It's the latest installment in Sony's Spider-Man Universe, which has floundered recently.
See full article...
See full article...
Foundered actually works well:Typo 1st paragraph, 2nd sentence: floundered not foundered
He’s not real?He's not a real person. Marvel came up with the name Kraven the Hunter first, and then decided his "real name" would be Sergei Kravinoff to justify what they'd already decided would be his supervillain name.
Who is Pwny?Pwny regretting signing away the ability to use live-action Spiderman in their own movies, every day.
Find me a western superhero that doesn't have daddy issues. I wracked my brain and the only one that immediately jumped to mind was Optimus Prime.I mean, it's "grittier" but violence, revenge, and daddy-issues have been in the movies since Toby Mcguire's run and that's ignoring it in Iron Man, the Hulk, Guardians of the Galaxy, Thor, Black Panther... I'm probably missing others.
Pwny is an ironic name for the sorry distributor Sony, that actually owns the movie rights to Spiderman and all Spiderman universe characters, who have been churning out these garbage spidermanless spiderman-adjacent films, like Kraven, Goddam Web, Venom, and Morbius, because they signing away the ability to use the Spiderman himself in their own movies via a profit-sharing deal with Disney's Marvel's Kevin Feige's MCU movies.Who is Pwny?
Kevin Feige doesn't regret it. He has said it had to be done "to keep the lights on." Seems to have done its job for Marvel.
Ms. Marvel?Find me a western superhero that doesn't have daddy issues. I wracked my brain and the only one that immediately jumped to mind was Optimus Prime.
All of the DC A-listers do, as do most of Marvel's except, I think, Captain America.
Wonder Woman definitely does. There's the whole Zeus/Made from Clay thing that gets messed with.Ms. Marvel?
… Wonder Woman?
The only counterpoint I would make is that you are ignoring a big chunk of millenials like myself who, while far from avid comic books fans, did love the animated Spider-man cartoon as a kid.I feel like the problem with this villain origin story strategy is that while pretty much everyone in the general public knows who the heroes are, very few outside of avid comic fans know who the villains are outside of the biggest ones (like Joker for Batman) so many may not even realize this is related to Spiderman unless they catch it in the advertising, and it's going to face a bigger uphill battle for people to become curious to see what the story is vs "oh look new Spiderman movie"
Who counts as A-list?Find me a western superhero that doesn't have daddy issues. I wracked my brain and the only one that immediately jumped to mind was Optimus Prime.
All of the DC A-listers do, as do most of Marvel's except, I think, Captain America.
Lantern does, or at least Jordan: his dad dies in a plane crash and it drives a lot of his behaviour. I think Rayner does as well.Who counts as A-list?
Aquaman, Green Lantern (any?), Wonder Woman
Most of the X-Men, the FF...
Also depends on what you're calling 'daddy issues'. I disagree that the WW/clay thing is her issue, but if you're stretching it to that, are you including DD's/Nightcrawler's religious bent?
Ah. Okay. We’re singing the same tune.Pwny is an ironic name for the sorry distributor Sony, that actually owns the movie rights to Spiderman and all Spiderman universe characters, who have been churning out these garbage spidermanless spiderman-adjacent films, like Kraven, Goddam Web, Venom, and Morbius, because they signing away the ability to use the Spiderman himself in their own movies via a profit-sharing deal with Disney's Marvel's Kevin Feige's MCU movies.
Of course Disney Feige Marvel doesn't regret the deal, their MCU movies with the spoodermans have been huge hits and they hasn't been the ones flailing around failing with shitty spidermanless spiderman-adjacent films for the past decade.
However much money $ony got out of the deal clearly wasnt enough, given that they've been desperately trying for a hit live-action spiderman universe film for so long now (the "Into the Spiderverse" films dont count and werent part of the deal because they are animated and not in the Disney MCU), and how they actually pulled out of the deal in 2019.
Also, the agreement was on Peter Parker-Spidey; Miles and others are available for Sony to do independent of MCU.Ah. Okay. We’re singing the same tune.
Sony didn’t sign the rights away, though. They agreed to rent Spider-Man back to Marvel because they couldn’t afford to keep making movies they didn’t know how to make, but if they didn’t use the franchise, the rights would revert to Marvel.
Eh, WW’s backstory was fine… given life from clay and granted the power of the gods. Silly to unnecessarily retcon it.Wonder Woman definitely does. There's the whole Zeus/Made from Clay thing that gets messed with.
Ms Marvel I suppose depends on which one, but yes you're correct there.
Um……the FF...
F. Scott Fitzgerald of Gatsby fame had said "Show me a hero and I'll write you a tragedy," that supposedly meant heroism leading to sacrifice, but you can also turn it around to read that hero's need a tragic backstory. Given the general/traditional audience of comics being adolescent boys (though it's more an issue of age than gender), that tragedy is generally the death or enmity of a family member. So it's either "screw you, dad!" or "make daddy (or other surrogate father figure) proud." I'm making some generalizations here, but it's also not limited to comics, a lot of mythology and literature has similar notes in either an attempt to make characters sympathetic or that Tolstoy inspired sentiment that unhappiness it what makes things interesting.Lantern does, or at least Jordan: his dad dies in a plane crash and it drives a lot of his behaviour. I think Rayner does as well.
Aquaman is definitely in this league as well, though it's more parental than daddy.
I'm less sure of the X-men, but it looks like a lot of them do, having come into their care by virtue of alienation and bigotry.
Nighcrawler and the FF I'll confess ignorance of.
In seriousness, there's a lot of parental issues in many superheroes' backstories. I went down the rabbit hole with this a while back and really struggled to find superheroes who didn't have challenges in their upbringing. It made me think there's a trope, here, about being hammered early on the anvil of life, or if it's a leftover from older mythological archetypes.
I took "daddy issues" to mean psychologically impacted where it's a driving force / part of the nature of the character, as opposed to "there's events involving their parents".Um…
Reed: Dad is a time traveller, disappeared (but comes back and causes issues)
Sue & Johnny: Dad went to prison (also had the accident where their mom died)
Ben: Dad was an alcoholic
It's going to make a Kravillion dollars. Far far more than the Morbillion that Morbius made, because Kraven is gonna Krave all over those fools!Seriously. I don’t know why anyone would be “intrigued” by yet another Spider-Man adjacent character that they will most likely butcher.
The only thing I’m curious about is how bad this one will bomb. Is it going to be Morbius or Venom?
I just saw this because its available on streaming, and it's not terrible. I wonder if people just didn't get the subtle vibe of Dakota Johnson's acting. Granted, I've not seen her in anything else, so it may be she really is just a flat actor emotionally, but I certainly have seen worse Marvel movies then Madame Web (Eternals and Ant-Man: Quantumania come to mind most immediately).Or Madame Web?
That's one hell of a broad brush you're painting with, there. It's also very likely that you may have forgotten just how dark (and gritty) even some of the more escapist cinema classics of the past were. Robocop is full of gore, body horror, and a darkly dystopian corporate future (as well as very on the nose social critique of the then-current socio-political landscape). The Shining, Full Metal Jacket, Dr Strangelove, Alien, The Thing, Blade Runner, Mad Max did not paint cheery pictures. And that's not even counting the B-movie, blaxploitation, sexploitation films of the 70s and 80s.Media used to be an escapist experience, avoiding looking at the darker side of human existence. These days, it's all grim, dark, grimdarkness with enough blood to float a carrier group in the first few scenes. It's one thing to ignore reality. It's quite another thing to wallow in the horror.
All in all, I prefer escapist fare.
Venom 2 and Morbius were so bad that if you could watch them for free on YouTube, I'd consider the price of keeping my computer on for the duration of the download too high.
But this movie looks so freaking awful I'd rather chew a spoonful of sand than watch another 10 seconds of it.
I don’t know why they keep doing “it’s meant to be dark and tortured” when it has been a proven failure in the DC cinematic universe (after Dark Knight anyway) and in Universal’s Monsterverse as well.Color us bored with this kind of thing already
Part of a grand Marvel tradition that also gave us [Oscar Isaac reading "Somehow, Palpatine has returned." voice] Blackagar Boltagon.He's not a real person. Marvel came up with the name Kraven the Hunter first, and then decided his "real name" would be Sergei Kravinoff to justify what they'd already decided would be his supervillain name.
That's just Inhuman!Part of a grand Marvel tradition that also gave us [Oscar Isaac reading "Somehow, Palpatine has returned." voice] Blackagar Boltagon.
They said it so much that I thought they were rebooting 'Hunter', the cop drama from the 80s.No idea – if only they'd said it like 50 times in two minutes, then we'd know for sure!
And then you spoiled it all by failing to end the sentence with a period.Typo 1st paragraph, 2nd sentence: floundered not foundered
It worked for Daredevil (Netflix), though, which was inspired by the similarly dark (and also very popular) Oldboy. Same with Punisher.I don’t know why they keep doing “it’s meant to be dark and tortured” when it has been a proven failure in the DC cinematic universe (after Dark Knight anyway) and in Universal’s Monsterverse as well.
Dark and gritty only works when it’s playing off the reverse. If everything is dark and gritty, then light-hearted will look refreshing. And thus you have the Snyder to Gunn transition in a nutshell.
With Sony, it’s not so clear that failure was the result of bad strategy, though. The execution has been so poor—laughably so in the case of both Morbius and Madame Webb—that it’s hard to tell how competently made movies would have performed.
Seriously. I don’t know why anyone would be “intrigued” by yet another Spider-Man adjacent character that they will most likely butcher.
The only thing I’m curious about is how bad this one will bomb. Is it going to be Morbius or Venom?