FCC demands CBS provide unedited transcript of Kamala Harris interview

We all best settle in. It is going to be 4 long years of imagined grievance settling in the U.S. Federal government. To my international brothers and sisters, I'm sorry, we tried. Probably best for you all to just treat the U.S. as the banana republic it is for the next few years. See you, God willing, on the other side 😐
 
Upvote
594 (629 / -35)

DCRoss

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,293
I'm curious. What part of "making available so far as possible, to all the people of the United States, without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex, rapid, efficient, nationwide, and world-wide wire and radio communication services with adequate facilities at reasonable charges" does this fall under, anyway?
 
Upvote
233 (242 / -9)

BrianZ

Ars Praetorian
581
Subscriptor
Soooo less than 30 days in and we essentially have concentration camps in Guantenomo, attacks on our trade partners, threats to take territory from other countries, attacks on the LGBT community, and now attacks on the freedom of the press. Impressive. I had odds on at least 6 months before we hit this level of fascist bullshitification.
 
Upvote
467 (501 / -34)
I should point out that this is one of those attacks the Right makes based on their own weaknesses, rather than those of their opponents. They're like "Check this out, we're gonna expose what you actually said" and the Left is like "Good, that's the point of saying things" and the Right is like "Whaaat!?"
 
Last edited:
Upvote
219 (231 / -12)

DarthSlack

Ars Legatus Legionis
23,059
Subscriptor++
Jeeeeeeesus christ. Is someone going to loudly and constantly remind conservatives in the USA what the words "Free Speech" actually mean... or have we finally just reached "1984" and it just means what they say it means?

Uh, welcome to 2025? Conservatives have been all about suppression of speech they don't like for ages. It's time everyone wakes up and smells the raw sewage: Republicans are Americans in name only. They don't believe in the Constitution, they don't believe in the even-handed application of the law, and they don't believe that other people have any rights. And none of this is new.

You best be believing in ghost stories Miss Turner, because you're in one.
 
Upvote
291 (315 / -24)

Golgo1

Ars Praefectus
5,046
Subscriptor
Further proof all the gun nuts who claimed for years that needing to stokpile weapons was to defend 'freedom' and other noble sounding bullshit, were never really serious.
I hadnt heard a peep from anywhere in that direction in regards to all the freedoms being taken away.

If even a fraction of the 'passionate Paitriots' gave a shit, DC would be a smoking pile already
 
Upvote
183 (197 / -14)
Uh, welcome to 2025? Conservatives have been all about suppression of speech they don't like for ages. It's time everyone wakes up and smells the raw sewage: Republicans are Americans in name only. They don't believe in the Constitution, they don't believe in the even-handed application of the law, and they don't believe that other people have any rights. And none of this is new.

You best be believing in ghost stories Miss Turner, because you're in one.
It's kind of wild that they basically claim ownership over the concept of patriotism while also openly despising every aspirational ideal and institution the USA has.
 
Upvote
236 (244 / -8)

adespoton

Ars Legatus Legionis
10,690
there's no "gotcha" moment in any of the footage, but the Trump team does its best to make something out of Kamala's 20-minute digression about her Pog collection
The idea here isn't really to do with distortion or anything else between the two versions of the interview footage.

The idea here is that someone noticed "hey, 60 minutes isn't using all the footage! I wonder what else they cut, and if we can access and weaponize it?"

Of course, at this point, they've moved on from that; Harris is unlikely to run again, and they don't need to punish her anymore. So now it's more about finding leverage over the media outlets, and this same case can be re-used to that purpose.
 
Upvote
149 (153 / -4)

DorkboyDC

Ars Praetorian
406
Subscriptor++
Soooo less than 30 days in and we essentially have concentration camps in Guantenomo, attacks on our trade partners, threats to take territory from other countries, attacks on the LGBT community, and now attacks on the freedom of the press. Impressive. I had odds on at least 6 months before we hit this level of fascist bullshitification.
RE: 30 days. We are only 12 days in! I can't even image the state of this corrupt shit-show after 30 days... Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria! - Dr. Peter Venkman
 
Upvote
129 (134 / -5)

omarsidd

Ars Praefectus
4,113
Subscriptor
Remember to thank some "uncommitted" and "protest" voters who have landed us in this boat. And remember to never, ever trust any of those magas who spent so much time bleating about freedom.

One thing we need to remember "next time" (whenever that is), is to not just repair things and start following rules again- but to actively, systematically, and aggressively punish these fascists first.
 
Upvote
163 (188 / -25)

cbreak

Ars Praefectus
5,922
Subscriptor++
So we can expect to see uncut recordings from the current President's many interview for other 'news' services, right?
All it ever seems to say in its interviews are brainless ramblings... Not much point getting those recordings, they're probably just the same garbage it spews during all the other interviews, speeches and so on...
 
Upvote
68 (72 / -4)

Wheels Of Confusion

Ars Legatus Legionis
75,398
Subscriptor
However, the Times also wrote that "many executives at CBS's parent company, Paramount, believe that settling the lawsuit would increase the odds that the Trump administration does not block or delay their planned multibillion-dollar merger with another company." Paramount is seeking FCC approval for TV broadcast station license transfers related to a pending deal with Skydance.
"Well yes, it's a horrific step backwards into legitimizing tyrannical censorship of the press... but you know, we ARE trying to get that merger approved..."
 
Upvote
203 (208 / -5)

Echohead2

Ars Legatus Legionis
61,767
What I don't understand is that all of the "left" media held Harris' feet to the fire WAAAAAYYY more than anyone held Trump accountable. I think the 'left" media (all except Fox?) were only pretending. They were active participants in the whole "Biden is old and of questionable mental state", but stopped saying a single word about Trump after Biden dropped out. They helped create the narrative.
 
Upvote
164 (174 / -10)

Gern Blaanston

Ars Scholae Palatinae
684
This shit is unreal.
They won everything. They have complete control of the entire government from top to bottom. They can literally do anything they want and no one can stop them.

And yet, they do nothing but complain, complain, complain.

They have no interest in governing. They have no interest in actually doing anything. Just complain, complain, complain.

I guess this is the definition of a sore winner.
 
Upvote
244 (250 / -6)

DCRoss

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,293
Something I have been wondering about for a while.... Does Godwin's law apply when such comparisons are actually justified? Like I said, just wondering...
According to Mike Godwin, who also wants everyone to stop making him the arbiter of how to apply Godwin's Law, Godwin's Law doesn't apply when the people you're comparing to Nazis are actually Nazis. It's only appropriate to invoke the rule when someone is making a frivolous comparison:

Note that there's an important distinction — the comparison to Nazis must be frivolous. The law is not supposed to apply to serious discussions of Nazi Germany or its policies on the Internet; Mike Godwin has long lamented frivolous invocation of his "law" to stifle such discussion, and has also lamented having to even clarify this aspect of the law. For example: following the infamous "Unite the Right" white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia in August 2017, he went on record saying that comparing the participants to Nazis was valid (given that there were Neo-Nazi groups present), and openly took aim at people who cited his law to discredit people who made such comparisons.
 
Upvote
198 (202 / -4)

Sajuuk

Ars Legatus Legionis
12,855
Subscriptor++
We all best settle in. It is going to be 4 long years of imagined grievance settling in the U.S. Federal government. To my international brothers and sisters, I'm sorry, we tried. Probably best for you all to just treat the U.S. as the banana republic it is for the next few years. See you, God willing, on the other side 😐
We’re two weeks in and they're literally going after the media (who have already capitulated, mind you) for wrongthink.

You think it's over in 4?
 
Last edited:
Upvote
157 (165 / -8)
Nope. Thanks to Ronald Reagan, the Fairness Doctrine was repealed.
So I guess Trump can reinstate it, since Congress didn't create it in the first place?

Seems like a bit of convenient outrage, which is not new and has been brought up by partisans on both sides multiple times over the intervening years. Both parties had multiple chances to reinstate it, if they so wished, and neither decided to codify it.

That said, the equal time rule still applies, so I guess they attack it from the perspective of whether it counts as a bonna fide interview (e.g. determining whether it was partisan or not).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal-time_rule
 
Upvote
15 (16 / -1)