Amid Twitter buyout, Musk says free speech is simply "that which matches the law."
Read the whole story
Read the whole story
Especially when a few weeks later, Joe Biden reached out to then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko asking him to remove the prosecutor that was involved in the Burisma investigation.
He didn't act on the customer's speech.
Freedom of Speech does not mean freedom from consequences.
Cutting ties with a customer does not impair their right to speak. If in the future he removes someone from Twitter, that argument might have some merit.
The argument that Musk has shown he actually doesn't support free speech.
So the Dems were celebrating Trump getting kicked off for no reason, and he wasn't impaired at all?
(discount third-rate trolling)
Because to be right wing, it's a requirement thst you have to be pig-ignorant and easily led. It's self-selection as an easy mark for scammers.LOL. Spot on as always.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46DBT_6KSzg
Why is it that all right wingers sell snake oil?
Reminder: It was the US State Department that wanted the prosecutor gone, because the prosecutor was corrupt and not investigating.
But that little fact isn't convenient to the lemmings' narrative.
Elon is a bright guy with massive blindspots.
One cannot put a price on the outrage, the woke outrage on display in this Arstechnica forum. It’s epic and I must say quite enjoyable to read.
Musk lives rent free in the minds of these woke people.
Arstechnica. Super woke. Super fly-woke.
Yes. The Woketard blah blah twatwaffle blah...
Look at this; 6 stories on Ars front page are all related to Musk - either Space/Twitter.
Start with that lawyer...
So given that Musk has already violated the terms of the acquisition agreement, do we think the board is still going to take the ludicrously over-valued payday, or will they drag this out to the last day and go "Oh, my goodness, you appear to have violated the terms of the agreement. We'll be leaving now, with that one billion you owe us. Ta ta, darling!"?
Elon will never give up his bot followers. Any statements to the contrary are lies.what I constantly miss in this discussion, is his statement that "everybody is going to be a registered user" (or something in that direction) -> Which I, as a European, interpret as "no anonimous bullshit allowed".
When that's a fact, people will automatically be responsible for their "free speech". As well as companies, which -absurdidly- are considered "people" as well, in USA law.
I'm not sure he needs them though - he has more than enough brainwashed followers who seem to think he's a real-world Tony Stark.
I've said it before and I'll say it again; he's just a more successful Justin Hammer at best.
oldshuren said:JThe blind hatred to Elon of many readers of Ars is astonish! (
Start with that lawyer...
...who has a Bachelor of Science qualification, whereas you probably have a strong opinion about which colour Crayon tastes best.
Everyone knows it's the purple one!![]()
I'm not sure he needs them though - he has more than enough brainwashed followers who seem to think he's a real-world Tony Stark.
I've said it before and I'll say it again; he's just a more successful Justin Hammer at best.
Yep. Perfect analogy.
Given Justin Hammer's utter incompetence at providing useful tech, wouldn't Obadiah Stane be a better fit?
Everyone knows it's the purple one!![]()
I have two and a half degrees myself, and I will stand by red being the best tasting until I die.
Wait, I missed something. If we are talking M&Ms, everyone knows the green ones are the best.
Everyone knows it's the purple one!![]()
I have two and a half degrees myself, and I will stand by red being the best tasting until I die.
Wait, I missed something. If we are talking M&Ms, everyone knows the green ones are the best.
Would you be surprised to find we're actually talking about Crayons?
I told you I missed something.
My vote goes to Burnt Umber.
Wild Strawberry.
The bots that Hammer develops with Vanko don't try to take over the world.
And put up a good fight against Iron Man and War Machine.
Wasn't the whole reason the whole EU backed it was because he was known to be corrupt and pro-Burisma and hindering the investigation, so removing him was what Burisma did not want?Especially when a few weeks later, Joe Biden reached out to then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko asking him to remove the prosecutor that was involved in the Burisma investigation.
I love how you try to frame this as something Joe did by himself, instead of it being a Governmental decision that had the backing of the entire EU behind it.
Wasn't Parler at the top of the downloads for a day or two way back? Looks like yes: https://fortune.com/2020/11/09/parler-c ... oaded-app/And while that sounds amazing to someone who is dumb, Truth Social is estimated to have barely more than a half million daily active users. Twitter has more than 200 million DAUs as of Q4 of last year with TikTok at around 50 million in the US alone.In another tweet after completing his deal with the Twitter board, Musk wrote that "Truth Social is currently beating Twitter & TikTok on the Apple Store,"
Well... yeah.
Most anyone who wants to use Twitter or TikTok already has it. Almost all daily downloads will be due to device repacements.
Truth Social downloads are going to be mostly interested-but-don't-have-it downloads.
Measuring the usefulness of a site based on its mobile app downloads is measuring something useless.
And how many active users does it have now?
If I am to take this seriously, you expect that something this trifling is useful in arguing Elon Musk is hypocritical about free speech?
Relax, why so serious?. You guys may have lost Twitter but still have Reddit and FB to go virtue signal on.No we don't. (Also... "libs"? Really? Grow up.)He said he is buying Coca Cola next and putting cocaine back in it. Now the libs have a reason to support him too.
The insane rage directed at Musk...
A lot of people got banned. Some like Pewdiepie got their account back but again, being censored over a tiny spicy comment is stupid and not democratic at all.
If you poor saps can't detect the hysteria in your reactions you're pretty out of touch with yourselves.
I did call you all insecure virgins, so you got me on that.
As far as immaturity, it takes courage, maturity and some authentic confidence in your moral posture to encounter disagreement and grow from the process.
If you withdraw from the world into a bubble, you stagnate and never live up to your potential.
Personally I don't care if you live up to your potential, but for your own sake you should consider trying.
Never said they didn't, what I did say is that they shouldn't have the right to have others banned over anything they find offensive.A lot of people got banned. Some like Pewdiepie got their account back but again, being censored over a tiny spicy comment is stupid and not democratic at all.
Banned for doing what?
And you didn't answer the question why "oversensitive morons" don't have the right to free speech as well.
If you poor saps can't detect the hysteria in your reactions you're pretty out of touch with yourselves.
I did call you all insecure virgins, so you got me on that.
As far as immaturity, it takes courage, maturity and some authentic confidence in your moral posture to encounter disagreement and grow from the process.
If you withdraw from the world into a bubble, you stagnate and never live up to your potential.
Personally I don't care if you live up to your potential, but for your own sake you should consider trying.
Did that little display of impotent chest-thumping sound good in your head?
Yep. Did it not sound good in what passes for your head?
...restrict and block content that you deemed antithesis...
But you don't care about democracy, only security. And sadly, you need protection from words, so you're security needs are gigantic.
You tried to call me impotent, which was desperate and embarasaing for you.
I'm short, fat, I'm in my forties, I'm not white and I don't have much testosterone really.
I'm short, fat, I'm in my forties, I'm not white and I don't have much testosterone really.
Your physical attributes are a matter of supreme indifference to us.
On the contrary, I am fascinated to learn that he views being non-white as a sign of weakness.
But you don't care about democracy, only security. And sadly, you need protection from words, so you're security needs are gigantic.
It would help if you would cite specific examples of things you want to say but feel you can't. You have yet to do so.
Or you could just continue to act like a third-rate Citizen Smith if you want. Your call.
Well, the Hunter Biden laptop comes to mind.
Without evidence!