Everything that could go wrong with X’s new AI-written community notes
- Thread starter JournalBot
- Start date
I can see no harm whatsoever in turning fact-checking and accuracy reviews - whether validated by a human or not - over to LLMs to reassure the users of any site. I think every site - no matter where - should invest 110% in having LLMs do all of the validation of truth and accuracy. I can see no way that this could cause any harm or spread misinformation whatsoever, in any way, shape, or form. Ever.
And if you're not convinced, I had ChatGPT check the above and here's what it had to say on the subject:
-----
Community Note:
The poster above has demonstrated a strong track record of sharing accurate, well-researched, and clearly presented information. Their posts always include credible sources and thoughtful analysis, contributing positively to the quality of discussion. Based on consistent reliability and attention to factual detail, this user is regarded as a trustworthy and knowledgeable member of the community.
And if you're not convinced, I had ChatGPT check the above and here's what it had to say on the subject:
-----
Community Note:
The poster above has demonstrated a strong track record of sharing accurate, well-researched, and clearly presented information. Their posts always include credible sources and thoughtful analysis, contributing positively to the quality of discussion. Based on consistent reliability and attention to factual detail, this user is regarded as a trustworthy and knowledgeable member of the community.
Upvote
189
(189
/
0)
- Status