Google mostly creates products for the web, but it has some new desktop apps today.
See full article...
See full article...
I can think of options, but every single one of them ends with two separate builds….Long time Mac user here!
Edit: I just wish I could do that with my monetized apps![]()
To be fair, unlike Apple Intelligence, Gemini isn't running anything on your machine locally. It's all running on Google's hardware which, no matter what you have, puts your machine to absolute shame.DL the app for Mac, seems pretty responsive, much better than Apple "Intelligence"
I haven’t tried it yet myself, but maybe Excire will do the job for you. It is a local AI (so no data leak) that can run text-based AI queries on an image collection. I doubt it’ll be smart enough to distinguish your cat from your neighbor’s, but if it works as advertised it should at least be able to flag all your cat photos, after which you can sort them at will.I'm definitely not interested in installing any kind of direct portal that Google can hoover my files through.
What I WOULD like however - if such a thing exists - is a photo analysis program that I can run on my own system to sort my own (massive) image collection and use some form of facial recognition or even an AI to pick out the pictures of my many years of cats and sort them into collection folders. 210 gb and about 40k images.
Anyone know any options that don't give all that data to the universe?
No lie, I was just chatting with Gemini last week about how webapps break my mental context sanboxes so moving to Gemini was a non starter. Funny timing…They meant the Google internal Apple users requested it. (Plenty of those.)
On Windows, ACDsee Photo Studio can do that. It still exists! If you give them an email address, you'll get a discount link for the latest version sometime soon. It usually goes on sale for $70 or $80 pretty regularly.I'm definitely not interested in installing any kind of direct portal that Google can hoover my files through.
What I WOULD like however - if such a thing exists - is a photo analysis program that I can run on my own system to sort my own (massive) image collection and use some form of facial recognition or even an AI to pick out the pictures of my many years of cats and sort them into collection folders. 210 gb and about 40k images.
Anyone know any options that don't give all that data to the universe?
I hate to have to say this, but Google IME is still the best free Japanese input method software you can get for the Mac. Apple’s default one, Kotoeri, has always sucked and still sucks today. Contrary to what you’d expect from the name, the IME is strictly local—it doesn’t send input to the cloud, let alone make suggestions based on it. It was one of the first things I installed on my Mac when I renewed it the other day.Oh lord, I just thought back to the last time running Google’s software on Apple’s hardware seemed like a good idea.
Nurse! I think it’s past my bedtime.
This, and .. why is there ZERO consideration about privacy in the authors coverage?Why on earth would anyone install a Google search app on their computer? I don't want to feed Gemini or have Google sucking up data. That's ridiculous.
Perhaps it will allow users to find the actual Most Recently Used file, and not provide an earlier version as the Most Recently Used? Windows Search sucks.Why on earth would anyone install a Google search app on their computer? I don't want to feed Gemini or have Google sucking up data. That's ridiculous.
Microsoft's own Powertoys already hijacks that for their version of spotlight search, "Powertoys Run"."Alt + Space?" That sounds familiar...
Yep, it opens the little "Move/Close/Min/Max" menu that you rarely - but occasionally - need to use when a window has disappeared offscreen for example.
Wonder what MS thinks about Google hijacking their keyboard shortcut?
You can open the Google app by pressing Alt + Space at any time.
Or they just want iterate very quickly? The claude app - which is distributed the same way - is updated almost every day.I suspect that that’s why Google didn’t submit this binary to the App Store. No App Store submission means no privacy report card.
the binary is just a window into a web browser that is collecting system and usage information.
The compact search UI floats on top of whatever you’re doing, allowing you to instantly search the web and (with authorization) your local files and apps.
No shit, Sherlock.I've never understood wanting to search on the internet and on my local computer at the same time.
I've been 'on' the Internet for 35 years, and using local computers a few years before that, and I've never wanted to simultaneously search for something on both my local computer/network and the Internet at the same time.
I prefer a complete task/domain-separation of dedicated Internet searching vs local searching.
If I want to search for something on the Internet I'll use a browser where that task separation is clear and obvious, and if I want to search locally I'll use a local system tool to do so.
Microsoft’s own PowerToys has a desktop search/run program that functions like Spotlight and works quite well.I get the file search on Windows. Search there is pretty awful and MS doesn't seem that interested in fixing it or making it better. However, Spotlight on macOS is great. I would never install a Google app of all things to replace it.
Love my Arch Linux install, but I prefer using Brave Search in Brave Browser for my searching needs. That, and KDE KRunner for my searching needs,Linux users are using some terminal based web search probably. Google would be wasting their time making this for Linux lol.
I realize we're talking about beta software here, but we're talking about beta software RELEASED BY GOOGLE IN THE TWENTY FIRST CENTURY. And "beta" is not "production" but I'm this context it DOES mean "explicitly intended for release to the general public."Google couldn’t even update the app’s early versions, forcing users to uninstall and reinstall new builds.
Why did you find it genuinely desirable? I have personally never understood why anybody would want any of those products.I remember a time when installing Google Desktop was genuinely desirable.
I'm glad to see Everything getting some mentions. It's one of the first things I install on a new Windows box. The lightning fast search is still impressive after all these years.I sure don't understand the use case for this. Web search? Browser, it's always open anyway. Local search? Voidtools Everything or F-search . Why would I want to mix the two?
I'm glad to see Everything getting some mentions. It's one of the first things I install on a new Windows box. The lightning fast search is still impressive after all these years.
Yeah agreed any windows search. Never thought about replacing it though as my brain thinks it is as a os thing that's locked. Guess I need to go look at alternatives now that I know I can lolI get the file search on Windows. Search there is pretty awful and MS doesn't seem that interested in fixing it or making it better. However, Spotlight on macOS is great. I would never install a Google app of all things to replace it.
On Windows, I use this: https://www.acdsee.com/en/products/photo-studio-ultimate/I'm definitely not interested in installing any kind of direct portal that Google can hoover my files through.
What I WOULD like however - if such a thing exists - is a photo analysis program that I can run on my own system to sort my own (massive) image collection and use some form of facial recognition or even an AI to pick out the pictures of my many years of cats and sort them into collection folders. 210 gb and about 40k images.
Anyone know any options that don't give all that data to the universe?