Now a swipe from the author. I'm honored. And obnoxious too it seems. I normally welcome criticism. Which I have here with sincerity. But not enough apparently. The pile on attitude is over the top. Over and over. Save your outrage for targets that actually oppose you rather than those who agree with your goals bar time scale or economic details. People love to feel morally superior. Just don't over do it. A lesson that was hammered into me today.https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/che ... ctric-carsNot a good faith arguement. ~30k will get you a BEV. Today.
I see exactly one model for 30K. And where should "everyone" charge it?8 Cheapest Electric Cars in 2020
2019 BMW i3: $44,450 | U.S. News Overall Score: 7.7/10
2019 Kia Niro EV: $38,500 | U.S. News Overall Score: 7.7/10
2020 Hyundai Kona Electric: $36,990 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.1/10
2019 Honda Clarity Electric: $36,620 | U.S. News Overall Score: N/A
2020 Chevrolet Bolt: $36,620 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.0/10
2020 Tesla Model 3: $35,400 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.8/10
2020 Nissan Leaf: $31,600 | U.S. News Overall Score: N/A
2019 Hyundai Ioniq Electric: $30,315 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.0/10
https://www.carfax.com/blog/cheapest-hybrid-cars
Good hybrid cars are in the 20K range, not the 30K one.Hyundai Ioniq | $22,200 | For Sale
Honda Insight | $22,930 | For Sale
Toyota Corolla Hybrid | $23,100 | For Sale
Kia Niro | $23,490 | For Sale
Toyota Prius | $24,325 | For Sale
Honda Accord Hybrid | $25,470 | For Sale
Hyundai Sonata Hybrid | $25,750 | For Sale
Ford Fusion Hybrid | $28,000 | For Sale
Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid | $28,220 | For Sale
Ford Escape Hybrid | $28,255 | For Sale
So your disdain for people who don't buy BEVs (likening them to smokers) is pretty much disdain for people who aren't as well-off? That's not very cash money of you, dear fellow.Maybe you mean "Let me know when everyone has 30k" like this Hyundai costs? I have no answer for that.
*edited to respond to your edit*
Wow, you're such a good person.Your priorities. Your choice. You need to smoke? Ok.
Thanks for the diss. I am in your eyes both elitist and immoral. Nicely twisted. I'm neither.
I work in climate issues. I'm afraid my daily exposure to the harbingers of a terrible future colors my assessment of virtually every economic issue.
Edit: I think most Ars readers are progressive and pro climate. Most or all of those downvoting me probably are too. So, I accept the slap as a rejection of an out of touch elitist good doer attitude. I wish it had been less acetic. Anyway, message received.
Your input is of 0 value because you assume on the strength of pure conjecture that BEVs are a solution for 100% of people 100% of the time, and they absolutely are not. Nor will they be for another ten years minimum.
Then you proceed to manufacture some sanctimonious condescension from your personal certitude in your Absolute Moral Rightness.
So in the meantime, for those people where BEVs ARE NOT a practical solution, a 52mpg hybrid a damn good compromise.
I wish the BEVs ONLY!! brigade were half as loud and obnoxious about getting people to use buses much more frequently.
BEVs solve shit. The big problem to cut emissions is land use and congestion. A Tesla takes the same room as a Cadillac.
Public transit and density or bust. Anything car related is a half assed bullshit solution.
Yeah you let me know when the DART actually has usable coverage and frequency and then we'll talk.
Until then, I'mma need a car.
Well, that's the thing. We won't get decent public transport until rich white people demand it, loudly and often.
The Optima did not get the new powertrain and so is still at "only" 40mpg combined. On the somewhat positive note it still has a PHEV version for those who want it, and it gets an EPA 101 MPGe (though at only 28 miles of max all electric range it's going to be somewhat lower than that for most folks without workplace charging).Yea, hopefully the Kia version will look as good as their new K5.My personal subjective opinion is that the exterior is hideous. It ranks among the ugliest sedans I've ever seen. I question the steering wheel as well (functionally, it's not clear to me where I would want to grip it). Other than the looks, this sounds like a good value.
The Kona Electric most certainly is available in the US, but only in CARB states, it's basically a compliance vehicle here.The Kona hybrid and PEV are not stateside. Just the gasoline version.Starting at $20KI know I'm a dinosaur, but how I wish that was available as a wagon.
Kia Niro/Hyundai Kona (though I'm not sure if the latter is available in the US).
I am not convinced that you are convinced yet, so let me give you myself as a specific example.https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/che ... ctric-carsNot a good faith arguement. ~30k will get you a BEV. Today.
I see exactly one model for 30K. And where should "everyone" charge it?8 Cheapest Electric Cars in 2020
2019 BMW i3: $44,450 | U.S. News Overall Score: 7.7/10
2019 Kia Niro EV: $38,500 | U.S. News Overall Score: 7.7/10
2020 Hyundai Kona Electric: $36,990 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.1/10
2019 Honda Clarity Electric: $36,620 | U.S. News Overall Score: N/A
2020 Chevrolet Bolt: $36,620 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.0/10
2020 Tesla Model 3: $35,400 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.8/10
2020 Nissan Leaf: $31,600 | U.S. News Overall Score: N/A
2019 Hyundai Ioniq Electric: $30,315 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.0/10
https://www.carfax.com/blog/cheapest-hybrid-cars
Good hybrid cars are in the 20K range, not the 30K one.Hyundai Ioniq | $22,200 | For Sale
Honda Insight | $22,930 | For Sale
Toyota Corolla Hybrid | $23,100 | For Sale
Kia Niro | $23,490 | For Sale
Toyota Prius | $24,325 | For Sale
Honda Accord Hybrid | $25,470 | For Sale
Hyundai Sonata Hybrid | $25,750 | For Sale
Ford Fusion Hybrid | $28,000 | For Sale
Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid | $28,220 | For Sale
Ford Escape Hybrid | $28,255 | For Sale
So your disdain for people who don't buy BEVs (likening them to smokers) is pretty much disdain for people who aren't as well-off? That's not very cash money of you, dear fellow.Maybe you mean "Let me know when everyone has 30k" like this Hyundai costs? I have no answer for that.
*edited to respond to your edit*
Wow, you're such a good person.Your priorities. Your choice. You need to smoke? Ok.
Thanks for the diss. I am in your eyes both elitist and immoral. Nicely twisted. I'm neither.
I work in climate issues. I'm afraid my daily exposure to the harbingers of a terrible future colors my assessment of virtually every economic issue.
Edit: I think most Ars readers are progressive and pro climate. Most or all of those downvoting me probably are too. So, I accept the slap as a rejection of an out of touch elitist good doer attitude. I wish it had been less acetic. Anyway, message received.
Your input is of 0 value because you assume on the strength of pure conjecture that BEVs are a solution for 100% of people 100% of the time, and they absolutely are not. Nor will they be for another ten years minimum.
Then you proceed to manufacture some sanctimonious condescension from your personal certitude in your Absolute Moral Rightness.
So in the meantime, for those people where BEVs ARE NOT a practical solution, a 52mpg hybrid a damn good compromise.
Ouch. Thanks for your analysis.
I had a 2015 Limited. It was a nice car and got good milage for my daily commute.
I drove it out to Washington DC last summer for vacation. When heading home, the transmission crapped out with only 135,000 miles on the odometer. The local dealer wanted 6 grand to fix it. I got rid of it as soon as I got home.
A mechanic told me the electric motor cooked the transmission, since the electric motor was mated directly to the transmission. Until the transmission cooling issue is addressed, I'm not looking at any hybrids in the foreseeable future.
The 2020 Camry Hybrid LE also gets 52MPG like the "Blue" variant of the Sonata hybrid (they're also practically the same price). I wonder what each car trades off to achieve the same rating. I'm thinking about this since the Cd of the Sonata is better and it also has a larger 1.6kwh battery vs the 1.04kwh battery in the LE variant of the Camry Hybrid.
It would be nice to have more details like the tires sizes and whether grip/braking were traded off for efficiency.
I bet the tires are stickier and thus have higher rolling resistance. Probably a worthy tradeoff for overall safety.SEL and Limited trims get 17-inch wheels like this, but the fuel efficiency drops by 4mpg combined as a result.
Ugh. If I'm buying a hybrid it's because I want the higher fuel economy. I shouldn't have to choose between maximizing that, and having safety features like blind spot cameras.
Save the tacky and garishly drag inducing wheels for vehicles that gulp so much fuel their penalty is insignificant. Or if you must include them in the product line, make them an optional "upgrade" independent of anything else.
It's not obvious why bigger wheels alone should affect fuel consumption because usually the total diameter is unchanged. But, as you say, lower profile tyres tend to be optimised for grip and that inevitably means more rolling resistance.
I'm currently driving a new-ish car with quite expensive eco tyres as standard, but at the first sign of a cold winter ahead they're liable to be replaced, because a drop of about 4mpg is better than a drop into the ditch.
https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/che ... ctric-carsNot a good faith arguement. ~30k will get you a BEV. Today.
I see exactly one model for 30K. And where should "everyone" charge it?8 Cheapest Electric Cars in 2020
2019 BMW i3: $44,450 | U.S. News Overall Score: 7.7/10
2019 Kia Niro EV: $38,500 | U.S. News Overall Score: 7.7/10
2020 Hyundai Kona Electric: $36,990 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.1/10
2019 Honda Clarity Electric: $36,620 | U.S. News Overall Score: N/A
2020 Chevrolet Bolt: $36,620 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.0/10
2020 Tesla Model 3: $35,400 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.8/10
2020 Nissan Leaf: $31,600 | U.S. News Overall Score: N/A
2019 Hyundai Ioniq Electric: $30,315 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.0/10
https://www.carfax.com/blog/cheapest-hybrid-cars
Good hybrid cars are in the 20K range, not the 30K one.Hyundai Ioniq | $22,200 | For Sale
Honda Insight | $22,930 | For Sale
Toyota Corolla Hybrid | $23,100 | For Sale
Kia Niro | $23,490 | For Sale
Toyota Prius | $24,325 | For Sale
Honda Accord Hybrid | $25,470 | For Sale
Hyundai Sonata Hybrid | $25,750 | For Sale
Ford Fusion Hybrid | $28,000 | For Sale
Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid | $28,220 | For Sale
Ford Escape Hybrid | $28,255 | For Sale
So your disdain for people who don't buy BEVs (likening them to smokers) is pretty much disdain for people who aren't as well-off? That's not very cash money of you, dear fellow.Maybe you mean "Let me know when everyone has 30k" like this Hyundai costs? I have no answer for that.
*edited to respond to your edit*
Wow, you're such a good person.Your priorities. Your choice. You need to smoke? Ok.
Thanks for the diss. I am in your eyes both elitist and immoral. Nicely twisted. I'm neither.
I work in climate issues. I'm afraid my daily exposure to the harbingers of a terrible future colors my assessment of virtually every economic issue.
Edit: I think most Ars readers are progressive and pro climate. Most or all of those downvoting me probably are too. So, I accept the slap as a rejection of an out of touch elitist good doer attitude. I wish it had been less acetic. Anyway, message received.
Your input is of 0 value because you assume on the strength of pure conjecture that BEVs are a solution for 100% of people 100% of the time, and they absolutely are not. Nor will they be for another ten years minimum.
Then you proceed to manufacture some sanctimonious condescension from your personal certitude in your Absolute Moral Rightness.
So in the meantime, for those people where BEVs ARE NOT a practical solution, a 52mpg hybrid a damn good compromise.
I wish the BEVs ONLY!! brigade were half as loud and obnoxious about getting people to use buses much more frequently.
BEVs solve shit. The big problem to cut emissions is land use and congestion. A Tesla takes the same room as a Cadillac.
Public transit and density or bust. Anything car related is a half assed bullshit solution.
Yeah you let me know when the DART actually has usable coverage and frequency and then we'll talk.
Until then, I'mma need a car.
Well, that's the thing. We won't get decent public transport until rich white people demand it, loudly and often.
It makes sense though.I find it funny that there is a trim level called Limited.
Bigger wheels also tend to weigh more. Mass is always the enemy of efficiency, but it's even worse when that mass is rotational mass. That's more rotational inertia you have to overcome, so it takes more energy to accelerate which is obviously bad for efficiency. A smaller radius also reduces the moment of inertia (even more so than the mass, it's linear with mass but the square of radius).I bet the tires are stickier and thus have higher rolling resistance. Probably a worthy tradeoff for overall safety.SEL and Limited trims get 17-inch wheels like this, but the fuel efficiency drops by 4mpg combined as a result.
Ugh. If I'm buying a hybrid it's because I want the higher fuel economy. I shouldn't have to choose between maximizing that, and having safety features like blind spot cameras.
Save the tacky and garishly drag inducing wheels for vehicles that gulp so much fuel their penalty is insignificant. Or if you must include them in the product line, make them an optional "upgrade" independent of anything else.
It's not obvious why bigger wheels alone should affect fuel consumption because usually the total diameter is unchanged. But, as you say, lower profile tyres tend to be optimised for grip and that inevitably means more rolling resistance.
I'm currently driving a new-ish car with quite expensive eco tyres as standard, but at the first sign of a cold winter ahead they're liable to be replaced, because a drop of about 4mpg is better than a drop into the ditch.
It's also more unsprung mass, but that doesn't matter for efficiency.
I bet the tires are stickier and thus have higher rolling resistance. Probably a worthy tradeoff for overall safety.SEL and Limited trims get 17-inch wheels like this, but the fuel efficiency drops by 4mpg combined as a result.
Ugh. If I'm buying a hybrid it's because I want the higher fuel economy. I shouldn't have to choose between maximizing that, and having safety features like blind spot cameras.
Save the tacky and garishly drag inducing wheels for vehicles that gulp so much fuel their penalty is insignificant. Or if you must include them in the product line, make them an optional "upgrade" independent of anything else.
It's not obvious why bigger wheels alone should affect fuel consumption because usually the total diameter is unchanged. But, as you say, lower profile tyres tend to be optimised for grip and that inevitably means more rolling resistance.
I'm currently driving a new-ish car with quite expensive eco tyres as standard, but at the first sign of a cold winter ahead they're liable to be replaced, because a drop of about 4mpg is better than a drop into the ditch.
I changed the tyres of a 2nd Gen Prius from the OEM low rolling resistance Bridgestone Turanza to Michelin Cross-Climate Plus, as we have snow for about 1 week (at most) a year.
5mpg loss (Imperial gallons) but the car turns corners better, never slips and the really annoying feature of the torque limiter kicking in every time I tried to turn from a halt has stopped. I would not go back!
Yes, a lower profile tire will weigh less than a higher profile tire that ends up giving you roughly the same total diameter. But the weight savings of the wheel will make up for it. And having less weight in the wheel, which is the more dense and more central piece, means the weight is closer to the center which reduces moment of inertia.Bigger wheels also tend to weigh more. Mass is always the enemy of efficiency, but it's even worse when that mass is rotational mass. That's more rotational inertia you have to overcome, so it takes more energy to accelerate which is obviously bad for efficiency. A smaller radius also reduces the moment of inertia (even more so than the mass, it's linear with mass but the square of radius).I bet the tires are stickier and thus have higher rolling resistance. Probably a worthy tradeoff for overall safety.SEL and Limited trims get 17-inch wheels like this, but the fuel efficiency drops by 4mpg combined as a result.
Ugh. If I'm buying a hybrid it's because I want the higher fuel economy. I shouldn't have to choose between maximizing that, and having safety features like blind spot cameras.
Save the tacky and garishly drag inducing wheels for vehicles that gulp so much fuel their penalty is insignificant. Or if you must include them in the product line, make them an optional "upgrade" independent of anything else.
It's not obvious why bigger wheels alone should affect fuel consumption because usually the total diameter is unchanged. But, as you say, lower profile tyres tend to be optimised for grip and that inevitably means more rolling resistance.
I'm currently driving a new-ish car with quite expensive eco tyres as standard, but at the first sign of a cold winter ahead they're liable to be replaced, because a drop of about 4mpg is better than a drop into the ditch.
It's also more unsprung mass, but that doesn't matter for efficiency.
The bigger wheel may weigh a bit more, but the lower profile tyre will surely weigh less?
Compare an 18 inch wheel to a 16 inch wheel. The rim is going to be approx. 12.5% heavier if it has the same section (2/16). The spokes may be somewhat heavier but that surely depends on the wheel design and material - just using a more expensive alloy could negate that. Against that you have lost two sections of sidewall 1 inch by about 50 inches, which is a substantial amount of rubber.
I think it needs to be demonstrated by actual real world examples that the moment of inertia of the larger wheel + tyre is significantly larger than that of the smaller one.
I genuinely like the Ioniq, but yes - it is small. If your kid's in a rear-facing carrier, the only place that will fit is behind the front passenger seat, which has to be slid forward to make room, so for practical purposes it's a three-seat car in that mode.I'm very interested in the Ioniq hybrid, especially if you could compare it to the Sonata. From what I gather it's a slightly smaller car with a somewhat less powerful engine, but that tells me little about how they compare in handling and drive experience.
It's much smaller—I am driving one this week. It's more like a Prius C competitor; you would not cross shop one with a full size sedan like this or the hybrid Camry or Accord.
I'm in my early 30s with two kids and a dog, and I have the exact same thought. The hybrid Sonata as a wagon would be an obvious leading candidate for us. The hybrid Sonata as an AWD PHEV wagon would be "why bother cross shopping anything else when this is so obviously perfect". (No need to give it low-range 4x4, or even mechanical AWD at all - just a 30 hp electric transaxle at the back to help it get moving uphill on snow & ice.)I know I'm a dinosaur, but how I wish that was available as a wagon.
I'm with you on the second part (more PHEVs) but not on the first part (fewer hybrids).Stop producing hybrids and increase production of plug-in hybrids with, at least, 5 - 10kWh battery!
99% drivers commute daily 10 - 50km and they could do it purely on battery. In any other case they have petrol engine.
It's only a review if the reviewer finds something they don't like? Nah bro. Sometimes a movie, a book, or a car is really just that good; at least for any given reviewer.This is a "plug" not a "review".
"plug" - Everything is great
"review" - This is great. This not so much. Maybe redesign this...
Low horsepower in a normal hybrid is not papered over by electric torque. The electric motor is for low speeds and (continuing after an interruption due to over-sensitive touchpad) ICE assistance, with major attention to minimum battery and motor size. That's how the weight is kept under control and mpg maximized. PHEV tends to be heavier, and unless it offers a considerable (probably 30-50 miles) EV range with full performance it likely will end up burning more gas than its non-plugin cousin.Is there a plug-in hybrid version of the Sonata?
With a 1.6kWh battery, and an electric motor with just 50hp, I really doubt it.
Other plug-in hybrids get a larger battery. I'm not sure why you think a plug-in hybrid version of this car would be any different.
A larger battery wouldn't do a thing about the fact that the electric motor only has 50hp, so you'd need both a bigger battery and a different motor.
Is there a plug-in hybrid version of the Sonata?
With a 1.6kWh battery, and an electric motor with just 50hp, I really doubt it.
Other plug-in hybrids get a larger battery. I'm not sure why you think a plug-in hybrid version of this car would be any different.
And a small electric motor?
To both of you: yes. That is precisely how the Prius Prime operates. It has a larger battery, and the capability of plug-in charging, but uses the same powertrain as the non-plug-in Prius.
https://www.irwinzonetoyota.com/2019-To ... rence.htmlThe 2019 Toyota Prius Prime has the same engine and electric motors as the Prius, but the Prius Prime is a plug-in hybrid. The Prius Prime gives you excellent gas mileage with 55 city and 53 highway miles per gallon. With this vehicle you can get about 25 miles of driving without using the gasoline engine.
Don't forget, as well, that the low horsepower rating is deceptive considering that electric motors produce all their torque right from a stop.
Bottom line: Prius-competitive hybrids are not quick, nor are they fast. 0-60 around 10 sec is the performance bogey. You can get on the freeway, but you need to pay attention, and it won't win many stoplight drag races.
> starts at $27,750
Damn that's a good starting price to bring folks in.
Yes, but what are the prices with some realistic configurations?
For me a PHEV would be worse than a regular hybrid because I have no place to plug in. Yes, I could buy a PHEV and never plug it in, but I could also buy a hybrid and put a layer of bricks in the trunk. The biggest practical difference is that bricks are cheaper.Stop producing hybrids and increase production of plug-in hybrids with, at least, 5 - 10kWh battery!
99% drivers commute daily 10 - 50km and they could do it purely on battery. In any other case they have petrol engine.
I'm very interested in the Ioniq hybrid, especially if you could compare it to the Sonata. From what I gather it's a slightly smaller car with a somewhat less powerful engine, but that tells me little about how they compare in handling and drive experience.
"It seems like every article we write explaining just how good Korean cars have become is met with surprise."
my first car was a 1993 Japanese-beetle-green Hyundai Excel. it was as bare-bones as you could get, yet attracted car-radio thieves like crazy. seeing reviews like this gives me the same feeling i get when i wake up and realize that the sleazy conman from the NYC tabloids is now President.
I'll take a lightly used 3 series any day of the week over this. With a 2.0 diesel, you'll get that kind of mileage without the bullshit hybrid tech. At least in europe.
My biggest design qualm with Hyundai is not their design language: it's that italicized logo. The non-symmetrical design just grates on me, and it's something I'd love to see them update because it looks horrible on their otherwise handsome cars. It looks ridiculous in the pictures above. I can't help but foggily remember that (now very old) episode of The Simpsons where the Principle's car gets blown up (?) and they discover when they find the bumper that it was a Hyundai and not a Honda...and thus it was less important or something. It was a joke at Hyundai's expense. Would love to see that get updated.
I know I'm a dinosaur, but how I wish that was available as a wagon.
I think you're confusing the complaint about the low horsepower of the electric motor, versus the relatively low horsepower of the ICE.
Further, torque is more often key over horsepower. The muscle-car era was dominated by cars that were fast, but whose horsepower numbers, especially when adjusted to SAE Net numbers, are considered less-than-impressive by todays standards. Lots of low end torque was what gave them their reputation.
I'm not sure where you're going with the touchpad comment.
The hybrid system used by Toyota (presumably others as well, since it works), combines the ICE with two electric motors. One is low torque high speed, the other is high torque low speed.
Nobody buys a hybrid because they're expecting them to be quick or fast. They buy them for practicality combined with low fuel consumption. Your complaint on that point is akin to complaining about how the Chevy Corvette isn't roomy enough for a family of four.
For those people who like to advertise how rough they have it.I find it funny that there is a trim level called Limited.
I think you're confusing the complaint about the low horsepower of the electric motor, versus the relatively low horsepower of the ICE.
Further, torque is more often key over horsepower. The muscle-car era was dominated by cars that were fast, but whose horsepower numbers, especially when adjusted to SAE Net numbers, are considered less-than-impressive by todays standards. Lots of low end torque was what gave them their reputation.
I'm not sure where you're going with the touchpad comment.
The hybrid system used by Toyota (presumably others as well, since it works), combines the ICE with two electric motors. One is low torque high speed, the other is high torque low speed.
Nobody buys a hybrid because they're expecting them to be quick or fast. They buy them for practicality combined with low fuel consumption. Your complaint on that point is akin to complaining about how the Chevy Corvette isn't roomy enough for a family of four.
The Prius Prime electric motor has 70 hp, or 40% more power than the electric motor of the Sonata.
That's my point. The "Blue" version of the Sonata Hybrid has higher MPG than the normal Sonata Hybrid just like the Camry LE is more efficient than the other Camry Hybrids.The 2020 Camry Hybrid LE also gets 52MPG like the "Blue" variant of the Sonata hybrid (they're also practically the same price). I wonder what each car trades off to achieve the same rating. I'm thinking about this since the Cd of the Sonata is better and it also has a larger 1.6kwh battery vs the 1.04kwh battery in the LE variant of the Camry Hybrid.
It would be nice to have more details like the tires sizes and whether grip/braking were traded off for efficiency.
Interestingly Toyota sells two hybrid versions of the Camry the LE is the highest mpg because of its better battery. I think compared to this you would need to compare to the lower mpg Camrys in terms of matching the equipment list as it was equipped in this test car.
I'd love to get a Sonata, but the lack of AWD given the mountainous terrain and snow where I live just makes it a deal-breaker. To get the AWD, I'd have to step up to a Genesis and, even though they are quite price competitive for the luxury market, it is hard to justify going that route rather than a much more economical Subaru Legacy.
I think you're confusing the complaint about the low horsepower of the electric motor, versus the relatively low horsepower of the ICE.
Further, torque is more often key over horsepower. The muscle-car era was dominated by cars that were fast, but whose horsepower numbers, especially when adjusted to SAE Net numbers, are considered less-than-impressive by todays standards. Lots of low end torque was what gave them their reputation.
I'm not sure where you're going with the touchpad comment.
The hybrid system used by Toyota (presumably others as well, since it works), combines the ICE with two electric motors. One is low torque high speed, the other is high torque low speed.
Nobody buys a hybrid because they're expecting them to be quick or fast. They buy them for practicality combined with low fuel consumption. Your complaint on that point is akin to complaining about how the Chevy Corvette isn't roomy enough for a family of four.
The Prius Prime electric motor has 70 hp, or 40% more power than the electric motor of the Sonata.
Source?
The Sonata also uses a stepped gear transmission rather than a continuously variable transmission.
And, regardless of those: what is your point? If the motor is sufficient for the standard hybrid version, what would make it insufficient for a plug-in hybrid version?