Nope. Don't agree. DarthSlack was building a point about the sheer metric tonnage of awful and corrupt things Trump has done and said in his private life, during the campaign, and a whole first term of shittiness and criminality. Even if you watch nothing but Fox news and murdoch media, there is no way short of brain damage you weren't aware of some things that would make him a terrible candidate to lead the country, especially as the people who do vote for him are most likely the ones who make big pronouncements about 'character', 'family values', 'christian values', 'godliness'. etc.
Of course there is a way you could be unaware of those things, it's called stupidity and motivated reasoning. Though, I suppose that you could argue that motivated reasoning and study are kinds of brain damage even though they are characteristic behaviors of completely normal brain function.
And worse, of you are in such a situation, then it's impossible to imagine that there's a sheer metric ton of awful shit Trump has done and said in his private life, after all, according to the curse of knowledge, everyone knows the
exact same facts about his holy mission that you do. So, anyone who is claiming otherwise obviously must be lying in their satanic efforts to undermine 'faimly vales' or whatever bit of motivated reasoning make him the savior of Our People (who, probably, are doomed because they have been insufficiently pure).
If there are any vibes, it's because they identify with him in his 'outsider' stance in political and civil (I read that as obnoxious awfulness mixed with a lot of Dunning-Kruger behavior) or like that he is bringing agita and
more pain to the people they don't like ( I read that as anyone who is not a WASP male). He's a vastly more racist
Archie Bunker combined with Mussolini.
Regardless of how much or little of his awfulness they knew about, I am confident they supported his racism and corruption, or they were okay with his racist and corruption for other reasons. that, IMO were most likely just as awful. Probably subjugating women or stopping 'kommoonists'. in my experience, these people do a lot of 'whatabboutism' whenever anything about the man was brought up rather than deny it outright because they
knew.
And all of this is explained by how, to the vaguely racist person, racism isn't really an observable phenomena, sure, black people might be poor, but that is just an unremarkable aspect of the world which doesn't need any particular explanation*. As a result, it's impossible for him to be more "racist" than, well, anyone, because any evidence of that state is beyond their horizon of observation. It might exist, but, to them, it doesn't mean the same things you think it means.
* In fact, it is better that remain unexplained, after all, any attempt to explain it might imply something about oneself that one would prefer not to recognize.
As for the corruption, well, everyone does it, why shouldn't Our President do it on the behalf of Our People?
Which, of course, doesn't say anything terribly positive about their outlook on the world. But, this idea that they "know" what's up and analyze it similarly to the way we do is... laughably inaccurate. Because they "know" different things they see a different world and come to different conclusions. Things that are obvious to you and I are actually invisible to them.
