Hyundai’s super-efficient 2020 Sonata Hybrid sedan is best in class

CraigJ ✅

Ars Legatus Legionis
27,010
Subscriptor
Not a good faith arguement. ~30k will get you a BEV. Today.
https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/che ... ctric-cars
8 Cheapest Electric Cars in 2020

2019 BMW i3: $44,450 | U.S. News Overall Score: 7.7/10
2019 Kia Niro EV: $38,500 | U.S. News Overall Score: 7.7/10
2020 Hyundai Kona Electric: $36,990 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.1/10
2019 Honda Clarity Electric: $36,620 | U.S. News Overall Score: N/A
2020 Chevrolet Bolt: $36,620 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.0/10
2020 Tesla Model 3: $35,400 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.8/10
2020 Nissan Leaf: $31,600 | U.S. News Overall Score: N/A
2019 Hyundai Ioniq Electric: $30,315 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.0/10
I see exactly one model for 30K. And where should "everyone" charge it?

https://www.carfax.com/blog/cheapest-hybrid-cars
Hyundai Ioniq | $22,200 | For Sale
Honda Insight | $22,930 | For Sale
Toyota Corolla Hybrid | $23,100 | For Sale
Kia Niro | $23,490 | For Sale
Toyota Prius | $24,325 | For Sale
Honda Accord Hybrid | $25,470 | For Sale
Hyundai Sonata Hybrid | $25,750 | For Sale
Ford Fusion Hybrid | $28,000 | For Sale
Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid | $28,220 | For Sale
Ford Escape Hybrid | $28,255 | For Sale
Good hybrid cars are in the 20K range, not the 30K one.

Maybe you mean "Let me know when everyone has 30k" like this Hyundai costs? I have no answer for that.
So your disdain for people who don't buy BEVs (likening them to smokers) is pretty much disdain for people who aren't as well-off? That's not very cash money of you, dear fellow.

*edited to respond to your edit*
Your priorities. Your choice. You need to smoke? Ok.
Wow, you're such a good person.

Thanks for the diss. I am in your eyes both elitist and immoral. Nicely twisted. I'm neither.

I work in climate issues. I'm afraid my daily exposure to the harbingers of a terrible future colors my assessment of virtually every economic issue.

Edit: I think most Ars readers are progressive and pro climate. Most or all of those downvoting me probably are too. So, I accept the slap as a rejection of an out of touch elitist good doer attitude. I wish it had been less acetic. Anyway, message received.

Your input is of 0 value because you assume on the strength of pure conjecture that BEVs are a solution for 100% of people 100% of the time, and they absolutely are not. Nor will they be for another ten years minimum.

Then you proceed to manufacture some sanctimonious condescension from your personal certitude in your Absolute Moral Rightness.

So in the meantime, for those people where BEVs ARE NOT a practical solution, a 52mpg hybrid a damn good compromise.

I wish the BEVs ONLY!! brigade were half as loud and obnoxious about getting people to use buses much more frequently.

BEVs solve shit. The big problem to cut emissions is land use and congestion. A Tesla takes the same room as a Cadillac.

Public transit and density or bust. Anything car related is a half assed bullshit solution.

Yeah you let me know when the DART actually has usable coverage and frequency and then we'll talk.

Until then, I'mma need a car.

Well, that's the thing. We won't get decent public transport until rich white people demand it, loudly and often.
Now a swipe from the author. I'm honored. And obnoxious too it seems. I normally welcome criticism. Which I have here with sincerity. But not enough apparently. The pile on attitude is over the top. Over and over. Save your outrage for targets that actually oppose you rather than those who agree with your goals bar time scale or economic details. People love to feel morally superior. Just don't over do it. A lesson that was hammered into me today.

You must have one helluva case of narcissistic personality disorder to think that was aimed at you personally. It clearly was not.

Chill the fuck out and maybe take your meds.
 
Upvote
16 (17 / -1)

afidel

Ars Legatus Legionis
18,222
Subscriptor
My personal subjective opinion is that the exterior is hideous. It ranks among the ugliest sedans I've ever seen. I question the steering wheel as well (functionally, it's not clear to me where I would want to grip it). Other than the looks, this sounds like a good value.
Yea, hopefully the Kia version will look as good as their new K5.
The Optima did not get the new powertrain and so is still at "only" 40mpg combined. On the somewhat positive note it still has a PHEV version for those who want it, and it gets an EPA 101 MPGe (though at only 28 miles of max all electric range it's going to be somewhat lower than that for most folks without workplace charging).
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)

afidel

Ars Legatus Legionis
18,222
Subscriptor
I know I'm a dinosaur, but how I wish that was available as a wagon.

Kia Niro/Hyundai Kona (though I'm not sure if the latter is available in the US).
Starting at $20K
The Kona hybrid and PEV are not stateside. Just the gasoline version.
The Kona Electric most certainly is available in the US, but only in CARB states, it's basically a compliance vehicle here.
 
Upvote
1 (2 / -1)

Mintaka87

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,086
Not a good faith arguement. ~30k will get you a BEV. Today.
https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/che ... ctric-cars
8 Cheapest Electric Cars in 2020

2019 BMW i3: $44,450 | U.S. News Overall Score: 7.7/10
2019 Kia Niro EV: $38,500 | U.S. News Overall Score: 7.7/10
2020 Hyundai Kona Electric: $36,990 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.1/10
2019 Honda Clarity Electric: $36,620 | U.S. News Overall Score: N/A
2020 Chevrolet Bolt: $36,620 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.0/10
2020 Tesla Model 3: $35,400 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.8/10
2020 Nissan Leaf: $31,600 | U.S. News Overall Score: N/A
2019 Hyundai Ioniq Electric: $30,315 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.0/10
I see exactly one model for 30K. And where should "everyone" charge it?

https://www.carfax.com/blog/cheapest-hybrid-cars
Hyundai Ioniq | $22,200 | For Sale
Honda Insight | $22,930 | For Sale
Toyota Corolla Hybrid | $23,100 | For Sale
Kia Niro | $23,490 | For Sale
Toyota Prius | $24,325 | For Sale
Honda Accord Hybrid | $25,470 | For Sale
Hyundai Sonata Hybrid | $25,750 | For Sale
Ford Fusion Hybrid | $28,000 | For Sale
Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid | $28,220 | For Sale
Ford Escape Hybrid | $28,255 | For Sale
Good hybrid cars are in the 20K range, not the 30K one.

Maybe you mean "Let me know when everyone has 30k" like this Hyundai costs? I have no answer for that.
So your disdain for people who don't buy BEVs (likening them to smokers) is pretty much disdain for people who aren't as well-off? That's not very cash money of you, dear fellow.

*edited to respond to your edit*
Your priorities. Your choice. You need to smoke? Ok.
Wow, you're such a good person.

Thanks for the diss. I am in your eyes both elitist and immoral. Nicely twisted. I'm neither.

I work in climate issues. I'm afraid my daily exposure to the harbingers of a terrible future colors my assessment of virtually every economic issue.

Edit: I think most Ars readers are progressive and pro climate. Most or all of those downvoting me probably are too. So, I accept the slap as a rejection of an out of touch elitist good doer attitude. I wish it had been less acetic. Anyway, message received.

Your input is of 0 value because you assume on the strength of pure conjecture that BEVs are a solution for 100% of people 100% of the time, and they absolutely are not. Nor will they be for another ten years minimum.

Then you proceed to manufacture some sanctimonious condescension from your personal certitude in your Absolute Moral Rightness.

So in the meantime, for those people where BEVs ARE NOT a practical solution, a 52mpg hybrid a damn good compromise.

Ouch. Thanks for your analysis.
I am not convinced that you are convinced yet, so let me give you myself as a specific example.

A BEV is only practical if you have a charger where you park overnight. I live in a town home that has no garage, carport or driveway. I park in a communal lot where the nearest parking space is over 50' from my house. It has no charger. Given that my neighbors show up with torches and pitchforks every time the HOA proposes a $5 fee increase, there won't be a charger any time soon. The only way I can plug in a BEV is to literally run an extension cord down the sidewalk past two of my neighbors' houses.

A BEV does not work for me. A BEV will not work for me for the foreseeable future. I am not going to take the major financial hit required for me to sell my current house and buy something that has a garage just so I can drive a BEV. Even if I were willing to, there will still be someone living in my house who doesn't have access to a charger. Public transit does not work for me, unless you consider 3 transfers and nearly tripling my commute time "working". Literally the best thing I can do is buy a hybrid.
 
Upvote
19 (20 / -1)

awshirley

Smack-Fu Master, in training
78
I had a 2015 Limited. It was a nice car and got good milage for my daily commute.

I drove it out to Washington DC last summer for vacation. When heading home, the transmission crapped out with only 135,000 miles on the odometer. The local dealer wanted 6 grand to fix it. I got rid of it as soon as I got home.

A mechanic told me the electric motor cooked the transmission, since the electric motor was mated directly to the transmission. Until the transmission cooling issue is addressed, I'm not looking at any hybrids in the foreseeable future.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Steve65

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,148
I had a 2015 Limited. It was a nice car and got good milage for my daily commute.

I drove it out to Washington DC last summer for vacation. When heading home, the transmission crapped out with only 135,000 miles on the odometer. The local dealer wanted 6 grand to fix it. I got rid of it as soon as I got home.

A mechanic told me the electric motor cooked the transmission, since the electric motor was mated directly to the transmission. Until the transmission cooling issue is addressed, I'm not looking at any hybrids in the foreseeable future.

Mechanics often don't know jack shit about how things actually work. Just because one random one says "the electric motor cooked the transmission" does not confirm that it was the cause, or a significant issue. Your transmission was more likely a victim of "lifetime" fluid service specification than excess heat from the electric motor.
 
Upvote
16 (16 / 0)

ChronoReverse

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,721
Subscriptor
The 2020 Camry Hybrid LE also gets 52MPG like the "Blue" variant of the Sonata hybrid (they're also practically the same price). I wonder what each car trades off to achieve the same rating. I'm thinking about this since the Cd of the Sonata is better and it also has a larger 1.6kwh battery vs the 1.04kwh battery in the LE variant of the Camry Hybrid.

It would be nice to have more details like the tires sizes and whether grip/braking were traded off for efficiency.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
The 2020 Camry Hybrid LE also gets 52MPG like the "Blue" variant of the Sonata hybrid (they're also practically the same price). I wonder what each car trades off to achieve the same rating. I'm thinking about this since the Cd of the Sonata is better and it also has a larger 1.6kwh battery vs the 1.04kwh battery in the LE variant of the Camry Hybrid.

It would be nice to have more details like the tires sizes and whether grip/braking were traded off for efficiency.

Interestingly Toyota sells two hybrid versions of the Camry the LE is the highest mpg because of its better battery. I think compared to this you would need to compare to the lower mpg Camrys in terms of matching the equipment list as it was equipped in this test car.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

dharmOS

Smack-Fu Master, in training
73
Subscriptor++
SEL and Limited trims get 17-inch wheels like this, but the fuel efficiency drops by 4mpg combined as a result.

Ugh. If I'm buying a hybrid it's because I want the higher fuel economy. I shouldn't have to choose between maximizing that, and having safety features like blind spot cameras.

Save the tacky and garishly drag inducing wheels for vehicles that gulp so much fuel their penalty is insignificant. Or if you must include them in the product line, make them an optional "upgrade" independent of anything else.
I bet the tires are stickier and thus have higher rolling resistance. Probably a worthy tradeoff for overall safety.

It's not obvious why bigger wheels alone should affect fuel consumption because usually the total diameter is unchanged. But, as you say, lower profile tyres tend to be optimised for grip and that inevitably means more rolling resistance.
I'm currently driving a new-ish car with quite expensive eco tyres as standard, but at the first sign of a cold winter ahead they're liable to be replaced, because a drop of about 4mpg is better than a drop into the ditch.


I changed the tyres of a 2nd Gen Prius from the OEM low rolling resistance Bridgestone Turanza to Michelin Cross-Climate Plus, as we have snow for about 1 week (at most) a year.

5mpg loss (Imperial gallons) but the car turns corners better, never slips and the really annoying feature of the torque limiter kicking in every time I tried to turn from a halt has stopped. I would not go back!
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)
Not a good faith arguement. ~30k will get you a BEV. Today.
https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/che ... ctric-cars
8 Cheapest Electric Cars in 2020

2019 BMW i3: $44,450 | U.S. News Overall Score: 7.7/10
2019 Kia Niro EV: $38,500 | U.S. News Overall Score: 7.7/10
2020 Hyundai Kona Electric: $36,990 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.1/10
2019 Honda Clarity Electric: $36,620 | U.S. News Overall Score: N/A
2020 Chevrolet Bolt: $36,620 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.0/10
2020 Tesla Model 3: $35,400 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.8/10
2020 Nissan Leaf: $31,600 | U.S. News Overall Score: N/A
2019 Hyundai Ioniq Electric: $30,315 | U.S. News Overall Score: 8.0/10
I see exactly one model for 30K. And where should "everyone" charge it?

https://www.carfax.com/blog/cheapest-hybrid-cars
Hyundai Ioniq | $22,200 | For Sale
Honda Insight | $22,930 | For Sale
Toyota Corolla Hybrid | $23,100 | For Sale
Kia Niro | $23,490 | For Sale
Toyota Prius | $24,325 | For Sale
Honda Accord Hybrid | $25,470 | For Sale
Hyundai Sonata Hybrid | $25,750 | For Sale
Ford Fusion Hybrid | $28,000 | For Sale
Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid | $28,220 | For Sale
Ford Escape Hybrid | $28,255 | For Sale
Good hybrid cars are in the 20K range, not the 30K one.

Maybe you mean "Let me know when everyone has 30k" like this Hyundai costs? I have no answer for that.
So your disdain for people who don't buy BEVs (likening them to smokers) is pretty much disdain for people who aren't as well-off? That's not very cash money of you, dear fellow.

*edited to respond to your edit*
Your priorities. Your choice. You need to smoke? Ok.
Wow, you're such a good person.

Thanks for the diss. I am in your eyes both elitist and immoral. Nicely twisted. I'm neither.

I work in climate issues. I'm afraid my daily exposure to the harbingers of a terrible future colors my assessment of virtually every economic issue.

Edit: I think most Ars readers are progressive and pro climate. Most or all of those downvoting me probably are too. So, I accept the slap as a rejection of an out of touch elitist good doer attitude. I wish it had been less acetic. Anyway, message received.

Your input is of 0 value because you assume on the strength of pure conjecture that BEVs are a solution for 100% of people 100% of the time, and they absolutely are not. Nor will they be for another ten years minimum.

Then you proceed to manufacture some sanctimonious condescension from your personal certitude in your Absolute Moral Rightness.

So in the meantime, for those people where BEVs ARE NOT a practical solution, a 52mpg hybrid a damn good compromise.

I wish the BEVs ONLY!! brigade were half as loud and obnoxious about getting people to use buses much more frequently.

BEVs solve shit. The big problem to cut emissions is land use and congestion. A Tesla takes the same room as a Cadillac.

Public transit and density or bust. Anything car related is a half assed bullshit solution.

Yeah you let me know when the DART actually has usable coverage and frequency and then we'll talk.

Until then, I'mma need a car.

Well, that's the thing. We won't get decent public transport until rich white people demand it, loudly and often.

lol not gonna happen in DFW that's for sure. They sign petitions to prevent DART extending to neighborhoods 'round here.

God I fucking hate this place.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

Voyna i Mor

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,918
SEL and Limited trims get 17-inch wheels like this, but the fuel efficiency drops by 4mpg combined as a result.

Ugh. If I'm buying a hybrid it's because I want the higher fuel economy. I shouldn't have to choose between maximizing that, and having safety features like blind spot cameras.

Save the tacky and garishly drag inducing wheels for vehicles that gulp so much fuel their penalty is insignificant. Or if you must include them in the product line, make them an optional "upgrade" independent of anything else.
I bet the tires are stickier and thus have higher rolling resistance. Probably a worthy tradeoff for overall safety.

It's not obvious why bigger wheels alone should affect fuel consumption because usually the total diameter is unchanged. But, as you say, lower profile tyres tend to be optimised for grip and that inevitably means more rolling resistance.
I'm currently driving a new-ish car with quite expensive eco tyres as standard, but at the first sign of a cold winter ahead they're liable to be replaced, because a drop of about 4mpg is better than a drop into the ditch.
Bigger wheels also tend to weigh more. Mass is always the enemy of efficiency, but it's even worse when that mass is rotational mass. That's more rotational inertia you have to overcome, so it takes more energy to accelerate which is obviously bad for efficiency. A smaller radius also reduces the moment of inertia (even more so than the mass, it's linear with mass but the square of radius).

It's also more unsprung mass, but that doesn't matter for efficiency.

The bigger wheel may weigh a bit more, but the lower profile tyre will surely weigh less?

Compare an 18 inch wheel to a 16 inch wheel. The rim is going to be approx. 12.5% heavier if it has the same section (2/16). The spokes may be somewhat heavier but that surely depends on the wheel design and material - just using a more expensive alloy could negate that. Against that you have lost two sections of sidewall 1 inch by about 50 inches, which is a substantial amount of rubber.

I think it needs to be demonstrated by actual real world examples that the moment of inertia of the larger wheel + tyre is significantly larger than that of the smaller one.
 
Upvote
-1 (1 / -2)

Voyna i Mor

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,918
SEL and Limited trims get 17-inch wheels like this, but the fuel efficiency drops by 4mpg combined as a result.

Ugh. If I'm buying a hybrid it's because I want the higher fuel economy. I shouldn't have to choose between maximizing that, and having safety features like blind spot cameras.

Save the tacky and garishly drag inducing wheels for vehicles that gulp so much fuel their penalty is insignificant. Or if you must include them in the product line, make them an optional "upgrade" independent of anything else.
I bet the tires are stickier and thus have higher rolling resistance. Probably a worthy tradeoff for overall safety.

It's not obvious why bigger wheels alone should affect fuel consumption because usually the total diameter is unchanged. But, as you say, lower profile tyres tend to be optimised for grip and that inevitably means more rolling resistance.
I'm currently driving a new-ish car with quite expensive eco tyres as standard, but at the first sign of a cold winter ahead they're liable to be replaced, because a drop of about 4mpg is better than a drop into the ditch.


I changed the tyres of a 2nd Gen Prius from the OEM low rolling resistance Bridgestone Turanza to Michelin Cross-Climate Plus, as we have snow for about 1 week (at most) a year.

5mpg loss (Imperial gallons) but the car turns corners better, never slips and the really annoying feature of the torque limiter kicking in every time I tried to turn from a halt has stopped. I would not go back!

Yes, I already did it on my wife's car. The strange noise exiting our drive (which I suspected was wheel scrub) immediately disappeared.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

ERIFNOMI

Ars Legatus Legionis
18,134
SEL and Limited trims get 17-inch wheels like this, but the fuel efficiency drops by 4mpg combined as a result.

Ugh. If I'm buying a hybrid it's because I want the higher fuel economy. I shouldn't have to choose between maximizing that, and having safety features like blind spot cameras.

Save the tacky and garishly drag inducing wheels for vehicles that gulp so much fuel their penalty is insignificant. Or if you must include them in the product line, make them an optional "upgrade" independent of anything else.
I bet the tires are stickier and thus have higher rolling resistance. Probably a worthy tradeoff for overall safety.

It's not obvious why bigger wheels alone should affect fuel consumption because usually the total diameter is unchanged. But, as you say, lower profile tyres tend to be optimised for grip and that inevitably means more rolling resistance.
I'm currently driving a new-ish car with quite expensive eco tyres as standard, but at the first sign of a cold winter ahead they're liable to be replaced, because a drop of about 4mpg is better than a drop into the ditch.
Bigger wheels also tend to weigh more. Mass is always the enemy of efficiency, but it's even worse when that mass is rotational mass. That's more rotational inertia you have to overcome, so it takes more energy to accelerate which is obviously bad for efficiency. A smaller radius also reduces the moment of inertia (even more so than the mass, it's linear with mass but the square of radius).

It's also more unsprung mass, but that doesn't matter for efficiency.

The bigger wheel may weigh a bit more, but the lower profile tyre will surely weigh less?

Compare an 18 inch wheel to a 16 inch wheel. The rim is going to be approx. 12.5% heavier if it has the same section (2/16). The spokes may be somewhat heavier but that surely depends on the wheel design and material - just using a more expensive alloy could negate that. Against that you have lost two sections of sidewall 1 inch by about 50 inches, which is a substantial amount of rubber.

I think it needs to be demonstrated by actual real world examples that the moment of inertia of the larger wheel + tyre is significantly larger than that of the smaller one.
Yes, a lower profile tire will weigh less than a higher profile tire that ends up giving you roughly the same total diameter. But the weight savings of the wheel will make up for it. And having less weight in the wheel, which is the more dense and more central piece, means the weight is closer to the center which reduces moment of inertia.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)
I'm very interested in the Ioniq hybrid, especially if you could compare it to the Sonata. From what I gather it's a slightly smaller car with a somewhat less powerful engine, but that tells me little about how they compare in handling and drive experience.

It's much smaller—I am driving one this week. It's more like a Prius C competitor; you would not cross shop one with a full size sedan like this or the hybrid Camry or Accord.
I genuinely like the Ioniq, but yes - it is small. If your kid's in a rear-facing carrier, the only place that will fit is behind the front passenger seat, which has to be slid forward to make room, so for practical purposes it's a three-seat car in that mode.
If it weren't for that, I'd probably have one of the all-electric models already.
I know I'm a dinosaur, but how I wish that was available as a wagon.
I'm in my early 30s with two kids and a dog, and I have the exact same thought. The hybrid Sonata as a wagon would be an obvious leading candidate for us. The hybrid Sonata as an AWD PHEV wagon would be "why bother cross shopping anything else when this is so obviously perfect". (No need to give it low-range 4x4, or even mechanical AWD at all - just a 30 hp electric transaxle at the back to help it get moving uphill on snow & ice.)

As a sedan, I have a harder time getting interested. There's no good place to confine a dog in a sedan, for one thing. You can't put him on the kids' laps, you can't put him in the trunk, you can't put him on the rear floorboards.
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)
Stop producing hybrids and increase production of plug-in hybrids with, at least, 5 - 10kWh battery!

99% drivers commute daily 10 - 50km and they could do it purely on battery. In any other case they have petrol engine.
I'm with you on the second part (more PHEVs) but not on the first part (fewer hybrids).

Hybrids like this one do not displace PHEVs; they displace conventional gas-powered cars. PHEV production is limited primarily by the unit cost and the supply chain capacity for lithium ion batteries, and secondarily by the willingness / ability of car buyers to pay the higher capital cost over a comparable hybrid or ICE.

From a total fleetwide emissions standpoint, which is preferable?
(a) Sell 200,000 hybrids with 2 kWh batteries at $28,000, averaging 5 L/100km each
(b) Sell 180,000 conventionally-powered cars at $25,000, averaging 8 L/100km, plus 20,000 PHEVs with 20 kWh batteries at $40,000, averaging 2 L/100km.

Scenario "b" is 48% worse on total fuel burn and total emissions, for the same available capacity in the battery factory and supply chain. It incurs higher engineering costs and higher business risks. It also concentrates the total cost of ownership benefit in the hands of the wealthiest 10% of buyers, providing no benefit to the 90% who cannot afford the higher CapEx.

So yes, let's scale up battery-making and engineering design capacity to allow more PHEVs, but in the meantime, hybridizing everything we possibly can is a prudent and valuable move in its own right.
 
Upvote
15 (15 / 0)

Wheels Of Confusion

Ars Legatus Legionis
76,140
Subscriptor
This is a "plug" not a "review".
"plug" - Everything is great
"review" - This is great. This not so much. Maybe redesign this...
It's only a review if the reviewer finds something they don't like? Nah bro. Sometimes a movie, a book, or a car is really just that good; at least for any given reviewer.
 
Upvote
10 (10 / 0)

King_V

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,889
Is there a plug-in hybrid version of the Sonata?

With a 1.6kWh battery, and an electric motor with just 50hp, I really doubt it.

Other plug-in hybrids get a larger battery. I'm not sure why you think a plug-in hybrid version of this car would be any different.

A larger battery wouldn't do a thing about the fact that the electric motor only has 50hp, so you'd need both a bigger battery and a different motor.

Is there a plug-in hybrid version of the Sonata?

With a 1.6kWh battery, and an electric motor with just 50hp, I really doubt it.

Other plug-in hybrids get a larger battery. I'm not sure why you think a plug-in hybrid version of this car would be any different.


And a small electric motor?


To both of you: yes. That is precisely how the Prius Prime operates. It has a larger battery, and the capability of plug-in charging, but uses the same powertrain as the non-plug-in Prius.

The 2019 Toyota Prius Prime has the same engine and electric motors as the Prius, but the Prius Prime is a plug-in hybrid. The Prius Prime gives you excellent gas mileage with 55 city and 53 highway miles per gallon. With this vehicle you can get about 25 miles of driving without using the gasoline engine.
https://www.irwinzonetoyota.com/2019-To ... rence.html

Don't forget, as well, that the low horsepower rating is deceptive considering that electric motors produce all their torque right from a stop.
Low horsepower in a normal hybrid is not papered over by electric torque. The electric motor is for low speeds and (continuing after an interruption due to over-sensitive touchpad) ICE assistance, with major attention to minimum battery and motor size. That's how the weight is kept under control and mpg maximized. PHEV tends to be heavier, and unless it offers a considerable (probably 30-50 miles) EV range with full performance it likely will end up burning more gas than its non-plugin cousin.

Bottom line: Prius-competitive hybrids are not quick, nor are they fast. 0-60 around 10 sec is the performance bogey. You can get on the freeway, but you need to pay attention, and it won't win many stoplight drag races.

I think you're confusing the complaint about the low horsepower of the electric motor, versus the relatively low horsepower of the ICE.

Further, torque is more often key over horsepower. The muscle-car era was dominated by cars that were fast, but whose horsepower numbers, especially when adjusted to SAE Net numbers, are considered less-than-impressive by todays standards. Lots of low end torque was what gave them their reputation.

I'm not sure where you're going with the touchpad comment.

The hybrid system used by Toyota (presumably others as well, since it works), combines the ICE with two electric motors. One is low torque high speed, the other is high torque low speed.

Nobody buys a hybrid because they're expecting them to be quick or fast. They buy them for practicality combined with low fuel consumption. Your complaint on that point is akin to complaining about how the Chevy Corvette isn't roomy enough for a family of four.
 
Upvote
5 (6 / -1)

PrionDX

Smack-Fu Master, in training
89
> starts at $27,750

Damn that's a good starting price to bring folks in.


Yes, but what are the prices with some realistic configurations?

Has Hyundai ever updated their dealership model to match their product ambitions?

$22,000 after all incentives and rebates! We'll let you know which ones you qualified for in the finance office-- that puts you at a $600/mo "fully protected" payment! Rate and term? We'll go over that with you on the paperwork. Don't forget the GAP insurance, these things lose value like crazy!
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

Mintaka87

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,086
Stop producing hybrids and increase production of plug-in hybrids with, at least, 5 - 10kWh battery!

99% drivers commute daily 10 - 50km and they could do it purely on battery. In any other case they have petrol engine.
For me a PHEV would be worse than a regular hybrid because I have no place to plug in. Yes, I could buy a PHEV and never plug it in, but I could also buy a hybrid and put a layer of bricks in the trunk. The biggest practical difference is that bricks are cheaper.
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)

password123

Ars Scholae Palatinae
969
I'm very interested in the Ioniq hybrid, especially if you could compare it to the Sonata. From what I gather it's a slightly smaller car with a somewhat less powerful engine, but that tells me little about how they compare in handling and drive experience.

I did a test drive of the Ioniq, first year model, the handling was fairly good as was the driving experience, short though it was. It had some decent acceleration, up a hill from a slow start, to merge into a freeway, was impressed enough. Not super fast, but worked on this challenging entrance ramp. On the whole seemed like a rather decent sedan.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

cleek

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,259
"It seems like every article we write explaining just how good Korean cars have become is met with surprise."

my first car was a 1993 Japanese-beetle-green Hyundai Excel. it was as bare-bones as you could get, yet attracted car-radio thieves like crazy. seeing reviews like this gives me the same feeling i get when i wake up and realize that the sleazy conman from the NYC tabloids is now President.
 
Upvote
-7 (0 / -7)

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,950
Ars Staff
"It seems like every article we write explaining just how good Korean cars have become is met with surprise."

my first car was a 1993 Japanese-beetle-green Hyundai Excel. it was as bare-bones as you could get, yet attracted car-radio thieves like crazy. seeing reviews like this gives me the same feeling i get when i wake up and realize that the sleazy conman from the NYC tabloids is now President.

Do you base all your other decisions on information that’s 27 years out of date? Seems a weird thing to boast about but OK.
 
Upvote
8 (10 / -2)
My biggest design qualm with Hyundai is not their design language: it's that italicized logo. The non-symmetrical design just grates on me, and it's something I'd love to see them update because it looks horrible on their otherwise handsome cars. It looks ridiculous in the pictures above. I can't help but foggily remember that (now very old) episode of The Simpsons where the Principle's car gets blown up (?) and they discover when they find the bumper that it was a Hyundai and not a Honda...and thus it was less important or something. It was a joke at Hyundai's expense. Would love to see that get updated.

Totally agree about the logo. I think a redesign will be key to Hyundai's future.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

fenris_uy

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,286
I think you're confusing the complaint about the low horsepower of the electric motor, versus the relatively low horsepower of the ICE.

Further, torque is more often key over horsepower. The muscle-car era was dominated by cars that were fast, but whose horsepower numbers, especially when adjusted to SAE Net numbers, are considered less-than-impressive by todays standards. Lots of low end torque was what gave them their reputation.

I'm not sure where you're going with the touchpad comment.

The hybrid system used by Toyota (presumably others as well, since it works), combines the ICE with two electric motors. One is low torque high speed, the other is high torque low speed.

Nobody buys a hybrid because they're expecting them to be quick or fast. They buy them for practicality combined with low fuel consumption. Your complaint on that point is akin to complaining about how the Chevy Corvette isn't roomy enough for a family of four.

The Prius Prime electric motor has 70 hp, or 40% more power than the electric motor of the Sonata.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

King_V

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,889
I think you're confusing the complaint about the low horsepower of the electric motor, versus the relatively low horsepower of the ICE.

Further, torque is more often key over horsepower. The muscle-car era was dominated by cars that were fast, but whose horsepower numbers, especially when adjusted to SAE Net numbers, are considered less-than-impressive by todays standards. Lots of low end torque was what gave them their reputation.

I'm not sure where you're going with the touchpad comment.

The hybrid system used by Toyota (presumably others as well, since it works), combines the ICE with two electric motors. One is low torque high speed, the other is high torque low speed.

Nobody buys a hybrid because they're expecting them to be quick or fast. They buy them for practicality combined with low fuel consumption. Your complaint on that point is akin to complaining about how the Chevy Corvette isn't roomy enough for a family of four.

The Prius Prime electric motor has 70 hp, or 40% more power than the electric motor of the Sonata.

Source?

The Sonata also uses a stepped gear transmission rather than a continuously variable transmission.

And, regardless of those: what is your point? If the motor is sufficient for the standard hybrid version, what would make it insufficient for a plug-in hybrid version?

Total horsepower for the Sonata is significantly greater than the Prius, despite being only slightly heavier. You don't need a ton of horsepower for cruising and light/moderate acceleration. just a reasonable amount of torque.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

ChronoReverse

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,721
Subscriptor
The 2020 Camry Hybrid LE also gets 52MPG like the "Blue" variant of the Sonata hybrid (they're also practically the same price). I wonder what each car trades off to achieve the same rating. I'm thinking about this since the Cd of the Sonata is better and it also has a larger 1.6kwh battery vs the 1.04kwh battery in the LE variant of the Camry Hybrid.

It would be nice to have more details like the tires sizes and whether grip/braking were traded off for efficiency.

Interestingly Toyota sells two hybrid versions of the Camry the LE is the highest mpg because of its better battery. I think compared to this you would need to compare to the lower mpg Camrys in terms of matching the equipment list as it was equipped in this test car.
That's my point. The "Blue" version of the Sonata Hybrid has higher MPG than the normal Sonata Hybrid just like the Camry LE is more efficient than the other Camry Hybrids.

In both cases, they're the lower trim so they can get away with smaller 16" wheels and less gizmos.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)

RCook

Ars Praefectus
4,742
Subscriptor
I'd love to get a Sonata, but the lack of AWD given the mountainous terrain and snow where I live just makes it a deal-breaker. To get the AWD, I'd have to step up to a Genesis and, even though they are quite price competitive for the luxury market, it is hard to justify going that route rather than a much more economical Subaru Legacy.

The Kia version of the same model offers AWD.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

watermeloncup

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,882
I think you're confusing the complaint about the low horsepower of the electric motor, versus the relatively low horsepower of the ICE.

Further, torque is more often key over horsepower. The muscle-car era was dominated by cars that were fast, but whose horsepower numbers, especially when adjusted to SAE Net numbers, are considered less-than-impressive by todays standards. Lots of low end torque was what gave them their reputation.

I'm not sure where you're going with the touchpad comment.

The hybrid system used by Toyota (presumably others as well, since it works), combines the ICE with two electric motors. One is low torque high speed, the other is high torque low speed.

Nobody buys a hybrid because they're expecting them to be quick or fast. They buy them for practicality combined with low fuel consumption. Your complaint on that point is akin to complaining about how the Chevy Corvette isn't roomy enough for a family of four.

The Prius Prime electric motor has 70 hp, or 40% more power than the electric motor of the Sonata.

Source?

The Sonata also uses a stepped gear transmission rather than a continuously variable transmission.

And, regardless of those: what is your point? If the motor is sufficient for the standard hybrid version, what would make it insufficient for a plug-in hybrid version?

Wikipedia actually says that the Prius Prime produces 91 hp in EV mode.

50 hp is definitely insufficient for a theoretical PHEV version of the Sonata. The 91 hp motor in the Prius Prime lets it do 0-60 in around 15 seconds in EV mode, which is about as already slower than many people would tolerate. A less powerful motor in a bigger and heavier car would be basically unsuitable for highway driving.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)