Hoverboarding dentist gets 12 years in prison for fraud, unlawful dental acts

dagar9

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,924
Subscriptor
Wait, this went to TRIAL?!? What lawyer in his/her right mind would have taken this case, thinking they should get it in front of a jury or judge?
Lawyers defend people who are probably guilty all the time. It's the way the "adversarial" US system works. And probably tried to get a plea deal, this one doesn't sound like there was much prospect of acquittal. But the client is not obliged to take their advice. The lawyer still has to do the best they can.
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)

waldo22

Ars Scholae Palatinae
680
Subscriptor++
Wait, this went to TRIAL?!? What lawyer in his/her right mind would have taken this case, thinking they should get it in front of a jury or judge?
It could be that the client didn't want to settle. Lawyers can only recommend settling to their clients, they can't force their clients to settle.

This was criminal, not civil, so you don't really settle. I guess you mean "accept a plea bargain"? If so, sorry for being pedantic.
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

Astro-CCD

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,256
As a retired dentist, I can say that incompetent and arrogant crooks like this deserve everything he got and more. I know every occupation has a few of these people but that does not make me feel much better about the damage he has done to his patients and his profession. I hope they lose the key to his cell and never find it.
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)

Viki Ai

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,113
Are there really people who need to be out cold under GA just for extractions? I've had Wisdom teeth extracted with just local anaesthesia and honestly it wasn't bad. Of course I could feel the dentist tugging at the tooth, but there was no pain at all.

Same. I had a wisdom tooth that had only partially cleared the gum and, being tucked out of reach of even the most diligent brushing, was starting to rot. Had it pulled out in my lunch break from work. Didn't hurt at all (note that '10' on my personal pain chart is 'passing 4mm kidney stone over a 4 day period when the morphine ran out* after 2' so YMMV!)

*more accurately, I was in China at the time and they are very touchy about giving people morphine - and equivalents - for any length of time (thanks British Empire!).

...

As for this particular dentist.... I know of a plant named Audrey II that would love to eat, um, meet him.
 
Upvote
0 (1 / -1)

Martin Blank

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,637
Subscriptor++
Medicare Fraud is huge and CEOs get away with it, some actually become politicians. Like Rick Scott.

And Rand Paul, that practiced medicine without a license because he didn’t want to pay or get continuing education.
He let his board certification lapse. It was not required for him to practice in Kentucky. He maintained his medical license, as that was required to practice and to bill insurance, and in fact still has it. He's assisted with COVID response at a hospital in Bowling Green. He may be a political hypocrite, but he seems to be a competent physician.
 
Upvote
3 (6 / -3)

Wheels Of Confusion

Ars Legatus Legionis
76,140
Subscriptor
He may be a political hypocrite, but he seems to be a competent physician.
Except a competent physician would have self-isolated and masked up while awaiting his coronavirus test results.

Paul was the first senator to test positive for coronavirus, after attending an event attended by two people also tested positive. Paul said he was tested out of an abundance of caution even though he had no symptoms.

Before receiving his results, the Kentucky Republican was interacting with colleagues and reporters in the Capitol and also voting on the Senate floor.

His contraction of the virus prompted two of his Republican colleagues — Sens. Mitt Romney and Mike Lee of Utah — to go into self-quarantine after interacting with him. Romney and Lee have since finished their self-quarantine.
 
Upvote
11 (12 / -1)

ArseTechnically

Smack-Fu Master, in training
67
Hoverboarding dentist gets 12 years in prison for fraud, unlawful dental acts

Hoverboarding was "outrageous, narcissistic you know, and crazy," former patient said.

.......

Judge bites his tongue and clamps down with a sentence that carries some teeth

:D



Found Beth's burner account. This is how she implants the puns the editors extract.
 
Upvote
7 (8 / -1)

Fatesrider

Ars Legatus Legionis
25,488
Subscriptor
When the prosecutor asked her how she would have responded to the hoverboard riding had she known and not been sedated, Wilhelm responded: “I would’ve said ‘Hell no!’”
I would've imagined that most folks would have offered to remove several of his teeth, free of charge, and without sedation.

Any word on the breakdown of his sentence? Is he basically being locked up largely because he stole money, or more because he risked people's lives in doing so? The punishment seems to fit, but it would be nice to know what the main driver was in his jail term.

Edit: speling

It's in the first sentence.

The infamous hoverboarding dentist of Alaska has been found guilty of fraud and unlawful dental acts and was sentenced to 12 years in prison this week, according to the Anchorage Daily News.


The hoverboard thing doesn't amount to jail time. It's entirely malpractice and a civil matter.

The crime was fraud and unauthorized dental acts. The unauthorized dental acts were to sedate people excessively, or keep them sedated longer than necessary. The fraud was charging Medicaid for unnecessary procedures.

Sedation easily kills people, and it seems many patients who went to him were sedated unnecessarily. Excessive sedation's could easily have killed someone.

So, for that, and the fraud and the unauthorized acts (which might have included the hoverboard stunt, though it doesn't specifically say that), he was convicted and sentenced to 12 years in prison.
 
Upvote
2 (3 / -1)

MöbiusTrip1

Seniorius Lurkius
46
Subscriptor
Do dentists have to pass a legal and ethics unit in their training at any stage? Is there a way for immoral a-holes to be weeded out of professions like this?
Just thinking about what he did that bugs me the most,

Deliberately endangering patient safety for financial gain,
Defrauding medicaid at the cost of the rest of the community...

At any point in his life, personal and professional, did anybody point him out and say "That guy's an a-hole and shouldn't be in a position of responsibility?"
I understand there are bad people, but the idea that he got THIS far without intervention?...
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)
Do dentists have to pass a legal and ethics unit in their training at any stage? Is there a way for immoral a-holes to be weeded out of professions like this?
Just thinking about what he did that bugs me the most,

Deliberately endangering patient safety for financial gain,
Defrauding medicaid at the cost of the rest of the community...

At any point in his life, personal and professional, did anybody point him out and say "That guy's an a-hole and shouldn't be in a position of responsibility?"
I understand there are bad people, but the idea that he got THIS far without intervention?...
Legal? Yes. In every state I obtained a license I had to pass a pretty basic test on the dental practice laws in the state. Ethics? Sort of. I had 3 years of ethics course in school.
When it comes to weeding out the dirtbags in the profession, it's difficult. We are a self governing body, meaning the dental board can dish out penalties, make requirements of things to do to keep or get back your license, etc. but getting them to take action is very difficult. I practice near a doctor that is very clearly committing fraud and breaking the laws of the state. I approached a member of the dental board about how something like that should be handled, and I was told in no uncertain terms that I have no place filing a complaint against another dentist. Only a patient, guardian of a patient, or financially responsible party (insurance) can officially complain to them.

I suppose those rules exist for a reason (using the board to harass competitors has probably been done in the past I suppose) but I'm still left telling patients that I cannot do a certain procedure on them because somebody else billed it out without doing it, or has done garbage work on them and medicaid won't pay to replace it because it was only done a month ago.

Honestly, I think the only real fix is to make medicaid pay enough that more high quality dentists will participate and give patients more options as to their dentist. But let's be honest here, that isn't going to happen. Programs like DentiCal are straight up shit. Why would anybody with a half million dollars in student debt spend 30 minutes doing a good filling on somebody when they'd make like $10 from it?
 
Upvote
15 (15 / 0)

Eurynom0s

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,956
Subscriptor
It's likely a fair bet that those who struggle with impulse control & show similar poor judgement have some more dirt should you go digging.

I wonder how much fraud and corruption goes on by people who don't seek the limelight.

WTF do those who struggle with "impulse control" have anything to do with this? I don't see how you can compare this kind of conscious fraud, committed by a person who made it thru dental school and may have been a competent dentist, to someone who has "poor impulse control"???

Probably more than you would think. The ability to make it through dental school, and even the ability to be a good dentist doesn't necessarily preclude underlying mental issues. I wouldn't be surprised if what we're seeing is the end result of a slow escalation driven by exactly that sort of long-term problem.

That's not an excuse, of course, and this guy should have recognized the problem and dealt with it if that's the case. The fact that he made it through dental school (and, even, seems to be reasonably competent aside from the obvious) does absolutely mean he should have known better. Lack of adequate mental health care is a real problem in the US (and a lot of the world), and dentists are hardly excluded.

Beyond all of the other problems with mental healthcare in the US, don't doctors in the US face a strong incentive to not seek mental healthcare because then they'd have to disclose it to their medical boards and fear said boards pulling their medical licenses over it?
 
Upvote
5 (5 / 0)

Green RT

Ars Scholae Palatinae
960
Subscriptor
Some people can't help themselves and are compelled to document their crimes. Ironically its always the ones that are sure they are too smart to be caught.
Did he document the medicare fraud, or just the hoverboarding while dentisting. My guess is the medicare fraud drove the prison time. If it was just the hoverboarding he might have just lost his license.
 
Upvote
0 (0 / 0)

Sxio

Smack-Fu Master, in training
52
It's likely a fair bet that those who struggle with impulse control & show similar poor judgement have some more dirt should you go digging.

I wonder how much fraud and corruption goes on by people who don't seek the limelight.

WTF do those who struggle with "impulse control" have anything to do with this? I don't see how you can compare this kind of conscious fraud, committed by a person who made it thru dental school and may have been a competent dentist, to someone who has "poor impulse control"???

I don't know. He's literally riding a hoverboard and doing dentistry. What would you call it?
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)

Wheels Of Confusion

Ars Legatus Legionis
76,140
Subscriptor
It's likely a fair bet that those who struggle with impulse control & show similar poor judgement have some more dirt should you go digging.

I wonder how much fraud and corruption goes on by people who don't seek the limelight.

WTF do those who struggle with "impulse control" have anything to do with this? I don't see how you can compare this kind of conscious fraud, committed by a person who made it thru dental school and may have been a competent dentist, to someone who has "poor impulse control"???

I don't know. He's literally riding a hoverboard and doing dentistry. What would you call it?
Callous disregard for others?
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

WilhelmC

Ars Scholae Palatinae
947
Wait, this went to TRIAL?!? What lawyer in his/her right mind would have taken this case, thinking they should get it in front of a jury or judge?

Of course, answering my own question, I'm guessing it's the kind who will happily take the money, and cheerfully represent the dentist, who, because he's already proven to be a rather poor judge of risks, thinks that there's no way that a judge or jury could possibly convict him. Even though that lawyer knows for sure the better strategy would be to quickly (and cheaply) negotiate a plea deal
The lawyer held his tongue rather than tell the client that he would have to tell the tooth, the whole tooth, and nothing but the tooth.
 
Upvote
10 (11 / -1)
It's likely a fair bet that those who struggle with impulse control & show similar poor judgement have some more dirt should you go digging.

I wonder how much fraud and corruption goes on by people who don't seek the limelight.

WTF do those who struggle with "impulse control" have anything to do with this? I don't see how you can compare this kind of conscious fraud, committed by a person who made it thru dental school and may have been a competent dentist, to someone who has "poor impulse control"???
Well, your brain generates all kinds of ideas. Like don't think of a pink elephant. Play on the highway. Always eat the chocolates you own then buy more. Always swipe right on Tinder. Hoverboard while drilling for teeth. Sedate patients for fun and profit, combine it with the hoverboarding.

Poor impulse control is when you cannot tell the difference between good ideas and bad ideas and just act on your impulses. You are missing feedback loops or lack the awareness to examine your actions.

It is very easy to get stuck in poor behavior reward cycles. After all, they get stronger the more you exercise the relevant brain pathways.

I think we can agree he has poor impulse control. I am sorry your particular impulse control is special and different and requires pity instead of condemnation.
 
Upvote
-2 (4 / -6)
Wait, this went to TRIAL?!? What lawyer in his/her right mind would have taken this case, thinking they should get it in front of a jury or judge?
It could be that the client didn't want to settle. Lawyers can only recommend settling to their clients, they can't force their clients to settle.
The evidence was apparently so plentiful and overwhelming that maybe the DA didn't offer a plea deal. This was criminal, not civil, right?

That basically doesn't happen, just to avoid the unnecessary time and labor, they will essentially always offer one. It might not be a very generous plea deal, but there's essentially always one on the table.
 
Upvote
1 (1 / 0)
While Medicaid fraud is a big deal, and performing procedures while balancing on an unstable surface is... well, stupid... I personally think that this punishment is on the harsh side. Technically, these are nonviolent crimes (although the risk of something going wrong with sedation is something to consider). Honestly, the punishment should be a fine equal to double the amount defrauded and referral to whatever board reviews the licensing/certification for dentists (a quick Google search shows that it looks like there are state licensing boards).
 
Upvote
-10 (0 / -10)

SixDegrees

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,655
Subscriptor
While Medicaid fraud is a big deal, and performing procedures while balancing on an unstable surface is... well, stupid... I personally think that this punishment is on the harsh side. Technically, these are nonviolent crimes (although the risk of something going wrong with sedation is something to consider). Honestly, the punishment should be a fine equal to double the amount defrauded and referral to whatever board reviews the licensing/certification for dentists (a quick Google search shows that it looks like there are state licensing boards).

$2 million bucks worth of fraud, with a side of reckless endangerment and a chaser of severe braggadocio, seems like a pretty heavy offense.

He was sentenced to 20 years, with 8 suspended. Seems reasonable. Also, in Alaska he'll be eligible for parole once he's served a quarter of his sentence, so it's very unlikely he'll spend anywhere near the 12 years he's been sentenced to.
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)
While Medicaid fraud is a big deal, and performing procedures while balancing on an unstable surface is... well, stupid... I personally think that this punishment is on the harsh side. Technically, these are nonviolent crimes (although the risk of something going wrong with sedation is something to consider). Honestly, the punishment should be a fine equal to double the amount defrauded and referral to whatever board reviews the licensing/certification for dentists (a quick Google search shows that it looks like there are state licensing boards).

$2 million bucks worth of fraud, with a side of reckless endangerment and a chaser of severe braggadocio, seems like a pretty heavy offense.

He was sentenced to 20 years, with 8 suspended. Seems reasonable. Also, in Alaska he'll be eligible for parole once he's served a quarter of his sentence, so it's very unlikely he'll spend anywhere near the 12 years he's been sentenced to.

I simply happen to disagree... I feel that this should have resulted in a $4M fine, and referral to the state licensing board for revocation of his dentist license (which any sane observer would agree this man should no longer hold a dentist license, and other articles on other sites indicate that he has lost his business, and the loss of his license is pending but likely). As far as reckless endangerment, as nobody was known to have been injured, add community service hours. The bottom line is that our justice system, as a whole, is too reliant on simply locking people up for years on end.
 
Upvote
-12 (0 / -12)

SixDegrees

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,655
Subscriptor
While Medicaid fraud is a big deal, and performing procedures while balancing on an unstable surface is... well, stupid... I personally think that this punishment is on the harsh side. Technically, these are nonviolent crimes (although the risk of something going wrong with sedation is something to consider). Honestly, the punishment should be a fine equal to double the amount defrauded and referral to whatever board reviews the licensing/certification for dentists (a quick Google search shows that it looks like there are state licensing boards).

$2 million bucks worth of fraud, with a side of reckless endangerment and a chaser of severe braggadocio, seems like a pretty heavy offense.

He was sentenced to 20 years, with 8 suspended. Seems reasonable. Also, in Alaska he'll be eligible for parole once he's served a quarter of his sentence, so it's very unlikely he'll spend anywhere near the 12 years he's been sentenced to.

I simply happen to disagree... I feel that this should have resulted in a $4M fine, and referral to the state licensing board for revocation of his dentist license (which any sane observer would agree this man should no longer hold a dentist license, and other articles on other sites indicate that he has lost his business, and the loss of his license is pending but likely). As far as reckless endangerment, as nobody was known to have been injured, add community service hours. The bottom line is that our justice system, as a whole, is too reliant on simply locking people up for years on end.

I'd agree that sentences like this one ought not to be handed out for minor crimes like shoplifting, or selling joints. But this is far beyond such crimes, and seems appropriate given the severity and magnitude here. If someone can just buy their way out of punishment, there's little in the way of deterrence and nothing in the way of punishment to be had.
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)
While Medicaid fraud is a big deal, and performing procedures while balancing on an unstable surface is... well, stupid... I personally think that this punishment is on the harsh side. Technically, these are nonviolent crimes (although the risk of something going wrong with sedation is something to consider). Honestly, the punishment should be a fine equal to double the amount defrauded and referral to whatever board reviews the licensing/certification for dentists (a quick Google search shows that it looks like there are state licensing boards).

$2 million bucks worth of fraud, with a side of reckless endangerment and a chaser of severe braggadocio, seems like a pretty heavy offense.

He was sentenced to 20 years, with 8 suspended. Seems reasonable. Also, in Alaska he'll be eligible for parole once he's served a quarter of his sentence, so it's very unlikely he'll spend anywhere near the 12 years he's been sentenced to.

I simply happen to disagree... I feel that this should have resulted in a $4M fine, and referral to the state licensing board for revocation of his dentist license (which any sane observer would agree this man should no longer hold a dentist license, and other articles on other sites indicate that he has lost his business, and the loss of his license is pending but likely). As far as reckless endangerment, as nobody was known to have been injured, add community service hours. The bottom line is that our justice system, as a whole, is too reliant on simply locking people up for years on end.

I'd agree that sentences like this one ought not to be handed out for minor crimes like shoplifting, or selling joints. But this is far beyond such crimes, and seems appropriate given the severity and magnitude here. If someone can just buy their way out of punishment, there's little in the way of deterrence and nothing in the way of punishment to be had.

That's the thing though: His private practice? Toast. He'll most likely never be able to work as a dentist again. Making him pay back double his ill-gotten gains has the legitimate potential to be a serious burden. Plus there are a number of civil suits pending against him. Tack on community service hours (like... 4,000 hours, which would take 100 weeks of doing 40-hour weeks of just community service, so nearly 2 years worth of full-time community service work), and I personally think that should be sufficient. According to other articles about his sentencing, he has expressed remorse for his actions, it's not like he "needs to be taught a lesson".
 
Upvote
-3 (1 / -4)

SixDegrees

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,655
Subscriptor
While Medicaid fraud is a big deal, and performing procedures while balancing on an unstable surface is... well, stupid... I personally think that this punishment is on the harsh side. Technically, these are nonviolent crimes (although the risk of something going wrong with sedation is something to consider). Honestly, the punishment should be a fine equal to double the amount defrauded and referral to whatever board reviews the licensing/certification for dentists (a quick Google search shows that it looks like there are state licensing boards).

$2 million bucks worth of fraud, with a side of reckless endangerment and a chaser of severe braggadocio, seems like a pretty heavy offense.

He was sentenced to 20 years, with 8 suspended. Seems reasonable. Also, in Alaska he'll be eligible for parole once he's served a quarter of his sentence, so it's very unlikely he'll spend anywhere near the 12 years he's been sentenced to.

I simply happen to disagree... I feel that this should have resulted in a $4M fine, and referral to the state licensing board for revocation of his dentist license (which any sane observer would agree this man should no longer hold a dentist license, and other articles on other sites indicate that he has lost his business, and the loss of his license is pending but likely). As far as reckless endangerment, as nobody was known to have been injured, add community service hours. The bottom line is that our justice system, as a whole, is too reliant on simply locking people up for years on end.

I'd agree that sentences like this one ought not to be handed out for minor crimes like shoplifting, or selling joints. But this is far beyond such crimes, and seems appropriate given the severity and magnitude here. If someone can just buy their way out of punishment, there's little in the way of deterrence and nothing in the way of punishment to be had.

That's the thing though: His private practice? Toast. He'll most likely never be able to work as a dentist again. Making him pay back double his ill-gotten gains has the legitimate potential to be a serious burden. Plus there are a number of civil suits pending against him. Tack on community service hours (like... 4,000 hours, which would take 100 weeks of doing 40-hour weeks of just community service, so nearly 2 years worth of full-time community service work), and I personally think that should be sufficient. According to other articles about his sentencing, he has expressed remorse for his actions, it's not like he "needs to be taught a lesson".

Sorry, but he endangered his patients for the sake of shoveling money into his own pocket. It's likely he'll simply find another way to take advantage of people without a stiff deterrent.

Maybe I'm being overly aggressive here, but I've pretty much had it with what seems to be a notable increase in sociopathic behavior of late, and this seems to be yet another example of it.
 
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)
Wait, this went to TRIAL?!? What lawyer in his/her right mind would have taken this case, thinking they should get it in front of a jury or judge?

Of course, answering my own question, I'm guessing it's the kind who will happily take the money, and cheerfully represent the dentist, who, because he's already proven to be a rather poor judge of risks, thinks that there's no way that a judge or jury could possibly convict him. Even though that lawyer knows for sure the better strategy would be to quickly (and cheaply) negotiate a plea deal

You're reaching here. The question of whether or not to go to trial isn't always up to the lawyer. You can try to settle civil cases, but you can generally expect that you won't get that option for criminal cases.

Most lawyers don't think "he's guilty, so I won't take his money ", they think “He’s going to trial and he needs legal representation to help him make his case, the judge and jury decide guilt, so I can try to represent him to the best of my abilities “.
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)
While Medicaid fraud is a big deal, and performing procedures while balancing on an unstable surface is... well, stupid... I personally think that this punishment is on the harsh side. Technically, these are nonviolent crimes (although the risk of something going wrong with sedation is something to consider). Honestly, the punishment should be a fine equal to double the amount defrauded and referral to whatever board reviews the licensing/certification for dentists (a quick Google search shows that it looks like there are state licensing boards).

$2 million bucks worth of fraud, with a side of reckless endangerment and a chaser of severe braggadocio, seems like a pretty heavy offense.

He was sentenced to 20 years, with 8 suspended. Seems reasonable. Also, in Alaska he'll be eligible for parole once he's served a quarter of his sentence, so it's very unlikely he'll spend anywhere near the 12 years he's been sentenced to.

I simply happen to disagree... I feel that this should have resulted in a $4M fine, and referral to the state licensing board for revocation of his dentist license (which any sane observer would agree this man should no longer hold a dentist license, and other articles on other sites indicate that he has lost his business, and the loss of his license is pending but likely). As far as reckless endangerment, as nobody was known to have been injured, add community service hours. The bottom line is that our justice system, as a whole, is too reliant on simply locking people up for years on end.

I'd agree that sentences like this one ought not to be handed out for minor crimes like shoplifting, or selling joints. But this is far beyond such crimes, and seems appropriate given the severity and magnitude here. If someone can just buy their way out of punishment, there's little in the way of deterrence and nothing in the way of punishment to be had.

That's the thing though: His private practice? Toast. He'll most likely never be able to work as a dentist again. Making him pay back double his ill-gotten gains has the legitimate potential to be a serious burden. Plus there are a number of civil suits pending against him. Tack on community service hours (like... 4,000 hours, which would take 100 weeks of doing 40-hour weeks of just community service, so nearly 2 years worth of full-time community service work), and I personally think that should be sufficient. According to other articles about his sentencing, he has expressed remorse for his actions, it's not like he "needs to be taught a lesson".

Sorry, but he endangered his patients for the sake of shoveling money into his own pocket. It's likely he'll simply find another way to take advantage of people without a stiff deterrent.

Maybe I'm being overly aggressive here, but I've pretty much had it with what seems to be a notable increase in sociopathic behavior of late, and this seems to be yet another example of it.

I don't know about your experiences, but in my experiences most people don't have $4 million just lying around easily accessible. He'd likely have to sell most of his belongings/assets to get that much (and that's before the civil suits I mentioned). Also, being on the hook for effectively a solid 2 years worth of community service is pretty stiff as well. Locking him up for a decade doesn't do much to better society, it just takes him out of it for an extended period of time. Prison should be reserved for violent offenders who cannot be trusted to walk among the rest of society, not a guy who found a way to get rich(er) through fraud.

Imagine how much better our country could be if nonviolent offenders like this guy, instead of being simply locked away for years were used for roadworks projects, or expanding fiber-optic Internet access to more rural areas.
 
Upvote
-2 (2 / -4)
I don't know what it is but DENTISTS from my experience were the most unethical. We had one who wanted us to take the drill bit home so it would be our own personal one and then bring it back so he could use it on us again. Another one I went there and he was fake friendly and then i go there again and his is closed permanently.

Last one and this is your typical factory dental office. He says oh here's another cavity. I said, "Didn't you do a full xray exam and catch that?" There was food around it. I said, "Doesn't Xrays go through food?"

Factory opticians have been a dismal failure too.
 
Upvote
-3 (0 / -3)

SixDegrees

Ars Legatus Legionis
48,655
Subscriptor
$2 million bucks worth of fraud, with a side of reckless endangerment and a chaser of severe braggadocio, seems like a pretty heavy offense.

He was sentenced to 20 years, with 8 suspended. Seems reasonable. Also, in Alaska he'll be eligible for parole once he's served a quarter of his sentence, so it's very unlikely he'll spend anywhere near the 12 years he's been sentenced to.

I simply happen to disagree... I feel that this should have resulted in a $4M fine, and referral to the state licensing board for revocation of his dentist license (which any sane observer would agree this man should no longer hold a dentist license, and other articles on other sites indicate that he has lost his business, and the loss of his license is pending but likely). As far as reckless endangerment, as nobody was known to have been injured, add community service hours. The bottom line is that our justice system, as a whole, is too reliant on simply locking people up for years on end.

I'd agree that sentences like this one ought not to be handed out for minor crimes like shoplifting, or selling joints. But this is far beyond such crimes, and seems appropriate given the severity and magnitude here. If someone can just buy their way out of punishment, there's little in the way of deterrence and nothing in the way of punishment to be had.

That's the thing though: His private practice? Toast. He'll most likely never be able to work as a dentist again. Making him pay back double his ill-gotten gains has the legitimate potential to be a serious burden. Plus there are a number of civil suits pending against him. Tack on community service hours (like... 4,000 hours, which would take 100 weeks of doing 40-hour weeks of just community service, so nearly 2 years worth of full-time community service work), and I personally think that should be sufficient. According to other articles about his sentencing, he has expressed remorse for his actions, it's not like he "needs to be taught a lesson".

Sorry, but he endangered his patients for the sake of shoveling money into his own pocket. It's likely he'll simply find another way to take advantage of people without a stiff deterrent.

Maybe I'm being overly aggressive here, but I've pretty much had it with what seems to be a notable increase in sociopathic behavior of late, and this seems to be yet another example of it.

I don't know about your experiences, but in my experiences most people don't have $4 million just lying around easily accessible. He'd likely have to sell most of his belongings/assets to get that much (and that's before the civil suits I mentioned). Also, being on the hook for effectively a solid 2 years worth of community service is pretty stiff as well. Locking him up for a decade doesn't do much to better society, it just takes him out of it for an extended period of time. Prison should be reserved for violent offenders who cannot be trusted to walk among the rest of society, not a guy who found a way to get rich(er) through fraud.

Imagine how much better our country could be if nonviolent offenders like this guy, instead of being simply locked away for years were used for roadworks projects, or expanding fiber-optic Internet access to more rural areas.

Suit yourself. To me, this seems like a reasonable sentence.
 
Upvote
2 (2 / 0)