You keep bringing up SCOTUS ruling but the one you mentioned doesn't say anything about allergies per se. Unless there was another
Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District?
If that's the one all the ruling said was provide a reasonable education plan for the individual (IAP) or pay to send the kid elsewhere. Or don't get federal funds. What happened with the family was the school plan was inadequate and private school had a better plan that actually worked so they asked them to 1) follow the private school plan/make a better plan for the autistic child or 2) pay for the private school. School didn't want to, got ran up to the SCOTUS and *bam* the ruling.
In my town there's one kid who they ship out to the tune of 100k/year and a few others they pay out 10k/20k for what I imagine is either special bussing (wheel/power chair) or out of district tuition.
Everyone should check out your city/town/hamlet's board of education meetings minutes, you really should. It's very eye opening hence why I know the school district spends 150k/year for three students. Thankfully they don't give any indication who they are so none of that first/last initial stuff. Student 82.
But the discussion about the ruling and law are best reserved for the soapbox. Make a thread and I'll comment once or twice before it suds up. It's the soapbox after all.
No need for the soapbox. I won't engage in that hellhole, frankly, and we're not even debating it here.
That is the one I referred to earlier, actually. It doesn't matter that it doesn't mention allergies. It covers the IDEA act and says it's absolutely the law of the land, especially in terms if as inclusive an environment as possible. It explicitly upholds the prior ruling in
Board of Education v Rowley which many had claimed didn't go as far as it was generally thought by parents with kids who needed more than the average.
Rowley was "only 6-3" so many assumed there was wiggle room. This new case, however, was not only unanimous but Gorsuch also stated during his confirmation that he'd have joined to make it a full 9-0 had he been confirmed and heard the case.
This level of certainty in the IDEA Act's standing is huge for those who've had to fight the various school districts for
decades. When parents, with backing from appropriate professionals (which often included the teachers themselves) said a kid needs X, we used to see school administrations push back and refuse, literally saying in as many words that the parents would have to sue them to get it. Since that case was decided, Since that, this happens only rarely. The case put districts on notice, and more importantly certain of the various Federal Circuits on notice, that SCOTUS no longer wants to play this game and it's time to follow the damned law or get Congress to change it.
This is why it's such a critical case. Now these districts are actually doing what they were already supposed to do and paying for kids to get an education that meets their needs funded by their local school district. That's a pretty basic thing, honestly, and should have been the case all along.