Biden-era punishment tossed; Intuit now has more friendly regulators under Trump.
See full article...
See full article...
That is an extremely odd way to misspell "corrupt".Biden-era punishment tossed; Intuit now has more friendly regulators under Trump.
OligarchyLovely third world banana republic you have there, America.
I'm afraid, dear Watson, that this is the point....privacy, combating robocalls, and regulating broadcasting—go effectively unenforced.”
Queue the TurboTax commercial: "TurboTax Free Edition only. Roughly 37% of filers qualify. Simple Form 1040 returns only."
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNqNlsUqlPo
Queue the TurboTax commercial: "TurboTax Free Edition only. Roughly 37% of filers qualify. Simple Form 1040 returns only."
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNqNlsUqlPo
I mean, he literally said he isn't going to.Just love that Carr isn't even trying to hide his partisanship.
Carr, a longtime Trump supporter who sometimes wears a Trump-shaped lapel pin, wrote a Project 2025 chapter in 2023 describing how the FCC should be overhauled to achieve conservative priorities. It was never likely that he and Trump would differ much in their policy positions. But few, if any, leaders of historically independent agencies have aligned themselves with Trump as consistently and vocally as Carr has in his first year as FCC chairman.
Carr’s devotion to the president has been most obvious to the general public whenever he threatens broadcaster licenses. But Carr hardly seems independent of Trump when it comes to his other actions as head of the FCC. His press releases announcing various types of FCC decisions often praise Trump’s leadership and say the FCC is acting to advance a Trump priority.
“We are fully aligned with the agenda that President Trump is running,” Carr told The Wall Street Journal.
Far from insisting that the FCC make decisions independently, Carr has welcomed Trump’s direct orders. After Trump issued a December 11 executive order requiring the FCC to open a proceeding that could lead to preemption of state AI laws, Carr issued a statement saying that “the FCC welcomes President’s Trump’s direction.”
We emailed Carr in early December, requesting a phone interview or comments about whether he still believes the FCC should operate independently from the White House and did not receive a response. But on December 17, Carr confirmed during a Senate hearing that he no longer believes the FCC is independent from the White House.
“There’s been a sea change in the law since I wrote that sentence,” he said after being confronted with one of his previous statements describing the agency as independent. “The FCC is not an independent agency” because “the president can remove any member of the commission for any reason or no reason,” he said.
Which companies like Intuit actively pay Congress bribes (sorry, "Campaign Contributions") in order to maintain. Just like they recently paid to get Congress to remove the free filing option.Reminder that the primary reason TurboTax exists is because the tax code is too complicated to just fill out the forms with a pen.
View attachment 131226
So this is a ruling that before an Executive branch agency can penalize you, they have to make their case to a Judicial branch court as opposed to a in-house judge? That sounds good in theory, but impractical. Kind of like how the criminal courts would be unable to operate if nobody ever excepted a plea-bargain.
That’s exactly what this ruling was. It was a process decision, not on the merits. The conflict with the FTC is that you have one agency serving as prosecutor, judge, jury, and setting the penalty, all in their in-house tribunals (where they have a 95+% “win” rate). They then further claim that you have to fully exhaust the in-house appeals system before having the right to move to an actual jury trial. The SC basically said what Jeff S suggested, that if you’re guilty and you know it and the penalty is reasonable, then you can pay it and move on, but if you disagree on whatever grounds you can immediately move to the courts.I don't understand - aren't such administrative agency 'fines' similar to a speeding ticket? Sure, I have the right to go to court and challenge the ticket on whatever legal theory I think will prevail "e.g. they don't have proper evidence to prove my guilt; or, they got the wrong person; or the police officer was trying to blackmail me into giving them a BJ by threatening me with a ticket" or whatever.
Or, you can decide that they have enough evidence, the ticket is $100 and it's not worth your time going to court to fight when you're going to lose anyhow, so you sign the back of the ticket waiving your right and admitting guilt and pay the $100.
So why isn't it like that with FTC fines? They can choose to waive the right to trial and pay the fine, or they can try their luck in court if they want to challenge it?
Replying just to repost.Just dropping this in here, in case people don't know: https://apps.irs.gov/app/freeFile/
There are plenty of (actually) free alternatives to Turbo Tax. You can you the link above to find an IRS approved tax service, based on what kind of income you have.
Like a lot of people, I used TurboTax for years when it was actually free (or at least close to it). Part of the appeal is that it keeps your previous years data which makes a much smoother filing each year. I've helped my parents a lot with their taxes and it makes it really easy for everyone, but I was shocked at how much they are charging for the service now. This seems to be the typical bullshit "get them in the door cheap and then slowly raise prices" routine that is all too common in tech industry.
The one I ended up finding for my parents was actually cleaner and easier than TurboTax, and completely free. Took less time start to finish and saved them roughly $180.
All true, except the "if it weren't for Intuit" part.If it weren't for Intuit, the IRS would be properly funded like any other 1st world developed nation. You wouldn't have to fill out any forms unless you've moved, in which case it's just a Change of Address Form from the Post Office. Everyone would get either a cheque or a bill, and the ability to review the final return with an option to file a correction. You could, of course, opt-in to file if you want to itemize or if you have foreign investments you need to report. But for 80% of Americans, you'd just get a cheque every year without having to do anything.
As a bonus, the IRS would also have the resources to audit wealthy individuals instead of low-income and blue-collar individuals who can't hire fancy lawyers. Reclaim billions of dollars in lost revenue, maybe even send a few of them to prison for tax evasion.
And if you're over the income limits for the free ones, or if you just hate yourself, you can fill out the forms yourself and file digitally. It's essentially just a bunch of PDFs that do the math for you.Just dropping this in here, in case people don't know: https://apps.irs.gov/app/freeFile/
There are plenty of (actually) free alternatives to Turbo Tax. You can you the link above to find an IRS approved tax service, based on what kind of income you have.
Like a lot of people, I used TurboTax for years when it was actually free (or at least close to it). Part of the appeal is that it keeps your previous years data which makes a much smoother filing each year. I've helped my parents a lot with their taxes and it makes it really easy for everyone, but I was shocked at how much they are charging for the service now. This seems to be the typical bullshit "get them in the door cheap and then slowly raise prices" routine that is all too common in tech industry.
The one I ended up finding for my parents was actually cleaner and easier than TurboTax, and completely free. Took less time start to finish and saved them roughly $180.
It's a sad not-quite-joke to say this is one of my favorite rants.Since the IRS knows if I do my taxes wrong, what if they just sent me a bill, I could claim any credits I am due, and then be done with it?
No, instead Intuit and H&R Block are so in bed with congress that we continue to have this ridiculous process where I have to figure it all out (or more likely pay someone to help me), and hope I did it right, because otherwise I have to pay someone, possibly from one of those companies, to help me fix it and refile to try again.
My favorite part is I'm supposed to wait for all these various documents that they must get access to as well, do I can double check their math. Those documents, which are critical for me getting my math right so it matches their math, must be sent out by the end of January or whatever to make sure I have time to submit my math by the legal deadline.It's a sad not-quite-joke to say this is one of my favorite rants.
They know the rules. They know the numbers. They know what I owe or am owed. But I still have to send in a convoluted form to make my best guess at what I think those numbers are, under penalty of law for getting it wrong.
And remember Der Orange Führer during his first run at the presidency claimed he was going to simplify the IRS to where you could fill out your entire tax form on a 3 by 5 inch card? Did he forget, or is that only true for billionaires? (Rhetorical, only MAGA morons don't know which). /SSince the IRS knows if I do my taxes wrong, what if they just sent me a bill, I could claim any credits I am due, and then be done with it?
No, instead Intuit and H&R Block are so in bed with congress that we continue to have this ridiculous process where I have to figure it all out (or more likely pay someone to help me), and hope I did it right, because otherwise I have to pay someone, possibly from one of those companies, to help me fix it and refile to try again.
I used to just use the guy my parents told me about until CA was in the trial for the direct file (that was taken out back and shot unceremoniously). I refuse to use TurboTax and all that for as long as possible. These free options should be advertised way more.Just dropping this in here, in case people don't know: https://apps.irs.gov/app/freeFile/
There are plenty of (actually) free alternatives to Turbo Tax. You can you the link above to find an IRS approved tax service, based on what kind of income you have.
Like a lot of people, I used TurboTax for years when it was actually free (or at least close to it). Part of the appeal is that it keeps your previous years data which makes a much smoother filing each year. I've helped my parents a lot with their taxes and it makes it really easy for everyone, but I was shocked at how much they are charging for the service now. This seems to be the typical bullshit "get them in the door cheap and then slowly raise prices" routine that is all too common in tech industry.
The one I ended up finding for my parents was actually cleaner and easier than TurboTax, and completely free. Took less time start to finish and saved them roughly $180.
The only difference between a banana republic an an oligarchy is the relative wealth levels of each end of the spectrum.Oligarchy