[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=31957143#p31957143:2vssykl4 said:
THavoc[/url]":2vssykl4]
[url=http://meincmagazine.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=31957087#p31957087:2vssykl4 said:
Asvarduil[/url]":2vssykl4]Dammit DCRoss ninja'd me. I was about to bring up the required "Attempt no landing there!" thing just to get it out of the way, but before I could be witless, he
just had to jump in.
I'm going to look for a suitable pony for this thread, and this time it's not THavoc's fault (yet.)
Damn it man!
Ok now it's your fault - you typed words, with a keyboard. They reached the internet, the pony is now in your name.*
Back on topic, though, the options for researching Europa seem legion. In addition to cubesats and direct fly-throughs, what about maybe deploying micro-rovers or stationary sensors directly to the planet? As noted, we've only had cursory observations of Europa; it seems like this is the perfect excuse to get more hardware out there, and to learn more.
Also, think about the PR. If you can get some awesome shots of another world, it could surely drum up public interest not only in the mission - thus resulting in maybe more money for NASA - but also people to develop into the astrophysicists and astroengineers of tomorrow. Look at what the flyby of Pluto did for the space program!
*: If this were a political thread, there'd already be a pony. I have great respect for interstellar exploration, though. I'll refrain from using this thread's allowance of pony until it's clear that it's over.