FCC probes editing of <em>60 Minutes</em> interview as CBS considers settling Trump suit.
See full article...
See full article...
This shit is unreal.Oh For fuck Sakes....
You best start believing in dystopias Miss Swan, because you're in one.This shit is unreal.
Jeeeeeeesus christ. Is someone going to loudly and constantly remind conservatives in the USA what the words "Free Speech" actually mean... or have we finally just reached "1984" and it just means what they say it means?
It's kind of wild that they basically claim ownership over the concept of patriotism while also openly despising every aspirational ideal and institution the USA has.Uh, welcome to 2025? Conservatives have been all about suppression of speech they don't like for ages. It's time everyone wakes up and smells the raw sewage: Republicans are Americans in name only. They don't believe in the Constitution, they don't believe in the even-handed application of the law, and they don't believe that other people have any rights. And none of this is new.
You best be believing in ghost stories Miss Turner, because you're in one.
It's kind of wild that they basically claim ownership over the concept of patriotism while also openly despising every aspirational ideal and institution the USA has.
The idea here isn't really to do with distortion or anything else between the two versions of the interview footage.there's no "gotcha" moment in any of the footage, but the Trump team does its best to make something out of Kamala's 20-minute digression about her Pog collection
RE: 30 days. We are only 12 days in! I can't even image the state of this corrupt shit-show after 30 days... Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria! - Dr. Peter VenkmanSoooo less than 30 days in and we essentially have concentration camps in Guantenomo, attacks on our trade partners, threats to take territory from other countries, attacks on the LGBT community, and now attacks on the freedom of the press. Impressive. I had odds on at least 6 months before we hit this level of fascist bullshitification.
Maybe I'm missing something, but even if CBS came out and said something, like "yes, we are pro Harris" shouldn't it not even make a lick of difference?
All it ever seems to say in its interviews are brainless ramblings... Not much point getting those recordings, they're probably just the same garbage it spews during all the other interviews, speeches and so on...So we can expect to see uncut recordings from the current President's many interview for other 'news' services, right?
"Well yes, it's a horrific step backwards into legitimizing tyrannical censorship of the press... but you know, we ARE trying to get that merger approved..."However, the Times also wrote that "many executives at CBS's parent company, Paramount, believe that settling the lawsuit would increase the odds that the Trump administration does not block or delay their planned multibillion-dollar merger with another company." Paramount is seeking FCC approval for TV broadcast station license transfers related to a pending deal with Skydance.
They won everything. They have complete control of the entire government from top to bottom. They can literally do anything they want and no one can stop them.This shit is unreal.
According to Mike Godwin, who also wants everyone to stop making him the arbiter of how to apply Godwin's Law, Godwin's Law doesn't apply when the people you're comparing to Nazis are actually Nazis. It's only appropriate to invoke the rule when someone is making a frivolous comparison:Something I have been wondering about for a while.... Does Godwin's law apply when such comparisons are actually justified? Like I said, just wondering...
Note that there's an important distinction — the comparison to Nazis must be frivolous. The law is not supposed to apply to serious discussions of Nazi Germany or its policies on the Internet; Mike Godwin has long lamented frivolous invocation of his "law" to stifle such discussion, and has also lamented having to even clarify this aspect of the law. For example: following the infamous "Unite the Right" white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia in August 2017, he went on record saying that comparing the participants to Nazis was valid (given that there were Neo-Nazi groups present), and openly took aim at people who cited his law to discredit people who made such comparisons.
We’re two weeks in and they're literally going after the media (who have already capitulated, mind you) for wrongthink.We all best settle in. It is going to be 4 long years of imagined grievance settling in the U.S. Federal government. To my international brothers and sisters, I'm sorry, we tried. Probably best for you all to just treat the U.S. as the banana republic it is for the next few years. See you, God willing, on the other side![]()
So I guess Trump can reinstate it, since Congress didn't create it in the first place?Nope. Thanks to Ronald Reagan, the Fairness Doctrine was repealed.