After looking at a bunch of other reviews online, reading about how this game compares to the old games and older action hack and slash titles, here are my thoughts.
It's ridiculous the way people are calling this game (which is very openly chasing trends that The Last Of Us and Dark Souls built out) fresh/new/innovative when at this point in time a AAA game studio making a high speed action game in the same vein of Bayonetta and the OG Devil May Cry series (or you know,
like the old God Of War games) would be the fresh and new thing to do. This game is not daring or bold, but merely
Sony leaning into a winning formula that they discovered with The Last Of Us. TLoU was a remarkably good game, but it was given an outsized amount of praise as if it was a flawless masterpiece, seemingly for its heavy focus on a story told in a "cinematic" movie-like fashion. With God Of War you have game critics singing praises for a massive company taking an incredibly safe and watered-down approach to this game that's almost like every other title that Sony's been promoting over the last few years. Sony made the gaming equivalent of Oscar Bait and people are eating it up.
This situation with God Of War reminds me of BioShock Infinite. Infinite was another watered-down, drastic departure from the mainline series that took far too much inspiration from its genre contemporaries, just like God Of War. After the neverending stream of perfect scores and the initial hype died down, people started picking away at Infinite's numerous flaws, and now a lot of people regard it as the low of the series, both in terms of gameplay and story. Here's hoping that the same thing happens for God Of War.