Google starts deprecating older, more capable Chrome extensions next week

Post content hidden for low score. Show…

ranphi

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
157
Even though I'm an Android user, I've removed as much other Googley-things from my life as I can. I'm quite happy running Firefox on my phone, along with the uBlock Origin, NoScript, and Dark Reader extensions for it. (Plus, AdGuard's DNS server plugged in for the Private DNS settings on my phone).

I'd rather give up the Web entirely, than have to access it with some cruddy browser that doesn't offer ad-blocking. (Seriously, how can anyone stand to use the Web anymore with how disgustingly spammy and ad-filled it's become?! It's an atrocious experience, IMO)!
 
Upvote
61 (61 / 0)

luckydob

Ars Scholae Palatinae
925
Yes, that was my thought as well. Keep your current version, which supports V2 extensions, indefinitely, until some catastrophic security flaw is found and it is no longer wise to use it.

Quick search and it seems there are multiple methods to prevent future Chrome updates. I might implement those today, since the article says the bad version starts getting automatically installed next week.
OR...hear me out...you could just use Firefox and not worry about it. You can import all your Chrome stuff into Firefox in seconds.
 
Upvote
94 (95 / -1)

AmorImpermissus

Ars Praetorian
474
Subscriptor++
I wonder how long it'll be before Google ad services/analytics, which are embedded in virtually the entire internet for site metrics, will require this? Imagine, all of your webpages you go to that use Google analytics will suddenly throw some unlockable overlay that your browser is unsupported because it still supports manifest v2 (even if it supports v3 too).
 
Upvote
27 (27 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

steelcobra

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,774
Man I remember when Google was supposedly the good guys. :(

Least I have options to not use it :)
"It is clear that a search engine which was taking money for showing cellular phone ads would have difficulty justifying the page that our system returned to its paying advertisers. For this type of reason and historical experience with other media [Bagdikian 83], we expect that advertising funded search engines will be inherently biased towards the advertisers and away from the needs of the consumers."

Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page in Google's original paper "The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine"
They knew what would happen but steered Google into being an advertising platform anyways.
 
Upvote
47 (48 / -1)
I wonder how long it'll be before Google ad services/analytics, which are embedded in virtually the entire internet for site metrics, will require this? Imagine, all of your webpages you go to that use Google analytics will suddenly throw some unlockable overlay that your browser is unsupported because it still supports manifest v2 (even if it supports v3 too).

I mean, they aren’t our websites, right? They are somebody else’s. If somebody else starts running junk to block us out, then… they just don’t want us around! Personally if someone doesn’t want me around I’m happy to leave.

Although, most of that junk barely runs without JavaScript anyway.
 
Upvote
39 (39 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

Epiktistes

Seniorius Lurkius
30
Subscriptor++
Can someone who understands this better explain how Manifest V3 compares to Safari's ad blocking API? My limited understanding is that both are declarative, and restrict the extension's access to your web content. There have been complaints that Safari's API has unrealistic limits on the size of the rule set that an extension can provide, but 1Blocker get around this limit with the ugly but effective hack of providing no fewer than 10 separate extensions for blocking various kinds of ads and annoyances. I've found that 1Blocker is nearly 100% effective in blocking ads. It's a great app! And although I trust the developer, I'm a lot more comfortable using an extension with limited privileges. I'm not using Chrome lots of other good reasons, but if Manifest V3 were no more restrictive than Safari's API, I'd have few problem with that part of it. If I'm misunderstanding this, I hope someone can set me straight.
 
Upvote
25 (25 / 0)

Navalia Vigilate

Ars Praefectus
3,103
Subscriptor++
Glad I've mostly transitioned to Firefox at this point...
Glad that after moving from Netscape to Firefox I never moved to anything else. Tried a lot of browsers but FF has always been the primary browser.

If you use FF, consider donating. Consider what a browser does for you, worth everything you donate.
 
Upvote
40 (40 / 0)

Rick C.

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,418
One big problem is schools were Chromebooks are used. There is no manageable way to provision the Chromebooks with Firefox instead.
I (and many of our students) will sorely miss uBlock Origin.
I was always bothered that they made some inroads into education. Anyone with IT experience would have known the data mining that they were setting up their students for. The decision making people at the schools or school distracts must have come away with fat wallets.
 
Upvote
29 (30 / -1)
600px-Mozilla_Firefox_2004_Logo.png

After all this time?

 
Upvote
54 (54 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
I am another user that ditched chrome and moved to Firefox. Mozilla really should consider modularizing the browser engine, however, so we can get support for something like electron. Beyond that, I wish the EFF would fork Chromium and release their own browser, that or another large company that has the marketing muscle to push users elsewhere.

In hindsight, letting an ad company control the browser market was a dumb idea.
 
Upvote
26 (27 / -1)
Twice in the past I switched to Firefox, but the performance was so low I had to switch back. I routinely have dozens of windows open, and hundreds of tabs. I actually wish I didn’t work that way, but it seems to be what happens, for many years now. I guess I could transfer over to Firefox again and see if performance is now comparable to Chrome. I do find the bookmarks manager to be massively better in Firefox!
Firefox did go through a significant re-engineering process a while back, and the result has been a lot more performant. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.
 
Upvote
61 (62 / -1)

GrandMasterJ

Ars Scholae Palatinae
813
I've been lazy about switching off of Chrome ever since switching to Chrome long ago when it was "fast and lightweight." I tried the "new and improved" Edge, but it stinks and slapping AI on everything is annoying as hell. To me, anyway. It does not feel like a "value add" at all. The reason I use uBlock is, in part, for reasons like malvertising. Breaking my uBlock sounds less secure to me. What is good these days and allows uBlock to function fully? Opera? Mozilla? Brave is an option, I suppose.

I find the web nearly unusable with all the in-your-face-instant-play-at-full-volume-follow-you-around ads. I do not know how anyone can use it like that. My elderly mother complains about it, for crying out loud! Does it not register to advertising companies, like Google, that ads do not work well on the people who already block them out of their lives? Forcing those people "back into the fold" will not have the impact you desire and just pisses people off. That reminds me, but what OS are people gaming on these days? Anyone tried AtlasOS? I would like HDR.
 
Upvote
7 (11 / -4)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
I looked at Firefox awhile back when the V3 switch was announced. One thing that I disliked about Firefox is the clunky profile management. It's pretty easy to switch and maintain in Chrome but I wasn't able to find a similar UI/UX in Firefox. There was an extension to help profile switching but that stopped working after a Firefox update. Hopefully Firefox beefs up it's profile UX in future updates.
I have left tech (and the workforce) due to a number of factors, so I haven’t needed profile support, so I have no idea if things have improved, but one possible solution is that you could simply use firefox for your default profile and use chrome for the other stuff. either that or use a fork.
 
Upvote
8 (8 / 0)
I've been lazy about switching off of Chrome ever since switching to Chrome long ago when it was "fast and lightweight." I tried the "new and improved" Edge, but it stinks and slapping AI on everything is annoying as hell. To me, anyway. It does not feel like a "value add" at all. The reason I use uBlock is, in part, for reasons like malvertising. Breaking my uBlock sounds less secure to me. What is good these days and allows uBlock to function fully? Opera? Mozilla? Brave is an option, I suppose.
Don't do Brave. They're full of scummy practices themselves. Things like modifying pages to redirect advertising/referral revenue to themselves instead of page owners, cryptocurrency shenanigans, etc.

Firefox is good.
 
Upvote
80 (81 / -1)

Jeff S

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,922
Subscriptor++
it's a really good thing Firefox has that handy "import from chrome" feature. Quit using Chrome some time ago and really only use it at work because that's what the company intranet works best with; i'm all on firefox/firefox mobile, now.
Firefox has been declining for years but this move by Google might be just the thing to kick off a renaissance of Firefox use. I hope anyhow.

Edit: I just re-read the above and realized that it might be ambiguous what I meant when I said "Firefox has been declining for years" - I just meant the number of users running it. Not the product itself, like from a technology standpoint. It's, afaik, just gotten better and better over the years.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
42 (42 / 0)
beyond me why people use chrome as their primary browser. you have to have it, for sure, for those chrome-only interfaces, but as a daily driver? do not get it, but i think there is some sort of compulsion to deliver data to google involved.
Those chrome-only interfaces are becoming increasingly rare, they often work fine in Firefox, Safari, etc. anyway..... and MS Edge is now just Chrome under the hood, plus MS's incompetent & killable tracking shit, and minus Google's scarily competent & unkillable tracking shit. I've yet to find a "This interface requires Google Chrome" prompt that doesn't go away when opened in Edge.
 
Upvote
22 (22 / 0)
Twice in the past I switched to Firefox, but the performance was so low I had to switch back. I routinely have dozens of windows open, and hundreds of tabs. I actually wish I didn’t work that way, but it seems to be what happens, for many years now. I guess I could transfer over to Firefox again and see if performance is now comparable to Chrome. I do find the bookmarks manager to be massively better in Firefox!
For years I've found Firefox to be far more performant than Chrome. I have dozens of tabs open in multiple tab groups on Firefox - no issues. I switched over 4 or 5 years ago at this point and have almost no issues.

The one issue with Firefox is that there are still some intranet sites I have to access that require Chrome for reasons I haven't figured out (other than probably "nobody is supporting them anymore but they're still mission critical for some things").
 
Upvote
29 (30 / -1)

cwaynerl

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
129
They've already rolled out some updates lately (which affects Edge browsers also) and I've noticed more embedded ads showing up on both browser even though I use adblocker and pihole. Going to the same sites using Firefox a few bleed through but not nearly as many which leads me to think they've already started doing this in a limited fashion. I never liked wack-a-mole even in arcardes when I was young so looks like it's time to re-examine optional browsers again.
 
Upvote
13 (13 / 0)

grommit!

Ars Legatus Legionis
20,678
Subscriptor
Upvote
72 (75 / -3)