from my home network and switched to Macs. When the professional workforce supporting your products don't even want to use them during their non-working hours...there is a problem.
…
I thought the reason everyone was getting windows back then was because MS was charging OEMs more for a DOS only license than a DOS+Windows licence.To be fair, we've been on the "...sure, Microsoft's latest system / cloud / whatever upgrade is a buggy, vulnerable, cluttered mess with useful settings and options buried in places nobody should have to look, but we have to use it because... everyone uses it..." train, arguably since the days of Windows 3.1. The level of Windows-related adoption over the years, no matter how bad or frustrating it got at times, is as much a study in "stupid things humans do even though they know they're stupid" as it is a study in technology advacement (or not).
Considering how fast Intel went to s**t, I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft collapses within a few years. These things seem to happen faster than I would have expected, once they get started.It is certainly interesting to watch as Microsoft are about to lose the techs that have supported them for decades by recommending hardware, helped their friends and family for years and years where as now, the recommendation is to either buy a Mac or get Linux installed, and with the Neo being available, the market is about to change as another round of older computers are about to be thrown away.
When the tech communities are no longer recommending Microsoft or Windows, where the same people are making purchasing decision at their work, that is when Microsoft should be worried in my opinion. Yes, it will take years, but the pebble has started to move. ...
If Microsoft collapse, that will be due to lack of trust. "Evig eies kun et dårlig rykte" which is a Norwegian saying which means "Forever owned is a bad reputation".Considering how fast Intel went to s**t, I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft collapses within a few years. These things seem to happen faster than I would have expected, once they get started.
Revit, Navis Manage and Solidworks would be greater if they worked on a MacBook Pro M5 Max….. One can dream.Apple releases a dirt cheap, "good enough" laptop.
A week later MS yells, again, "WE'RE GOING TO MAKE WINDOWS LESS SHITTY!!!!"
Yeah, too late. My last reason to stay on Windows was my CAD software, and the M5 should run it faster and with less crap than Windows.