I*duels ?
While Verstappen has been the most vocal, it seems that most of the drivers agree that the current situation doesn't feel right, not just in terms of the feeling that they cannot go "flat out", but also in terms of driving safety: two cars can come to the same spot with big differences in speed under the current rules, depending on whether they are regenerating or they are under a full battery. I believe that I've heard Sainz voicing that and he is one of the driver's reps. So I wonder if the drivers will end up forcing the issue at least to address the safety aspects.and the rest—Audi, Cadillac, Honda, and Ferrari—aren’t in a hurry to do so.
No, not at this point, sorry!So... will there be an upcoming Canadian Grand Prix report, or should I just go look up the results elsewhere?
(not being salty, just asking because I kind of rely on Ars for my F1 news)
Voicing = Speaking about that? Asking as a European."I believe that I've heard Sainz voicing"
Yep. Classic English register split - "speak" is the native (low register) Old English/Germanic version, "voice" is the mid-register (Norman) French-derived version, and "communicate" would be the high-register Latin-derived version.Voicing = Speaking about that? Asking as a European.
Could probably have skipped the Ferrari debacle.First off, apologies for the lack of a Canadian Grand Prix report at the beginning of this week; Ferrari chose last weekend to show us its new electric vehicle,...
You're not missing much.I had forgotten that the F1 season was underway until this popped up in my commercial TV listings.
Fun to watch, but I wouldn't say I'm missing F1.
Ah yes, Lucas - the Prince of Darkness.
It was as dumb as fuck, strategically. It's what happens when you make up some Papaya Rules "fairness" bullshit instead of being honest & running with a split strategy.Because the article didn't mention it, I just want to add how comically awful McLaren's decision to start with intermediates was, and particularly that they didn't change tires and start from the pit lane when they had the chance.
Respectfully, I disagree. Russell may have just pipped Antonelli in both Quali sessions but his laps and inputs looked a lot more ragged. If RUS is supposed to be the Prost to ANT's Senna, he sure didn't look it in Canada, and I don't think that bodes well for his chances. It's a shame that we didn't get 40 laps more of the battle, but if we game it out, I think Kimi gets by on track more often than he doesn't.Kudos to Russel for the liquid nitrogen cold killer way he resisted Antonelli before his engine blew off. If anything impressed me in that race, it was that.
It was almost "Mansell hunting Senna in Monaco 1992" level. Top dog.
I think it's a little more nuanced than that. Hindsight is always 20/20, but in the cooldown room, Lewis noted to Max that his own decision to go with the Softs came at the last possible second. I think with some threat of rain, an ice cold track, and the fact that Canada is hardly a stranger to the safety car, it wasn't quite as stupid a gamble as some people want you to believe.Because the article didn't mention it, I just want to add how comically awful McLaren's decision to start with intermediates was, and particularly that they didn't change tires and start from the pit lane when they had the chance.
Yes, raising the concern with the media, I believe it was mentioned in one of the F1 broadcastsVoicing = Speaking about that? Asking as a European.
Funny, as a veteran of the semiconductor industry that is what we also said about our silicon chips fresh from the first lot of a new tape out.when you let the smoke out, the cars [chip] stopped working.
Voicing = Speaking about that? Asking as a European.