When the hybrid 'Vette goes on sale later this year, it will be the quickest of them all.
See full article...
See full article...
So, you don't understand the point of a Toyota Prius either?I'm still not sure what the point of a hybrid that can only get power from the standard combustion engine is (and has practically no battery, at that)
It's the same capacity as the battery in a Toyota Prius, which weirdly no one seems to complain about or make fun of. I wonder why?That's a tiny battery, I have a 1.7kWh battery in my ebike![]()
Yes, you're wrong, and we should expect this Corvette to be much more efficient than the Stingray.For the Prius, I thought the argument was that the hybrid can run with more efficiency than direct ICE and thus cleaner (always in the max mpg mode essentially), but it doesn't seem like this vehicle has that advantage- am I wrong?
Happy to be educated...
LMAO do you post dumb things like this about the Prius or the Hyundai Sonata hybrid too? Those cars use “a tiny battery”It only gives 3-4 miles of range in the Vette, that's nothing.
“hey Siri, please explain to me the difference between a parallel hybrid and a plug-in hybrid?”If the electric motor is being used for regen braking then it is a motor generator- not in the sense of an F1 MGU, putting energy back into the battery while braking.
Just looked up the McLaren Artura which has a 7.4 kWh battery giving a 19 mile electric range. I'm sure McLaren drivers also don't want to buy a Bolt but the McLaren solution seems more useful than the Corvette's minimally functional virtue signalling, and no this does not mean the Corvette would cost as much as a McLaren. As well as any 'green' issues, using any internal combustion engine for a 2/3 mile journey especially if done regularly, is not good for the mechanicals. So being able to do this sort of short trip running just on battery is definitely good for any car
I’d love to meet the galaxybrain that thinks three hours in Manhattan for a meeting, with seven hours spent either side taking a train, somehow counts as a jolly or a junket or a benefit of some kind.For those who like to complain about paid editorial content, this one is pretty trivial. Even trying to make it cost a lot but not ridiclous (Acela Business Class, refundable tickets, day-before purchase) it's about $500 round trip. IMO that's not payment for content; it's just good business to have somebody else pay for an information-gathering trip. I don't know anybody in business or government who wouldn't take the same deal, and I did a number of times when working full-time (you wouldn't believe the approval process for an out-of-state trip by a state employee, even if the feds pay for the whole thing!).
Imagine the negative comments if this was a PHEV with a 1.9 kWh battery. Sometimes I find the things people post in comments here to be utterly ridiculous."A plug-in hybrid would have added a lot more weight and cost for diminished performance returns."
This car already has the battery, motor and controller. Adding a plug would be minimal extra weight and cost.
A PHEV doesn't need to have a big battery. I -like- small batteries as they're lighter but adding a plug even at this battery size would make the existing performance more accessible as you could deplete the battery using all that extra front axle power and and then simply plug it in to do it all over again without having to regen the battery the hard way. Not to mention those ICE free short hops that PHEVs are best at.
(I'm a 330e owner for this reason and think BMW has struck a reasonable compromise between battery capacity/range vs weight)