bolomkxxviii":2i72wroa said:I wonder how hard it will be to get my hands on the international version here in the states.
charleski":5cddgn3p said:It's interesting to note that google recently came down pretty hard on the idea of CyanogenMod incorporating similar split-screen multitasking through cornerstone - so much so that the CM devs dropped the idea. It was not entirely clear why Google accepted Samsung's version, though - from the review it sounds as if Samsung's operating a whitelist approach and will only allow the mode for apps that it has specifically modified so they won't break when the display area changes. Is this the case?
.
.
.
With the 16GB Nexus 7 at $199 it's going to be a tough sell if the price on this ends up over $250, but with their marketing muscle Samsung will probably get away with $299.
ChrisG":22kqqawi said:Samsung can pretty much whatever they want, and there's relatively little Google could do to stop them in that regard
charleski":3d89d2ba said:It's interesting to note that google recently came down pretty hard on the idea of CyanogenMod incorporating similar split-screen multitasking through cornerstone - so much so that the CM devs dropped the idea. It was not entirely clear why Google accepted Samsung's version, though - from the review it sounds as if Samsung's operating a whitelist approach and will only allow the mode for apps that it has specifically modified so they won't break when the display area changes. Is this the case?
The relatively low res is quite disappointing, but we knew that already. The main attraction lies in the stylus allowing more accurate note-taking, but I saw another review that mentioned a bit of lag, something that would be a real annoyance. Did you experience any problems writing or drawing with the stylus?
With the 16GB Nexus 7 at $199 it's going to be a tough sell if the price on this ends up over $250, but with their marketing muscle Samsung will probably get away with $299.
Francis Kuntz":2ohs0a3j said:"The smaller version of the Note 10.1 learns from its predecessor's mistakes."
You mean they learnt from Apple ...
pixelstuff":3vavejs9 said:If the US version is missing a major built in feature that the international version has, like voice calling, I'm going to be a little bit angry.
edit...
Not to mention I'll avoid buying it purely out of retaliation. There are plenty of tablets out there. Voice calling would be a good way to set it apart. Pairing such a tablet with something like the Sony SmartWatch and a blue tooth ear piece seems like it might be a good setup.
charleski":3g7l9p7s said:ChrisG":3g7l9p7s said:Samsung can pretty much whatever they want, and there's relatively little Google could do to stop them in that regard
Just like Amazon, Samsung's free to create their own fork of Android, but then they wouldn't be able to bundle the Play Store and Google's apps. Amazon has enough content to forge ahead with their own ecosystem, but Samsung doesn't, and I don't remember seeing them make any moves to do so. So, while Samsung carries a lot of weight with Android, Google still has a big stick when it comes to enforcing app compatibility.
mediaboy":krky5d20 said:This and the FonePad are steps in the right direction... but why not build a speaker and microphone into the pen? Use it as a Bluetooth handset that docks in the tablet to charge.
It's convenient, hard to lose, and you won't look like an a-hole with a tablet against your face... just a weirdo who talks into a pen.
MAFIAAfire":2yc2u0eq said:One of the problems with Samsung is their products are so damn good; let me explain:
I first bought a S3, amazing phone but was finally tempted by the Note 2 so give the S3 to my mom who loves it...and got the Note 2!
Now the Note 8 just seems like a bigger version of the Note 2 but does not offer a whole lot of stuff for me to break contract and go for the 8 as the 2 is just fantastic as is.
A friend of mine is on the original Note and he still loves it, no plans to even upgrade to the 2, he's looking forward to the 3 and while I will be out of contract around the time the 4 arrives... I am so happy with my phone that I dont see myself upgrading unless something drastic happens to my phone (eg: smashed screen).
For those of you who dont have a Note/2:
1 - Yes, the first time you take it out of its package it looks huge,
2 - the first 2 days it feels a bit odd
3 - after the 3rd day you dont even think about it
4 - other phones look and feel puny or like toys (not trying to be insulting, just saying it like it is)
5 - No problems putting it in jacket or jeans pockets, and yes, I wear tight jeans but not skinnies.
Cheers!
MAFIAAfire":2423i2ok said:One of the problems with Samsung is their products are so damn good; let me explain:
I first bought a S3, amazing phone but was finally tempted by the Note 2 so give the S3 to my mom who loves it...and got the Note 2!
obarthelemy":10vs7oe9 said:The discussion linked above clearly states Google's litmus test: modifications to Android must not break market apps. Dynamically changing the screen size and/or ratio while running would break apps. Thus, Samsung only does multi-windows for their own apps; market apps are not impacted (but can't use the functionnality). It is also OK to have the functionnality as an opt-in, with 3rd-party apps coded for it enabling the feature. But apps *not* coded for it must not suffer any side-effects, which means must run full-screen without the OS trying to resize them.
ChrisG":bw4jh61e said:obarthelemy":bw4jh61e said:The discussion linked above clearly states Google's litmus test: modifications to Android must not break market apps. Dynamically changing the screen size and/or ratio while running would break apps. Thus, Samsung only does multi-windows for their own apps; market apps are not impacted (but can't use the functionnality). It is also OK to have the functionnality as an opt-in, with 3rd-party apps coded for it enabling the feature. But apps *not* coded for it must not suffer any side-effects, which means must run full-screen without the OS trying to resize them.
Slightly hypocritical though, in that Google's own GMail app can use the split-screen functionality - as well as a few other 3rd party apps like twitter and Facebook.
Boskone":29svfm3q said:I, and one of my coworkers, are keeping an eye on these.
Both of us want a pocketable tablet...)
RockDaMan":ohrxh2a7 said:MAFIAAfire":ohrxh2a7 said:One of the problems with Samsung is their products are so damn good; let me explain:
I first bought a S3, amazing phone but was finally tempted by the Note 2 so give the S3 to my mom who loves it...and got the Note 2!
A bit more info please...why is it (S3) amazing and how has the durability been? Same for the Note.
Totally agree, and the *many* so-so to downright negative reviews really call into question the integrity of the reviewers when they fly in the face of the reality of using the Note 10.1, which like any good device, is good enough to be considered a tool. I sold my iPad3 for a good price to get this thing and never regretted it. I'm keeping it until something like the YOUM screen models come out, hopefully full sunlight capable. I'd like to see the stylus button made more useful... let us map it to what we want. In particular, for text selection. I love being able to select text on my Win8 Sony Duo 11 with its stylus and then using its button to copy & paste. Mobile text editing has been pretty poor for a long time, and why not use the stylus to get around that limitation?renik":1xly4ipg said:The Note 10.1, despite the plastic casing and average screen resolution, is hands down the best tablet I have every used.
ChrisG":1c8h36pk said:charleski":1c8h36pk said:It's interesting to note that google recently came down pretty hard on the idea of CyanogenMod incorporating similar split-screen multitasking through cornerstone - so much so that the CM devs dropped the idea. It was not entirely clear why Google accepted Samsung's version, though - from the review it sounds as if Samsung's operating a whitelist approach and will only allow the mode for apps that it has specifically modified so they won't break when the display area changes. Is this the case?
.
.
.
With the 16GB Nexus 7 at $199 it's going to be a tough sell if the price on this ends up over $250, but with their marketing muscle Samsung will probably get away with $299.
Samsung can pretty much whatever they want, and there's relatively little Google could do to stop them in that regard - up to and including nigh-on completely re-writing their own version of Android if they wanted from something like an AOSP source.
As for the price, forget it. If it's actually a phone and has cellular capability, it'll be more like $799 rather than $299. The Galaxy S3 itself is listed as $545 on Amazon right now, off-contract.
If it's only a tablet, however, $299-350 is more plausible.
ChrisG":171pfe32 said:As for the price, forget it. If it's actually a phone and has cellular capability, it'll be more like $799 rather than $299. The Galaxy S3 itself is listed as $545 on Amazon right now, off-contract.
If it's only a tablet, however, $299-350 is more plausible.
obarthelemy":3q7gz0gt said:Samsung only does multi-windows for their own apps; market apps are not impacted (but can't use the functionnality). It is also OK to have the functionnality as an opt-in, with 3rd-party apps coded for it enabling the feature. But apps *not* coded for it must not suffer any side-effects, which means must run full-screen without the OS trying to resize them.
Jorj_X_McKie":rrl5q4nx said:I understand the carriers will make the decision on the enabling the voice capability, but dang near every day I see stories about how dominant Samsung has become, and how much clout they have. Samsung has shown it can now get the Note2 into all of the main USA carriers without much meddling of their designs, so why can't they just tell them to shut up and activate the damn phone on the Note8? Why wouldn't a carrier want more devices using their network? It's not like an 8" cellphone is going to steal sales for their usual cash cows...
Andrew Cunningham":1or42os9 said:The back of the tablet has none of the nasty flexing exhibited in the Note 10.1.