Elon Musk and Tesla ignored Autopilot’s fatal flaws, judge says evidence shows

rcduke

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,191
Subscriptor++
What level of punitive damages is likely in this case? Company destroying levels?
It needs to be in the billions for Tesla and the tens of billions for Musk. He's per the article "the de facto leader of autopilot" and should therefore take the brunt of the fees. And it needs to be in the billions to make a point, otherwise it's just the cost of doing business. Musk has shown he has no regard for human life, so he needs to pay.
 
Upvote
297 (310 / -13)

harlequin69

Ars Centurion
231
Subscriptor
An automated driving system that covers 99.9% of cases but requires a driver to remain aware and intervene manually at the last moment continues to be a terrible idea, no matter what click-wrap conditions they sign off on when they take the wheel. Humans are just not built that way. Given nothing to do for extended periods of time our minds will wander, or we will fall asleep. The system will either need to require enough interaction from us to keep us awake and alert or be better than the best human driver in all conceivable scenarios. A nearly fool-proof solution isn’t good enough.
 
Upvote
511 (518 / -7)
D

Deleted member 92645

Guest
It needs to be in the billions for Tesla and the tens of billions for Musk. He's per the article "the de facto leader of autopilot" and should therefore take the brunt of the fees. And it needs to be in the billions to make a point, otherwise it's just the cost of doing business. Musk has shown he has no regard for human life, so he needs to pay.
Man, you're harsh on mush... He seems to care a lot about Nazis, white supremacists and other disgusting people.
 
Upvote
213 (224 / -11)
The judge wrote that Tesla would be able to make this argument at trial—which has been delayed—but at this stage, a jury presented with available evidence could reasonably find Tesla guilty of both intentional misconduct and gross negligence.

Request from non-USAian: What part of of the trial is this? It reads like the judge is making a finding, for good or bad, but it's not the trial?
 
Upvote
98 (100 / -2)

VelvetGlove

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,303
The trolley problem does seem to have application in real life after all. Though it's a weaker version than the original:

"The trolley will keep running over people unless the trolley management company spends money to make safety changes. Should they company make these changes, despite reduced profits?"
 
Upvote
204 (208 / -4)

Fatesrider

Ars Legatus Legionis
25,295
Subscriptor
Request from non-USAian: What part of of the trial is this? It reads like the judge is making a finding, for good or bad, but it's not the trial?
My understanding is that Tesla filed a motion for summary dismissal based on some legal nonsense about them not being responsible for what drivers do (because the car owners agree to terms they typically don't actually read when they buy the car). Since the issue was with the marketing of the vehicle and the expectations of the buyers, the judge looked at the evidence to see if that applied, and ruled that Musk could not have NOT known he was lying in his marketing.

That allows the lawsuit to proceed on the LIKELY merits that the plaintiffs have a valid case.
 
Upvote
184 (185 / -1)

DCStone

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,819
Request from non-USAian: What part of of the trial is this? It reads like the judge is making a finding, for good or bad, but it's not the trial?
Pre-trial by the sounds of it. Once the initial complaint has been filed, there's a period where both sides can submit motions related to the suit such as summary dismissal, what evidence can be admitted, and who should be required to disclose what documents/transcripts/emails as part of discovery. I believe the intent is to narrow the scope of the trial to keep things manageable once it actually ends up in court.
 
Upvote
96 (96 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

nom3ramy

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,878
Subscriptor
It needs to be in the billions for Tesla and the tens of billions for Musk. He's per the article "the de facto leader of autopilot" and should therefore take the brunt of the fees. And it needs to be in the billions to make a point, otherwise it's just the cost of doing business. Musk has shown he has no regard for human life, so he needs to pay.
Destroying both Musk and Tesla in one verdict as a punitive measure is not likely. However, a verdict in the millions with a finding of deliberate disregard for human life and
"autopilot" claims as a sham might turn the market perception of Tesla from an exciting tech company to an overpriced car manufacturer. Along with rising competition, this could achieve the same result, but more slowly.
 
Upvote
138 (140 / -2)

Rakeshi

Seniorius Lurkius
2
The trolley problem does seem to have application in real life after all. Though it's a weaker version than the original:

"The trolley will keep running over people unless the trolley management company spends money to make safety changes. Should they company make these changes, despite reduced profits?"
Didn't we already run this scenario with car seat belts? 🤔
 
Upvote
64 (67 / -3)

Ozy

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,450
With the pending Cybertruck disaster and the enormous problem his politics represents, it's hard to see what the Tesla Board gains by tolerating Elon. The sooner they fire him, the sooner they can initiate clawback proceedings to recover his ill-gotten bonuses.
He controls the board.
 
Upvote
155 (156 / -1)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

ERIFNOMI

Ars Legatus Legionis
17,734
Destroying both Musk and Tesla in one verdict as a punitive measure is not likely. However, a verdict in the millions with a finding of deliberate disregard for human life and
"autopilot" claims as a sham might turn the market perception of Tesla from an exciting tech company to an overpriced car manufacturer. Along with rising competition, this could achieve the same result, but more slowly.
I think it would be more likely that Musk would pull the "they're out to get me card" (which he already plays every other time he gets into trouble) and his sycophants will eat it up as usual. I don't think enough of the normal population will give a shit.

But hey, maybe it'll actually be big news and Tesla will face some repercussion for subjecting us to their awful public beta test.
 
Upvote
90 (92 / -2)

xoe

Ars Scholae Palatinae
7,496
Fanboys and techbros:
It is important to move fast with this tech as it will inevitably save lives in the future, every day of delay in final implementation is a day people die needlessly, early real world testing is critical to success and the losses as a result will be outweighed by the lives saved.
Edit: added quote tags to clarify, fixed swipo.
 
Last edited:
Upvote
-18 (15 / -33)

mephits

Ars Praetorian
496
Subscriptor
An automated driving system that covers 99.9% of cases but requires a driver to remain aware and intervene manually at the last moment continues to be a terrible idea, no matter what click-wrap conditions they sign off on when they take the wheel. Humans are just not built that way. Given nothing to do for extended periods of time our minds will wander, or we will fall asleep. The system will either need to require enough interaction from us to keep us awake and alert or be better than the best human driver in all conceivable scenarios. A nearly fool-proof solution isn’t good enough.
And this is the fundamental problem with all attempts at fully automated driving systems. Until they're genuinely better than any human could be at all aspects of driving, I believe we're going to be sitting at basically current driver-assist technologies. And honestly, what we would really be talking about is a true Artificial General Intelligence. That's the only thing that's going to be able to effectively evaluate any conceivable driving scenario. Would anybody but the stupid rich waste the money something like that is almost certainly going to cost on being a mere chauffeur? I don't seriously expect the hoi polloi to have access to true self-driving general transportation in any of our lifetimes.
 
Upvote
82 (87 / -5)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
Post content hidden for low score. Show…

VelvetGlove

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,303
Fanboysaand techbros:
It is important to move fast with this tech as it will inevitably save lives in the future, every day of delay in final implementation is a day people die needlessly, early real world testing is critical to success and the losses as a result will be outweighed by the lives saved.
There are good ways to test (using trained safety drivers, etc.) and bad ways to test (let the entire customer base be the beta testers). Proper testing takes a little longer, but kills fewer people.
 
Upvote
89 (93 / -4)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…