The front corner of headboard doesn't look right either.Looks pretty clearly AI generated to me.
The corner of the walls don't meet the ceiling properly, and the top of the curtains just cut off into the ceiling.
View attachment 135846
I'm relatively certain nobody asked for those books to have that title, and it was simply added by the generative AI because these things are stupid parrots that echo the internet, and well ...
actually the ceiling mismatch is one thing that could point to it not being ai. That mismatch could be caused by a false ceiling or a channel around the top of the ceiling allowing for LED strips to be hidden from view. The lighting on the top of the walls would almost require that, and it's specifically the type of thing that the products are sold for.Looks pretty clearly AI generated to me.
The corner of the walls don't meet the ceiling properly, and the top of the curtains just cut off into the ceiling.
View attachment 135846
I'm relatively certain nobody asked for those books to have that title, and it was simply added by the generative AI because these things are stupid parrots that echo the internet, and well ...
As someone who previously worked in advertising, dozens of people across dozens of hours. I'm sure some of that has changed in the era of "prompt and ship," though.Who the heck studies these ad images that closely?
I've seen ceiling's like that in restaurants / hotels / non-residence buildings. It allows for that "wall" lighting / "warm" lighting..but yes..odd to see it in a home, but I wouldn't call it "fake" just because of that. It would let the curtain rods and stuff "hide" like the image makes it look and honestly, outside of cost, the idea is kinda cool.Looks pretty clearly AI generated to me.
The corner of the walls don't meet the ceiling properly, and the top of the curtains just cut off into the ceiling.
View attachment 135846
I'm relatively certain nobody asked for those books to have that title, and it was simply added by the generative AI because these things are stupid parrots that echo the internet, and well ...
Who the heck studies these ad images that closely?
Well, okay then. Carry on. /sThe image was sourced from a third-party licensed library.
That could just be a recessed wall and roof to put some hidden led strips there.Looks pretty clearly AI generated to me.
The corner of the walls don't meet the ceiling properly, and the top of the curtains just cut off into the ceiling.
View attachment 135846
I'm relatively certain nobody asked for those books to have that title, and it was simply added by the generative AI because these things are stupid parrots that echo the internet, and well ...
It could just be a dropped ceiling, with the lighting and curtain rail inset into the space above it. But I think the books give it away more convincingly.The corner of the walls don't meet the ceiling properly, and the top of the curtains just cut off into the ceiling.
That's interesting, and I'm sure I'd like to learn more. It sounds like the sort of challenge that an actual photographer would be delighted to rise to, if the company were willing to pay for one.it’s worth noting that photographing colorful LEDs accurately presents unique challenges.
Maybe it's both. A real room that someone told an AI to populate with stuff.actually the ceiling mismatch is one thing that could point to it not being ai. That mismatch could be caused by a false ceiling or a channel around the top of the ceiling allowing for LED strips to be hidden from view. The lighting on the top of the walls would almost require that, and it's specifically the type of thing that the products are sold for.
ETA: I'm not saying it's a real photo, hell if I know, but I've seen that kind of construction. Also the actual facts of the image are horrific and the fact that this kind of hate makes it through, generated or not, is a frightening view into where we are at.
I have actually seen rooms that have an “indent” in the ceiling all around the perimeter of the room that can hold lighting and curtain rods. It looks to me like this room is supposed to be that sort of room. However it probably is AI generated.Looks pretty clearly AI generated to me.
The corner of the walls don't meet the ceiling properly, and the top of the curtains just cut off into the ceiling.
View attachment 135846
I'm relatively certain nobody asked for those books to have that title, and it was simply added by the generative AI because these things are stupid parrots that echo the internet, and well ...
Yeah the more you look the more the telltale signs are there. Like the fact that the LEDs aren't reflecting in the window behind them ...It's very obvious that whomever was responsible for sourcing the image did not look at it. From the "White Supremacy" book spine labels and backwards cover to the obvious graphical errors that Aurich pointed out that are the hallmark of AI, someone just took a quick glance and said, "Looks good, post it."
Edit: the curved fringe of the blanket is also floating above the floor (and casting a shadow).
View attachment 135851
I bought a clock exactly like that. It cost just a couple dollars. I use it to keep my phone away from my bed.For whatever reason, I feel like the kind of person who keeps books on white supremacy by their bedside as well as a 1950s-style alarm clock probably isn't in the market for smart neon LEDs. Perhaps there's a market overlap I'm missing.
Even .01% is a "horrifying percentage" of a population to still adhere to white supremacy.Say what you will, but it seems to adequately represent an average home for an admittedly horrifying percentage of America.
Although using images from stock libraries or generative AI tools can help save money and time and simplify work processes, photographing a real space with real products is a safer and more honest way to showcase products. In Govee’s case, it’s worth noting that photographing colorful LEDs accurately presents unique challenges. But that’s ultimately a problem for the company to solve.
100%. Suspected pixel-slop the moment I looked at it.Looks pretty clearly AI generated to me.
The corner of the walls don't meet the ceiling properly, and the top of the curtains just cut off into the ceiling.
View attachment 135846
I'm relatively certain nobody asked for those books to have that title, and it was simply added by the generative AI because these things are stupid parrots that echo the internet, and well ...
It's not a matter of studying them. Its merely a matter of being able to see what's actually there when you look at something.Who the heck studies these ad images that closely?
The problem is no one proofread the final image. This is depressingly common nowadays. Somebody gives an image or a document or other ad copy a cursory glance, just assumes it's OK, and off it goes. It used to be commonplace for someone to actually go over anything published with a fine-tooth comb before releasing it - and yes, this includes examining minute details in images. Because even in real images it's possible for small, subtle mistakes to take place - a wedding ring on an unmarried character, somebody's zipper down, a scrap of toilet paper on somebody's shoe - and people used to actually look for such things.
"The AI did it, so it must be perfect" will be the epitaph for the AI Age.
well, not to be anti-anti-AI, but i take the ceiling to be a drop-type where there are built-in soffit lights around the whole perimeter, and the curtain rod is mounted up in there. this is a real thing, but does not in any way negate the possibility that this is AI-gen.Looks pretty clearly AI generated to me.
The corner of the walls don't meet the ceiling properly, and the top of the curtains just cut off into the ceiling.
View attachment 135846
I'm relatively certain nobody asked for those books to have that title, and it was simply added by the generative AI because these things are stupid parrots that echo the internet, and well ...
The image was sourced from a third-party licensed library.
However, we recognize that our internal review and approval process did not meet the standard required. We are taking immediate steps to strengthen our processes to ensure this does not happen again.
We sincerely apologize for the offensive content contained in this image. As soon as we became aware of the matter, the image was immediately removed from the Govee website.
We are committed to ensuring all content on our platforms aligns with our core values of respect and integrity, and we take this matter extremely seriously.
Oh, good. That explains why zero people on your marketing team spent more than one (1) second each looking at it. Also, if it's from a library, what exactly is the image meant to illustrate?Connie Liu said:The image was sourced from a third-party licensed library.
You mean to tell me the Audi R8 doesn't really go to pieces as pictured?Scharon Harding said:For shoppers, the fiasco may not just be vexing but also a reminder that you can’t trust the flashy (and potentially offensive) images that vendors use to promote gadgets.
These recessed ceilings with rim lighting are nothing special, at least in my area of the globe, but the other AI errors clearly show how much care was put into this marketing effort. Guess it's so easy to create, they will just post some other slop instead.The front corner of headboard doesn't look right either.
But a dropped ceiling that doesn't go all the way to the wall (kinda what this hallucination looks like) would actually be kinda cool if you were into this "LED splash lighting everywhere" thing. put the lights up in that gap to cast diffuse light down the wall, hiding the LED strip entirely.
Considering they say they sourced the image from a 3rd party library, they may have gotten an image of just the room, and photoshopped their products into it.Yeah the more you look the more the telltale signs are there. Like the fact that the LEDs aren't reflecting in the window behind them ...