Actually, that's an interesting idea. I wonder if fat dose of MDMA or LSD would open things up for them.I wonder if a little MDMA for these poor souls might spice things up a little. (Breaks out old t-shirt "If you don't like techno you haven't taken the right drugs yet.")
I mean, obviously music isn't a universally-pleasurable sensation, since they found 15 people who didn't respond to it. In people with a typical connection between the reward and auditory processing centers of the brain, it appears that deriving pleasure from music is the norm.I wonder how they are ruling out the hypothesis that music isn't a universally pleasurable sensation. They think there is a failure to communicate with the reward circuit, but why should every person feel a more positive response to a melody than to another sound?
Why would it? I’m not a huge fan of music in general (I do like a little of certain things once in a while, but not often), so why would drugs make any difference? I hate okra. Will I like okra if I take drugs, too?I wonder if a little MDMA for these poor souls might spice things up a little. (Breaks out old t-shirt "If you don't like techno you haven't taken the right drugs yet.")
Why would it? I’m not a huge fan of music in general (I do like a little of certain things once in a while, but not often), so why would drugs make any difference? I hate okra. Will I like okra if I take drugs, too?
Overall, this study seems to really weirdly pathologize what amounts to a question of personal taste. If someone exposed to a stimulus measurably responds to it but their pleasure centres don’t light up, the logical conclusion is that they don’t like it, not that there’s something wrong with their brain.
Having had multiple head injuries and being very interested in the whole concept of consciousness, I've spent a lot of time reading up on the physiology of brain. What the "common person" knows about the brain is mostly entirely wrong, but it serves as a basic IDEA of what the brain does and some of how it does it.Actually, that's an interesting idea. I wonder if fat dose of MDMA or LSD would open things up for them.
I know that my appreciation for music intensifies a thousand-fold when I'm tripping. All music (except Def Leppard) becomes ecstatic.
But I think the problem with this study was that they played Trout Mask Replica as the music samples. They probably should have played something else.
With something as plastic as the human brain, you're going to find subsets of people who share some unusual traits (such as not enjoying music) simply from the volume of people out there.This disconnection, Pallarés thinks, may involve a neural mechanism similar to that involved in many other conditions that make people unable to enjoy things like food, sex, or social interactions. But beyond that, we don’t know a lot.
If it's a DNA thing, which I'd say is likely, since it seems to be a physical issue, that would be nature, and I'd expect only gene therapy, assuming those impacted want it, or scientists can make it, would "fix" it.Once the nature vs. nurture question is settled, the team wants to see if the mechanism generalizes to other, similar conditions. “We want to see if a similar disconnection causes other disorders which are also very specific to certain stimuli. Then we’ll have to go and see if we can revert that,” Pallarés says.
I think that analogy is more akin to not liking any food. But it begs the question, if okra were a type of music, what kind would it be?Why would it? I’m not a huge fan of music in general (I do like a little of certain things once in a while, but not often), so why would drugs make any difference? I hate okra. Will I like okra if I take drugs, too?
Overall, this study seems to really weirdly pathologize what amounts to a question of personal taste. If someone exposed to a stimulus measurably responds to it but their pleasure centres don’t light up, the logical conclusion is that they don’t like it, not that there’s something wrong with their brain.
Hell, when I was on shrooms once, listening to the rhythmic cacophony of the dishwasher was wholly engrossing.Actually, that's an interesting idea. I wonder if fat dose of MDMA or LSD would open things up for them.
It bugs me that the baseline assumption here seems to be "almost everyone likes music, so there must be something wrong with people who don't like it." Why not "almost everyone likes music, so it's interesting to explore why some people don't"?Once the nature vs. nurture question is settled, the team wants to see if the mechanism generalizes to other, similar conditions. “We want to see if a similar disconnection causes other disorders which are also very specific to certain stimuli. Then we’ll have to go and see if we can revert that,” Pallarés says.
It bugs me that the baseline assumption here seems to be "almost everyone likes music, so there must be something wrong with people who don't like it." Why not "almost everyone likes music, so it's interesting to explore why some people don't"?
It's like so many other things about people: while there's a lot of widely-shared human experiences, there's also a huge amount of individual variance. There are people who like the sensation of being tickled, and people who can't stand it. There are people who don't like sweets, people who don't like babies, people who don't like sex. I'm not talking about anyone who's responding to trauma, but just people who get no pleasure from (whatever), even in cases where (whatever) is widely appreciated across times and cultures.
I had a friend in school who didn't like music. I grew up in a very musical family, so I was kind of puzzled by this... "you don't like any kind of music at all?" He had one song he liked, but that was because it was associated with fond memories, not because of the music itself. Music just didn't do much for him. It didn't bother him at all, but he didn't typically tell people because their response (either to argue with him or to suggest something was wrong with him) did bother him.
I hear you on on Def Leppard harshing your mellow, but I remember hearing Tom Waits' Swordfishtrombones in a friends' dorm room while dosed and noping the hell out of there PDQ. The CD cover didn't help at the time, lol.Actually, that's an interesting idea. I wonder if fat dose of MDMA or LSD would open things up for them.
I know that my appreciation for music intensifies a thousand-fold when I'm tripping. All music (except Def Leppard) becomes ecstatic.
But I think the problem with this study was that they played Trout Mask Replica as the music samples. They probably should have played something else.
Hyperspecific musical anhedonia
Actually, that's an interesting idea. I wonder if fat dose of MDMA or LSD would open things up for them.
I know that my appreciation for music intensifies a thousand-fold when I'm tripping. All music (except Def Leppard) becomes ecstatic.
But I think the problem with this study was that they played Trout Mask Replica as the music samples. They probably should have played something else.
It goes to show how well designed we are that everything has to be just so in order for us not only to hear music but to enjoy it.
Well MDMA specifically makes you feel things stronger. So in the case of the folks who truly don't like music, they would "don't like it" harder, I imagine.Why would it? I’m not a huge fan of music in general (I do like a little of certain things once in a while, but not often), so why would drugs make any difference? I hate okra. Will I like okra if I take drugs, too?
Overall, this study seems to really weirdly pathologize what amounts to a question of personal taste. If someone exposed to a stimulus measurably responds to it but their pleasure centres don’t light up, the logical conclusion is that they don’t like it, not that there’s something wrong with their brain.
Those are all ultimately pleasure center things that are eliciting a dopamine response, which is how your "reward system"...well...rewards you.I am unsure of what actual experience 'the reward system' corresponds to in music enjoyment? Being deeply moved by an aria like "Parto, ma tu ben mio"? Feeling at one with the world by Cut Copy's "Lights and Music"? Being madly energized by The Clash?
Are all those experiences all the same as far as 'the reward system' is concerned? That sounds unlikely given how wildly different they, well feel.
Seems like a bit of Hysteria IMOHave you tried pouring some sugar on yourself?
Oh, you evil bastard.Have you tried pouring some sugar on yourself?
In the name ofHave you tried pouring some sugar on yourself?
I’d like a Photograph of that.Seems like a bit of Hysteria IMO
I know you mean well, but the very first reaction to finding out that someone doesn't enjoy something you previously considered universal probably shouldn't be to suggest they need "fixing" in some way.I wonder if a little MDMA for these poor souls might spice things up a little. (Breaks out old t-shirt "If you don't like techno you haven't taken the right drugs yet.")
Because many drugs, including alcohol and nicotine, can inherently increase the pleasure of already pleasurable things. This is known.Why would it? I’m not a huge fan of music in general (I do like a little of certain things once in a while, but not often), so why would drugs make any difference? I hate okra. Will I like okra if I take drugs, too?
Overall, this study seems to really weirdly pathologize what amounts to a question of personal taste. If someone exposed to a stimulus measurably responds to it but their pleasure centres don’t light up, the logical conclusion is that they don’t like it, not that there’s something wrong with their brain.
There is the scientificamerican article about the evolution of hiccup comparing the human body to an 100 year old building renovated multiple times.On the other hand, the mechanism for keeping shit out of our eyes, the eyelash, sometimes falls out and goes into our eye. I'm not sure I buy this "well-designed" theory.
When we opened the walls to look at the plumbing, wiring and other mechanicals, we saw a tangle that made no apparent sense; cables, wires and pipes took bizarre loops and turns throughout the building. Nobody in their right mind would have designed my building to conform to the snarled mess we saw when the wall was removed. Constructed in 1896, the utilities reflect an old design that has been jury-rigged for each renovation done over previous decades.
It was certainly tongue in cheek and I didn’t mean to actually imply anything wrong with these folks. My little girl has a friend who is hypo-sensitive and basically feels nothing, ever. No emotions. I get it.I know you mean well, but the very first reaction to finding out that someone doesn't enjoy something you previously considered universal probably shouldn't be to suggest they need "fixing" in some way.
I say that as someone who's never found any sexual enjoyment and honestly find it kind of repulsive, and have heard over and over and over again that there's probably some hormone imbalance and I can "see a doctor to fix that".
I think most likely these people find plenty of enjoyment in life without the need for music, and while I personally love music and don't want to live one without it, I don't feel like these people are "missing out" any more than someone blind from birth is "missing out" on art.
Don't worry, I'm not judging you or anything, it's just a common attitude and as your's was the very first post I thought it'd make a good example.
"Why are most people so susceptible to musical reward that they'll"Why can't these people enjoy music?" the question could be "Why are most people so susceptible to musical reward that they'll pay premium prices to have their emotions manipulated by organized sound?"