It’s-a-weird, Mario: Pratt’s vocal performance distracts from movie trailer

samred

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,708
I appreciate Kyle's take here, and it matters because Nintendo and Illumination had options for how to introduce arguably the biggest splash yet for the world's most recognizable fictional character. Only like two lines? Really, y'all? Kyle's child is absolutely not the exception to how an avg kid will react to this.

Still, my trailer-based optimism comes from everything that the 2:30 video did *not* do to match usual Illumination style, particularly in terms of sloppy, gross-out physical comedy. Jack Black sounded like he was projecting a distinct personality onto Bowser, and Keegan-Michael Key's effort and performance shone in an incredibly brief moment. (I'm ready for Nintendo's awwwwwwful Toad voice actor to be retired after this film launches.) As one Ars commenter already pointed out, this seems like at worst a tolerable family film and at best possibly one that parents might actually like taking their kids to see. For my money, it just has to be better than Sonic 1.
 
Upvote
115 (121 / -6)

IncorrigibleTroll

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,228
Honestly I wouldn't care as much, but there was such an uproar over the casting, and Pratt coming out and saying it was going to be unlike anything we've heard, and to be super excited for it, and then for it to just be his absolutely normal voice? It's so funny it's sad.

Pratt has never struck me as having much of any dramatic range.
 
Upvote
216 (222 / -6)

Zennikku

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
190
Subscriptor++
It seems everyone forgets Charles Martinet can tone it down. He's a professional voice actor and could do a more mild Mario voice with the occasional excited outburst of classic Mario. But he doesn't have the pull of a current Hollywood actor so that's my guess why it ended up with Chris Pratt.
 
Upvote
231 (232 / -1)

kerbaldroptest

Ars Scholae Palatinae
660
Subscriptor
Why even have these celebrities voice these roles? Personally I don't understand the appeal of following a certain actor, I almost would rather every movie use fairly unknown people so I can see the character as someone within the movie. But I get that isn't the case for most blockbuster movies.
 
Upvote
194 (202 / -8)

samanime

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,878
Subscriptor++
Why even have these celebrities voice these roles? Personally I don't understand the appeal of following a certain actor, I almost would rather every movie use fairly unknown people so I can see the character as someone within the movie. But I get that isn't the case for most blockbuster movies.
I completely agree. I think it is an unfortunately side-effect of our celebrity-obsesses culture. Just having a famous name slapped on the poster or commercial fills seats at the theater and drives sales.

I would absolutely love it if we stopped using so many (non-trained-voice-actor) celebs and instead let trained voice actors reprise the roles. Especially when most animated films are already done by studios whose reputation itself is what usually gets me to see the movie.
 
Upvote
140 (140 / 0)

Uragan

Ars Legatus Legionis
11,242
It seems everyone forgets Charles Martinet can tone it down. He's a professional voice actor and could do a more mild Mario voice with the occasional excited outburst of classic Mario. But he doesn't have the pull of a current Hollywood actor so that's my guess why it ended up with Chris Pratt.
It's a Mario movie. Why do you need the pull of a Hollywood actor for it to work? Tons of people know who Mario is and like Mario.
 
Upvote
174 (177 / -3)

rickytwo3

Smack-Fu Master, in training
63
Obviously it doesn't sound like traditional Mario but i didn't really think it sounded like Chris Pratt either. You can hear he does put a bit of something on it and for the length of a movie it'll probably be fine.

I also thought Bowser's voice fit nicely, although I can definitely hear Jack Black's normal voice slip through at times.
 
Upvote
4 (18 / -14)

Sajuuk

Ars Legatus Legionis
13,088
Subscriptor++
Why even have these celebrities voice these roles? Personally I don't understand the appeal of following a certain actor, I almost would rather every movie use fairly unknown people so I can see the character as someone within the movie. But I get that isn't the case for most blockbuster movies.
Name recognition puts butts in seats. At least, as far as traditional wisdom goes.
 
Upvote
24 (27 / -3)

AdamM

Ars Praefectus
5,931
Subscriptor
It seems everyone forgets Charles Martinet can tone it down. He's a professional voice actor and could do a more mild Mario voice with the occasional excited outburst of classic Mario. But he doesn't have the pull of a current Hollywood actor so that's my guess why it ended up with Chris Pratt.
It's a Mario movie. Why do you need the pull of a Hollywood actor for it to work? Tons of people know who Mario is and like Mario.

Because video game adaptations don't have a great record. Especially Mario in particular.
 
Upvote
22 (27 / -5)

stormcrash

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,906
Once you get into the movie you probably get used to it.

But I was little jarred by Pratt's voiceover too.

It's like any movie with Tom Hanks, Tom Hanks always just sounds like Tom Hanks, but he still gets into the character and once you get into the movie you follow him into the illusion in very short order
 
Upvote
70 (76 / -6)

ChadD

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,433
We have heard 5s. I think its fine. I as pleased it isn't an "Itss a Me a Mario" style performance. That would be annoying.

Pretty sure it won't bother any children. Movie looks fun. Jack Blacks voice work seems top notch. This one is going to make some bank assuming the movie lives up to the first teaser.
 
Upvote
-2 (11 / -13)
D

Deleted member 853890

Guest
I appreciate Kyle's take here, and it matters because Nintendo and Illumination had options for how to introduce arguably the biggest splash yet for the world's most recognizable fictional character. Only like two lines? Really, y'all? Kyle's child is absolutely not the exception to how an avg kid will react to this.

Still, my trailer-based optimism comes from everything that the 2:30 video did *not* do to match usual Illumination style, particularly in terms of sloppy, gross-out physical comedy. Jack Black sounded like he was projecting a distinct personality onto Bowser, and Keegan-Michael Key's effort and performance shone in an incredibly brief moment. (I'm ready for Nintendo's awwwwwwful Toad voice actor to be retired after this film launches.) As one Ars commenter already pointed out, this seems like at worst a tolerable family film and at best possibly one that parents might actually like taking their kids to see. For my money, it just has to be better than Sonic 1.

The fact it was only a handful of lines and one was whispered is actually why I'm trying *not* to judge. It isn't necessarily representative.

But agreed - I actually liked what we saw. Gorgeous visually, no already dated pop culture references, and I actually laughed at both the penguin attack and Toad's appearance. They at least didn't screw up the easy things.
 
Upvote
22 (26 / -4)

Kyle Orland

Ars Praefectus
3,434
Subscriptor++
Why even have these celebrities voice these roles? Personally I don't understand the appeal of following a certain actor, I almost would rather every movie use fairly unknown people so I can see the character as someone within the movie. But I get that isn't the case for most blockbuster movies.

My impression is that studio heads look at previous animated movies that did well, realize they had celebrity voice casts, and assume that THEY also needs celebrity names to get parent butts in seats. Whether that correlation is causation or not, execs seem to THINK it is, so here we are.

Arguably goes back to Tom Hanks and Tim Allen in Toy Story.
 
Upvote
118 (121 / -3)
I appreciate Kyle's take here, and it matters because Nintendo and Illumination had options for how to introduce arguably the biggest splash yet for the world's most recognizable fictional character. Only like two lines? Really, y'all? Kyle's child is absolutely not the exception to how an avg kid will react to this.

Still, my trailer-based optimism comes from everything that the 2:30 video did *not* do to match usual Illumination style, particularly in terms of sloppy, gross-out physical comedy. Jack Black sounded like he was projecting a distinct personality onto Bowser, and Keegan-Michael Key's effort and performance shone in an incredibly brief moment. (I'm ready for Nintendo's awwwwwwful Toad voice actor to be retired after this film launches.) As one Ars commenter already pointed out, this seems like at worst a tolerable family film and at best possibly one that parents might actually like taking their kids to see. For my money, it just has to be better than Sonic 1.

The fact it was only a handful of lines and one was whispered is actually why I'm trying *not* to judge. It isn't necessarily representative.

But agreed - I actually liked what we saw. Gorgeous visually, no already dated pop culture references, and I actually laughed at both the penguin attack and Toad's appearance. They at least didn't screw up the easy things.

Out of all the things that could have gone wrong in the trailer, my only real issue is the choice of Chris Pratt for Mario. Everything else was spot on but they failed at the one thing that should have been an easy win.
 
Upvote
26 (31 / -5)

Kyle Orland

Ars Praefectus
3,434
Subscriptor++
It seems everyone forgets Charles Martinet can tone it down. He's a professional voice actor and could do a more mild Mario voice with the occasional excited outburst of classic Mario. But he doesn't have the pull of a current Hollywood actor so that's my guess why it ended up with Chris Pratt.

Yeah, I mention this in the piece. And I do think giving Martinet a major movie role would be a good reward for his stewardship of this character.

That said, I'm not sure asking him to "tone it down" for an entire movie would lead to the best results either. Being good at enthusiastic 2-second voice snippets and being able to do a whole movie with complex dialogue are very different things, and Martinet has only proven his ability to do the former...
 
Upvote
29 (39 / -10)
Is it too soon to mention Bob Hoskins?

Depends... are you going to say the 1993 movie was underrated or are you going to be correct?

Of the many, many problems with the 1993 Super Mario Bros movie (my love for that movie doesn't excuse how bad it is, I just like bad movies sometimes)... Bob Hoskins' voice wasn't one of them.

His voice was great, absolutely what I would have wanted from a grittier, live-action Mario. It's a shame the rest of the movie was such an off the rails disaster.
 
Upvote
52 (54 / -2)

Kyle Orland

Ars Praefectus
3,434
Subscriptor++
Is it too soon to mention Bob Hoskins?

Depends... are you going to say the 1993 movie was underrated or are you going to be correct?

Of the many, many problems with the 1993 Super Mario Bros movie (my love for that movie doesn't excuse how bad it is, I just like bad movies sometimes)... Bob Hoskins' voice wasn't one of them.

His voice was great, absolutely what I would have wanted from a grittier, live-action Mario. It's a shame the rest of the movie was such an off the rails disaster.

His /voice/ was fine, but his performance (and general casting) was... questionable.
 
Upvote
21 (23 / -2)

HiroTheProtagonist

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,585
Subscriptor++
Pratt aside, it's unfortunate, though understandable that big name actors are used instead of voice actors. So much incredible talent out there in voice acting but instead we just get someone just doing their normal voice.

Funnily enough, I frequently see posts on my Twitter feed of people just now realizing the genius of Mel Blanc's voice acting. There's a lot of people waking up to the fact that voice acting is indeed an art worth appreciating, but the way things are going with animated films and the looming wave of artificially synthesized voices, things are only going to get worse for VAs as time goes on.

Hell, I've had random people, apropos of nothing, tell me I should try my hand at voice acting, but that's mostly because I normally sound like a radio host. I don't have nearly the range required to actually make it anywhere.
 
Upvote
44 (45 / -1)

Zennikku

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
190
Subscriptor++
It seems everyone forgets Charles Martinet can tone it down. He's a professional voice actor and could do a more mild Mario voice with the occasional excited outburst of classic Mario. But he doesn't have the pull of a current Hollywood actor so that's my guess why it ended up with Chris Pratt.

Yeah, I mention this in the piece. And I do think giving Martinet a major movie role would be a good reward for his stewardship of this character.

That said, I'm not sure asking him to "tone it down" for an entire movie would lead to the best results either. Being good at enthusiastic 2-second voice snippets and being able to do a whole movie with complex dialogue are very different things, and Martinet has only proven his ability to do the former...

That's a fair assessment. I'm still disappointed in their choice though. Even though it's just a movie it pulls my nostalgia and gets me too emotionally involved.

I really want to hear how the French dub version sounds with more dialogue though.
 
Upvote
8 (9 / -1)
Pratt aside, it's unfortunate, though understandable that big name actors are used instead of voice actors. So much incredible talent out there in voice acting but instead we just get someone just doing their normal voice.

Funnily enough, I frequently see posts on my Twitter feed of people just now realizing the genius of Mel Blanc's voice acting. There's a lot of people waking up to the fact that voice acting is indeed an art worth appreciating, but the way things are going with animated films and the looming wave of artificially synthesized voices, things are only going to get worse for VAs as time goes on.

Hell, I've had random people, apropos of nothing, tell me I should try my hand at voice acting, but that's mostly because I normally sound like a radio host. I don't have nearly the range required to actually make it anywhere.

To be fair, neither does Chris Pratt.
 
Upvote
62 (64 / -2)
D

Deleted member 853890

Guest
Is it too soon to mention Bob Hoskins?

Depends... are you going to say the 1993 movie was underrated or are you going to be correct?

Of the many, many problems with the 1993 Super Mario Bros movie (my love for that movie doesn't excuse how bad it is, I just like bad movies sometimes)... Bob Hoskins' voice wasn't one of them.

His voice was great, absolutely what I would have wanted from a grittier, live-action Mario. It's a shame the rest of the movie was such an off the rails disaster.

His /voice/ was fine, but his performance (and general casting) was... questionable.

Given how much of a trainwreck that movie was behind the scenes, can you really blame him if his performance wasn't his best work?
 
Upvote
19 (19 / 0)

Kyle Orland

Ars Praefectus
3,434
Subscriptor++
It seems everyone forgets Charles Martinet can tone it down. He's a professional voice actor and could do a more mild Mario voice with the occasional excited outburst of classic Mario. But he doesn't have the pull of a current Hollywood actor so that's my guess why it ended up with Chris Pratt.
It's a Mario movie. Why do you need the pull of a Hollywood actor for it to work? Tons of people know who Mario is and like Mario.

Because video game adaptations don't have a great record. Especially Mario in particular.

Video game adaptations have traditionally had a horrible rep, true. But I think recent hits like Detective Pikachu and the Sonics are changing that perception somewhat among studios and younger audiences. It's been 30 years since Bob Hoskins Mario, after all...

More to the point, I think when a studio exec looks at "Super Mario movie" vs. "Super Mario movie but also with big celebrity voice cast" and tries to determine which one they'd rather fund/market, they'll always pick the latter.
 
Upvote
36 (37 / -1)