A new book argues that tests might reshape human diversity even if they don't work.
See full article...
See full article...
Sorry to break this to you, but the experience shows that humans are terrible at that regardless of the prevalence of otherness. About 10% of people are naturally left-handed, but for centuries it was considered aberrant and "corrected". And god have mercy on you if you're born male and ginger today.if everyone is bred to be tall, smart, and good-looking, how will we learn to tolerate otherness
Not just poorer for the lack of heterogeneity, it would also make such dystopian society potentially quite inbred.While it is understandable that parents want to give their kids the best chance of success, eliminating traits that they find objectionable will make humanity as a whole more uniform and society as a whole poorer for the lack of heterogeneity.
I couldn't resit - but what to you use to bread your social norms? Panko? Sourdough crumbs? day old that you break up to reuse?Breading for idealized social norms. I want more “mules” that throw the system in chaos and force us to be better, not cattle.
In fact Harry seems to be perhaps the happiest member of the Windsor soap opera cast.And god have mercy on you if you're born male and ginger today.
True. Someone tell Mike Huckabee.Where we are from? I'm from the freakin modern world and so's he.
Idea stolen from Huxley's Brave New World. Only in that, the workers were trained to be happy."My gift to industry is the genetically engineered worker, or Genejack. Specially designed for labor, the Genejack's muscles and nerves are ideal for his task, and the cerebral cortex has been atrophied so that he can desire nothing except to perform his duties. Tyranny, you say? How can you tyrannize someone who cannot feel pain?"
Chairman Sheng-ji Yang, SMAC
This is a deeply incoherent argument. Tall, smart, and good-looking are just three traits, and are also relative traits. There is a 0% chance that gene editing everyone for more of these will substantially reduce the innumerable ways humans will sort each other into boxes of "us" and "other."Everyone can benefit from exposure to people who are different from them; if everyone is bred to be tall, smart, and good-looking, how will we learn to tolerate otherness?
Idea stolen from Huxley's Brave New World. Only in that, the workers were trained to be happy.
I can't let it sip by–but what have you done to resit? Cushions? Soft blankets? I'm certain if you raise up and try again that should work eventually.I couldn't resit - but what to you use to bread your social norms? Panko? Sourdough crumbs? day old that you break up to reuse?
So Americans are largely at the mercy of corporations that want to profit off of them at least as much as they claim to want to help them.
Am I the only one who remembers this Twilight Zone episode?if everyone is bred to be tall, smart, and good-looking, how will we learn to tolerate otherness?
WTF? Where in the hell do you live?Almost every family I know has a kid who has taken growth hormones
Welcome to competitive child rearing. All over the US.Where in the hell do you live?
I live in the US. I'm not aware of any of my children's peers using growth hormones. Maybe they are, but it wasn't something that everyone else would be aware of.Welcome to competitive child rearing. All over the US.
I was somewhat ostracized when my kids were growing up as I wanted them to be kids. Not products.
One might argue that the rich have a vested interest in eliminating autism. Especially that part of the autistic mind that looks at a rat, and says "rat", rather than, as instructed, "racehorse".I know a guy who is a primary investor in a baby gene screening firm. Their primary claim to fame, and something he insists is real, is that they can eliminate autism entirely. Never mind the fact that 400+ genes, and random environmental factors are involved in it. He's rich, so he must be right, is the argument he constantly resorts to.
I'd weep for the future, but at this point I'm not sure if we have one, or even deserve it, given how much the general populace idolizes these people.
My kids are in their 30s now. I don't know specifically about HGHs now but it would not surprise me at all if it was a thing.I'm not aware of any of my children's peers using growth hormones.
I've come to hate interacting with people who do not know how to be wrong.He's rich, so he must be right, is the argument he constantly resorts to.
Came here to say that. I'm not aware of any of my kid's friends and acquaintances that had any such treatments, in childhood or adolescence.From the article:
"Almost every family I know has a kid who has taken growth hormones, and plenty of them get tutoring, too."
That's a weird sentence.
But isn't that the very definition of woke? And isn't American expending significant resources to eliminate that from our society?Everyone can benefit from exposure to people who are different from them; if everyone is bred to be tall, smart, and good-looking, how will we learn to tolerate otherness?
I remember when growth hormones became a thing and there was a concern that parents would clamor for it, with parents worried their kids were a little short for their age instead of using it legitimately for a deficiency. I'm guessing that became a reality.Stolen/inspired by... I like Frank Herberts Hellstrom's Hive as an influence on the Human Hive.
From the article:
"Almost every family I know has a kid who has taken growth hormones, and plenty of them get tutoring, too."
That's a weird sentence. Are we talking families the author knows, because that sounds alarming to me, or are those the families who did the genetic screening? Some googling tells me just one in 4000-10000 kids have a growth hormone deficency. And tutoring on what? Tutoring because they have a disability of some sort?
There are some stories of people getting those ancestry tests and and discovering somewhere in the recent past some of their ancestors originated in Africa or other unexpected places. Genetic diversity is not what some think.True. Someone tell Mike Huckabee.
My roots are in North London, not some largely imaginary Judaea. I don't go and kiss the soil of Italy when I go there because that's where my great-grandmother's family came from.
But many people seem to imagine that distant ancestry has meaning and ignore Abraham Lincolns observation: "Don't tell me who someone's father was, tell me what his son is like."
My brother was treated with growth hormone nearly 70 years ago, when it was extracted from human pituitaries, (and he avoided Creuzfeld-Jacob syndrome). However, he had remained at 35 lbs for nearly five years when he was given the drug, and ended up well below average height. Our family has erratic growth curves, but even by our standards he was unusual. When my sons were confidently told that they would be respectively 5 ft 2 and 6 ft 3, I just smiled, and was not surprised when both ended up average at 5ft 10.I remember when growth hormones became a thing and there was a concern that parents would clamor for it, with parents worried their kids were a little short for their age instead of using it legitimately for a deficiency. I'm guessing that became a reality.
Until we reach the clone wars...This is a deeply incoherent argument. Tall, smart, and good-looking are just three traits, and are also relative traits. There is a 0% chance that gene editing everyone for more of these will substantially reduce the innumerable ways humans will sort each other into boxes of "us" and "other."
Please excuse my subtle but important correctionBut isn't that the very definition of woke? And isn't American expending significant resources to eliminate that from our society?
All of these firms had to set up special groups who would call folks when it was obvious that "dad" was not really "dad" or simlar before just mailing back the results. The blow back in the early days from people just getting a printed report or email was a bit fierce.There are some stories of people getting those ancestry tests and and discovering somewhere in the recent past some of their ancestors originated in Africa or other unexpected places.