The original material design is a fluke anomaly in a history of bad design (all thanks to hiring Duarte after Palm failed) from a company that never understood UI design and still doesn't. The only other thing they ever had was the "clean" simple google search home page and they've ruined that too. Google has always sucked so much at user interfaces it's kind of astounding that they're still finding new lows to sink toYeah, the original Material Design was definitely the apex of Android design philosophy (though I maintain a soft spot for Holo).
Safety corners vomiting up a rainbow, ugh.
Nah it's garish but in a bougie kind of way rather than a more pedestrian way like supermarket consumer brandingGreat. Everything is going to look like the candy aisle on Easter.
Duarte still seems to be VP of Design at Google, so I wouldn't let him off the hook for MD2 and 3, unfortunately.The original material design is a fluke anomaly in a history of bad design (all thanks to hiring Duarte after Palm failed) from a company that never understood UI design and still doesn't. The only other thing they ever had was the "clean" simple google search home page and they've ruined that too. Google has always sucked so much at user interfaces it's kind of astounding that they're still finding new lows to sink to
Instead of brighter, I want a Vantablack dark mode. I want all light that gets anywhere near it to just disappear.
^Where's the double upvote button.It depends on how you define "better".
Google is an ad company, so they almost always define "better" as "more engagement" - with engagement being "clicks", "use/watch time", and "ad views".
So to an internal Google study, a better interface is one that forces you to use your phone more. More scrolling. More clicks to get anything done. More ads.
To Google, a better interface is one where everything is harder and takes longer.
This is the exact opposite of how any reasonable user would define a good interface. Users want to get things done quickly and easily, so they can either get away from the interface to the content, or put the phone down - but Google has never cared what their users think. Google doesn't want you to put the phone down. Their customers are the companies buying the ads, the users are merely a consumable product.
You've stated perfectly why Google needs to be broken upIt depends on how you define "better".
Google is an ad company, so they almost always define "better" as "more engagement" - with engagement being "clicks", "use/watch time", and "ad views".
So to an internal Google study, a better interface is one that forces you to use your phone more. More scrolling. More clicks to get anything done. More ads.
To Google, a better interface is one where everything is harder and takes longer.
This is the exact opposite of how any reasonable user would define a good interface. Users want to get things done quickly and easily, so they can either get away from the interface to the content, or put the phone down - but Google has never cared what their users think. Google doesn't want you to put the phone down. Their customers are the companies buying the ads, the users are merely a consumable product.
Ads? What ads? Certainly not on MY phone.It depends on how you define "better".
Google is an ad company, so they almost always define "better" as "more engagement" - with engagement being "clicks", "use/watch time", and "ad views".
So to an internal Google study, a better interface is one that forces you to use your phone more. More scrolling. More clicks to get anything done. More ads.
To Google, a better interface is one where everything is harder and takes longer.
This is the exact opposite of how any reasonable user would define a good interface. Users want to get things done quickly and easily, so they can either get away from the interface to the content, or put the phone down - but Google has never cared what their users think. Google doesn't want you to put the phone down. Their customers are the companies buying the ads, the users are merely a consumable product.
This. O. M. G.One of the first thing I do with a new device is disable the animations. I certainly hope I can continue to do so. I find it extremely difficult and draining to use an interface where stuff is moving around.
Would be nice if you could choose — OneUI is nice but... sometimes you want change.But will they? History suggests that Google's design preferences are rarely reflected in software from companies like Samsung and OnePlus.
Like a different launcher.Would be nice if you could choose — OneUI is nice but... sometimes you want change.
Sure that can help, but it isn't complete - doesnt change the settings or notification bar for example.Like a different launcher.
There's a lot of wiggle room to argue the particulars, but I think it's self-evident that if you could do literally anything on the lock screen, it would defeat the point of it being a lock screen.^Where's the double upvote button.
If your theory is correct it certainly explains the still total garbage usability of phones today. Like the biggest example: why can't you do whatever you choose from the lock screen? Anything you want in fact - should be able to assign any function or any setting from any app to a lock screen button or control you can customize - same with home screen of course. They're not actually interested in usability, or are just really stupid and know nothing about human interaction (so need an 18,000 person focus group to try to learn); but almost certainly both.
(Btw there's an app called Tasker I think that can do some of this but I've never used it, you have to buy it, it certainly can't execute any internal app action (without a macro, which I think it has but which is also ridiculous) and you shouldn't need a separate app for the most basic functionality that should've been on the very first smartphone. And in Windows.)
Never. They'll be long cancelled before there's a chance to update them.How many years until Google updates all of its own apps with this new design language?
Ya, I wasn't too clear; I meant configure it in any way you want, so any shortcuts, a menu, add a slider that controls a single notification volume, etc...anything. Most people would have whichever things they use constantly during the day. It makes 0 sense that it's not already like this esp. now with all the smart home devices etc. Even if some of those apps use lock screen notifications properly, not all do and none of the ones I've seen are done properly. Also as I say, you need the same simple functionality on the home screen. You can have one page for example be your custom control panel you can build however you want.There's a lot of wiggle room to argue the particulars, but I think it's self-evident that if you could do literally anything on the lock screen, it would defeat the point of it being a lock screen.
The paper-sheet concept actively encouraged subtle drop shadows and square corners. Those are gone, gone, gone, and MD is worse off for it.I remember disliking Material at the time for wasting so much space on then-small screens, making everything flat (losing distinctions between content and interactive elements), as well as their pretentious "design guide" (these are paper shapes hovering above a surface)
This new design looks like it uses the same approach. More "look what I can do" than anything pragmatic.
That explains why, when I looked at that graph, I got the impression the data shouldn't be taken too seriously...Actually, that bar graph is so bad that I need to say that it is a prime example of what NEVER to do.