Honestly I wouldn't care as much, but there was such an uproar over the casting, and Pratt coming out and saying it was going to be unlike anything we've heard, and to be super excited for it, and then for it to just be his absolutely normal voice? It's so funny it's sad.
I completely agree. I think it is an unfortunately side-effect of our celebrity-obsesses culture. Just having a famous name slapped on the poster or commercial fills seats at the theater and drives sales.Why even have these celebrities voice these roles? Personally I don't understand the appeal of following a certain actor, I almost would rather every movie use fairly unknown people so I can see the character as someone within the movie. But I get that isn't the case for most blockbuster movies.
It's a Mario movie. Why do you need the pull of a Hollywood actor for it to work? Tons of people know who Mario is and like Mario.It seems everyone forgets Charles Martinet can tone it down. He's a professional voice actor and could do a more mild Mario voice with the occasional excited outburst of classic Mario. But he doesn't have the pull of a current Hollywood actor so that's my guess why it ended up with Chris Pratt.
Name recognition puts butts in seats. At least, as far as traditional wisdom goes.Why even have these celebrities voice these roles? Personally I don't understand the appeal of following a certain actor, I almost would rather every movie use fairly unknown people so I can see the character as someone within the movie. But I get that isn't the case for most blockbuster movies.
It's a Mario movie. Why do you need the pull of a Hollywood actor for it to work? Tons of people know who Mario is and like Mario.It seems everyone forgets Charles Martinet can tone it down. He's a professional voice actor and could do a more mild Mario voice with the occasional excited outburst of classic Mario. But he doesn't have the pull of a current Hollywood actor so that's my guess why it ended up with Chris Pratt.
Once you get into the movie you probably get used to it.
But I was little jarred by Pratt's voiceover too.
You better sign this petition then!I really think the most egregious deviation from the character Mario is the flat ass. Mario should be dummy thicc, he needs an ass you can bounce a koopa shell off of!
I appreciate Kyle's take here, and it matters because Nintendo and Illumination had options for how to introduce arguably the biggest splash yet for the world's most recognizable fictional character. Only like two lines? Really, y'all? Kyle's child is absolutely not the exception to how an avg kid will react to this.
Still, my trailer-based optimism comes from everything that the 2:30 video did *not* do to match usual Illumination style, particularly in terms of sloppy, gross-out physical comedy. Jack Black sounded like he was projecting a distinct personality onto Bowser, and Keegan-Michael Key's effort and performance shone in an incredibly brief moment. (I'm ready for Nintendo's awwwwwwful Toad voice actor to be retired after this film launches.) As one Ars commenter already pointed out, this seems like at worst a tolerable family film and at best possibly one that parents might actually like taking their kids to see. For my money, it just has to be better than Sonic 1.
Why even have these celebrities voice these roles? Personally I don't understand the appeal of following a certain actor, I almost would rather every movie use fairly unknown people so I can see the character as someone within the movie. But I get that isn't the case for most blockbuster movies.
I appreciate Kyle's take here, and it matters because Nintendo and Illumination had options for how to introduce arguably the biggest splash yet for the world's most recognizable fictional character. Only like two lines? Really, y'all? Kyle's child is absolutely not the exception to how an avg kid will react to this.
Still, my trailer-based optimism comes from everything that the 2:30 video did *not* do to match usual Illumination style, particularly in terms of sloppy, gross-out physical comedy. Jack Black sounded like he was projecting a distinct personality onto Bowser, and Keegan-Michael Key's effort and performance shone in an incredibly brief moment. (I'm ready for Nintendo's awwwwwwful Toad voice actor to be retired after this film launches.) As one Ars commenter already pointed out, this seems like at worst a tolerable family film and at best possibly one that parents might actually like taking their kids to see. For my money, it just has to be better than Sonic 1.
The fact it was only a handful of lines and one was whispered is actually why I'm trying *not* to judge. It isn't necessarily representative.
But agreed - I actually liked what we saw. Gorgeous visually, no already dated pop culture references, and I actually laughed at both the penguin attack and Toad's appearance. They at least didn't screw up the easy things.
Is it too soon to mention Bob Hoskins?
Still time to drag Pratt back to the booth to re-record all his dialog, preferably after an intensive boot camp with a voice acting coach and an accent specialist.
It seems everyone forgets Charles Martinet can tone it down. He's a professional voice actor and could do a more mild Mario voice with the occasional excited outburst of classic Mario. But he doesn't have the pull of a current Hollywood actor so that's my guess why it ended up with Chris Pratt.
Is it too soon to mention Bob Hoskins?
Depends... are you going to say the 1993 movie was underrated or are you going to be correct?
Is it too soon to mention Bob Hoskins?
Depends... are you going to say the 1993 movie was underrated or are you going to be correct?
Of the many, many problems with the 1993 Super Mario Bros movie (my love for that movie doesn't excuse how bad it is, I just like bad movies sometimes)... Bob Hoskins' voice wasn't one of them.
His voice was great, absolutely what I would have wanted from a grittier, live-action Mario. It's a shame the rest of the movie was such an off the rails disaster.
Pratt aside, it's unfortunate, though understandable that big name actors are used instead of voice actors. So much incredible talent out there in voice acting but instead we just get someone just doing their normal voice.
It seems everyone forgets Charles Martinet can tone it down. He's a professional voice actor and could do a more mild Mario voice with the occasional excited outburst of classic Mario. But he doesn't have the pull of a current Hollywood actor so that's my guess why it ended up with Chris Pratt.
Yeah, I mention this in the piece. And I do think giving Martinet a major movie role would be a good reward for his stewardship of this character.
That said, I'm not sure asking him to "tone it down" for an entire movie would lead to the best results either. Being good at enthusiastic 2-second voice snippets and being able to do a whole movie with complex dialogue are very different things, and Martinet has only proven his ability to do the former...
Pratt aside, it's unfortunate, though understandable that big name actors are used instead of voice actors. So much incredible talent out there in voice acting but instead we just get someone just doing their normal voice.
Funnily enough, I frequently see posts on my Twitter feed of people just now realizing the genius of Mel Blanc's voice acting. There's a lot of people waking up to the fact that voice acting is indeed an art worth appreciating, but the way things are going with animated films and the looming wave of artificially synthesized voices, things are only going to get worse for VAs as time goes on.
Hell, I've had random people, apropos of nothing, tell me I should try my hand at voice acting, but that's mostly because I normally sound like a radio host. I don't have nearly the range required to actually make it anywhere.
Is it too soon to mention Bob Hoskins?
Depends... are you going to say the 1993 movie was underrated or are you going to be correct?
Of the many, many problems with the 1993 Super Mario Bros movie (my love for that movie doesn't excuse how bad it is, I just like bad movies sometimes)... Bob Hoskins' voice wasn't one of them.
His voice was great, absolutely what I would have wanted from a grittier, live-action Mario. It's a shame the rest of the movie was such an off the rails disaster.
His /voice/ was fine, but his performance (and general casting) was... questionable.
It's a Mario movie. Why do you need the pull of a Hollywood actor for it to work? Tons of people know who Mario is and like Mario.It seems everyone forgets Charles Martinet can tone it down. He's a professional voice actor and could do a more mild Mario voice with the occasional excited outburst of classic Mario. But he doesn't have the pull of a current Hollywood actor so that's my guess why it ended up with Chris Pratt.
Because video game adaptations don't have a great record. Especially Mario in particular.